Attachment_L-2_PPQ.pdf

ATTACHMENT L-2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) COVER

LETTER

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

When filled in, this document is Source Selection sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

The Directorate of Contracting of the Air Force Test Center is in the process of competitively selecting a source for a Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineer Requirements (SABER) Contract at Edwards AFB, CA. The scope of work includes efforts involving repair, sustainment, renovation and/or construction of facilities on Edwards AFB. (Refer to RFP FA9301-14-R-0011 at www.fbo.gov).

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire.

Our schedule is extremely tight and we desire your written response no later than 5 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of evaluations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to Jacob.arola@us.af.mil and Suntok.mcguinness@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

SUN MCGUINNESS

Contracting Officer

Directorate of Contracting

Attachment 1 - Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

FA9301-14-R-0011

Section L – Attachment L-2

Sun McGuinness

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: _____________________

Address: ____________________________ Fax Number: _________________________

____________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work:_________________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ____________*

Highest amount of Task orders performed concurrently________________________________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: __________________________*

Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Mentor Protégé

Job Disciplines Performed:

☐ Heating Ventilation Air Conditioning (HVAC) ☐ Electrical (Indoor and Outdoor) ☐ Mechanical ☐ Design ☐ Carpentry ☐ Roofing ☐ Excavation ☐ Plumbing

FA9301-14-R-0011

☐ Sheet metal ☐ Painting ☐ Demolition ☐ Concrete masonry ☐ Welding ☐ Carpeting ☐ Lead abatement ☐ Asbestos abatement ☐ Steam Fitting ☐ Road and parking lot repair ☐ Fire Protection ☐ Fencing ☐ Other:_________________________________________________________________

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _______________________________ Title: _______________________

Address: ______________________________________________________________________

Telephone Number: _____________________________________________________________

Fax Number: _________________________________________________________________

Email Address: _________________________________________________________________

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:

Jacob Arola Sun McGuinness 661-277-2993 661-275-3248 Directorate of Contracting Directorate of Contracting Jacob.arola@us.af.mil Suntok.mcguinness@us.af.mil

FA9301-14-R-0011

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E G S M U N

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral

Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Customer’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets/met contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements . The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented

Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER: ______________

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

E G S M U N

Quality Control

1. Quality of Workmanship

2. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

3. Contractor provided effective measures in implementing their established Quality Control Plan

4. Implementation of Quality Control Procedures

5. Contractor provided adequate Storage and facilities in order to properly store their Materials

6. Adequacy of Materials Submittals

7. Adequacy of Materials proposed to complete project

8. How well did the contractor use the Specified Materials as required by their SOW

9. Accuracy of As-Builts

10. Identification/Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to established quality control procedures

Comments on Quality Control:

E G S M U N

Timely Performance

1. Developed realistic Progress Schedules

2. Adherence to Approved Schedule

3. Timely resolution of Delays

4. Timely completion of Punchlist Items

5. Timely submission of Updated and Revised Progress Schedules

6. Timely submission of Progress Reports

7. Timely submission of other Required Documentation

8. Provided timely resolution of warranty calls

9. Provided adequate Bonding as required on time

10. Contractor’s ability to handle a high volume of Task Orders concurrently

Comments on Timely Performance:

Effectiveness Management

1. Responsiveness to Government personnel (Contracting and Project Management Office) after award

2. Adequacy of effectively obtaining and retaining Key personnel

3. Adequacy of Site Clean Up

4. Effectiveness of Job-Site Supervision

5. Professional Conduct

6. Review/Resolution of Subcontractor Issues

7. Displayed effective Subcontractor Management

8. Paid sub-contractors/suppliers in a timely manner

9. Provided accurate and complete proposals for task orders including all aspects of work required for each task

10. Provided adequate project supervision

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems

Comments on Effectiveness of Management:

Compliance with Labor Standards

1. Payrolls Properly Completed and Submitted

2. Payrolls submitted to the Contracting Office on time

3. Compliance with Labor Laws and Regulations with Specific Attention to the Davis-Bacon Act and EEO Requirements

4. Management cooperation during Labor Interviews

Comments on Compliance with Labor Standards:

Compliance with Safety Standards

1. Adequacy of Safety Plan

2. Implementation of Safety Plan

3. Adequacy and efficiency in correcting noted safety deficiencies

Comments on Compliance with Safety Standards:

Overall Rating of Performance

1. Overall Rating of Performance

How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance on this contract?

Please provide any additional information you feel is important and not covered elsewhere in this evaluation:

IF U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating was required indicated level specified and level achieved in remarks.

Would you award another contract to this contractor? (Yes/No) if No, please explain.

Thank you for your remarks. Be sure to return to the Contracting Agency and not to the Contractor you are providing a reference for.

Name:_______________________________Contact Phone #:__________________________

Respondent Signature:______________________________Date Completed:_______________