Atch_11_(L-7),_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(PPQ).pdf

(When Completed)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Source Selection Sensitive Information See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

FA9301-17-R-0008 PAINTING AND COATINGS ID/IQ

SOLICITATION ATTACHMENT L-7

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 1 of 6

16 Jun 2017

MEMORANDUM FOR DISTRIBUTION

FROM: AFTC/PZIOC

5 South Wolfe Avenue

Building 2800

Edwards AFB, CA 93524

SUBJECT: Painting and Coatings ID/IQ Solicitation No. FA9301-17-R-0008, Past Performance Questionnaire

(PPQ)

1. You have been identified as a point of contact for a past performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm would like to be considered for the Painting and Coating Services Indefinite

Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (ID/IQ) construction contract at Edwards AFB, CA.

2. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors’ past performance on contracts or other work efforts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror’s performance on those contracts or work efforts.

3. Areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than five calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of evaluations.

4. Your completed questionnaire will become part of the official Source Selection record. Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

5. To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to the Contract Specialist at guillermo.martinez.2@us.af.mil and the Contracting

Officer at vanessa.russell-reed@us.af.mil.

//signed//

VANESSA RUSSELL-REED

Procuring Contracting Officer

Attachment:

Past Performance Questionnaire mailto:ashley.priestley@us.af.mil mailto:guillermo.martinez.2@us.af.mil mailto:vanessa.russell-reed@us.af.mil.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 2 of 6

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

GENERAL INFORMATION (to be filled out by Offeror)

Contractor’s Name:

Address:

Point of Contact:

Phone Number:

Email:

Project Title:

Description of Work:

Type of Work Completed (Majority): Water tank painting Epoxy floor coatings

Interior/exterior paint

Other: _____________________________________

CONTRACT INFORMATION:

Is all information as provided above in

“General Information” correct?

Yes No

If no, please correct as necessary.

Contract Number:

Contract Type (indefinite delivery, standalone contract, task/job order, etc.)

Pricing Arrangement (FFP, CPIF, FPIF, etc.)

Dollar Amount: $

Contract Performance Period (e.g. “90 calendar days after Notice to Proceed issuance”):

Contract Dates of Performance (per the

Notice to Proceed):

Contractor performed as: ontractor

Other: _____________________________________

CUSTOMER/AGENCY INFORMATION:

Name:

Agency:

Title:

Address:

Phone Number:

Email:

Description of role on subject contract

(PCO, Project Manager, etc.):

Other suggested points of contact:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 3 of 6

PLEASE EMAIL COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO:

Guillermo Martinez Vanessa Russell-Reed

Contract Specialist Contracting Officer guillermo.martinez.3@us.af.mil vanessa.russell-reed@us.af.mil

Phone: (661) 277-0247 Phone: (661) 277-2532

*Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last five years, please complete separate questionnaires for those contracts as well.

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:

In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY

RATINGS OF M or U. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

E EXCEPTIONAL Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available.

Do not know.

mailto:guillermo.martinez.3@us.af.mil mailto:vanessa.russell-reed@us.af.mil

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 4 of 6

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

Quality Control E V S M U N/A

1. Quality of Workmanship

2. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements

3. Provided effective measures in implementing their established Quality Control

Plan

4. Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to established quality control procedures

5. Provided adequate storage and facilities in order to properly store their materials

6. Adequacy of Submittals

7. Adequacy of Material Testing

Comments on Quality Control:

Timely Performance E V S M U N/A

1. Developed Realistic Progress Schedules

2. Adherence to Approved Schedule

3. Resolution of Delays

4. Submission of Required Documentation

5. Completion of Punchlist Items

6. Submission of Updated and Revised Progress Schedules

7. Provided timely resolution of warranty calls

8. Provided adequate Bonding as required

9. Contractor’s ability to handle a high volume of Task Orders concurrently

Comments on Timely Performance:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 5 of 6

Effectiveness of Management E V S M U N/A

1. Cooperation with personnel after award

2. Coordination and Control of Subcontractors

3. Adequacy of Site Clean-Up

4. Effectiveness of Job-Site Supervision

5. Compliance with Laws and Regulations

6. Professional Conduct

7. Review and Resolution of Subcontractor Issues

8. Displayed effective Subcontractor Management

9. Paid Subcontractors and Suppliers in a timely manner

10. Provided accurate and complete proposals for task orders including all aspects of work required for each task

11. Provided adequate project supervision

12. Displayed initiative to solve problems

13. Responsiveness to Government inquiries after award

14. Compliance with environmental regulations

15. Flexibility and coordination with all project stakeholders

16. Provided experienced managers and supervisors

17. Responsiveness to contract changes

18. Performed accurate quantity takeoffs for estimates

19. Performed concurrently on geographically separated projects at within a 20 mile radius

Comments on Effectiveness of Management:

Compliance with Labor Standards

E V S M U N/A

1. Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their Quality Control

Plan

2. Payrolls Properly Completed and Submitted

3. Compliance with Labor Laws and Regulations with Specific Attention to the

Construction Wage Rate Requirements Statute formerly known as the Davis-

Bacon Act

Comments on Compliance with Labor Standards:

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE Page 6 of 6

Compliance with Safety Standards E V S M U N/A

1. Adequacy of Safety Plan

2. Implementation of Safety Plan

3. Adequacy and efficiency in correcting noted Deficiencies

Comments on Compliance with Safety Standards:

Overall Quality of Performance E V S M U N/A

1. Overall Quality of Performance

Please provide any additional information you feel is important and not covered elsewhere in this evaluation:

How would you rate the contractor’s overall quality of performance on this contract?

Would you award another contract to this contractor?

Yes No (If no, please explain)

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance! Be sure to return to the Contracting Agency and not to the Contractor you are providing a reference for.

Name: Contact Phone #:

Respondent Signature: Date Completed: