I.B.08 Attachment 2 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.pdf
PDF 226 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Facilities Reduction Program (FRP) West Region IV Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912DY-20-R-0097
About this file
This document outlines a Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) for demolition and abatement services. The contractor must submit 90% of reports on time with less than 10% requiring revisions and complete 90% of mobilization tasks within the scheduled timeframe. Performance will be evaluated at each milestone and delivery. A Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) rating of exceptional requires 100% on-time reporting with zero revisions and completion of all milestones on schedule, while an unsatisfactory rating results from less than 80% on-time reporting or more than 20% requiring multiple revisions, or less than 90% of mobilization tasks on schedule. Failure to meet standards may result in work stoppages, withdrawn work, task order or contract termination.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation from the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Engineering Support Center Huntsville for demolition and abatement services to remove, demolish, deconstruct facilities along with associated contaminant abatement. Services include facility reduction, tree and vegetation removal, utility and electrical disconnections and rerouting, abatement of contaminants like lead, asbestos and chemicals, debris transportation and disposal, and site restoration.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 2 – Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan
1. Performance Requirements Summary
The table on the following page lists the PWS requirements/deliverables that the Government shall monitor. The absence of any contract requirement from the PRS/QASP must not detract from its enforceability nor limit the rights or remedies of the Government under any other provision of the contract, including the clauses entitled “Inspection of Services” and “Default.” The table defines the standard for each listed PWS service, cites the respective specification, provides the method of surveillance, and describes disincentives for not meeting acceptable standards.
2. Government Quality Assurance
The Contracting Officer (CO) has overall responsibility for overseeing the Contractor’s performance. The CO shall monitor day-to-day contract compliance and administration. The
COR shall assist the CO with their duties and is responsible of technical administration of the project. The COR also assures proper Government surveillance of the Contractor’s performance and shall monitor, record, and report on the technical performance of the Contractor on a day-today basis. The COR, along with USACE subject matter experts, shall assure the Contractor is meeting contract PWS standards, as well as all Federal, state, and local regulatory requirements.
The Government intends to use the following methods to monitor standards:
Inspection and review of all required documents and submittals.
Periodic inspection of work processes or output.
100% inspection at the completion of key work segments and deliverables.
Customer feedback.
3. Performance Evaluation
The Government shall evaluate Contractor performance to determine if its performance meets the requirements of the contract. The COR shall evaluate and report Contractor performance to the
Contracting Officer at each milestone and delivery per the project schedule. Contractor shall submit progress inspection reports as required. When the performance requirement is not met, the
Contracting Officer shall issue a contract discrepancy report (CDR) to the Contractor. The
Contractor must respond to the CDR and return it to the contracting officer within five (5) calendar days of receipt. Failure to meet acceptable performance standards may result in one or all of the following actions:
Temporary work stoppage awaiting corrective action.
Withdrawal of work
Terminate the task order.
Terminate the MATOC (basic) contract.
Required Service Paragraph
Number
Standard Method of
Surveillance
Incentive/Disincentive
Preparation and submittal of required project documents, forms, permit requests, and notifications.
6.5 Contractor shall
submit 90% of reports on time, with less than
10% requiring more than one revision.
100% inspection
CPARS Rating:
Exceptional = 100% of reports on time requiring zero revisions.
Unsatisfactory = less than 80% of reports on time and/or more that
20% requiring more than two revisions.
Submittals that do not meet acceptable performance standards may be rejected in whole or in part.
Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination
Mobilization/demobil ization and work site setup, to include protection of personnel, xxx, land, and water resources.
6.5.3 Accomplish 90%
of mobilization/de mobilization tasks within timeframe allotted in project schedule
Periodic progress inspection
CPARS Rating:
Exceptional = 100% of project milestones completed by
Contractor within project milestone schedule.
Unsatisfactory = less than <80% of project milestones completed by Contractor within project milestone schedule.
Failure to perform work according to project execution schedule could result in assessment of liquidated damages for schedule delays, and may result in the issuance of show cause and/or possible contract termination.
Removal, capping, rerouting of all affected utilities
6.5.5 Meets site-
specific utility owner standard
Periodic progress inspection
Failure to correctly perform this service may disrupt installation utility services and negatively impact operations. Such an incident could result in assessment of liquidated damages for outages, and may result in the issuance of show cause and/or possible contract termination.
Abatement of
ACM/ORM
6.5.6, 6.5.7 No exceptions to reported
ACM/ORM
removal
100% inspection
Failure to perform this service in compliance with Federal, State, and local environmental, health, and safety regulations, will result in a less than satisfactory CPARS rating and/or a stop work order. Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination for cause.
Demolition performed in accordance with accepted work plan
6.5.9 100% work required by PWS
100% inspection
Failure to perform this service in compliance with Federal, State, and local environmental, health, and safety regulations, will result in a less than satisfactory CPARS rating and/or a stop work order. Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination for cause.
Debris disposal, diversion, and recycling
6.5.10 Meets material
handling and disposal requirements based on waste stream characterization
Periodic progress inspection
Failure to perform this service in compliance with Federal, State, and local environmental, health, and safety regulations, will result in a less than satisfactory CPARS rating and/or a stop work order. Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination for cause.
Site Restoration 6.5.11 Meets requirements of
PWS and
SWPPP.
100% inspection
Failure to perform this service in compliance with Federal, State, and local environmental, health, and safety regulations, will result in a less than satisfactory CPARS rating and/or a stop work order. Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination for cause.
Recurring
Deliverables/Submitt als
(daily/weekly/monthl y)
6.5.12 Contractor shall
submit 90% of reports on time, with less than
10% requiring more than one revision.
100% inspection
CPARS Rating:
Exceptional = 100% of reports on time requiring zero revisions.
Unsatisfactory = less than 80% of reports on time and/or more that
20% requiring more than two revisions.
Submittals that do not meet acceptable performance standards may be rejected in whole or in part.
Contractor must resolve and correct deficiencies in reasonable time or will be subject to issuance of show cause and possible termination
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .