J.4 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 15 KB Posted

Attached to
Request for Proposal_NOAA C-130J Aircraft Production
Solicitation number
1305M224RNMAN0230
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for reference contract number 1305M224RNMAN0230. It requests evaluation of a contractor's quality of service, schedule, and management on a past contract. Respondents are asked to rate performance in these categories as exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory. The questionnaire must be completed and sent to contracting specialists at NOAA by January 17, 2024.

The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number 1305M224RNMAN0230 for the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration regarding the production of NOAA C-130J aircraft. No further details are provided on required products or services, response dates, or other salient information.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFP 1305M224RNMAN0230_C-130J Aircraft Production_Amendment 0007.pdf PDF
SF30_ Amendment 0007.pdf PDF
Attachment J.2 Pricing Schedule_Amendment 0006 (2).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment J.1.1 Appendix A - Specification - Amendment 0006.pdf PDF
SF30_ Amendment 0006.pdf PDF
Amendment 0005_SF30.pdf PDF
Attachment J.6 - Accounting System Questionaire.pdf PDF
Attachment J.1 Statement of Work - Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
RFP 1305M224RNMAN0230_C-130J Aircraft Production_Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
Attachment J.1.1 Appendix A - Specification - Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
Attachment J.2 Pricing Schedule_Amendment 0005.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment J.4 Past Performance Questionnaire_Amendment 0005.pdf PDF
SF30 Amendment 0004.pdf PDF
J.1.1 Appendix A - Specification - Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
J.1 Statement of Work - Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
RFP 1305M224RNMAN0230_C-130J Aircraft Production_Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
RFP 1305M224RNMAN0230_C-130J Aircraft Production_Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
RFP 1305M224RNMAN0230_C-130J Aircraft Production.pdf PDF
J.1 SOW_ Final.docx DOCX document
J.2 Pricing Schedule_Final.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J.3 Past Performance Information Form.docx DOCX document
SOW Appendix A Specification_FINAL.docx DOCX document
J.5 Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition_Redacted.pdf PDF
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation #: 1305M224RNMAN0230 Attachment J.4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________

(Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)

CONTRACTOR EVALUATED: ________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to the following people no later than January 17, 2024 at 2PM, ET:

Senior Contract Specialist, Jennifer Peters at Jennifer.Peters@noaa.gov Contract Specialist, Austin Salmon, austin.salmon@noaa.gov

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: ___________________________ Rater’s Signature: ________________________ Date: ____________________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Jennifer Peters at Jennifer.Peters@noaa.gov by no later than January 17, 2024 at 2PM, ET

Page of Source Selection Information

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .