RFP_Amendment_0001.pdf

F1S2AA3318A001

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to update the follow ing:

a. Update the building number for the site visit from "5600" to "5620".

b. Add language to section L, Part III, Para. B, Subpara. 3b.

c. All other terms remain unchanged.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 14

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 06-Jun-2014

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA9301-14-R-0011

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

30-May-2014

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06-Jun-2014

CODE

AFTC/PZIOC - FA9301

JACOB AROLA - 5 S. WOLFE AVE

EDWARDS AFB CA 93524

FA9301 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA9301-14-R-0011

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

SECTION L

Section L - Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors or Respondents

L-001 GENERAL INFORMATION

1. Point of Contact. The Contracting Officer (Sun McGuinness) is the sole point of contact for this acquisition. Written requests for clarification may be sent to the address located in Block 7 of the SF 1442.

2. Debriefings. The Contracting Officer (CO) will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range, whereupon they may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505. Offerors excluded from the competitive range may request a preaward debriefing or they may choose to wait until after the source selection decision to request a post-award briefing. However, offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing for each proposal. The CO will notify unsuccessful offerors in the competitive range of the source selection decision in accordance with FAR 15.503. Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring debriefing must make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.

3. Discrepancies. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the CO in writing with supporting rationale as well as the remedies the offeror is asking the CO to consider as related to the omission or error. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion. This reservation includes matters of additional or substitute pages of the initial proposal.

4. Mandatory Submission. The offeror shall submit a paper copy of the SF 1442, front and back, including the proposed coefficient (for the entire performance period and six-month extension of services option period, if exercised) for CLIN 0001. The SF 1442 shall be submitted with the appropriate original signatures, and acknowledgement of all amendments as required, along with all required referenced submittal information mentioned in Sections L and M.

5. Minimum Information. Only the required minimum amount of information is requested to provide for proper evaluation. Efforts should be made to keep offers as brief as possible, concentrating on substantive information essential for proper evaluation. The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating its validity. Elaborate format and color representations are not desirable.

6. Restrictions. Incomplete proposals: Failure to submit all the data indicated and required in this section may be cause for determining a proposal incomplete and, therefore, not considered for price evaluation, technical evaluation, or award.

7. Disposition of Unsuccessful Proposals. In compliance with FAR Subpart 4.8 the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Extra copies of unsuccessful proposals will be destroyed by the Government. Destruction certificates will not be provided.

L-002 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in the entire proposal being considered non-responsive and may not be considered for award.

Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of four (4) separate parts; Part I - Price Proposal, Part II - Technical Proposal, Part III - Past Performance Information, and Part IV - Contracts:

Table L-1 Section Copies Page Limits Part I – Price Proposal 3 Paper (1 Original

+ 2 Copies) + 1 Electronic

Unlimited

Part II – Technical Proposal 4 Paper (1 Original + 3 Copies) + 1 Electronic

40 Pages

Part III – Past Performance Information

4 Paper (1 Original + 3 Copies)+ 1 Electronic

Maximum of 4 contracts total for the proposed offeror (prime and/or subcontractors using Past Performance Information Form (Attachment L-1)).

Limited to no more than 6 pages per contract.

Part IV – Contracts 2 Paper (1 Original + 1 Copy) + 1 Electronic

Unlimited

B. Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal. Excess paper copies will be removed from the offerors’ proposal and disposed IAW Subpart FAR 4.8.

C. Formatting for proposal Parts II and III shall be as follows:

1. A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages.

2. The proposals shall be 8 ½” x 11”; except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17”.

3. Typing shall be Times New Roman Font, size twelve (12) pitch. Margins shall be a minimum of one (1) inch on all four (4) edges. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by part.

4. Submit proposal information in 3 ring binders. Elaborate formats, bindings or color presentations are not desired or required. Flash drives, DVDs and email proposals will not be accepted.

5. Each Part of the proposal, in accordance with Table L-1, should be separately bound in a three-ring, loose leaf binder permitting the part to lie flat when open. Staples shall not be used. A cover sheet should be bound in each book, clearly marked as to part number, title, copy number, solicitation identification, and the offeror's name. The same identifying data should be placed on the spine of each binder. All unclassified document binders shall have a color other than red or other applicable security designation colors.

Be sure to apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(e), Restriction on disclosure and use of data, and FAR 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Proposal Information and Source Selection Information.

6. The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. For electronic copies, indicate on each CD the part number and title. Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, including subfactors, exhibits, annexes, and attachments, if any. The offerors’ shall submit parts I through IV in electronic format, using recordable CDs. Each part shall be in a different directory on a CD. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included. In the event that hard copies and electronic copies of a proposal are submitted and if there are any discrepancies between the hard copies and the electronic copies of the proposal, the hard copies will be used for evaluation.

7. Electronic storage media shall be submitted in one of the following formats: prerecorded (pressed) CD-ROM or CD-R.

a. Documents submitted using Microsoft Office shall use version 2010 or earlier, save files in default and searchable format.

b. Documents submitted using Microsoft Excel shall use version 2010 or earlier, save files in default searchable format.

c. Documents submitted using Microsoft Project, shall use version 2010 or earlier, save files in default searchable format.

d. Documents submitted using Adobe Acrobat shall use version 10.0 or earlier, save files in default searchable format. Do NOT submit any documents in PDF format that are copied as “images”. When creating PDF files always create to enable textual search and copy functions.

8. The original proposal shall be identified. Proposals must be mailed or hand-carried to the following address:

AFTC/PZIOC

5 S. Wolfe Ave.

Edwards AFB, CA 93524-1185 Attn: Jacob Arola and Sun McGuinness For: FA9301-14-R-0011

D. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer’s opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional data will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit cost data to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.

E. Documents submitted in response to this RFP must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the RFP (CLINs & SOW) and government standards and regulations pertaining to the SOW.

2. Evaluation Factors for Award in Section M of this RFP.

3. Page limitations may be placed on responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) (If required). The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offerors (If required). Every page shall be counted including any attachments, except the following: cover letter, table of contents, tabs, glossaries, consent letters and client authorization letters, bonding capability documentation, joint venture/teaming arrangements, and past performance questionnaires (Attachment L-2).

PART I – PRICE PROPOSAL:

Note: The price proposal is not limited as to the number of pages. Submit original plus two (2) copies. See Attachment L-4, Coefficient Information, for specific information regarding the purpose and application of the Coefficient.

1. Price: The price proposal shall consist of one contract coefficient for CLIN 0001 as solicited in the Price Schedule. The coefficient shall be entered into Section B of the solicitation next to the CLIN 0001 description. All offerors will assume the Bakersfield, CA City Cost Index (CCI) when factoring for a proposed coefficient.

a. The coefficient shall be limited to three decimal places (e.g., .951, 1.002, 1.053 etc.)

b. The offerors shall have one coefficient for the entire contract which shall be applied to all projects associated with the resultant contract. The purpose of applying the coefficient to direct pre-priced costs from the Unit Price Book is to compensate the offeror for burden costs and profit for performance. The coefficient is not subject to economic price adjustments and will remain unchanged for the existing terms and conditions of the entire contract.

c. The offeror's price coefficient shall include all costs including, but not limited to, minimum design costs, mobilization, demobilization, overhead, general and administrative expense, engineering services, project design work, insurance, expenses to comply with environmental and tax laws, bond premiums, cost estimating software and profit.

d. Offerors shall explain the basis for the methodology and development of the coefficient.

i. Offerors may use the following chart as a guide in developing their coefficient:

Table L-2

***EXAMPLE ONLY***

COEFFICIENT TABLE EXAMPLE

ITEM TYPE DECIMAL

OVERHEAD *0.301

MINIMUM DESIGN COSTS XXX

GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE (G&A) XXX

BOND PREMIUM XXX

GROSS RECEIPT TAXES XXX

PROFIT XXX

XXXXX XXX

XXXXX XXX

XXXXX XXX

XXXXX XXX

XXXXX XXX

XXXXX XXX

XXX

COEFFICIENT TOTAL XXX

*0.301 is a fictitious number and is only added to show the number format to be used.

Note 1. All offerors shall use the Bakersfield, CA City Cost Index (CCI).

Note 2. Coefficient shall be limited to three decimal places (e.g., .951, 1.002, 1.053 etc.).

Note 3. Contractor may include any other Coefficient expenses as needed.

Note 4. Offerors shall explain the basis for the methodology and development of the Coefficient.

Note 5. After calculation of coefficient it shall be entered into Section B of the solicitation next to the CLIN 0001 description.

Note 6. Offerors shall have one coefficient for the entire contract which shall be applied to all projects associated with the resultant contract for all 5 years and any option periods.

e. Historical Data:

i. Project Distribution: It is estimated that the maximum dollar amount of this contract will be distributed as follows (this shall be reflected in the proposed coefficient for each CLIN/performance period identified in Section B):

99% Work accomplished during standard working hours Note: Standard hours are Mon. – Fri., 7:00 am – 4:00 pm PST

ii. Construction projects issued as task orders under this contract will generally range from $2,000 to $750,000.

iii. Below is other pertinent historical information from the previous SABER 10 Year contract (FA9301-04-D-0025) at Edwards Air Force Base as accumulated during the period December 2003 through December 2013:

Table L-3

SABER Historical Task Order Data Fiscal Year *Amount of Task Orders *Award Value

2004 72 $ 9,682,008.00 2005 90 $ 10,950,410.00 2006 89 $ 10,299,494.00 2007 68 $ 10,048,076.00 2008 123 $ 20,564,171.00 2009 **110 $ 15,048,046.00 2010 63 $ 7,997,590.00 2011 86 $ 11,256,874.82 2012 53 $ 3,287,992.95 2013 14 $ 535,189.64 2014 ***1 $ 12,558.52

Totals 769 $ 99,682,410.93

* This information is an approximate only, and the Government does not guarantee neither the number of task orders nor the award amounts.

** High volume due to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

*** Issued only 1 task order due to contract ceiling/expiration.

PART II – TECHNICAL PROPOSAL:

Note: Technical proposals shall be limited to 40 pages of text (inclusive of Drawings, Designs, etc.) (Sub-Factor 1 - bonding capability documentation is not included in the overall page count). Pages in excess of 40 will be removed and will not be evaluated. Submit original plus three (3) copies.

The specific topics to be addressed in Part II are as follows:

SUB-FACTOR 1: CONFORMANCE TO RFP REQUIREMENTS

1. Letter from bonding company will show the Offeror’s capability to provide Payment and

Performance Bonds. Letter will indicate capability to provide payment and performance bonds in the singular amount of $750,000.00, and combined project amount of $3,000,000.00. The bonding capability documentation is not limited as to the number of pages.

SUB-FACTOR 2: SEED PROJECT PROPOSAL

1. Offerors “must” propose on the seed project (Attachment L-3) to be considered for award.

The seed project will be evaluated as part of the offerors proposal. The proposed price of the seed project will not be separately added into the Total Evaluated Price. The seed project will be awarded to the same offeror who is awarded the SABER contract, as a result of this solicitation. The government reserves the right to order any or all of the seed project in response to this RFP.

2. Magnitude of construction for this project is Between $25,000 and $100,000.

Element 2-1: Reasonable Assumptions

1. For evaluation purposes and potential award of the initial Task Order, the proposal shall separately breakout the following for each of the three parts of the Seed Project SOW, specifically 1) RPR ADA Access B2850, 2) Exterior Closures and Electrical Work, and 3) Landscaping.

Written proposal shall include:

a. A cover page including the project title, total project cost, list of assumptions, list of requirements, performance period, material lead times, and any special considerations such as phasing of construction.

b. A written narrative describing approach to the seed project.

c. A schedule showing the offeror’s intended progression, breakout of major work components, any permits required, etc. for the project and progression of work effort from task order award to completion.

d. A Schedule of Material Submittals which identifies all items that have a material effect on the seed Project.

e. Project Cost Estimate.

Element 2-2: Soundness of Approach.

1. For evaluation purposes and potential award of the initial Task Order, the proposal shall separately breakout the items in paragraph a (below) for each of the three parts of the Seed Project SOW, specifically 1) RPR ADA Access B2850, 2) Exterior Closures and Electrical Work, and 3) Landscaping.

Written proposal shall include:

a. A detailed price breakout, using RS Means line items, showing the price to accomplish the effort. Also, the price breakout shall specify how the contract coefficient is applied to the proposed price of this effort. The proposed coefficient shall be applied to the seed project. The estimate shall be prepared in the 16 division Master Format system of classification and numbering as developed by the Construction Specifications Institute (CSI). The initial TO proposal types and quantifies format shall be as follows:

Table L-4

TYPES AND QUANTITIES FORMAT

(1) R.S.

MEANS

Line Item Number

(2) Line Item Description

(3) Unit Of Measure

(4) Crew

(5) Quantity

(6) Material

(7) Labor

(8) Equipment

(9) Unit Cost

(10) Total

Total Cost City Index Coefficient

PART III – PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:

Note: Maximum of four (4) contracts for the proposed offeror (Prime and/or subcontractors) using Past Performance Information Form (Attachment L-1). .

A. Submit original plus three (3) copies.

1. Past Performance Information Forms (PPIF) (Attachment L-1): Only references for relevant past efforts/contracts are desired. Relevant contracts include: performance of efforts involving SABER, Job Order Contracts (JOC), Task Order Contracts (TOC), Multi-skill/Multi-discipline Construction type Contracts involved in similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires (See Section M, Table 4).

Submit Past Performance Information Forms (Use Attachment L-1) on no more than four

(4) recent and relevant contracts for the proposed offeror (Prime and/or subcontractors IAW paragraph B. of this section). Refer to Section M provision M-001, para. C., for definitions of recent and relevant.

2. Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Attachment L-2): The government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror's performance deemed relevant to the requirements of this RFP. The government will use the information submitted by the offeror and any other sources of information available to the government to assess past performance. The Government may submit past performance questionnaires to the references provided. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition.

3. Past and Present Performance Questionnaire Distribution: Offerors must send the Questionnaire and Cover Letter (Attachment L-2) to all points of contact (POCs) listed in the Performance Information Sheet (see Attachment L-1, Paragraph F).

B. Other Past Performance Considerations:

1. For purposes of evaluating Prime Contractor Past Performance, the Prime Contractor is defined as the contractor identified in Block 14 of the Standard Form 1442.

2. In addition to the data provided by each offeror in this part of the proposal, the Government may use data obtained from other sources (Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), which pulls information input into Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS); other Government sources, commercial sources, etc.) in the development of the Integrated Past Performance Assessment Rating.

3. Teaming Arrangements: The government recognizes the validity and integrity of teaming arrangements as detailed in FAR Subpart 9.6. In accordance with FAR 9.1, Responsible Prospective Contractors, offerors must identify and provide in their offer any teaming arrangement to be considered and include any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with the same team. For purposes of determining prime/subcontractor relationships for partnerships, the government will only recognize written formal partnerships as having a prime/prime relationship. All informal partnerships will be determined to have prime/subcontractor relationships and will be evaluated IAW Section M-001, para C.1.c.

3a. Joint Venture Agreements (Including Mentor-Protégé Joint Ventures): If proposing as a joint venture, send the proposed joint venture agreement to your assigned SBA Business Opportunity Specialist (BOS) in time to ensure receipt by the SBA prior to the proposal due date so that the BOS can review/approve the agreement should the joint venture receive the contract award. It is recommended that the agreement be submitted to your BOS as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with established SBA regulations.

Corrections and/or changes required can be made only when your BOS has had adequate time for a thorough review. The Joint Venture agreement must be received prior to proposal due date and approved before the award of any resulting contract.

3b. Mentor-Protégé Agreements: If proposing a Mentor-Protégé relationship, the mentor and protégé must have a written agreement approved by SBA. SBA must approve the mentor/protégé agreement before the two firms may submit an offer as a joint venture on a particular government prime contract or subcontract in order for the joint venture to receive the exclusion from affiliation.

4. If no past performance information is submitted as a part of the offeror’s proposal, the entire proposal will be considered non-responsive and will not be considered for award.

However, if the Government has knowledge or gains knowledge through other sources regarding what the Government believes to be relevant past performance for an offeror who states they have none, such information may be used by the Government for evaluation purposes and a past performance confidence assessment rating will be assigned to that offeror’s proposal. For those offeror’s who do not have any relevant past performance information to submit, a statement to that effect will satisfy the requirement for a past performance part such that the past performance will be considered.

5. Provide with the proposal, a client authorization letter for commercial clients, a Consent Letter from each teaming partner, joint venture partner, and/or major critical subcontractor authorizing the release of past performance information to the prime contractor.

PART IV – CONTRACT:

1. Specific Instructions:

a. The offeror shall submit an original and one (1) copy of their proposal with each part clearly labeled. One electronic copy shall also be submitted.

b. Complete blocks 14 through 20 of the RFP Section A, SF 1442. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP Sections A through K.

These sections constitute the model contract. Offerors shall submit Sections A through J in their entirety. Section K shall only be returned for Representations and Certifications that are not completed in the System for Award Management (SAM), or that specify the offeror will complete their representations and certifications for each solicitation on an individual basis.

c. As applicable, provide a letter from the Small Business Administration (SBA) showing proof of Section 8(a) status and/or approved mentor/protégé agreement. If a teaming arrangement and/or joint venture is contemplated, provide complete, verifiable information as to the arrangement.

d. In order for an offeror to be eligible to submit an offer for this 8(a) procurement limited to the state of California geographic area, it must receive from SBA a determination that it has a bona fide place of business within that area prior to submitting its offer for the procurement.

e. There will be no financial consideration made to Offerors for the development of their proposals in response to this solicitation.

5352.215-9001 NOTICE OF PRE-BID/PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE (MAY 1996)

(a) A pre-bid/pre-proposal conference will be conducted at 0815 on 13 June 2014 at 90 Farrell Drive, Edwards AFB, CA 93524, Building 5620 (Galaxy Room) for the purpose of answering questions regarding this solicitation.

(b) Submit the names of all attendees (not to exceed 2 (per company)) to Jacob Arola at jacob.arola@us.af.mil or Sun McGuinness at suntok.mcguinness@us.af.mil prior to 9 June 2014 at 10:00 AM PST. This information must be provided in advance in order to ensure access to the military base/conference site and adequate seating for the conference attendees.

(c) Bidders/Offerors are requested to submit questions to the point of contact noted above not later than 19 June 2014, 4:00 PM PST. Information provided at this conference shall not qualify the terms and conditions of the solicitation and specifications. Terms of the solicitation and specifications remain unchanged unless the solicitation is amended in writing. If an amendment is issued, normal procedures relating to the acknowledgment and receipt of solicitation amendments shall apply.

(d) A record of the conference shall be made and furnished to all prospective bidders/offerors. The record should include minutes of the meeting, including questions (on a non-attribution basis) and answers

(End of Summary of Changes) mailto:jacob.arola@us.af.mil mailto:suntok.mcguinness@us.af.mil