J23 Past Performance Survey.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
Competitive 8(a) SATOC JOC (DRAFT RFP)
Solicitation number
W9124P
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Survey that will be used to evaluate and award federal contracts. The survey asks for candid responses on the contractor's past performance, including compliance with requirements, project management, timeliness, customer satisfaction, and other relevant information. The respondents are asked to provide a rating (Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence) and a rationale for each performance area. The survey also requests information on any other relevant past efforts by the contractor. The completed survey is to be returned to the listed points of contact for the acquisition, which is a Competitive 8(a) SATOC JOC (Job Order Contract) for the U.S. Army Garrison-Redstone to provide a full range of new construction, alterations, maintenance, repair, sustainment, restoration, and modernization services. This is a 100% 8(a) small business set-aside acquisition.

View the file

Other files

Show all 25

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Past Performance Survey

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions, or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

· Substantial Confidence

· Satisfactory Confidence

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

D. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

· Limited Confidence

· No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

E. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

F. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

G. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return the completed Questionnaire to the points of contact(s) for this acquisition, listed below, within the stated timeframe.

Army Contracting Command – Redstone

CCAM-CAD-A

Building 5303 Martin Road Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898

Lead Contract Specialist:

Cledis Henry Email: cledis.henry.civ@army.mil

Contract Specialist:

Eustlene Bailey Email: eustlene.e.bailey.civ@army.mil

Procuring Contracting Officer Crystal Blake E-mail: crystal.blake3.civ@army.mil

Reference RFP# W9124P-24-R-0004. Thank you for your assistance.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .