7_-_Q_&_As_84_-_87.docx
DOCX document 18 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fixed and Rotary Wing Air Transportation Services in the PACOM AOR, Republic of the Philippines
- Solicitation number
- HTC711-18-R-R004
About this file
Questions and Answers - 7
View the file
Other files
Show all 28
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation HTC711-18-R-R004
QUESTIONS 84 - 87
| QUESTION NO. |
| REFERENCE |
| QUESTION |
| RESPONSE |
| 84 |
| RFP Section L3, Page 47, Part III Factor 2 Technical (a) I Subfactor 1 Management Approach |
| Does the 6 page limit apply to the entire reply to the PWS? Or just a subsection? Please clarify. |
| The page limit of 6 pages apply only to Subfactor 1 – Management & Operational Approach. However, the Government has amended the page limitation in the RFP, to 8 pages for this Subfactor. |
| 85 |
| PWS Section Task Area 2, Page 15, Para 1.3.5.4. |
| Does the PWS require 2 paramedics for each RW aircraft (for a total of 4) plus the 2 FW paramdics? Or do we supply 2 for FW and 2 total for RW? |
| 2 paramedics for FW and 2 paramedics for each RW; a total of 6 paramedics. |
| 86 |
| PWS Section 1.1., Page 4, Para 1.2.1.8. |
| Would PACOM allow a change of this paragraph to: "The contractor shall ensure that all contractor personnel who work under this contract either in and out process through CRC Fort Bliss, TX, Camp Pendleton, CA or go through contractor provided screening equivalent to the requirements of CRC Fort Bliss (if approved by the Contracting Officer). " |
| The Government is not amenable to revision of this paragraph. The CRC in Fort Bliss, TX is the only location authorized for contractor deployers to satisfy requirements. |
| 87 |
| RFP Section L, Page 52, (A) Technical Subfactor 3 – Positioning & Depositioning Plan i. The Offeror’s proposal includes a Positioning Plan outlining its approach to have all proposed personnel, equipment and aircraft positioned and operational, 30 days from date of award but no later than 60 days from date of award. |
| If a respondent to the RFP elects to position utilizing up to 60 days will there be a lower score applied during the review as opposed to a mobilization plan showing a 30 day startup? |
| There will not be a penalty in scoring for positioning 60 days vs 30 days. |
File details come from the government source that posted it.