Attachment_L-8_-_Workload_Resource_Guide.pdf

PDF 103 KB Posted

Attached to
Test Operations and Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA9101-13-R-0100
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center

About this file

Attachment L-8 Workload Resource Guide

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Test Operations and Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
Questions_from_Industry_Post_RFP_7_Oct.pdf PDF
Industry_Announcement_7Oct14.pdf PDF
Questions_from_Industry_Post_RFP_Amd_0003.pdf PDF
Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
Response_to_RFP_Comment_22Sep14.pdf PDF
Response_to_RFP_Comment.pdf PDF
Attachment_9 _Section_L.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_9 _Section_L.pdf PDF
PWS_22_84_89_91.pdf PDF
CDRL_30000_30001_81861.pdf PDF
Questions_from_Industry_Post_RFP_for_FBO.pdf PDF
TOS_Award_Fee_Plan_Amd_0001.pdf PDF
Addtl_Responses_to_Draft_RFP_12Sep14.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_-_Award_Fee_Term_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-1_-_PPI_for_Offerors.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-4_-_Client_Authorization_Letter.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_-_Contract_Data_Requirements_List.pdf PDF
Attachment_10_-_Section_M.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-9_-_TOS_Cost_Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_5_-_Davis_Bacon_Wage_Decisions.pdf PDF
Attachment_11_-_Government_Furnished_Property.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-6_-_Relevancy_Matrix.pdf PDF
Draft_RFP_Responses_to_Comments_and_Atch.pdf PDF
AGENDA_Final_20140610.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_DoD_Contract_Security_Classification_Specification_CORRECTED.pdf PDF
Industry_Day_No._4_Registration.pdf PDF
Combined_Test_Force_(CTF)_Briefing.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_-_Statement_of_Objectives.pdf PDF
Attachment_L-11__TOS_Cost_Model.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
TOS_DRFP_Final_19_May.pdf PDF
Exhibit_A_-_DRAFT_Contract_Data_Requirements_List.pdf PDF
Section_M_Draft_RFP.pdf PDF
Exhibit_B_-_Data_Item_Descriptions.pdf PDF
Question_to_Industry_Quality_22Jan14.pdf PDF
Request_for_Information_No._4.pdf PDF
RFI_No._3.pdf PDF
RFI_No._3_Delay_10Sep13.pdf PDF
RFI_No._2_Amendment_02.pdf PDF
RFI_No._2_Amendment_01.pdf PDF
Atch_1 _REVISED_Agenda_Industry_Day_No._2_v7.pdf PDF
Atch_1 _REVISED_Agenda_Industry_Day_No._2_v5.pdf PDF
Revised_Agenda_for_Industry_Day__2.pdf PDF
Atch_1 _Agenda_for_Industry_Day_Draft.pdf PDF
Amendment_03_RFI_No._1.pdf PDF
CDRL_30001_30049.pdf PDF
CDRL_30100_81611.pdf PDF
Atch_2 _OCI_Clause.pdf PDF
Atch_1_-_PWS.pdf PDF
RFI_No._1.pdf PDF
Show all 50

Test Operations and Support has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment L-8

WORKLOAD RESOURCE GUIDE

(FY 16 Government Estimate)

The Government has prepared this estimate to assist the offerors in quantifying the work described in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Table L-8.1, Test Workload, presents the test workload by cell in operational units and is the baseline workload for this proposal. This test workload shall be held constant over the entire contract period for purposes of proposal preparation. Table L-8.2, FY16 Government Estimate, represents the labor hours (including overtime) estimated to accomplish the FY16 workload assuming accomplishment of the AEDC mission under the current contract structure.

The workload estimates are presented in terms of the AEDC Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) format. A map showing the approximate linkage between the PWS and the AEDC WBS is provided at Table L-8.3 The FY16 Government estimate was determined by averaging the workload in the various test facilities over the last 10 years and by guidance from functional area managers where averages were deemed not indicative.

Offeror’s should consider this Government estimate as a guide only. We anticipate Offerors outlining initiatives to accomplish the PWS with different resource levels including reapportionment of labor hours and/or reduced staffing. We expect to see these initiatives outlined in the Mission Capability proposal and the results reflected in the Cost proposal. Staffing levels must be fully supported showing a clear understanding of the work and providing a high confidence level for achieving proposed reductions. Proposed staffing reductions based on increased productivity must be specifically identified and explained in detail. Ambiguous or unrealistic assumptions regarding increased productivity are not acceptable and will negatively impact evaluation of your proposal.

Reducing the scope of work defined by this baseline or proposing to shift work to other Government contractors are not acceptable approaches.

Total resources available in any fiscal year are based upon a budget subject to Congressional approval and funding allocation to AEDC. Therefore, it may be necessary to adjust the contract resources during phase-in and prior to performance to accommodate actual funding availability for FY16.

Table L-8.1 (Yellow highlights indicate change since draft RFP)

TEST CELLS Units Number

16S UOH 50

16T UOH 3,650

4T UOH 845

ABC UOH 1,285

Flight Systems Prep Work Mhrs 5,176

NFAC UOH 1,460

NFAC Test Prep Work Mhrs 11,335

Small (T5/11/12,SL2/3) AOH 335 Small (SL1/2/3 Sea Level) SLOH 1,325 Medium (T1,T2,T4,J1,J2) AOH 517 Large (C1/C2) AOH 340 C1 Sea Level SLOH 268

T3 AOH 4

APTU Runs 11 Aeropropulsion Prep Work Mhrs 50,000

Chambers - 12V OSH ‐ Chambers - Mark I OSH

Chambers - Research OSH

Chambers - Complex OSH 1,831 STAT Mhrs 360

NWE (MBS) WEEK

J4/J6 Firings 4 Arcs (total) Runs 36 H1 Runs 22 H2 Runs 7 H3 Runs 8 Range G/I Shots 9 Range S Shots

AMSC Mhrs 35,000

Tunnel 9 OccDays 60

Technology/Foreign Tech Mhrs 60,441

UOH - User Occupancy Hour - All of the facility available productive hours after the test article is installed in the facility until the start of removal of the test article from the facility. For clarification - available means scheduled shift hours - if 2 shift ops the max available in a day would be 16 hours without overtime. UOH does not include downtime hours or hours where scheduled maintenance prevents the customer from making productive use of the time.

AOH: Air-On-Hour are tracked to measure progress of a test relative to the AOHs specified in the Statement of Capability and any subsequent project change agreements to add or reduce AOHs. The AOH does not include the pre-test checks and operation of the plant equipment or the posttest securing of the equipment. Air-On is declared by an event which is usually the opening of an isolation valve. Air-off is declared by when the test cell isolation valves are closed and it is safe to begin the test cell entry procedure.

The total power used during pre-operation, test and post operation is billed to the customer along with the direct labor charges for facility operations.

SLOH: Sea-Level-Air-On-Hour are tracked to measure progress of a test relative to the SLOH specified in the Statement of Capability and any subsequent project change agreements to add or reduce SLOHs. SLOH do not include pre-test checks or posttest checks and securing of supporting systems. The SLOH is declared by the test engineer upon confirmation that all supporting systems are ready for testing. Sea-Level air-off is declared once the engine throttle is put in the engine off position.

Occupancy Day. The base unit (i.e., final cost objective) used for charging the direct costs of Tunnel 9 operations to a customer. An occupancy day is based on a contiguous period of operations where both the operations staff and the test capability are dedicated to the support of a customer test program.

Shot: A shot is the measure of progress for an AEDC Hypervelocity Flyout, Impact, and Lethality Ground T&E project, relative to the number of shots specified in the Statement of Capability and any subsequent Project Change Agreements to increase or decrease the number of shots on the project. A shot starts at T=0 and consists of the firing of the two-stage light-gas gun (ignition of the powder charge). A typical shot lasts ~40 milliseconds. If the gun does not fire, another attempt of the shot may be executed. A shot does not include pre-test checks nor post-test securing of the aeroballistic range.

Firing: A firing is the measure of progress of an AEDC Solid Rocket Motor Ground T&E project, relative to the number of firings specified in the Statement of Capability and any subsequent Project Change Agreements to increase or decrease the number of firings on the project. A firing starts at T=0 and consists of rocket motor ignition, running the length of time specified in the test plan/matrix, thrust termination, and shutdown. A typical firing lasts ~60 seconds. If the firing is aborted before T=0, another attempt of that firing may be executed. A firing does not include pre-test checks nor post-test securing of the rocket test cell.

Run: A run is the measure of progress of an AEDC High-Temperature Materials Characterization and Evaluation project, relative to the number of runs specified in the Statement of Capability and any subsequent Project Change Agreements to increase or decrease the number of runs on the project. A run starts at T=0 and consists of energizing the arc-heater, ramping to conditions, probe verification of conditions, on-point data collection with multiple test samples, and shutdown. A run can last 1-30 minutes and, depending on test requirements, can test up to ten test articles and probes in a single run.

If the run is aborted before T=0 another attempt of that run may be executed. A run does not include pre-test checks or post-test securing of the arc-heater test cell.

Operation Shift Hour (OSH): An OSH is the measure of progress of an AEDC High- Altitude / Space Environmental Effects and Sensor Ground T&E project, relative to the number of OSHs specified in the Statement of Capability and any subsequent Project Change Agreements to increase or decrease the number of OSHs on the project. An OSH starts at T=0 and consists of evacuating and cooling the chamber, establishing test conditions, on-condition data collection, and warm-up and re-pressurizing the chamber.

A typical test can last 720 OSHs. Pre-test checks, post-test securing of the space chamber and performance of data analysis and reporting do not result in OSHs.

Table L-8.2 Displays the government estimate in hours (regular plus overtime) for FY 16

(Yellow highlighted hours indicate a change from the Draft RFP)

WBS WBS Description Hours

1.0 IT&E Management 24,268

1.1.1 Aeropropulsion Products 303,998

1.1.2 Flight Systems Products 260,000

1.1.3 Space & Missile Test 84,280

1.2.1 Aeropropulsion Technology/A&E 10,917

1.2.2 Flight Systems Technology/A&E 8,583

1.2.3 Space & Missile Technology/A&E 15,699

1.2.5 M&S/I&D/A&E 44,145

1.2.6 Technology/A&E Maint & Mgmt 11,518

1.2.9 Capabilites Planning 9,539

1.3.1 Turbine Technology RBA 2,780

1.3.2 Flight Systems Technology RBA 196

1.3.3 Space & Missile Technology RBA 43,118

1.3.4 Hypersonic T&E S&T 9,630

1.3.5 Core Tech RBA (M&S/I&D/A&E) 31,590

1.3.6 Foreign Technology RBA 8,127

1.4.1 Hypersoncis Management 29,609

1.4.2 Hypersonic Products 367

1.4.3 Tunnel 9 Product Cost 8,884

1.5.1 NFAC Management 88,120

1.5.2 NFAC Products 30,000

2.1.1 ETF Investments 127,248

2.1.2 PWT Investments 122,595

2.1.3 Space & Missile Fac Inv 51,688

2.1.4 VKF Plant Investments 75,057

2.1.5 CORE & Support Fac Innovation 44,145

3.1.1 Aeropropulsion Asset Stewardship 57,350

3.1.2 Flight Systems Asset Stewardship 47,257

3.1.3 Space & Missile Asset Stewardship 54,714

3.1.4 Plant Asset Stewardship 422,000

3.1.6 Safe Reliable Effective Operations 17,975

3.2.1 Machine & Fab, TMDE, and Chem Lab 59,316

4.1.2 Industrial Security 3,620

4.2 Environmental Management 5,430

4.3.1 Facility Plans & Programs, Sustainment, and 163,840

4.5.1 Logistics Support & Purchasing 25,026

4.3.6 Utitlies 203,159

5.1.1 ID&C Maintenance & Info Assurance 105,888

6.1.2 Corporate Services/Mgmt/Admin 94,841

6.2 Safety 10,860

6.3 Quality 10,288

Total 2,727,663

WBS TOS WBS Description

P W

S D es cr ip ti on

.1 T es t an d E va lu at io n

.2 T ec h n o lo gy P ro je ct s

.3 O p er at io n o f Te st A ss es ts a n d T es t

A rt ic le s

.4 In te gr at ed

S ch ed u lin g

.5 L if ec yc le S u st ai n m en t o f Te st a n d

Te st S u p p o rt A ss et s

.6

ID

C E n gi n ee ri n g Se rc ie s an

Li fe cy cl e Su st ai n m en t

.7 T es t M ea su re m en t an d D ia gn o ic

Eq u ip m en t (T M D E) M an ag em en t

.8 C ap it al Im p ro ve m en ts

.9 P ro vi d e Fu el s M an ag em en t

Se rv ic es

.1 M ac h in in g/ Fa b ri ca ti o n a

C h em ic al /M at er ia l A n al ys is

.1 O p er at io n s an d L if ec yc le

Su ai n m en t o f A

ED

C B as e Su p p o rt

A ss et s

.1 U ti lit ie s G en er al S u p p o rt

.1 D at a an d d o cu m en ta ti o n f o r A

ED

C co fi gu ra ti o n it em s

.1 A

ED

C G ro u n d , W ea p o n s

Sy em

S af et y P ro gr am s

.1 S en si ti ve C o m p ar tm en te

In fo rm at iu o n

SC

I)

.1 F in an ci al M an ag em en t

.1 A cq u is it io n o f su p p lie s, s er vi ce s, e q u ip m en t

.1 In te rf ac e M an ag em en t

.1 G en er al M an ag em en t

.2 S tr at eg ic P la n n in g

.2 F o re ig n T ec h n o lo gy

.2 P u b lic A ff ai rs

.2 R ea l P ro p er ty M an ag em en t

A cc o u n ta b ili ty S er vi ce s

.2 C o n ti n u o u s Im p ro ve m en t

P ro gr am

.2 In te gr at ed p er fo rm ce m ag em en t p ro gr am

1.0 IT&E Management

1.1.1 Aeropropulsion Products

1.1.2 Flight Systems Products

1.1.3 Space & Missile Test

1.2.1 Aeropropulsion Technology/A&E

1.2.2 Flight Systems Technology/A&E

1.2.3 Space & Missile Technology/A&E

1.2.5 M&S/I&D/A&E

1.2.6 Technology/A&E Maint & Mgmt

1.2.9 Capabilites Planning

1.3.1 Turbine Technology RBA

1.3.2 Flight Systems Technology RBA

1.3.3 Space & Missile Technology RBA

1.3.4 Hypersonic T&E S&T

1.3.5 Core Tech RBA (M&S/I&D/A&E)

1.3.6 Foreign Technology RBA

1.4.1 Hypersoncis Management

1.4.2 Hypersonic Products

1.4.3 Tunnel 9 Product Cost

1.5.1 NFAC Management

1.5.2 NFAC Products

2.1.1 ETF Investments

2.1.2 PWT Investments

2.1.3 Space & Missile Fac Inv

2.1.4 VKF Plant Investments

2.1.5 CORE & Support Fac Innovation

3.1.1 Aeropropulsion Asset Stewardship

3.1.2 Flight Systems Asset Stewardship

3.1.3 Space & Missile Asset Stewardship

3.1.4 ETF Plant Asset Stewardship

3.1.5 High Pressure Air Costs

3.1.6 Safe Reliable Effective Operations

3.2.1 Machine & Fab, TMDE, and Chem Lab

4.1.2 Industrial Secuirty

4.2 Environmental Management

4.3.1 Facility Plans & Programs, Sustainment, and

Investments

4.5.1 Logistics Support & Purchasing

4.3.6 Utitlies

5.1.1 ID&C Maintenance

6.1.2 Corporate Services/Mgmt/Admin

6.2 Safety

6.3 Quality

Hours for PWS element primarily in WBS

Table L. 8‐3

Hours included throuhout WBS elements indicating that some work done in WBS

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .