J-2_NAV_PHASE_I_DRLs.pdf

NOAA AGOR VARIANT (NAV)

Phase I Data Requirements List (DRL)

Attachment J-2

Version 1.0

26 April 2018

Solicitation No. N00024-18-R-2201

DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.

N00024-18-R-2201

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: i

FOREWORD

The Data Requirements List (DRL) identifies Contractor data item delivery requirements in support of the NOAA

AGOR Variant (NAV) program. This foreword serves as supplemental information to clarify requirements of an administrative and/or procedural nature. Emergent issues that are not addressed herein or otherwise provided for in source documents shall be referred to PEO SHIPS PMS325.

Data required to be delivered under the Data Requirement List (DRL) or this contract, that would be deemed Technical

Data under DFARS 252.227-7013, if it were delivered in written form, shall not lose its status as Technical Data because access by the Government, or delivery by the Contractor, is by electronic means. The rights of the parties in said

Technical Data shall be as specified in DFARS 252.227-7013.

I. CONTENT AND FORMAT OF SUBMITTALS

Submittals shall be prepared in the Contractor’s format unless otherwise specified. Each submittal shall be clear, legible, and electronically developed and formatted (keyed/typed) unless otherwise specified. All submittals shall be prepared in the English language. Calculations and design data shall be provided in metric units unless otherwise specified, or in inch-pound system where existing documentation is in the inch-pound system.

Data Items shall be assigned a sequential one-character alphabet designation in the Revision Block to signify a change from the previous submittal. Revision letter designations shall be in alphabetical order. The first submittal of any data item shall be identified as Revision “-”.

Electronic media and digital files shall be compatible with Windows 7 operating system, or latest available version, unless otherwise specified. The latest available versions of the following software products shall be utilized in the generation of data items, unless otherwise specified: Microsoft Office™ including Microsoft Project™, Adobe

Acrobat™, WinZip™, or IGES™. Electronic files shall not be password protected.

Drawings shall be submitted in the latest version of AutoCAD

TM

and PDF format, unless otherwise specified, and shall not be in “read only” format. Schedules shall be submitted in Microsoft Project compatible format and PDF format.

All submittals, including drawings, reports and machine-produced listings shall be prepared with the following information:

a. Contractor’s serial number and date.

b. The contract number, data item number, and data item title. When multiple submissions are made under the same data item (such as drawings, purchase orders, or test reports), a subtitle shall be included to further identify the content.

c. A list of all enclosures being submitted in the data package.

d. A revision letter and date shall be included to reflect the revision of any previously submitted document.

The cover sheet shall provide a brief explanation of the reason for the change or a more detailed discussion shall be included in the content of the submittal.

e. Distribution and quantity of copies being sent.

f. Updates and revisions to plans, reports, and procedures shall include a Record of Revisions to annotate what has changed since the previous submittal change bar in the left margin.

Each Data Item submittal shall include Distribution Statement C at the bottom of each cover sheet, as follows:

“DISTRIBUTION Statement C: Distribution authorized to the U.S. Government agencies and their Contractors.

Other request for this document shall be referred to PEO Ships PMS325.”

Each file extension shall be the three or four-character default extension automatically assigned by the applicable software in which the document is saved. If the software does not automatically assign the three or four-character

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: ii extension, the Contractor shall assign a three or four-character extension and specify the file’s applicable software and version in the letter of transmittal.

Each Data Item shall be submitted with a separate letter of transmittal. Multiple documents may be submitted under the same letter of transmittal; subtitles, revision designations, and sheet quantities shall be identified for each document.

Each letter of transmittal shall contain the following:

a. Ship Acronym and applicable Hull Numbers

b. Contractor’s name, correspondence serial number, and actual date of transmittal

c. Contract Number

d. Data Item Number and Data Item Title

e. Applicable revision letter and revision date

f. Electronic media or digital file name and respective file date

g. Each transmittal letter shall provide a brief explanation of the submittal and the reason for the document’s change.

h. Submittals requiring approval shall state: “This document requires Government approval.” If approval of a document is contingent upon incorporation of comments, the document shall be resubmitted. If approval has been granted, the approved version shall state: “The previous version of this document has been reviewed and approved by the Government.” Include identification of the Government approving document serial number and date.

i. Distribution and quantity of copies being sent (not applicable to reproducibles provided at a shared Government and Contractor location)

Where hard copies or electronic media are required, the Contractor shall deliver the Data Item submittals using properly sized envelopes or boxes in accordance with good commercial practice to prevent damage.

II. SUBMISSION SCHEDULE

The Contractor shall develop and maintain scheduling data relating to the submission requirements of all individual

Data Items and shall ensure that actual submission dates are on or before computed due dates. Submission criteria are usually based on key events. Key events identified herein apply to the lead ship and awarded options. Days

After Contract (DAC) refers to award of lead ship Contract Line Item Number (CLIN). Days After Option Exercised

(DAOE) refers to option exercise of each appropriate CLIN.

It is the responsibility of the Contractor to notify the Government of changes which impact the content and accuracy of a previously submitted document so that the Government may make a determination as to whether the document warrants a revision. If the Government determines that there are significant enough changes which impact the content and accuracy of the document, the document shall be revised appropriately and resubmitted within 30 days or as otherwise agreed to between the Government and the Contractor.

III. QUALITY CONTROL

The Contractor shall maintain internal quality control to ensure submittals are complete and adequate and shall not rely on Government review comments to ensure the technical accuracy of data. The Contractor shall review submittals to ensure accuracy of language, flow, overall readability, as well as proofreading for grammar, spelling, and typographical errors.

IV. ACRONYMS

An alphabetical list of acronyms follows. The list includes those acronyms used most frequently in the DRL.

ABS American Bureau of Shipping

AT Acceptance Trials

BI-WKLY Bi-Weekly

BDT Builder’s Dock Trials

BST Builder’s Sea Trials

BT Builder’s Trials

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: iii

CDWE Contractor Design Weight Estimate

CFD Computational Fluid Dynamics

CFM Contractor Furnished Material

CLIN Contract Line Item Number

DAC Days After Contract Award

DARC Days After Receipt of Comments

DARP Days After Reporting Period

DAOE Days After Option Exercised

DI Data Item

DMA Design Maturity Assessment

DPT Days Prior To

DR Design Review

DRL Data Requirements List

DSAT Deep Sea Acceptance Trial

DSR Design Summary Report

EPLA Electric Power Load Analysis

FAT Factory Acceptance Test

HAT Harbor Acceptance Test

HVAC Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning

IAW In Accordance With

IESH Integrated Environmental, Safety, and

Health

MEL Master Equipment List

MTHLY Monthly

OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer

PAC Post Award Conference

PME Program Management Enterprise

QRTLY Quarterly

QWR Quarterly Weight Report

R/ASR Revisions As Required

SAT Sea Acceptance Trial

SD Ship Delivery

SES Scientific Electronics System

SOC Start of Construction

SOW Statement of Work

SSV Single Source Vendor

VRS Vendor Recommended Spares

WKLY Weekly

V. GLOSSARY

The items listed below are explanations of the headings and blocks on the Data Requirements List (DRL).

PROGRAM NAME: The name of the program.

CONTRACT NO.: The Procurement Instrument Identification Number (PIIN), such as the Contract number, Purchase Request (PR) number, the Request for Proposal (RFP) number, or other appropriate designator.

CLIN: The Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) that is associated with the DRL.

CONTRACTOR: The Contractor's name.

PREPARED AND APPROVED BY: The name and organization responsible for the preparation and approval of the DRL.

PREPARED AND

PAGE: iv

DATE: The date the Contractual DRL was approved.

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: An identification number to support each Data Item identified in the Statement of Work (SOW) or the Contract.

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: The title of the Data Item.

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE: The specific location within the SOW or Contract that contains the tasking that generates a requirement for the data. System Specification, Attachment J-1, Expanded Ship Work Breakdown

Structure (ESWBS) references, where provided, is shown in parenthesis.

BLOCK 4-DATA DESCRIPTION: Details regarding the Data Item’s content characteristics and format requirements, if applicable.

BLOCK 5-APPROVAL/REVIEW REQ.: The Government will review the Contractor’s submittal as indicated. The time period required for Government review will be as specified. The Government will comment on Data Items that require Government comment and/or approval within the timeframe noted. Non-response to a Government approval Data Item shall be taken as disapproval. The Government reserves the right to comment on all deliverables.

BLOCK 6-SUBMITTAL SCHEDULE: The scheduled date for initial data submission, incremental submittals, and resubmittals, shall be as specified. In addition, details regarding Data Item submittal requirements are included. Submittal dates are often based on Contract events. Days identified are calendar days unless otherwise identified. Where scheduled date for data submission falls on a Saturday, Sunday or

Federal Government holiday, the submission due date shall be the following Federal Government working day.

Revisions and subsequent periodic submissions shall incorporate the resolution of Government comments.

BLOCK 7-DISTRIBUTION: Unless otherwise stated, all deliveries shall be in digital format submitted to the

PMS325 Project Management System – Extranet Site (PMS-ES) in accordance with Integrated Digital

Environment Site Access and Public Key Infrastructure/Information Assurance Awareness Attributes, Attachment J-5 unless otherwise specified. The PMS-ES system is the platform used for PMS325’s

Integrated Data Environment (IDE). Specific formats and unique delivery requirements are identified in the individual data items. The numbers specified in Block 7 are the quantities of hard copies and digital copies to be provided to the addressees. Data provided at a shared location shall meet the requirements for digital copies

VI. DRL Data Item Extensions

In the event that the Contractor decides to submit separate items to fulfill a DRL Data Item requirement and to ensure that the PMS-ES accounts for each item individually, the Contractor shall request a Data Item Extension/Re-designation from the PMS-ES Data Manager via e-mail. The Data Item Extension/Re-designation allows the PME to establish separate sub-tier items within the database allowing the Contractor and Government to submit, review, and track each item independently. By requesting a DRL Data Item Extension/Re-designation, the Contractor avoids the need to submit all of the individual items with each submission of the data item, even if only one of the items has been modified since the previous submission.

Examples of when the Contractor shall request DRL Data Item Extension/Re-designation include the Technical

Manual data item. In such an instance, the Contractor shall request DRL Data Item Extension/Re-designation to establish separate items for each individual technical manual, thus allowing individual tracking of review comments, independent resubmissions of single technical manuals, and closure of comments on independent technical manuals.

Another example would be for data items that require supporting calculations to be submitted with drawings. In such an instance, the Contractor shall request DRL Data Item Extensions/Re-designation to establish separate sub-tier items for the drawing and for the calculations.

PREPARED AND

PAGE: v

NOAA AGOR Variant Table of Contents

Phase I

Data Item

No.

Data Item

Titles And Subtitles Contract Reference

Change

Status

DI-001

DI-002

DI-003

DI-004

DI-005

DI-006

DI-007

DI-008

DI-009

DI-010

DI-011

DI-012

DI-013

DI-014

DI-015

DI-016

DI-017

DI-018

DI-019

DI-020

DI-021

DI-022

DI-023

DI-024

DI-025

DI-026

DI-027

DI-028

DI-029

DI-030

DI-031

DI-032

DI-033

DI-034

DI-035

DI-035-01

DI-035-02

DI-035-03

DI-035-04

DI-035-05

DI-035-06

DI-035-07

DI-035-08

DI-035-09

DI-035-10

DI-035-11

DI-035-12

DI-035-13

DI-035-14

DI-035-15

DI-035-16

DI-036

DI-037

DI-038

DI-039

POST AWARD CONFERENCE AGENDA, PRESENTATION AND MINUTES

DESIGN REVIEW AGENDAS, PRESENTATIONS, AND MINUTES

DESIGN MATURITY ASSESSMENT REPORT

DESIGN SUMMARY REPORT

PHASE I MASTER SCHEDULE

MASTER EQUIPMENT LIST

EQUIVALENT EQUIPMENT SUBSTITUTION REQUEST

REQUIREMENTS VERIFICATION MATRIX

COST ESTIMATES

LIFE CYCLE FUEL ESTIMATE AND LIFE CYCLE COST SAVINGS STUDY REPORT

NOTIONAL PHASE II SCHEDULE

NOAA AGOR VARIANT SPECIFICATION REVIEW REPORT

HULL LINES DRAWING

APPENDAGE AND CONTROL SURFACE DRAWING

SPEED AND POWER REPORT

SEAKEEPING PERFORMANCE REPORT

MANEUVERING PERFORMANCE REPORT

DYNAMIC POSITIONING SYSTEM PERFORMANCE REPORT

BUBBLE SWEEPDOWN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS REPORT

REGULATORY BODY COMMUNICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE

REGULATORY BODY COMMUNICATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCE LOG

AIRBORNE NOISE REPORT

SONAR SELF-NOISE REPORT

UNDERWATER RADIATED NOISE REPORT

VIBRATION REPORT

INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY, AND HEALTH PLAN

INTACT AND DAMAGE STABILITY REPORT

SHORE BASED SPARES LIST

WEIGHT CONTROL PLAN

CONTRACTOR DESIGN WEIGHT ESTIMATE

MODEL TEST PROGRAM PLAN

MODEL TEST REPORT

MODEL TEST VIDEO AND PHOTOGRAPHS

ANCHOR HANDLING, MISSION DECK EQUIPMENT HANDLING, AND PILOT

HOUSE MOCKUP PLAN

DRAWINGS

GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWING

COMPARTMENT LAYOUT DRAWINGS

MIDSHIP SECTION DRAWING

TYPICAL SECTIONS DRAWING

SHELL EXPANSION DRAWING

DECK AND PLATFORM DRAWING

SUPERSTRUCTURE DRAWING

MAST AND FLAGSTAFF DRAWING

PROPELLER DRAWING

TOPSIDE ARRANGEMENT DRAWING

NAVIGATION LIGHTS ARRANGEMENT DRAWING

PILOT HOUSE/CHART AREA ARRANGEMENT DRAWING

MACHINERY ARRANGEMENT DRAWING

EQUIPMENT REMOVAL DRAWING

HANDLING SYSTEMS AND SCIENTIFIC PACKAGE DEPLOYMENT DRAWING

ANCHORING AND MOORING DRAWING

ENDURANCE FUEL CALCULATIONS

PROPULSION SINGLE SYSTEM VENDOR MANAGEMENT REPORT

STACK GAS FLOW ANALYSIS REPORT

ELECTRIC POWER LOAD ANALYSIS

SOW C-3.1.042a SOW C-3.1.042a SOW C-3.1.042b SOW C-3.1.042c SOW C-3.1.042d SOW C-3.1.042e SOW C-3.1.042f SOW C-3.1.042g SOW C-3.1.042h SOW C-3.1.042i SOW C-3.1.042j

SOW C-3.1.060

SOW C-3.1.070a SOW C-3.1.070a SOW C-3.1.070a SOW C-3.1.070a SOW C-3.1.070a SOW C-3.1.070a SOW C-3.1.070a SOW C-3.1.070b SOW C-3.1.070b SOW C-3.1.073b SOW C-3.1.073b SOW C-3.1.073b SOW C-3.1.073b

SOW C-3.1.077

SOW C-3.1.079

SOW C-3.1.080

SOW C-3.1.096

SOW C-3.1.096

SOW C-3.1.098a SOW C-3.1.098a SOW C-3.1.098a

SOW C-3.1.098b (See Attachment 1 to

Data Item No. DI-035) SOW C-3.1.100a SOW C-3.1.100a SOW C-3.1.100b SOW C-3.1.100b SOW C-3.1.100b SOW C-3.1.100b SOW C-3.1.100b

SOW C-3.1.170

SOW C-3.1.245

SOW C-3.1.400

SOW C-3.1.400

SOW C-3.1.423

SOW C-3.1.501

SOW C-3.1.501

SOW C-3.1.573

SOW C-3.1.581

SOW C-3.1.200

SOW C-3.1.202

SOW C-3.1.251

SOW C-3.1.300

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: vi

NOAA AGOR Variant Table of Contents

Phase I

Data Item

No.

Data Item

Titles And Subtitles Contract Reference

Change

Status

DI-040

DI-041

DI-042

DI-043

DI-044

DI-045

DI-046

DI-047

DI-047-01

DI-047-02

DI-047-03

DI-047-04

DI-047-05

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM ONE-LINE DIAGRAM

PRELIMINARY FAULT CURRENT ANALYSIS REPORT

SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS SINGLE SYSTEM VENDOR MANAGEMENT

REPORT

SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS ARRANGEMENT DRAWING

SCIENTIFIC ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS WIRING DIAGRAM

COMMUNICATIONS REQUIREMENTS MATRICES

HEATING, VENTILATION, AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM AND REFRIGERATION

SYSTEM REPORT

REPORTS

AREA/VOLUME REPORT

PROPULSION SYSTEM REPORT

AUXILIARY SYSTEMS REPORT

POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS REPORT

AUTOMATION CONTROL AND MONITORING SYSTEMS REPORT

SOW C-3.1.300

SOW C-3.1.300

SOW C-3.1.426

SOW C-3.1.426

SOW C-3.1.426

SOW C-3.1.441

SOW C-3.1.512

(See Attachment 1 to

Data Item No. DI-047) SOW C-3.1.100a

SOW C-3.1.200

SOW C-3.1.500

SOW C-3.1.500

SOW C-3.1.561

BASIC

BASIC

BASIC

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 1

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

PHASE I DATA REQUIREMENTS

CONTRACT NO.: N00024-18-R-2201 CLIN: 0001 CONTRACTOR:

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-001

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: POST AWARD CONFERENCE AGENDA,

PRESENTATION AND MINUTES

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE: SOW C-3.1.042a

BLOCK 4-DATA DESCRIPTION:

1. The Post Award Conference (PAC) Agenda shall identify the meeting name, date, time, and location of the

PAC. Materials to be presented during the PAC shall be provided with the agenda. The agenda shall include as a minimum a discussion of the following:

a. Introductions

b. Organizations and Points of Contact

1) All major organizations involved in the contract (such as PEO SHIPS, NAVSEA, NOAA, Contractor, Design Agent (if used), and others).

2) Roles and Responsibilities of Organizations and Points of Contact.

c. Program Overview

1) Schedule of Phase I Conferences and Reviews.

2) Contractor Facilities Access Control.

3) Model Testing.

4) Government Expectations.

5) Contractor Expectations.

d. Program Administration

1) Management.

2) Contracts Administration.

e. Communications

1) Authorized Government Representatives.

2) Authorized Contractor Representatives.

3) Web-based Project Management System.

4) Email and Letter Correspondence.

5) Regulatory Body Correspondence.

6) Submission of Data Requirements List.

f. Action Item Review

g. Conclusion

2. The PAC Minutes shall identify date, time, and location of the PAC and a chronological listing of each topic discussed. The minutes shall include applicable discussions, concerns, action items assigned and completed, and a list of the documentation discussed. A list of attendees with contact information shall be included.

Copies of each presentation or document reviewed at the conference shall also be included and identified in the minutes by document name, document revision, document date, and the digital file name and date.

BLOCK 5-REVIEW REQ.:

Allow 5 days for Government review and comment for the agenda and presentation. Allow 7 days for Government review and comment for the minutes.

(Continued on Next Page)

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 2

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.:

DI-001 (CONTINUED)

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: POST AWARD CONFERENCE AGENDA,

PRESENTATION AND MINUTES

BLOCK 6-SUBMITTAL SCHEDULE:

10 DPT PAC; R/ASR 5 DARC. Draft of materials to be presented during the PAC shall be provided with the agenda. Minutes and final presentation materials to be submitted 7 days after the PAC; R/ASR 3 DARC.

BLOCK 7-DISTRIBUTION: Addressee QTY

PMS325Q IDE 0*/1

* Hard copy final presentation materials shall be provided for each attendee at the meeting.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 3

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-002

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE:

DESIGN REVIEW AGENDAS, PRESENTATIONS,

AND MINUTES

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE:

SOW C-3.1.042a

1. Design Review (DR) Agendas shall identify the meeting name, date, time, and location of each DR. Drafts of materials to be presented during each DR meeting shall be provided with the agenda.

2. DR Agendas shall provide information regarding risks, potential issues and decisions. Information regarding ship design status and results shall also be discussed. Items that will be updated prior to the next DR shall also be discussed.

3. The Design Review Agendas shall include discussion on the following topics, as applicable.

a. Scope of effort required to accomplish Phase I, and an updated Phase I Master Schedule.

b. Detailed status of the evolving Preliminary/Contract Design.

c. Risk review including mitigation plans for all moderate and high risks.

d. Requirements verification status.

e. Efforts accomplished by subcontractors including the design agent (if used), Propulsion and Scientific

Electronic Systems (SES) Single Systems Vendors (SSV’s), Dive Air Consultant, and Noise Control

Consultant.

f. Model Test Status.

g. Primary design drivers, constraints and other issues that are influencing the ship design.

h. Integration of SES.

i. System Specification requirements.

j. Scientific Mission Systems Specifications requirements.

k. Status of regulatory body submittals and responses related to the design. Address anticipated future regulatory body changes that may impact the design and operation of the ship. In addition, where regulatory body changes result in an impact to the design, provide rationale for implementing the consequential design changes and the technical impact of those changes.

l. Technical analyses, tradeoffs, discussions of supporting calculations, and resulting derived design details.

m. Supporting data required by the Phase I DRL, Attachment J-2.

4. DR Minutes shall identify date, time, and location of the applicable review and a chronological listing of each topic discussed. The minutes shall include applicable discussions, concerns, action items assigned and completed, and a list of the documentation discussed. A list of attendees with contact information shall be included. Copies of each presentation or document reviewed shall also be included and identified in the minutes by document name, document revision, document date, and the digital file name and date.

Allow 5 days for Government review and comment for the agenda and presentation. Allow 7 days for Government review and comment for the minutes.

Agendas 10 DPT each DR; R/ASR 5 DARC. Draft of materials to be presented during each DR shall be provided with each agenda. Minutes and final presentation material to be submitted 7 days after each DR; R/ASR 3 DARC.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 4

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-002 (CONTINUED)

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE:

DESIGN REVIEW AGENDAS, PRESENTATIONS

AND MINUTES

PMS325Q IDE 1*

* Hard copy final presentation materials shall be provided for each attendee at the meeting.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 5

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-003

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: DESIGN MATURITY ASSESSMENT REPORT

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE: SOW C-3.1.042b

1. The Design Maturity Assessment (DMA) Report shall demonstrate the readiness to proceed into the Contract

Design phase in accordance with the requirements of the Contract. The report shall include the following:

a. Identification of the systems whose architectures have been developed. The number of full design iterations that have been performed shall also be cited. For each design iteration, a summary and assessment of the overall magnitude of design changes since the previous iteration shall be provided.

b. Confirmation that the design has converged and will not lead to significant changes in design characteristics (e.g. light ship and full load displacement, volume, KG, etc.). List the analyses that were done in support of the converged Preliminary Design and what analysis remains to be done in Contract

Design.

c. Confirmation that the data items identified as part of the DMA reflect architectures that are consistent among themselves. State which design revision number that each data item is based on.

d. The identification of any novel features of the design, and rationale for selection of critical equipment.

e. Assessment of the risks that significant design changes will occur in the design. If the risk is high, provide options identifying design changes that would need to occur in order to reduce the risk level to low.

f. Identification of all areas of non-compliance with the System Specification, Attachment J-1 and Scientific

Mission System Specification, Attachment J-6. For any areas of non-compliance, list those areas with a supporting explanation, provide the remediation plan and identify which (if any) of those areas will have an effect on design convergence.

g. Identification of the weight and KG margins and service life allowance that were assigned for Preliminary

Design, how much of each margin was consumed, and confirmation that there are adequate margins for the

Contract Design.

Allow 7 days for Government review and comment.

14 DPT the DMA.

PMS325Q IDE 1

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 6

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

DI-004

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: DESIGN SUMMARY REPORT

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE: SOW C-3.1.042c

1. The Design Summary Report (DSR) shall document the results of the completed Contract Design and shall be organized into the following two sections:

a. Section One shall include an Executive Summary of the Contract Design.

b. Section Two shall identify final revisions of Data Items, DI-005 through DI-047 including Data Items identified in attachments.

Allow 14 days for Government review and comment.

Submit Section One only 7 DPT the Final scheduled DR. Final submittal 30 days after the Final scheduled DR.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 7

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-005

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: PHASE I MASTER SCHEDULE

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE: SOW C-3.1.042d

The Phase I Master Schedule shall include planned dates for design reviews, Design Maturity Assessment, model testing, major subcontractors’ purchase order issue dates, and initial submission and planned revisions of documentation. The timelines shall highlight the critical paths and include Regulatory Body submittal status. This deliverable shall be Microsoft Project compatible.

7 DPT each DR.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 8

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-006

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: MASTER EQUIPMENT LIST

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE: SOW C-3.1.042e

1. The Master Equipment List (MEL) shall provide the following characteristics for all listed items. The data shall be provided and sorted in a tabular form and include the following column headings:

a. ESWBS.

b. Manufacturer.

c. Model Number.

d. Nomenclature.

e. Critical/Non-Critical designation.

f. Government or Contractor identified.

g. Description.

h. Quantity.

i. Equipment Location.

j. Dimensions.

k. Weight and whether the weight was derived by estimation, manufacturer’s data or actual measurement.

l. Capacity/Rating.

m. Electrical power requirements.

n. Service requirements.

o. Regulatory Body Approval.

p. Lead Time.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 9

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

PHASE II DATA REQUIREMENTS

CONTRACT NO.: N00024-18-R-2201 CLIN: 0003 CONTRACTOR: X

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-007

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: EQUIVALENT EQUIPMENT SUBSTITUTION

REQUEST

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE: SOW C-3.1.042f

1. Each Equivalent Equipment Substitution Request shall include a side-by-side comparison of the existing and proposed equivalent equipment. The Substitution Request shall identify make and model of each item and address the following equivalency requirements:

a. Meets the specified contract requirements and Regulatory Body requirements; and

b. Meets the requirements identified in the Equipment Salient Characteristics, Attachment J-9, and

c. Possesses similar (or improved):

1) Dimensions.

2) Weight.

3) Power, HVAC, cooling water and other support services.

4) Suitability for marine service.

5) Material.

6) Time in service.

7) Number of units in commercial service.

8) Vendor furnished training.

9) Vendor furnished information.

10) Life Cycle Cost.

11) Noise and vibration characteristics.

12) Interface characteristics.

13) Environmental factors.

14) Reliability.

Allow 21 days for Government review and approval. Any Substitution Request not approved within 45 days of submittal to the Government shall be considered disapproved.

As required.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 10

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-008

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: REQUIREMENTS VERIFICATION MATRIX

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE SOW C-3.1.042g

1. The Requirements Verification Matrix shall include the following data:

a. Requirement. Each requirement shall be identified individually.

b. Requirement Source. Identify the source of each requirement within the System Specification, Attachment

J-1, and the Scientific Mission Systems Specification, Attachment J-6. In addition, identify the section number or applicable paragraph.

c. 3-Digit ESWBS. Identify the applicable section where the requirement is specified in the System

Specification, Attachment J-1.

d. Data Item Name and Number. Identify the related Data Item Name and Data Item Number (if applicable).

e. Verification Process. Identify the process(es) by which the requirement has been or will be verified, such as analysis, inspection, and test. Verification methods are defined as:

1) Analysis: This method utilizes established technical or mathematical models or simulations, algorithms, charts, graphs, circuit diagrams, or other scientific principles and procedures to provide evidence that the stated requirements have been met. Analysis may also consist of using construction drawings and other design documentation to verify that required features, clearances, and other spatial and performance requirements are met. Simulations shall be validated and verified by a generally recognized industry standard.

2) Inspection: Inspection consists of investigation, without the use of special laboratory appliance or procedures, of items to determine conformance with those specified requirements which can be determined by such investigation. Inspection is generally non-destructive and typically includes the use of sight, hearing, smell, touch, taste, simple physical manipulation, and other forms of investigation.

3) Test: A test generally denotes the determination, by technical means, of the properties or elements of items, including functional operation, and involves the application of established scientific principles and procedures. Testing may include the actual operation, adjustment, or re-configuration of items to provide evidence that the designed functions have been accomplished under specific scenarios. The items may be outfitted with instruments and quantitative limits of performance monitored.

14 DPT the Second and Final DR.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 11

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-009

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: COST ESTIMATES

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE: SOW C-3.1.042h

1. Cost Estimates shall include sufficient detail to enable independent Government review.

a. Each Cost Estimate shall be in 1-digit ESWBS format (NAVSEA Publication No. S9040-AA-IDX-

010/SWBS 5D and Publication No. S9040-AA-IDX-020/SWBS 5D) and consistent with Data Item, DI-012

NOAA AGOR Variant Specification Review Report.

b. Each estimate shall include a description of the methodology used and any supporting rationale. The format and basis for the estimate shall be determined by the Contractor.

Hard copy Cost Estimates shall be provided separately at each DR.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 12

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

CONTRACT NO.: N00024-18-R-2201 CLIN: 0001 CONTRACTOR

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-010

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: LIFE CYCLE FUEL ESTIMATE AND LIFE CYCLE

COST SAVINGS STUDY REPORT

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE: SOW C-3.1.042i

1. The Life Cycle Fuel Estimate and Life Cycle Cost Savings Study Report, as a minimum, shall identify selected maintenance and operational features which reduce maintenance and manpower efforts including features for corrosion control related to the following equipment:

a. Air Conditioning (A/C) plants

b. Refrigeration Plants

c. Watermakers

d. Air Compressors

e. Dive Air Compressors and Nitrox Membrane Unit

f. Purifiers

g. Steering Gear

h. VCHT

i. Sewage Treatment Plant

j. Ballast Water Treatment Equipment

k. Incinerator

l. Rescue Boat

m. Diesel Generator Sets

n. Propulsion Motors

o. Steerable Propulsion Thrusters (if provided)

p. Thruster Motor(s)

q. Cranes

r. Overboard Handling Equipment

s. Oceanographic Winches

t. Anchor Windlass

2. The study shall include the life cycle fuel consumption estimate and document the Contractor's analysis identifying potential life cycle cost savings. Supporting calculations and assumptions from related Phase I data and accompanying vendor information shall be presented.

a. The Report shall include a description of the methodology used and supporting analysis of manufacturer alternatives and rationale for selection.

b. The Report shall identify selected maintenance and operational features which reduce maintenance and manpower efforts including features for corrosion control.

c. The Report shall address the Contractor’s selection of equipment, which reduce life cycle costs considering all modes of operation including normal transit, survey, towing, and on-station.

d. The Report shall document the Contractor’s analysis in the selection and integration of Energy Saving

Devices (ESDs) and/or energy saving measures into the ship.

e. Estimates of the energy consumption when the ship is not underway (pierside or at anchor) shall be described.

(Continued on next page)

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 13

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

CONTRACT NO.: N00024-18-R-2201 CLIN: 0001 CONTRACTOR

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-010 (CONTINUED)

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: LIFE CYCLE FUEL ESTIMATE AND LIFE CYCLE

COST SAVINGS STUDY REPORT

BLOCK 4-DATA DESCRIPTION: (Continued)

f. The Report shall address energy saving goals, metrics, and calculations related to fuel consumption savings for each ESD and/or energy saving measures employed versus non-employment of these items on the ship.

BLOCK 5-REVIEW REQ:

14 DPT the Final DR.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 14

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-011

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: NOTIONAL PHASE II SCHEDULE

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE: SOW C-3.1.042j

1. The Notional Phase II Schedule shall present, in chronological sequence, the overall plan and duration for the design, construction, test and trials, Ship Delivery (SD), and Fitting Out Availability (FOA).

2. The Notional Phase II Schedule shall include:

a. Schedule including major design and production milestones with completion of Detail Design Phase, keel laying, landing of major equipment, ship launching, outfitting, test and trials phase, and delivery

b. Identification and ordering of long lead material

c. Engineering and production staffing

d. Module identification and definition

e. The Erection Sequence/Master Erection/Way Schedule identifying systematic planning sequences, starting and completing Contractor construction efforts.

f. Integration of the Propulsion SSV and SES SSV installation and test and trials events.

g. Identify other planned work that is scheduled during the NAV construction period and possible impacts.

3. This deliverable shall be Microsoft Project compatible.

14 DPT each DR.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 15

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-012

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: NOAA AGOR VARIANT SPECIFICATION REVIEW

REPORT

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE: SOW C-3.1.060

1. The NOAA AGOR Variant Specification Review Report shall be based on a comprehensive and fully integrated review. The report shall be organized in the same corresponding order as the System Specification, Attachment J-1, and the Scientific Mission Systems Specification, Attachment J-6, with similar section numbering and headings. The Contractor shall provide recommendations which identify errors, omissions, inconsistencies, or additional suggestions that may be considered beneficial and would require modification of the Specifications to suit.

2. The NOAA AGOR Variant Specification Review Report shall include additional headings and sections inserted as necessary to fully describe the NOAA AGOR Variant design, including implementation of regulatory body requirements. Amplifying detail including specific features and characteristics of the Contractor’s design, descriptions and specifications of materials, fabrication techniques, and characteristics of the recommended changes to the effected ship systems and equipment shall be included. Where the System Specification, Attachment J-1, and the Scientific Mission Systems Specification, Attachment J-6, allows for ranges of parameters and choices of systems, the Contractor shall provide additional specific detail relating to the actual design of the ship.

3. For NAV system requirements, the corresponding verification requirement shall also be reviewed to identify how each requirement will be verified. Additional details on the verification requirement shall also be included for Contractor derived requirements.

4. If references to other documents are included as requirements, each shall specify the document name, document effective date, and document revision, as applicable.

5. The report shall be submitted in the format depicted in the Specification Review Form, Attachment J-4.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 16

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-013

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: HULL LINES DRAWING

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE: SOW C-3.1.070a

1. The Hull Lines Drawing shall include the following:

a. At least 20 stations including the forward and aft perpendiculars.

b. Waterlines at least every 3.3 feet (1 meter).

c. Buttock lines at least every 3.3 feet (1 meter).

d. Locations of knuckle lines.

e. Location of bilge keel trace.

f. Location of decks, buttlines of skegs, rudders, propellers, and thrusters (if provided).

g. A Table of Offsets showing the station, or frame number, waterline, and buttock intersections, and chines, knuckles, shear lines, flats and decks, to at least the nearest 0.08 inches (2 millimeters).

2. The Hull form shall be modelled in FastShip format. If FastShip is not used for hull form design, then an Initial

Graphics Exchange Specification (IGES) file is acceptable.

PMS325Q IDE 2*

*One of the reproducible of each drawing shall be in AutoCAD format. One of the reproducible of each drawing shall be in PDF format.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 17

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-014

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: APPENDAGE AND CONTROL SURFACE

DRAWING

SOW C-3.1.070a

1. The Appendage and Control Surface Drawing shall show sizes and locations of appendages, including bilge keels, thruster openings and, if provided, skegs, shafts, struts, rudders and steerable thrusters.

2. The drawing shall also depict the locations of the Scientific Electronic Systems (SES) hull mounted transducers.

*One of the reproducible of each drawing shall be in AutoCAD format. One of the reproducible of each drawing shall be in PDF format

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 18

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-015

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: SPEED AND POWER REPORT

The Speed and Power Report shall document the results of the speed and power analysis. The report shall include calculations of total ship’s resistance and powering characteristics with and without service life allowance. The report shall include speed-power curves, propulsor characteristics (e.g. diameter, rpm, propulsive coefficient, cavitation data, etc.), explanations of scaling factors, and supporting technical data. The report shall include a description of how the model test data was utilized.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 19

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-016

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: SEAKEEPING PERFORMANCE REPORT

The Seakeeping Performance Report shall document the seakeeping analysis. The report shall include calculations of seakeeping performance for all criteria and operability indices in the full load and arrival conditions using the maximum wave height (for sea state four) and the mean wave height (for sea states five and six) and the most probable modal period characteristic data for each sea state for the Open Ocean North Atlantic as defined in Table

D-1 of STANAG 4194 using the Bretschneider spectrum in long-crested seas with and without a roll stabilization system. The report shall include all calculations used to size the roll stabilization system including a description of the methodology, a description of any models used including model assumptions, and any empirical data used.

Allow 21 days for Government review and comment.

21 DPT each DR.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 20

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-017

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: MANEUVERING PERFORMANCE REPORT

The Maneuvering Performance Report shall include calculated maneuvering characteristics including steady turning diameter, course keeping and directional stability (zigzags) over the full range of ship speeds. In addition, the report shall include the maneuvering analysis of the control surfaces, maneuvering characteristics, and flow characteristics to show compliance with the requirements of the System Specification, Attachment J-1. The report shall describe the geometry of ship appendages and a prediction of maneuvering performance.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 21

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-018

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: DYNAMIC POSITIONING SYSTEM

PERFORMANCE REPORT

The Dynamic Positioning System (DPS) Performance Report shall include calculations and associated polar plots of the DPS performance analysis including position keeping and track lining at the full-load condition with service life allowance and speeds and sea state defined in accordance with the System Specification, Attachment J-1.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 22

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-019

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: BUBBLE SWEEPDOWN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID

DYNAMICS REPORT

The Bubble Sweepdown Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Report shall include the results of the CFD analysis using a free surface potential flow program at eight (8) knots, ten (10) knots and sustained speed at full load condition without service life allowance and at the mid-voyage condition without service life allowance and with streamline initiation points defined in the System Specification, Attachment J-1. The report shall include an analysis of the influence of pitch from +/- four (4) degrees in one (1) degree increments on bubble sweepdown. The report shall also identify the lightest draft at which the flow streamlines are two meters (2m), measured transversely, from the center line of the deep water multibeam survey system sonar transducer receive array.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 23

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-020

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: REGULATORY BODY COMMUNICATIONS AND

CORRESPONDENCE

SOW C-3.1.070b

1. Copies of all incoming and outgoing Regulatory Body Communications and Correspondence, including attachments/enclosures, between the Contractor and Regulatory Bodies and between Subcontractors and the

Regulatory Bodies shall be provided in electronic format, wherever possible.

2. Communications include letters, faxes, memos, electronic mail, and memos of phone conversations.

Attachments/enclosures include drawings, sketches, photographs, slides, viewgraphs, presentations, specifications, manuals, studies, calculations, analyses, requests for change of class, applications for inspection, Contracts, scopes of work, and related communications.

3. Communications shall be assigned serial numbers and shall be indexed by the serial numbers, topic, and applicable dates.

3 days after each incoming or outgoing communications have been issued or received.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 24

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-021

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: REGULATORY BODY COMMUNICATIONS AND

CORRESPONDENCE LOG

SOW C-3.1.070b

A sortable log of all Regulatory Body Correspondences shall be provided in Excel and PDF. At a minimum the log shall include sender, Regulatory Body, serial number, date, subject, and additional remarks.

Allow 5 days for Government review and comment.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 25

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-022

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: AIRBORNE NOISE REPORT

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE: SOW C-3.1.073b

The Airborne Noise Report shall include calculations and analysis of each space for which there is a noise requirement. All noise sources and transmission paths shall be identified. Consideration of source levels in equipment selection to meet airborne noise requirements shall be discussed. Noise control measures to be incorporated including acoustic treatments, equipment mounting, and compartment separation shall be identified.

21 DPT the Second and Final DR.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 26

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-023

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: SONAR SELF-NOISE REPORT

The Sonar Self-Noise Report shall include analysis and supporting calculations to demonstrate that the underwater noise at the SES transducer locations meets the requirements of the Contract. Machinery, propellers, flow noise from the hull and appendages, and bubble sweepdown in way of transducers shall be addressed in the analysis.

Noise control measures to be incorporated including acoustic treatments, equipment and system design specifications, equipment and piping mounting, and machinery-transducer separation shall be identified.

Consideration of source levels in equipment selection to meet sonar self-noise requirements shall be discussed. The report shall incorporate the results of Bubble Sweepdown CFD Analysis and model testing as it pertains to acoustic performance.

Initial submittal 21 DPT the DMA. Subsequent submittals 21 DPT each DR after the DMA.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 27

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-024

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: UNDERWATER RADIATED NOISE REPORT

The Underwater Radiated Noise Report shall provide a prediction of the vessel’s underwater radiated noise signature, and include supporting analysis, assumptions with regard to equipment in operation, and supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with the underwater radiated noise requirement. Consideration of source levels in equipment selection to meet underwater radiated noise requirements shall be discussed. Radiated noise control measures to be incorporated, including acoustic and vibration treatments, equipment mounting, and propeller design criteria, shall be identified.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 28

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-025

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: VIBRATION REPORT

The Vibration Report shall include identification of vibration limits, and analysis and supporting calculations to demonstrate the requirements of the Contract are met. The report shall address natural frequencies and associated levels of the hull girders, mast, above deck structures, and superstructure, and their relationship to shaft and blade rate forces and other impulse forces. Consideration of source levels in equipment selection to meet vibration requirements shall be discussed. Vibration treatments to be used including machinery resilient mounts, piping hangers, flexible hoses, and structural damping shall be identified.

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 29

NOAA AGOR VARIANT

BLOCK 1-DATA ITEM NO.: DI-026

BLOCK 2-DATA ITEM TITLE: INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY, AND

HEALTH PLAN

BLOCK 3-REFERENCE SOW C-3.1.077

1. The Integrated Environmental, Safety, and Health (IESH) Plan shall address:

a. Strategy for meeting IESH requirements for the construction of the ship to include identifying, evaluating, eliminating, reducing, or controlling potential IESH hazards prior to system production and construction.

b. Strategy, organization, controls, and schedule to achieve compliance with all applicable international, federal, state, and local environmental protection, system safety, and occupational health specifications and regulatory requirements.

c. Strategy for implementation of the ABS Inventory of Hazardous Materials Notation.

d. Strategy for identification and implementation of Human Engineering requirements in accordance with

ASTM F1166.

e. Strategy for the identification and submittal of all Safety Data Sheets for any Prohibited or Controlled substances identified for use in construction, test and operation, and during required maintenance.

f. Planned internal organization and the process for establishing and conducting a Phase II IESH Working

Group with the Government to ensure IESH risks identified but not eliminated are included in the

Contractor’s overall risk management plan.

BLOCK 5-REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:

PREPARED AND

APPROVED BY: DONNA E. HUDSON, PMS325 DATA MANAGER DATE: TBD

PAGE: 30