Attachment_L-2_-_Past_and_Present_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

TOS

FA9101-13-R-0100

Attachment 9

ATTACHMENT L-2

PAST / PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION : Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate :

A. Contractor (Company / Division):

B. Point of Contact (Program Manager and Contracting Officer):

C. Telephone Number:

D. Cage Code: ________________

E. Contract Number:

F. Dollar Amount:

G. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, CPAF):

H. Contract Period of Performance:

I. Program Title:

J. Brief Program Description:

K. Program Phase: (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD))

L. Contractor Performed as the Prime Contractor Joint Venture Partner Subcontractor (If Joint Venture Partner specifically identify the managing partner and other partners; if Subcontractor, identify Prime Contractor).

II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

A. Name(s):

B. Address:

C. Phone Number(s):

D. Fax Number:

E. Email Address:

F. Position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO):

G. Other suggested points of contact:

III. GENERAL COMMENTS

IV. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Please indicate your performance rating for the Contractor’s by circling or place an “X” over the appropriate code using the performance evaluation scale below. Ratings are defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE RATING

B BLUE / EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the Contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level.

Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the Contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.

P PURPLE / VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the Contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well.

Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the Contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

G GREEN / SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the Contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level.

Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the Contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.

Y YELLOW / MARGINAL - During the entire period, the Contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED / UNSATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the Contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.

Respondents should explain their rating in the remarks section for any rating of Blue, Yellow or Red and ratings that might contradict official Past Performance documentation (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs)). If more space is needed, remarks may be continued on separate pages.

Please identify Factor and Subfactor and question number.

A. TECHNICAL FACTOR - Rate the Offeror’s performance for the following subfactors:

Technical Operations B P G Y R N/A

T1) Test and Analysis: How well did the Contractor perform technical research, development, and test and evaluation tasks or products at various stages of technical development?

T2) Test and Analysis: How well did the Contractor perform analysis tasks that accurately assessed the system under test?

T3) Test and Analysis: How well did the Contractor protect Controlled Information?

T4) Operation of Test and Test Support Assets: How well did the Contractor safely, efficiently, and effectively conduct operations of test and test support assets?

T5) Operation of Test and Test Support Assets: How well did the Contractor ensure delivery of test and system operational data?

T6) Integrated Scheduling: How well did the Contractor develop and execute a process for integrating operations schedules to avoid conflict?

T7) Lifecycle Sustainment: How well did the Contractor demonstrate effective operations, maintenance, repair, and modernization of industrial facilities (e.g., aerospace test facilities, petro-chemical facilities, automobile industry, nuclear facilities, etc.)?

T8) Lifecycle Sustainment: How well did the Contractor demonstrate a clear understanding of software lifecycle management, including configuration management and development principles required during development, test, and production?

T9) Lifecycle Sustainment: How well did the Contractor input operations and maintenance information into various management systems?

T10) Capital Improvements: How well did the Contractor demonstrate a clear understanding of system engineering processes for delivering capital improvement projects?

Management Approach B P G Y R N/A

M1) Performance Measurement: How well did the Contractor use performance measures and metrics to guide actions and motivate high performance?

M2) Interface Management: How well did the Contractor identify relevant interfaces and demonstrate an effective approach to managing interfaces in collaborating with multiple contractor and Government entities?

M3) Workload Management: How well did the Contractor demonstrate workforce flexibility and mobility across multiple facilities and integrate operations with multiple contractor interfaces?

M4) Workload Management: How well did the Contractor accommodate significant workload increases and decreases?

M5) Workload Management: How well did the Contractor manage multiple facilities and people with varied skills, both salary and wage to meet rapidly changing work requirements?

M6) Workload Management: How well did the Contractor manage labor relations with both Organized Labor (Union Workforce), Salaried Workforce, and others?

M7) Transition / Phase-in Management: How well did the Contractor accomplish phase-in / phase-out periods to ensure full continuity of mission requirements by the performance start date?

M8) Subcontract Management: How well did the Contractor demonstrate timely resolution of contract administration issues and contract changes with their subcontractors?

M9) Subcontract Management: How well did the Contractor execute a subcontract management plan?

M10) Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI): How well did the Contractor manage OCI issues and risks in accordance with FAR Part 9.5?

Qualified Personnel B P G Y R N/A

Q1) Key Personnel: How well did the Contractor provide the proposed key leadership, management, and technical experts?

Q2) Staffing Plan: How well did the Contractor provide personnel with the skills and experience enabling that employee to be fully qualified on day one?

Q3) Staffing Plan: How well did the Contractor demonstrate the capability to retain existing expertise whether it be through current workforce or from external sources?

Q4) Staffing Plan: How well did the Contractor show ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period?

Innovations and Efficiencies B P G Y R N/A

I1) Innovations and Efficiencies: How well did the Contractor demonstrate ability to propose sound innovations and efficiencies with measurable saving or qualitative improvements?

I2) Innovations and Efficiencies: How well did the Contractor demonstrate implementation of initiatives that reduced the cost of operations, labor, and/or energy usage?

I3) Innovations and Efficiencies: How well did the Contractor demonstrate an effective process for continuous improvement?

B. COST / PRICE FACTOR

Cost Performance B P G Y R N/A

C1) Cost Performance: How well did the Contractor forecast contract cost / price?

C2) Cost Performance: How well did the Contractor develop and meet realistic project cost estimates?

C3) Cost Performance: How well did the Contractor show initiative and resourcefulness in controlling fringe benefit costs?

C4) Cost Performance: How well did the Contractor alert Government / customer of unforeseen costs before they occurred?

C5) Cost Performance: How well did the Contractor handle unforeseen cost increases?

C6) Cost Performance: How well did the Contractor provide accurate and timely cost reporting?

C7) Cost Performance: How well did the Contractor ensure subcontractors / suppliers were paid in a timely manner?

C8) Cost Performance: How well did the Contractor identify accurate and complete scope of efforts in order to facilitate cost estimating?

Please provide the following information regarding cost/price:

(1) Original Contract Cost or Price $_____________________

(2) Value of Negotiated Contract Changes $_____________________

(3) Actual / Projected Cost to Complete $_____________________

(4) Baseline Estimate at Completion $_____________________

(5) Total Negotiated Changes EAC $_____________________

(6) Cost Under run / Over run (-) $_____________________

C. NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B / E (Blue / Exceptional), Y / M (Yellow / Marginal) or R / U (Red / Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

D. GENERAL COMMENT (Choose one of the following and explain your choice in the remarks)

Given what I know today about the Contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I definitely would_____ probably would _____ might or might not _____ probably would not _____ definitely would not _____ award to him today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

E. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes_____ Default_____ Convenience_______ Pending Termination______

No_____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please email this completed questionnaire to: aedc.sso@us.af.mil