Attachment 2 - LRAFB MACC HTRO Evaluation Package Rev1.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Little Rock Air Force Base Industry Day
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
About this file
This file is an evaluation package spreadsheet for the Little Rock Air Force Base (LRAFB) Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) solicitation. The document outlines the Two-Phase Highest Technically Rated Offeror with Fair and Reasonable Price (HTRO-RFP) evaluation methodology that the 19th Contracting Squadron plans to utilize for award. The MACC will support construction services at LRAFB as a prime contractor vehicle with an expected performance period of one 3-year base period followed by two 2-year option periods and a possible 6-month extension. The evaluation package provides the framework and criteria for assessing offeror proposals during the technical and pricing evaluation phases, establishing the basis for contractor selection under the HTRO methodology where the Government will award to the highest-rated technically compliant offer at a fair and reasonable price rather than using lowest-price evaluation.
This evaluation attachment was prepared in advance of the Hybrid Virtual Industry Day held on August 26, 2026, hosted by LRAFB 19th Contracting Squadron, Air Force Installation Contracting Center (AFICC), and APEX Accelerator at Jacksonville Community Center and via Microsoft Teams. The package is intended to provide prospective contractors information regarding evaluation expectations and methodology before the formal RFP is issued. Interested parties should note that the Industry Day itself was informational only and did not constitute a solicitation or commitment to award; all costs for participation were to be borne solely by industry participants.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Self-Scoring Rating
| HTRO Self-Scoring Matrix – Little Rock AFB MACC | |||||
| For official use in source selection. Scores must be supported by specific proposal narrative citations. | |||||
| Factor Name | Maximum Points | Adjectival Rating | Score Assigned | Percentage of Maximum (%) | Evaluator Notes |
| Category 1: Relavant Construction Experience | 10,900 | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| Category 2: Design Experience | 2,080 | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| Category 3: Past Performance | 1,000 | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| Category 4: Staffing | 1,000 | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| Category 5: Geographic Expertise | 50 | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| Category 6: Estimating Capability | 2,000 | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| SUMMARY TOTALS | 17,030 | Unacceptable | 0 | 0.0% | Overall adjectival rating computed from total score percentage vs. 17,030-point maximum. |
| SCORING LEGEND | |||||
| Adjectival Rating | Score Range | Description / Source Selection Implication | |||
| Outstanding | 90–100% of maximum | Proposal exceeds all stated requirements; strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. | |||
| Good | 75–89% of maximum | Proposal meets all requirements; strengths outweigh weaknesses. | |||
| Acceptable | 60–74% of maximum | Proposal meets minimum requirements; weaknesses do not outweigh strengths. | |||
| Marginal | 40–59% of maximum | Proposal fails to meet some requirements; significant risks present. | |||
| Unacceptable | Below 40% of maximum | Proposal fails to meet requirements; cannot be corrected without a major revision. | |||
| FOUO – Source Selection Sensitive – Little Rock AFB MACC Aug 2026 |
Weighted Scoring
| HTRO Weighted Scoring Variant – Little Rock AFB MACC | ||||||||
| Normalized scoring allows cross-offeror comparison by factor weight. Use alongside raw scores. | ||||||||
| Factor | Max Points | Weight % | ||||||
| (Rounded 2nd Decimal) | Raw Score (0–Max) | Normalized Score (%) | Weighted Score (%) | Notes | ||||
| Category 1: Relavant Construction Experience | 10,900 | 64.01% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00% | |||
| Category 2: Design Experience | 2,080 | 12.21% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00% | |||
| Category 3: Past Performance | 1,000 | 5.87% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00% | |||
| Category 4: Staffing | 1,000 | 5.87% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00% | |||
| Category 5: Geographic Expertise | 50 | 0.29% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00% | |||
| Category 6: Estimating Capability | 2,000 | 11.74% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00% | |||
| SUMMARY TOTALS | 17,030 | 100% | 0 | Total Weighted Score | 0.00% | 0.0 | ||
| Equivalent Points (Weighted Score × 17,030): | 0.0 | |||||||
| ADJECTIVAL RATING REFERENCE — WEIGHTED SCORING | ||||||||
| Adjectival Rating | Weighted Score Threshold | Points Equivalent | Source Selection Implication | |||||
| Outstanding | ≥90% | ≥15,327 pts | Exceeds requirements across all factors; proposal demonstrates superior capability. | |||||
| Good | 75–89% | 12,772–15,326 pts | Meets all requirements; strengths outweigh weaknesses in key factors. | |||||
| Acceptable | 60–74% | 10,218–12,771 pts | Meets minimum requirements; manageable risk with no fatal weaknesses. | |||||
| Marginal | 40–59% | 6,812–10,217 pts | Fails to meet some requirements; significant weaknesses requiring major revision. | |||||
| Unacceptable | <40% | <6,812 pts | Fails requirements; cannot be corrected without complete revision. | |||||
| FOUO – Source Selection Sensitive – Little Rock AFB MACC Aug 2026 |
Weighted Score by Factor Weighted Score (%) Category 1: Relavant Construction Experience Category 2: Design Experience Category 3: Past Performance Category 4: Staffing 0 0 0 0 Weighted Score (%)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .