Attachment 2 - LRAFB MACC HTRO Evaluation Package.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Little Rock Air Force Base Industry Day
- Solicitation number
- Not on record
About this file
This file is a source selection evaluation matrix template for the Little Rock Air Force Base (LRAFB) Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) using the Two-Phase Highest Technically Rated Offeror with Fair and Reasonable Price (HTRO-RFP) methodology. The evaluation package contains two scoring variants: a self-scoring rating matrix and a weighted scoring matrix, both designed to assess contractor proposals across five evaluation factors totaling 15,080 maximum points.
The evaluation criteria are weighted as follows: Relevant Construction Experience (10,900 points, 72.28% weight), Design Experience (2,080 points, 13.79% weight), Past Performance (1,000 points, 6.63% weight), Staffing (1,000 points, 6.63% weight), and Geographic Expertise (100 points, 0.66% weight). Proposals receive adjectival ratings based on normalized scores, with Outstanding (90-100%), Good (75-89%), Acceptable (60-74%), Marginal (40-59%), and Unacceptable (below 40%) categories. The weighted scoring converts raw scores into normalized percentages and calculates equivalent points against the 15,080-point maximum, with thresholds identifying Outstanding proposals at 13,572 equivalent points and Acceptable proposals at 9,048-11,309 equivalent points. This evaluation template is intended for use during the source selection process for the MACC IDIQ solicitation, which includes a 3-year base period with two 2-year option periods and a possible 6-month extension.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Self-Scoring Rating
| HTRO Self-Scoring Matrix – Little Rock AFB MACC | |||||
| For official use in source selection. Scores must be supported by specific proposal narrative citations. | |||||
| Factor Name | Maximum Points | Adjectival Rating | Score Assigned | Percentage of Maximum (%) | Evaluator Notes |
| Section 1: Relavant Construction Experience | 10,900 | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| Section 2: Design Experience | 2,080 | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| Section 3: Past Performance | 1,000 | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| Section 4: Staffing | 1,000 | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| Section 5: Geographic Expertise | 100 | 0 | 0.0% | ||
| SUMMARY TOTALS | 15,080 | Unacceptable | 0 | 0.0% | Overall adjectival rating computed from total score percentage vs. 15,080-point maximum. |
| SCORING LEGEND | |||||
| Adjectival Rating | Score Range | Description / Source Selection Implication | |||
| Outstanding | 90–100% of maximum | Proposal exceeds all stated requirements; strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. | |||
| Good | 75–89% of maximum | Proposal meets all requirements; strengths outweigh weaknesses. | |||
| Acceptable | 60–74% of maximum | Proposal meets minimum requirements; weaknesses do not outweigh strengths. | |||
| Marginal | 40–59% of maximum | Proposal fails to meet some requirements; significant risks present. | |||
| Unacceptable | Below 40% of maximum | Proposal fails to meet requirements; cannot be corrected without a major revision. | |||
| FOUO – Source Selection Sensitive – Little Rock AFB MACC Aug 2026 |
Weighted Scoring
| HTRO Weighted Scoring Variant – Little Rock AFB MACC | ||||||||
| Normalized scoring allows cross-offeror comparison by factor weight. Use alongside raw scores. | ||||||||
| Factor | Max Points | Weight % | ||||||
| (Rounded 2nd Decimal) | Raw Score (0–Max) | Normalized Score (%) | Weighted Score (%) | Notes | ||||
| Section 1: Relavant Construction Experience | 10,900 | 72.28% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00% | |||
| Section 2: Design Experience | 2,080 | 13.79% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00% | |||
| Section 3: Past Performance | 1,000 | 6.63% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00% | |||
| Section 4: Staffing | 1,000 | 6.63% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00% | |||
| Section 5: Geographic Expertise | 100 | 0.66% | 0 | 0.0% | 0.00% | |||
| SUMMARY TOTALS | 15,080 | 100% | 0 | Total Weighted Score | 0.00% | 0.0 | ||
| Equivalent Points (Weighted Score × 15,080): | 0.0 | |||||||
| ADJECTIVAL RATING REFERENCE — WEIGHTED SCORING | ||||||||
| Adjectival Rating | Weighted Score Threshold | Points Equivalent | Source Selection Implication | |||||
| Outstanding | ≥90% | ≥13,572 pts | Exceeds requirements across all factors; proposal demonstrates superior capability. | |||||
| Good | 75–89% | 11,310–13,571 pts | Meets all requirements; strengths outweigh weaknesses in key factors. | |||||
| Acceptable | 60–74% | 9,048–11,309 pts | Meets minimum requirements; manageable risk with no fatal weaknesses. | |||||
| Marginal | 40–59% | 6,032–9,047 pts | Fails to meet some requirements; significant weaknesses requiring major revision. | |||||
| Unacceptable | <40% | <6,031 pts | Fails requirements; cannot be corrected without complete revision. | |||||
| FOUO – Source Selection Sensitive – Little Rock AFB MACC Aug 2026 |
Weighted Score by Factor Weighted Score (%) Section 1: Relavant Construction Experience Section 2: Design Experience Section 3: Past Performance Section 4: Staffing 0 0 0 0 Weighted Score (%)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .