USS_RUSHMORE_PPI_QA5_Posted_A0006.xlsm

Sheet2 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Question and Government Responses #5

Reference 2.4 does not list Space (02-43-3-L).

Please provide the correct drawing Item 643-11-001 has been revised in Errata 4.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

63 150-11-002 Work Item 150-11-002 “Radar Tank Level Indicating (TLI) System; repair” Paragraph 3.3 states, “Remove deck grating installed. Tag and retain for installation.”

Offeror has reviewed the specification and all identified references 2.1 thru 2.6 and is unable to determine the referenced deck grating size, quantity, and location to accomplish the requirements of paragraph 3.3.

“3.1 Provide 600,000 gallons of F-76 diesel fuel, conforming to MIL-DTL-16884 and 2.2.”

Work Item 992-21-003 Defueling and Fueling; accomplish “3.2 When notified by the SUPERVISOR, provide manpower assistance, towboat service with towing bridle and pilot to tow two fuel barges from the Fuel Depot to the contractors facility, adjacent to the ship for on-loading 500,000 gallons of DFM and 100,000 gallons of JP5.” Are 992-11-005 and 992-21-003 to be worked in conjunction? If so;

a. Is the 600,000 gallons of F-76/DFM the contractor is to provide for 992-11-005 the same 500,000 gallons of F-76/DFM required for 992-21-003?

b. Will it be 600,000 or 500,000 gallons of F-76/DFM?

c. Will all F-76/DFM and JP5 be provided via the Navy Fuel Depot?

Revisions to Work Item 992-11-005 and 992-21-003 have been made in Errata 1 and 2 to clarify. Offerors are required to provide DFM and JP5.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

a. Please provide a known source to acquire this controlled commodity.

b. Why does the Government not use the DLA’s SEA Card program for refueling under existing bunker contracts? A contract vehicle is already established for this purpose: http://www.dla.mil/Energy/Offers/Products/GovernmentFuel/SEACard.aspx.

Paragraph 3.1 states, “Power tool clean deck and lower 12 inches of each bulkhead listed in 1.2. Accomplish each requirement of Surface Preparation Specification SSPC-SP 3 of 2.2.”

Paragraph 3.3 states, “Accomplish the requirements of 009-11 of 2.1 for all lagging located in 1.2, to include bulkheads, overhead, Air Conditioning Plants, all piping and valves.”

Contractors has reviewed the specification and notes that paragraph 3.1 implies that the contractor will remove any interference (lagging) on the lower 12 inches of each bulkhead listed in 1.2 to accomplish inspection requirements identified in paragraph 3.1.1. Additionally, paragraph 3.3 directs the contractor to accomplish 009-11, not just on the lagging that was removed in paragraph 3.1, but for all lagging located in 1.2, to include bulkheads, overhead, Air Conditioning Plants, all piping and valves.

Question:

1) Is it the customer’s intent that all lagging located in 1.2, to include bulkheads, overhead, Air Conditioning Plants, all piping and valves shall be removed to accomplish new lagging installation in accordance (IAW) with the requirements identified in paragraph 3.3?

2) Whether all of the lagging located in 1.2 (as questioned above) or just the lower 12 inches of each bulkhead listed in 1.2 as identified in paragraph 3.1 is to be replaced with new lagging IAW 009-11, how many square or linear feet with dimensional sizes of preformed pipe insulation, sheet insulation, lagging cloth, lagging studs, and wall board should the contractor estimate to accomplish the requirements of paragraph 3.3? 1. The Intent of this work item is to remove and replace all lagging located in the space.

2. This information though not discrete, can be determined form the references provide.

67 631-13-001 Work Item 631-13-001 “Overhead Passageway; preserve” Paragraph 3.2 states, “Remove existing and install new the insulation for all of the refrigerant piping and overhead brackets located in 1.2 using 2.2 for guidance.”

Paragraph 3.2.1 states, “Accomplish the requirements of 009-11 of 2.1.”

Contractors has reviewed the specification and notes that paragraph 3.2 directs the contractor to remove an unspecified quantity of lagging on refrigerant piping and overhead brackets located in 1.2.

Question:

Paragraph 3.1 states, “Remove existing firefighter ladder safety system carrier rail located in 1.2, and install 4 frames aft of current location, in accordance with 2.2 and 2.3.”

Contractor has reviewed the specification and all identified references 2.1 thru 2.4 and requires further clarification. On the USS Rushmore a frame measured as 4 feet. Paragraph 3.1 is directing the contractor to move the firefighter Ladder Safety System (LSS) carrier rail 4 frames or 16’-0” aft of its current location. This would move the firefighter LSS into another space, out of the Escape Trunk (5-66-4-T), out of WTH 2-66-2, and would make the equipment inoperable.

Reference 2.2, sheet 6, elevation 42-A, 45-A, and 47-A shows installation of the firefighter Ladder Safety System at frame 66 starting at the 2nd deck passing thru WTH 2-66-2, the 3rd deck, the 14’-3” Flat, and terminating at the 6’-3” Lvl.

Reference 2.3 only addresses the operation and maintenance of the firefighter Ladder Safety System (LSS).

1) Contractor requests clarification of the work scope requested in paragraph 3.1?

2) Will an Errata be issued to revise the specification with the requested information? The intent of work item is to relocate carrier rail within the existing trunk to align with the upper system on the 02 level, not 16'. WI 623-12-001 has been revised in Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

Reference 2.8 is a consolidated list of material from 2.2 2.7.

71 631-12-001 Paragraph 3.3 of 631-12-001 states that all existing structural, pipe and equipment insulation in 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 is to be removed and replaced with new.

None of the provided references can help identify the scope of work and currently the USS RUSHMORE is not available for ship check.

73 N/A Amendment 0001 issued 11/01/2018 included:

• Errata 001, revised 11 work items and cancelling 3 work items

• Errata 002, revised 38 work items and cancelling 1 work item

• Addendum 01, added 2 work items Contractor acknowledges and appreciates that, due to the Amendment 0001 revisions/additions and subsequent extension requests from bidders, the proposal due date was extended 14 days to 12/17/2018.

Contractor notes that Amendment 0002 issued 11/08/2018 includes an additional:

• Errata 003, revised 47 work items

• Addendum 02, added 2 work items The total revisions (96 work items) and additions (4 work items) from Amendments 0001, and now 0002, now affects nearly ~30% of the entire work package. The revised proposal due date, impacted by the upcoming Veterans and Thanksgiving holidays, still only allows contractors roughly ~28 planning days to prepare and provide a robust proposal. This timeline, even with the 14-day extension, will have a negative effect on bid development, and more specifically, the responsiveness of the subcontractor and material vendor community.

Question:

In order to afford all contractors ample time to prepare/submit accurate proposals and to allow for adequate time for subcontractor/vendor solicitations/evaluations/selections, request that the proposal due date be extended from 17 December 2018 3:00PM to 7 January 2018 3:00PM. A 21-day proposal due date extension, or roughly ~15 additional planning days due to the Christmas and New Year’s Day holidays.

Paragraph 3.1.5 states, “Replace 40 linear feet of Bulkhead stiffeners in each location listed in 2.1. (E3)” Paragraph 2.1 identifies, “Standard Items, (FY19)” Question:

1) Paragraph 3.1.5 references the locations listed in 2.1, but paragraph 2.1 is NAVSEA Standard Items, FY19 and contains no locations. The contractor suspects that 2.1 identified and referenced in paragraph 3.1.5 is a typographical error and requests clarification and direction.

This is a typo, 3.1.5 should reference para 1.2. WI 120-11-007 has been revised in Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

75 123-12-003(E3) Work Item 123-12-003 (E3) “JP-5 Tank; repair” Paragraph 3.5.1 states, “Accomplish a joint inspection of repairs conducted in each tanks listed in 2.1, take pictures of repairs and serialize. (E3)” Paragraph 2.1 identifies, “Standard Items, (FY19)” Question:

1) Paragraph 3.5.1 references the tanks listed in 2.1, but paragraph 2.1 is NAVSEA Standard Items, FY19 and contains no locations or tanks. The contractor suspects that 2.1 identified and referenced in paragraph 3.5.1 is a typographical error and requests clarification and direction. This is a typo, 3.5.1 should reference para 1.2. WI 123-12-003 has been revised in Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

76 123-14-003 (E3) Work Item 123-14-003 (E3) “Landing Craft Air Cushion Washdown Tank; repair” Paragraph 3.1.1 states, “Accomplish a visual inspection of the tank, including each sounding tube, tank vent, overflow, piping, pipe hanger/liner, ladder, manhole cover and structural member for structural integrity, deterioration, pitting, cracks, and areas of damage or distortion.”

Paragraph 3.1.1.1 states, “Submit one legible copy, in hard copy or approved transferrable media, of a report listing results of the requirements of 3.1.1 with pictures of damaged and deteriorated area, each area to be repaired shall be serialized, to the SUPERVISOR. (E3)” Paragraph 3.2 states, “Accomplish the following repairs in the tank as designated by the SUPERVISOR.”

Paragraph 3.5 states, “Submit one legible copy, in hard copy or approved transferable media, of a report listing results of the requirements of 3.1.1 with serialized pictures of each area repaired to the SUPERVISOR. (E3)” Question:

1) Contractor suspects that paragraph 3.5 which asks for pictures from each repaired area but references the inspection at 3.1.1 is a typographical error. If paragraph 3.5 wants pictures of each repaired area, shouldn’t 3.5 refer to the repair paragraphs 3.2 through 3.2.4.1? This is a typo. The government is asking for the contractor to visually inspect the tank, document conditions found with photographs, then document each repaired deficiency with another photograph. WI 123-14-003 has been revised in Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

77 123-15-001 (E3) Work Item 123-15-001 (E3) “Lube Oil Tank; repair” Paragraph 3.1.1 states, “The PCP shall include preparing and restoring the MRG for repairs to sump casing listed in 1.2.17 and 1.2.30 and accomplishing inspections using 2.2 through 2.7 for guidance and as directed by the SUPERVISOR.”

Paragraph 3.3 states, “Accomplish a visual inspection of each tank listed in 1.2, including sounding tubes, tank vents, overflows, piping, pipe hangers/liners, ladders, manhole covers and structural members for structural integrity, deterioration, pitting, cracks, and areas of damage or distortion.”

Paragraph 3.3.1 states, “Submit one legible copy, in hard copy or approved transferrable media, of a report listing results of the requirements of 3.1.1 with pictures of damaged and deteriorated area, each area to be repaired shall be serialized, to the SUPERVISOR. (E3)” Paragraph 3.4 states, “Accomplish the following repairs for each tank listed in 1.2 as designated by the SUPERVISOR, using 2.2 through 2.8 for guidance and material requirements. Area of repair shall include deck, bulkhead, shell plating, and overhead:”

Paragraph 3.9 states, “Submit one legible copy, in hard copy or approved transferable media, of a report listing results of the requirements of 3.3.1 with serialized pictures of each area repaired to the SUPERVISOR. (E3)” Question:

1) Contractor suspects that paragraph 3.3.1 which asks for pictures of the inspected and identified damaged and deteriorated areas but references the PCP at 3.1.1 is a typographical error. If paragraph 3.3.1 wants pictures of the inspected and identified damaged and deteriorated areas, shouldn’t 3.3.1 refer to the inspection paragraph at 3.3?

2) Contractor suspects that paragraph 3.9 which asks for pictures from each repaired area but references the inspection report at 3.3.1 is a typographical error. If paragraph 3.9 wants pictures of each repaired area, shouldn’t 3.9 refer to the repair paragraphs 3.4 through 3.4.3.1?

This is a typo. The government is asking for the contractor to visually inspect the tank, document conditions found with photographs, then document each repaired deficiency with another photograph. WI 123-15-001 has been revised in Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

78 123-16-004(E3) Work Item 123-16-004 (E3) “Ballast Tank; repair” Paragraph 3.1.1 states, “Accomplish a visual inspection of each tank listed in 1.2, including sounding tubes, tank vents, overflows, piping, pipe hangers/liners, ladders, manhole covers and structural members for structural integrity, deterioration, pitting, cracks, and areas of damage or distortion.”

Paragraph 3.1.1.1 states, “Submit one legible copy, in hard copy or approved transferrable media, of a report listing results of the requirements of 3.1.1 with pictures of damaged and deteriorated area, each area to be repaired shall be serialized, to the SUPERVISOR. (E3)” Paragraph 3.2 states, “Accomplish base metal weld buildup in the bottom area of each tank listed in 1.2, in accordance with 2.3 through 2.53 and as designated by the SUPERVISOR.”

Paragraph 3.3 states, “Accomplish the following repairs in each tank in 1.2, using 2.3 through 2.53 for guidance, and as designated by the SUPERVISOR.”

Paragraph 3.6 states, “Submit one legible copy, in hard copy or approved transferable media, of a report listing results of the requirements of 3.1.1.1 with serialized pictures each area repaired to the SUPERVISOR. (E3)” Question:

1) Contractor suspects that paragraph 3.6 which asks for pictures from each repaired area but references the inspection report at 3.1.1.1 is a typographical error. If paragraph 3.6 wants pictures of each repaired area, shouldn’t 3.6 refer to the repair paragraphs 3.2 through 3.3.5? This is a typo. The government is asking for the contractor to visually inspect the tank, document conditions found with photographs, then document each repaired deficiency with another photograph. WI 123-16-004 has been revised in Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

79 123-21-001 (E3) Work Item 123-21-001 (E3) “Accessible Void; repair” Paragraph 3.1.1 states, “Accomplish a visual inspection of each tank listed in 1.2 for existing preservation coating, structural integrity, deterioration, pitting, cracks, and areas of damage or distortion, including sounding tubes, tank vents, overflows, piping, structural members, and manhole covers.”

Paragraph 3.1.1.1 states, “Submit one legible copy, in hard copy or approved transferrable media, of a report listing results of the requirements of 3.1.1 with pictures of damaged and deteriorated area, each area to be repaired shall be serialized, to the SUPERVISOR. (E3)” Paragraph 3.2 states, “Accomplish the following repairs in each void in 1.2 as designated by the SUPERVISOR.”

Paragraph 3.7 states, “Submit one legible copy, in hard copy or approved transferable media, of a report listing results of the requirements of 3.1.1.1 with serialized pictures each area repaired to the SUPERVISOR. (E3)” Question:

1) Contractor suspects that paragraph 3.7 which asks for pictures from each repaired area but references the inspection report at 3.1.1.1 is a typographical error. If paragraph 3.7 wants pictures of each repaired area, shouldn’t 3.7 refer to the repair paragraphs 3.2 through 3.2.6? This is a typo. The government is asking for the contractor to visually inspect the tank, document conditions found with photographs, then document each repaired deficiency with another photograph. WI 123-21-001 has been revised in Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

80 123-22-002 (E3) Work Item 123-22-002 (E3) “Chain Locker and Chain Locker Sump; repair” Paragraph 3.1.1 states, “Accomplish a visual inspection of each tank listed in 1.2, including sounding tubes, tank vents, overflows, piping, pipe hangers/liners, ladders, manhole covers and structural members for structural integrity, deterioration, pitting, cracks, and areas of damage or distortion.”

Paragraph 3.1.1.1 states, “Submit one legible copy, in hard copy or approved transferrable media, of a report listing results of the requirements of 3.1.1 with pictures of damaged and deteriorated area, each area to be repaired shall be serialized, to the SUPERVISOR. (E3)” Paragraph 3.2 states, “Accomplish the following repairs for each location listed in 1.2 as designated by the SUPERVISOR.”

Paragraph 3.5 states, “Submit one legible copy, in hard copy or approved transferable media, of a report listing results of the requirements of 3.1.1.1 with serialized pictures each area repaired to the SUPERVISOR. (E3)” Question:

1) Contractor suspects that paragraph 3.5 which asks for pictures from each repaired area but references the inspection report at 3.1.1.1 is a typographical error. If paragraph 3.5 wants pictures of each repaired area, shouldn’t 3.5 refer to the repair paragraphs 3.2 through 3.2.4.1? This is a typo. The government is asking for the contractor to visually inspect the tank, document conditions found with photographs, then document each repaired deficiency with another photograph. WI 123-22-002 has been revised in Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

81 130-11-005 (E3) Work Item 130-11-005 (E3) “Fan Room Deck Ultrasonic Test; accomplish (Option Item)” Paragraph 3.1.2 states, “Remove and replace a total of 60 square feet of deteriorated deck plating located in 21. as directed by the SUPERVISOR, using 2.3 for guidance and material requirements. (E3)” Question:

1) The contractor suspects that paragraph 3.1.2 has a typographical error, in that (21.) is not a recognizable ship board location, please provide clarification and direction. This is a typo, paragraph 3.1.2 should reference location 1.2. WI 130-11-005 has been revised in Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to schedule a ship check.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to schedule a ship check.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to schedule a ship check.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to schedule a ship check.

87 Drawings Please provide the following missing documents:

Drawing----------561-90-001 835------8620598 ---------------Not Provided; Possible TYPO? 835-8620958 Instructions------ 474-11-001E2-------- Ref. 2.9 NSWC/LOU 613-A- Not Provided Instructions ------474-11-001E2-------- Ref. 2.10 NSWC/L 613------ Not Provided Drawing--------- 643-11-001E1 --------6438565858-A ------------Not Provided Drawing ---------651-11-005E2 -------321-8577325 ---------------Not Provided Drawing--------- 980-90-006E1------ 184-8620899-A------------- Not Provided MRC------------ 233-10-004A2------ MIP 2331 MRC 86 H3NM N---- Not Provided Drawing ---------997-11-002A2------ 801-6102099-D -------------Not Provided UNKNOWN ------997-11-002A2------ R9-2003-0265 -------------Not Provided UNKNOWN ------997-11-002A2------ R9-2013-0064------------- Not Provided UNKNOWN------ 997-11-002A2 ------Naval Base San Diego Graving Dock Use Agreement Not Provided Drawing--------- 643-11-002E3------ 510-8565859-B----------- Not Provided WI 561-90-001 is a typo as the referece drawing should be 835-862-0958. This has been corrected in Errata 6. For the NAVSEA drawings, offerors should look to NAVSEA Standard Item 009-01.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the references.

88 997-11-002 (A2) Work Item 997-11-002 (A2) “Docking and Undocking at NAVFAC Graving Dock; accomplish (Option Item)” Paragraph 3.1 states, “Accomplish the requirements of 2.4 and 2.8 through 2.10 using 2.2, 2.3, and 2.5 through 2.7 for guidance.”

Reference 2.2 identifies, “MIL-STD-1625, Safety Certification Program for Drydocking Facilities” Paragraph 5.2 of reference 2.2 states, “Graving docks.”

Paragraph 5.2.1 of reference 2.2 states, “Facility types. The requirements of this section apply to graving docks.”

Paragraph 5.2.5.7.8 of reference 2.2 states, “Ship positioning gear. Bitts, bollards, winches, capstans, and cleats shall be inspected for fatigue, looseness, or other signs of deterioration or excessive loading. Capstans and winches shall be checked for proper operation in all directions and speeds and for proper engagement of brakes.”

Contractor notes that the NAVFAC Graving Dock’s eastern most capstan has not been used for many years and that the southeast capstan failed to operate in both directions during the most recent utilization of the NAVFAC Graving Dock for the USS Champion’s docking.

Question:

Contractor notes that a 1,000 foot inhaul soft line will be required to dock the USS RUSHMORE in the NAVFAC Graving Dock.

Question:

1) Will NAVFAC or the customer provide the needed 1,000 foot inhaul soft line for the RUSHMORE docking? This has been revised in Errata 6. The contractor shall provide 1000 Ft inhaul soft line and then it shall be turned over to NAVFAC upon completion of docking.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the errata.

90 529-80-001 (E3) Work Item 529-80-001 (E3) “ShipAlt LSD47-1042D, Remote Control Operating Gear for Well Deck Drain Valve; accomplish” Paragraph 1.3.1 identifies, “Quantity (One EA) Deck Box for WDFD-V-4-143-2” Paragraph 1.3.2 identifies, “Quantity (7 EA) Well Deck Flood and Drain Valve, Remote Operating Systems for Valve Numbers: WDFD-V-4-35-1, WDFD-V-4-67-2, WDFD-V-4-67-1, WDFD-V-4-100-1, WDFD-V-4-118-2, WDFD-V-4-118-1, WDFDV-4-143-1” Paragraph 3.1 states, “Accomplish the requirements of 009-90 of 2.1 for the replacement of each well deck drain valve actuator and each associated component.”

Question:

1) The contractor is unable to ascertain who the 009-90 technical representative requirements of paragraph 3.1 is, who is the technical representative that paragraph 3.1 is directing the contractor to obtain quotes from?

The known source for 009-90 technical representative is:

Sea-Tech Prodcuts Inc, 19340 Los Hermanos Ranch Rd, Vally Center, CA 92082.

P:(760) 749-4350

91 992-11-002 (E1) Work Item 992-11-001 (E1) “Temporary Service; provide” Paragraph 3.4 states, “Install and maintain 2 gangways, one forward and one aft, with handrails. Each gangway, platform (if required), and handrail shall be built and maintained to meet the requirements of 2.2 and the following:”

Paragraph 3.6.1.9 states, “Provide Electrical service in accordance with Table C-7.”

Question:

1) Will the customer provide the (2 EA) gangways required by paragraph 3.4 while the ship is in the NAVFAC Graving Dock?

• Errata 001, revised 11 work items and cancelling 3 work items

• Errata 002, revised 38 work items and cancelling 1 work item

• Addendum 01, added 2 work items

• Extended the proposal due date 14 days to 12/17/2018.

Amendment 0002 issued 11/08/2018 included:

• Errata 003, revised 47 work items

• Addendum 02, added 2 work items Amendment 0003 issued 11/13/2018 included:

• Addendum 03, added 2 work items

• Addendum 04, added One work item The total revisions (96 work items) and additions (7 work items) from Amendments 0001, 0002, and 0003 now affects nearly ~30% of the entire work package. The revised proposal due date, impacted by the upcoming Thanksgiving holidays, still only allows contractors roughly ~28 planning days to prepare and provide a robust proposal. This timeline, even with the 14-day extension, will have a negative effect on bid development, and more specifically, the responsiveness of the subcontractor and material vendor community.

Question:

1) In order to afford all contractors ample time to prepare/submit accurate proposals and to allow for adequate time for subcontractor/vendor solicitations/evaluations/selections, request that the proposal due date be extended from 17 December 2018 3:00PM to 7 January 2018 3:00PM. A 21-day proposal due date extension, or roughly ~15 additional planning days due to the Christmas and New Year’s Day holidays.

2) Additionally, with everything identified above the customer has not revised the PPI submission deadline, Amendment 0003 (conformed) RFP states that questions must be submitted no later November 15, 2018 at 3:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. This is not sufficient time to review the new work items just added to the package, will the PPI submission deadline be extended?

Due to the volume of changes and in order to afford all contractors ample time to prepare an accurate proposal that will be most beneficial to the Government, it is requested that the bid date be extended by two weeks to 31 December 2018 vice 17 December 2018.

Also, please extend the RFI due date to 29 November 2018 vice 15 November 2018.

Basic 150-11-005

2.3 612-6517711, Rail & Ldr MODS CIWS Mounts

2.4 158-65179936, MOD CIWS Topside Area Aft Ammo Handling Walkway INCID CIWS 643-11-002

2.9 634-8565858 Rev B, Habitability Improvement LSD 47 Arrangement CPO, STNCO, Crew & Troop Living Spaces Mod

2.10 331-8565860 Rev B, Habitability Improvement LSD 47 Electrical CPO, STNCO, Crew & Troop Living Spaces Mod

2.11 510-8565865 Rev B, Ventilation-Manufacturing Details CPO, STNCO, Crew & Troop Living & Sanitary Spaces 644-11-001

2.21 644-8565861 Rev B, Habitability Improvement LSD 47 Arrangement CPO, STNCO, Crew & Troop Sanitary Spaces Mod.

2.22 510-8565862 Rev B, Habitability Improvement LSD 47 Ventilation CPO, STNCO, Crew & Troop Sanitary Spaces Mod.

2.23 331-8565864 Rev B, Habitability Improvement LSD 47 Electrical CPO, STNCO, Crew & Troop Sanitary Spaces Mod.

2.24 528-8565863 Rev B, Habitability Improvement LSD 47 Piping CPO, STNCO, Crew & Troop Sanitary Spaces Mod.

2.25 510-8565865 Rev B, Ventilation-Manufacturing Details CPO, STNCO, Crew & Troop Sanitary Spaces Mod. All HAB drawings have been provided. For all remaining drawings review SI 009-01.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the references.

96 Multiple Please provide the listed missing references:; Errata 1 & 2 474-11-001 E2

2.4 184-6517931, FDNS INCID to SRBOC Instl (E2)

2.5 187-7445973, SRBOC FDN MOD INCID TO RAM INSTL (E2)

2.6 184-8336612, FDN MODS MK53 DECOY LAUNCHING SYSTEM NULKA (E2)

2.7 184-8336613, STRL MODS MK53 DECOY LAUNCHING SYSTEM NULKA (E2)

2.8 6780856 Rev U, INSTALLATION CONTROL DRAWING FOR MK53 MODS 3,4,5 AND 6 DECOY LAUNCHING (E2)

2.9 NSWC/LOU 613 Rev A, SURVINST LAUNCHER SURVEYING INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE MK53 DECOY LAUNCHING SYSTEM (E2)

2.10 NSWC/L 613, BORESIGHT MK53 DECOY LAUNCHING SYSTEM BORESIGHT (E2)

2.11 7244886, PLATE, INSTALLATION SURVEY AND DRILLING

651-11-005 E2

2.4 321-8577325, Power Instl Galley Combi Oven 980-90-006 E1

2.6 184-8620899 Rev A, SCD 20949 LSD47 SSDS MK2 Mod 5C Foundation Modifications CIC (05-30-0-C) Addendum 2 233-10-004 A2

2.2 NSWCCD SSES 931, LSD-41/49 Midlife Diesel Engine Preservation Procedure: Date 30 July 10

2.3 S9233-A8-MM0-A10, Description, Operation, Maintenance and Installation Instructions Main Propulsion Diesel Engine LSD-41 Class Ships

2.4 PMS MRC LU-1, (SYSCOM: B5 6WMS N), MIP Series: 2331/001, Prepare Engine for Lay-Up

2.5 S9086-HB-STM-010/CH-233, Diesel Engines

2.6 PMS MRC SU-1 (SYSCOM: B5 6WMU N), MIP Series: 2331/001, Prepare Engine for Operation

2.7 S9233-A8-MM0-A20, Description, Operation, Maintenance and Installation Instructions Main Propulsion Diesel Engine LSD-41 Class Ships

2.4 S9086-7G-STM-010 Rev 3, NSTM 997, Docking Instructions and Routine Work in Dry Dock

2.6 801-6102103 Rev B, Tank Capacity Curves

2.8 R9-2003-0265, Best Management Practices for the United States Navy Graving Dock Naval Station, San Diego

2.9 R9-2013-0064, Best Management Practices for the United States Navy Graving Dock Naval Station, San Diego

Please provide the listed missing references from Errata 1 & 2 & Addendum 1:

437-21-001 E2

2.5 LAR LSD47/SW13011, RADAR TLI INSTALL

474-11-001 E2

2.4 184-6517931, FDNS INCID TO SRBOC INSTL (E2)

2.5 187-7445973, SRBOC FDN MOD INCID TO RAM INSTL (E2)

2.6 184-8336612, FDN MODS MK53 DECOY LAUNCHING SYSTEM NULKA (E2)

2.7 184-8336613, STRL MODS MK53 DECOY LAUNCHING SYSTEM NULKA (E2)

2.8 6780856 Rev U, INSTALLATION CONTROL DRAWING FOR MK53 MODS 3,4,5 AND 6 DECOY LAUNCHING (E2)

2.9 NSWC/LOU 613 REV A, SURVINST LAUNCHER SURVEYING INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE MK53 DECOY LAUNCHING SYSTEM

2.10 NSWC/L 613, BORESIGHT MK53 DECOY LAUNCHING SYSTEM BORESIGHT (E2)

2.11 7244886, PLATE, INSTALLATION SURVEY AND DRILLING

643-11-001 E1 643-8565858 REV A, ARRANGEMENT CPO, STNCO, CREW & TROOP LIVING SPACES MODIFICATIONS 651-11-005 E2

2.3 651-8576672 FOOD SERVICE SPACE ARRANGEMENT COMBI OVEN UPGRADES

2.4 321-8577325, POWER INSTL GALLEY COMBI OVEN

980-90-006 E1

2.6 184-8620899 REV A, SCD 20949 LSD47 SSDS MK2 MOD 5C FOUNDATION MODIFICATIONS CIC (05-30-0-C) 233-10-004 A2

2.2 NSWCCD SSES 931, LSD-41/49 Midlife Diesel Engine Preservation Procedure: Date 30 July 10

2.3 S9233-A8-MM0-A10, Description, Operation, Maintenance and Installation Instructions Main Propulsion Diesel Engine LSD-41 Class Ships

2.4 PMS MRC LU-1, (SYSCOM: B5 6WMS N), MIP Series: 2331/001, Prepare Engine for Lay-Up

2.5 S9086-HB-STM-010/CH-233, Diesel Engines

2.6 PMS MRC SU-1 (SYSCOM: B5 6WMU N), MIP Series: 2331/001, Prepare Engine for Operation

2.7 S9233-A8-MM0-A20, Description, Operation, Maintenance and Installation Instructions Main Propulsion Diesel Engine LSD-41 Class Ships

2.8 PMS MRC R-33 (SYSCOM: 86 H3NM N), MIP Series: 2331/001, Obtain Lubricating Oil Sample from New Oil Prior to Onload and Perform analysis Using Kittiwake Oil Test Center (OTC) 997-11-002 A2

2.4 S9086-7G-STM-010 Rev 3, NSTM 997, Docking Instructions and Routine Work in Dry Dock

2.6 801-6102103 Rev B, Tank Capacity Curves

2.8 R9-2003-0265, Best Management Practices for the United States Navy Graving Dock Naval Station, San Diego

2.9 R9-2013-0064, Best Management Practices for the United States Navy Graving Dock Naval Station, San Diego

2.10 Naval Base, San Diego Graving Dock Use Agreement, 29 February 2016 441-71-001 A1

2.2 LAR.SA-1234K-1281-1K-LSD47-SW17043, INMARSAT System Removal

2.3 LAR.SA-1234K-1281K-LSD47-SW17043-ENCLOSURES 1 – 7, Redlined Drawings

2.4 LAR.SA-1234K-1281-1K_LSD47-SW17043-ENCLOSURE 8 (2 -SHEETS), Redlined Drawing

Note that locations in each work item include the tanks, main spaces, and blast tanks. It is unrealistic to protect certain locations just to meet the requirement of 3.1.

To be consistent with other bidders, please provide quantity of deck covering material. Shipchecks are available to determine the quantity.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to schedule a ship check.

100 524-80-001 Paras. 3.12 states “Calibrate and adjust each new gage and/or switch IAW with the rqmts of 009-14 of 2.1”.

Contractor noted that NAVSEA FY-19 Standard Item CHG 4 applies to this Solicitation.

Contractor seeks clarification or guidance on listed standard item (009-14) as it applies to the work item due to the fact that 009-14 has been cancelled as of 30 APR 2018 as listed in the Numerical Index of NAVSEA STD ITEMS FY-19 CH-4.

Para 3.12 should reference 009-13. This has been corrected in Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

101 245-12-005 Paras. 3.4 states “Accomplish the requirements of 009-14 of 2.1 for each new equipment”.

Contractor noted that NAVSEA FY-19 Standard Item CHG 4 applies to this Solicitation.

Contractor seeks clarification or guidance on listed standard item (009-14) as it applies to the work item due to the fact that 009-14 has been cancelled as of 30 APR 2018 as listed in the Numerical Index of NAVSEA STD ITEMS FY-19 CH-4.

Para 3.4 should reference 009-13. This has been corrected in Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

102 529-11-005 Para. 1.3.1.1 provides APL: 61A160009.

Question 1: Contractor seeks clarification or guidance on proper APL since listed APL information in work specs does not cross over to any available information pertaining to equipment listed in the work specification.

Question 2: Contractor seeks clarification or guidance if GFM listed in paragraph 5.1 already includes the “Actuator” as described in paragraph 1.3.1.1.

1. APL and part number have been reviewed and are valid.

2. Para 5.1 provides the valve only. Actuator is to be provided as CFM.

103 980-90-004 Para. 3.12 states “Provide a total of 40 mandays of labor and $ 5,000 dollars of material to accomplish additional AIT support assistance not previously identified in the Work Item, when directed by the Supervisor.”

Contractor then noticed that sub-paragraphs 3.12.1 up to 3.12.3 which is broken down by trade discipline add up to 46 mandays. (16+20+6+4).

Contractor seeks clarification or guidance what total mandays should be utilized; is it the 40 mandays as per paragraph 3.12 or it is it the total breakdown by trade discipline as per paras. 3.12.1 to 3.12.3 of 43 mandays?

The total trade breakdown of para 3.12.1 through 3.12.3.1 is 46 directed man days. Para 3.12 has been revised in Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

104 623-12-001 Item 623-12-001, paragraph 3.1 states to “Remove existing firefighter ladder safety system carrier rail located in 1.2, and install 4 frames aft of current location.”

Exact location is required in order to bid the requirements of the spec This has been addressed in Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

105 997-11-002 Item 997-11-002, Question #1 - Paragraph 3.2.2 Tugs and Pilot, please confirm that Navy Tugs will accomplish this paragraph while at base.

Question #2 - Paragraph 3.9.2.2 please confirm that Navy divers will accomplish the installation and daily maintain of cofferdams on the North and South side flood tunnels IAW with SRO 4 paragraph 5 of references 2.8, 2.9.

Question #3 – Please confirm that divers for docking and undocking evolution are to be provided by the contractor.

Please confirm the 3 questions above.

1. No, tugs shall be provided by the Contractor.

2. No, this shall be completed by the Contractor.

3. Yes, all pilots and divers shall be provided by the Contractor.

106 997-11-002 Item 997-11-002, Please identify what work will be accomplished by paragraph 3.20

Any welding services required by the contractor in support of this work item.

107 992-11-004 Item 992-11-004, It is the contractors understanding that services for the berthing barge are provided only when at the contractor’s facility.

Please identify the level of cleanliness for paragraph 3.21.1 and the pressure of the steam cleaning the contractor will need to provide to accomplish this paragraph.

The contractor also recommends the paragraph be made into a man-hour and material pool.

Please advise:

The contractor would like to verify that the capstans used to bring a ship into dock and center on the blocks are fully functional for this docking and undocking evolution.

Please confirm:

Question #1 - Since there is no dock master, who does the NAVFAC personal report to and what is the chain of command?

Question #2 - Will the NAVFAC personal report to the contractors dock master for the duration of the docking and undocking operation.

Question #3 - Who is responsible for the operation of the Caisson gate and the flooding and de-watering of the dock?

Question #4 - Provide certification that capstans and dry-dock is fully functional and ready to use for the contractor.

Question #5 - Please confirm that NAVFAC will supply the Amsteel lines on carts that will be used for ship handling.

Please provide answers to all 5 questions above.

1. The Contractor will need to furnish a qualified dock master.

2. Contractor shall review Para 4.3 for chain of command.

3.. NAVFAC will operate flooding/dewatering equipment and caisson gate.

4. Drydock is certified and fully functional.

5. Contractor will need to provide amsteel lines and carts.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to schedule a ship check.

112 120-11-010 Item 120-11-010, Paragraph 3.2 states; “Accomplish an additional 200 square feet of deck and bulkhead replacement in the locations listed in 1.2 as directed by the SUPERVISOR.”

QUESTION; Exact location of material to be replaced is not provided in this paragraph, therefore interference(s) cannot be identified, unless otherwise directed, removal & reinstallation of interferences related to this paragraph will be subject to an equitable adjustment, please concur.

Shipchecks are available. The government does not concur with an equitable adjustment.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to schedule a ship check.

113 150-11-001 Item 150-11-001, Paragraph 3.3 states; “Remove existing and install new the material listed in 1.3.1, and located in 1.2, in way of deteriorated deck plate, using 2.3 for guidance.”

QUESTION; Exact location of material to be replaced is not provided in this paragraph, therefore interference(s) cannot be identified, unless otherwise directed, removal & reinstallation of interferences related to this paragraph will be subject to an equitable adjustment, please concur.

Shipchecks are available. The government does not concur with an equitable adjustment.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to schedule a ship check.

114 150-11-003 Item 150-11-003, Paragraph 3.4.2 states;…