Questions_posted_in_FBO_on_10-29-15.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- C-26 CLS RFP
- Solicitation number
- N00019-15-R-0089
About this file
Industry questions and the Government's responses to the questions.
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 67 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions N00019-15-R-0089 C-26 Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) RFP Questions and Answers
| # | Document | Question from Industry | Answers |
| 1 | Past Performance Questionnaire | Would the Government consider utilizing PPQs (Past Performance Questionnaires) submitted for the UC-35 program also for the C-26 program? | Yes, you may use the same past performance questionnaires for both UC-35 and C-26 if: |
1. You are using the same companies/contracts for past performance, and
2. You notify the Contract Specialist (Alexander.Cody@navy.mil) with the names of the companies completing the PPQ and the applicable solicitation numbers.
| 2 | RFP Section B & Pricing Matrix | There are no Flight Hour and Material CLINS in Section B or the Pricing Matrix like there are on the UC-35. Was that an oversight or does the Government want Industry to price that in another CLIN? | The requirement is as contained in the solicitation; the absence of a Flight Hour and Material CLIN was not an oversight. See revised PWS, sections 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10. |
| 3 | Scope | Has a contractor performed similar work to this for the government in the past? If available, please provide the incumbent contract number. If you are unable to provide a contract number, is it safe to assume this is a new requirement for the government? | As stated in the FBO notice posted on Sep 8, 2015, this requirements is a follow-on procurement to contract N00019-11-D-0002. |
| 4 | Clause 5252.245-9520 | In the UC-35 solicitation, the Government removed Clause 5252.245-9520 and directed Offerors to PWS paragraph 3.3. Would you also consider removing it from the subject solicitation? | Yes. The clause is removed. See Amendment 1. (*TBD*) |
| 5 | Prop Schedule | The prop schedule in Att 1H Depot Schedule doesn't match the number of events in the associated CLINs. Which is correct? | The offerors shall propose in accordance with Section B |
| 6 | Tech Library | We got a call from our subcontractor inquiring if there was any additional usage data other than the March 1, 2015-May 31, 2015? We had a years' worth on the UC-35 effort. | Yes. Additional data usage has been added under the tech library. |
| 7 | RFP | Considering the extension of the UC-35 proposal until October 20, 2015, will the government give consideration to extending the C-26 solicitation N00019-15-R-0089 as this extension of the UC-35 impacts proposal prepation for C-26, N00019-15-R-0089. | See posted amendments for any extensions. |
| 8 | We understand any TBO, Life Limited, or common wear items would not be included in bidders quote as these issues will be resolved via Over and Above work order requests. Will the Government confirm this assumption? | The Government revised PWS to clarify. See revised PWS sections 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10. | |
| 9 | Would the Government consider providing a minimal component replacement/repair list that all Offerors must include in proposed pricing for CLIN 0X08? | The government will not provide a minimal component replacement/repair list. Offerors should propose all items needed to complete tasking described in the PWS. | |
| 10 | Would the Government consider providing a requirement of minimal component replacement/repair list that all Offerors must include in proposed pricing for CLIN 0X09? | The government will not provide a minimal component replacement/repair list. Offerors should propose all items needed to complete tasking described in the PWS. | |
| 11 | Will the Government consider incorporating additional CLIN to support Over and Above maintenance not restricted to Depot activities? | The Government will not incorporate any additional CLINs. See revised PWS, section 10. | |
| 12 | As Jeppesen subscription is specific to the FMC installed on the aircraft. Will the Government please provide additional information on the FMC Make/Model that is installed on the aircraft in order to assist offerors in obtaining quotes from the directed vendor? | Current FMC is Rockwell Collins FMC-3000 V3.1.1 (p/n 822-0883-036). However, the Government is in the process of developing this system to the V4.2. | |
| 13 | With the exception of Patuxent River Site, the mission for the Navy Utility Lift C-26 Fleet is well defined. Will Government provide mission overview for the new BSO located at Patuxent River as differing mission profiles and activities (test vs transport) could adversely affect proposed staffing and BSO build up for CLINs 0003 and 0X06 as well as impact contractor furnished SE? | The Government revised PWS to add Patuxent River Site overview. See revised PWS section 1. | |
| 14 | CBA | Is there a Collective Bargaining Agreement applicable to the sites for the C-26 RFP? | There are no known CBAs applicable to the C-26 sites. |
| 15 | Parts Usage | It would appear the usage lists on fbo.gov for the subject solicitation are from the UC-35 portion of the Navy Light Lift current contract as they contain Cessna and Pratt & Whitney part numbers. Please see attached. Would it be possible to get only C-26 usage data? | The Government revised the list as requested and is posted on fbo.gov. |
| 16 | PWS section 7 | Is the Government requesting a quote only for teardown, buildup, and consumables used in the teardown and buildup [in section 7]? | Yes. PWS section 7 is requesting a quote for teardown, buildup, and consumables used in teardown and buildup. |
| 17 | Would the Navy consider have a separate CLIN for the various disciplines, aircraft Depot, Engine/Prop and Engineering Services as referenced in CLIN 11? Please see the below rational; |
Question for CLIN 11 RFP statement - Item 0X11 – Over and Above Labor. The contractor shall perform Over and Above Labor in accordance with section 10.0 of the PWS.
% Utilization 52% Depot Aircraft Rate 3% Propeller Depot Rate 25% Engines
| 20% Engineering Services | The Government requirement is as stated in the RFP. No changes to CLIN 0X11 are anticipated. |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 28 | |
| 29 | |
| 30 | |
| 31 | |
| 32 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 35 | |
| 36 | |
| 37 | |
| 38 | |
| 39 | |
| 40 | |
| 41 | |
| 42 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .