0018-IDIQ-OwnerReferEvalForm.pdf

1 GS-03P-13-CD-D-0018

7/23/13

SOLICITATION NO.: GS-03P-13-CD-D-0018

Indefinite Delivery / Indefinite Quantity Multiple Award Large Project Construction Term Contract

For Western Virginia and West Virginia

Notes:

It is the contractors responsibility to ensure that their references have completed the Owner Reference / Evaluation and to ensure that the form is submitted to GSA by the proposal due date.

Reference Evaluations must be submitted in a sealed envelope with the technical proposal.

SUBMIT PROPOSALS TO: GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

ACQUISITION MANAGEMENT DIVISION-WV & VA (3PQCV)

ATTN: CELESTE W. DOW

STRAWBRIDGE BUILDING, 9TH FLR

20 N. 8TH STREET

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107-3191

GSA will not attempt to locate references that are not submitted by the owner.

GSA may contact any/all references submitted by the offeror. An owner is defined as a reference that is submitted by a building owner/developer or anyone who was hired by the building owner/developer to represent them during a project such as a construction manager or architect/engineering firm.

2 GS-03P-13-CD-D-0018

Owner Reference / Evaluation for IDIQ Multiple Award Large Project

Construction Term Contract(s) Solicitation No.: GS-03P-13-CD-D-0018

Evaluation to be conducted for: (Contractor Name):

PROJECT TITLE & DESCRIPTION:

PROJECT LOCATION:

PROJECT DOLLAR VALUE:

Evaluator Name and Title:

Organization:_________________________________________________________________

Contact Info:

Telephone: __________________________________________________________________

Email: ______________________________________________________________________

Interview Questions for Company Level Past Performance

a. Timeliness of performance

b. Cost Control

c. Quality product

d. Project Management

A. Timeliness of Performance –

1. Did the contractor complete the project on schedule?

_____ Contractor completed project prior to approved scheduled completion date.

_____ Contractor completed project by original scheduled completion date.

_____ Contractor failed to meet project completion date.

Comments:

3 GS-03P-13-CD-D-0018

2. To what extent did the contractor adhere to contract delivery schedules at significant milestones?

____ Contractor exceeded scheduled milestone requirements.

____ Contractor typically delivered as scheduled but occasionally missed milestone dates.

____ Contractor rarely met scheduled milestone requirements.

Comments:

3. How responsive was the contractor in addressing unforeseen/unanticipated conditions?

____ Contractor consistently exercised a pro-active approach.

____ Contractor demonstrated some initiative in exercising a pro-active approach.

____ Contractor never demonstrated a pro-active approach.

Comments:

B. Cost Control –

1. Did the contractor submit reasonably priced change proposals?

____ Contractor consistently submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.

____ Contractor typically submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.

____ Contractor submitted fair and reasonably priced proposals some of the time.

____ Contractor rarely submitted fair and reasonably priced change proposals.

Comments:

2. How responsive was contractor in submitting proposals for owner initiated changes?

____ Contractor was extremely responsive in expediting proposal submissions.

____ Contractor was generally responsive in expediting proposal submissions ____ Contractor was sometimes responsive in timely submissions of change

Proposals.

____ Contractor was nonresponsive in timely submissions of change proposals.

4 GS-03P-13-CD-D-0018

Comments:

3. How reasonable were contractor initiated changes?

____ Contractor initiated changes were extremely reasonable.

____ Contractor initiated changes were typically reasonable.

____ Contractor initiated changes were reasonable some of the time.

____ Contractor initiated changes were not reasonable.

Comments:

C. Quality product

1. How well has the contractor complied with contract requirements?

____ Contractor exceeded contract requirements.

____ Contractor met the minimum requirements.

____ Contractor did not meet the minimum requirements.

Comments:

2. Did they conform to standards of good workmanship?

____ Contractor exceeded standards of good workmanship.

____ Contractor met the standards of good workmanship.

____ Contractor did not meet standards of good workmanship.

Comments:

3. Does the contractor have the ability to adapt to changing requirements while maintaining a desired level of quality?

____ Contractor was extremely effective in adapting to changing requirements.

____ Contractor was effective in adapting to changing requirements.

____ Contractor was ineffective in adapting to changing requirements.

5 GS-03P-13-CD-D-0018

Comments:

D. Project Management

1. How well did the contractor work with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors?

____ Contractor worked extremely well with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors) ____ Contractor was generally cooperative with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors.

____ Contractor did not work well with the owner and the owner’s technical advisors.

Comments:

2. Was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of project related third party entities (i.e. tenants)?

____ Contractor was very cooperative.

____ Contractor was generally cooperative.

____ Contractor was not cooperative.

Comments:

3. Did the contractor maintain a consistent on site management/project team throughout the duration of the project?

____ No adjustments were made: contractor maintained the same team throughout the duration of the project.

____ Minor adjustments to the support team were made during the project.

____ Significant changes to the key personnel of the project team were made during the project.

____ Contractor maintained no consistency in key personnel during the project.

Comments: