Attachment J.4 Past Performance Questionnaire_Amendment 0005.pdf
PDF 159 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 1305M224RNMAN0230
About this file
This document is the Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation #1305M224RNMAN0230, which is a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for the procurement of up to four (4) fully modified C-130J aircraft to support NOAA's research and scientific programs.
The questionnaire requests an assessment of the contractor's past performance in three key areas: quality of service, schedule, and management. Evaluators are asked to provide an adjectival rating (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory) and comments for each area. Completed questionnaires must be submitted by May 31, 2024 at 2PM ET to the specified NOAA contracting personnel. The RFP includes the production of two (2) 'green' C-130J aircraft, an analysis of alternatives for a vertically scanning doppler radar, and design of aircraft modifications. It also contains several optional Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) for additional aircraft, modifications, radar design, spare parts, services, and training.
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation #: 1305M224RNMAN0230 Attachment J.4
Source Selection Information
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________
(Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)
CONTRACTOR EVALUATED: ________________________
Send Completed Questionnaire to the following people no later than May 31, 2024 at 2PM, ET:
Senior Contract Specialist, Jennifer Peters at Jennifer.Peters@noaa.gov Contract Specialist, Austin Salmon, austin.salmon@noaa.gov
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).
(Check the appropriate rating box.)
RATING ADJECTIVAL
RATING
DEFINITION
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Comments:
mailto:Jennifer.Peters@noaa.gov mailto:austin.salmon@noaa.gov
2. SCHEDULE
Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).
Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished
Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed
3. MANAGEMENT
Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.
Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished
Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:
Rater’s Name: ___________________________
Rater’s Signature: ________________________
Date: ____________________________________
Send Completed Questionnaire to Senior Contract Specialist, Jennifer Peters at Jennifer.Peters@noaa.gov and
Contract Specialist, Austin Salmon, austin.salmon@noaa.gov no later than May 31, 2024 at 2PM, ET mailto:Jennifer.Peters@noaa.gov mailto:austin.salmon@noaa.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .