FA890326R00090001 - R3F Solicitation Amendment (14 Apr 2026).pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

14 Apr 2026

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE

REQUISITION NUMBER

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE FA8903

FA8903 772 ESS PK

2261 HUGHES AVE STE 163, BLDG 171 CP 210 395 8776

JBSA LACKLAND, TX 78236-9861

UNITED STATES

TIER BLANCO, Email: tier.blanco@us.af.mil Telephone: 380-457-0231 ANGEL HILL, Email: angel.hill.2@us.af.mil Telephone: 385-678-5201

7. ADMINISTERED BY (if other than Item 6)

CODE

SCD: PAS:

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE: FACILITY CODE:

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

FA890326R0009

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

25 Mar 2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; 1 or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required) See Section G - Contract Administration Data

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK

ONE

A.THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NUMBER IN

ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.)

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

See Schedule

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

ANGEL N. HILL

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

14 Apr 2026

Computer generated. Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

This amendment updates the solicitation, Statement of Work, and attachments as follows: Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

1. Volume Organization & Submission Requirements

- Relocated Attachment L-03 completion instructions from Volume I (3.1) to Volume II (3.2.1).

- Added page-limit clarification ("The narrative is limited to five pages and does not include supporting documentation") to Sections 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.3, 3.4.1, 3.4.2.

- Added language in Sections 3.3.3 and 5.3.4.1 to submit Attachment L-04 with Volume III for planning purposes (not evaluated; not counted against page limits).

- Updated Section 5.3.2.1 to change "Bond Certification Letter or equivalent" to "Bond Certification Letter."

- Updated Section 3.1 to replace reference to SF 1442 with SF 33.

2. Technical Capability & Experience Requirements

- Revised Section 5.4.2.2, "The Offeror shall provide a minimum of three projects performed with subcontractors. One project must be performed within each region proposed as a prime contractor. For example, if you propose in three regions, you shall submit a completed project in each of the three regions. If you proposed in four regions, you shall submit a completed project in each of the four regions."

- Updated language in SOW Sections 4.1-4.6 and RFP Section 5.4.3.2 - Superintendent, Project Manager, and QCM.

3. Teaming Agreement Clarification

- Clarified that first-tier subcontractor roofing type experience may not be used to satisfy the Volume II (Technical Capability) 9 of 17 roofing type requirement unless the Prime and subcontractor have a valid teaming agreement submitted in Volume I. Without a teaming agreement, Volume II capability will be evaluated solely on the Prime Offeror's experience.

- Corresponding clarifications added to Sections 2.1.4, 5.2.1, and 5.4.1.

4. Attachments

- Attachment L-01 SOW: Removed EMR language; revised paragraph 4.16, 4.17 and Key Personnel language.

- Attachment L-03 Roofing Contract Evaluation: Corrected duplication by replacing second "Clay Tile Roofing Replacement or Repair" with "Copper Roof Panels" on Line 7.

- Attachment L-04-01 Bases by Region Maps and List: Added as a new attachment.

- Attachment L-06 Project Manager Outline: Removed language regarding Certified Roofing System Installer.

Section J - List of Attachments

The following Attachment(s) were added:

L-04-01 Bases by Region Maps and List (9 Apr 2026)

The following Attachment modifications were made:

01 Attachment - R3F Statement of Work FINAL 10 Mar 2026

Information From To AttachmentName 01 Attachment - R3F Statement of Work FINAL 10 Mar 2026 01 Attachment - R3F Statement of Work FINAL (9 Apr 2026) AttachmentDate 06 Mar 2026 09 Apr 2026 AttachmentURL 73267977 73953689

L-03 roofing contract evaluation Information From To AttachmentName L-03 roofing contract evaluation L-03 Roofing Contract Evaluation (9 Apr 2026) AttachmentDate 06 Mar 2026 09 Apr 2026 AttachmentURL 72241320 73953708

L-06 Certified Roofing Installer, Project Manager Outline Information From To OtherAttachment L-06 Project Mgr Outline L-06 Project Manager Outline AttachmentName L-06 Certified Roofing Installer, Project Manager Outline L-06 Project Manager Outline (9 Apr 2026) AttachmentDate 06 Mar 2026 09 Apr 2026 AttachmentURL 72935510 73953919

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

FA890326R00090001

The following instructions and information are a combination of Instructions to Offerors (ITO) and the corresponding evaluation methodology that will be applied to the R3F MATOC IDIQ proposals resulting from this solicitation. These have been combined for ease of reference and to ensure that all submission instructions have corresponding evaluation methodology or criteria. The terms "Offeror," "Contractor," or "Prime" are used interchangeably in this document.

1.0 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS

This section provides instructions for preparing proposals. It is the Offeror's responsibility to ensure the completeness of the proposal submitted. Compliance with these instructions is mandatory and failure to furnish a complete proposal, at the time of proposal submission, may result in the proposal being unacceptable to the Government and may eliminate the Offeror from further consideration for award. Simply stating that the Offeror understands and intends to comply with this effort or paraphrasing statements in the RFP is inadequate. By submitting your proposal, you are representing that your firm will perform all the requirements specified based upon the proposed regions and roofing types in response to this solicitation. All appropriate markings shall include those prescribed in IAW FAR 3.104-4, "Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information" and FAR 52.215-1(e), "Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data." Evaluation of a proposal will be conducted solely based on the information contained within it and the Government will not assume that an Offeror possesses any capabilities not specified.

1.1 PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES

1.1.1. Basis for Award. The Government intends to award a Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts IAW FAR 19.502-2, under a total small business set aside (SBSA), with a reserve of two 8(a) firms per region at the basic contract level.

Additionally, an embedded 8(a) SA applies at task order (TO) level for all actions $250K and below, the "Rule of Two" applies at TO level. IAW FAR 15.304(c)(1)(ii)(A), the Government intends to make an award to each and all qualifying offerors. For an offeror to participate in task order solicitations for a specific region, the offeror must meet the technical acceptability requirements defined below for each region proposed. The award document will identify the regions in which the contractor is qualified to participate.

1.1.2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award contracts without discussions with Offerors IAW FAR 52.215-1"ITO - Competitive Acquisition." Therefore, the Offeror's initial proposal should contain the Offeror's best terms from a technical standpoint. Clarifications may be conducted as described in FAR 15.306(a). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the PCO later determines them to be necessary or in the best interest of the Government. If discussions are held; discussions will only be held with those Offerors determined to be in the competitive range.

1.1.3. Regions for R3F will consist of the following:

Region 1: West - California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming Region 2: Midwest - Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Wisconsin Region 3: Northeast - Connecticut, Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington D.C., and West Virginia Region 4: Southwest - Arizona, Oklahoma, Texas, and New Mexico Region 5: Southeast - Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee Region 6: Alaska

2.0 GENERAL INFORMATION

2.1 QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS SOLICITATION

Solicitation documents will be posted to the System for Award Management (SAM.gov) website. Any further questions, concerns, or clarifications shall be submitted to the PCO using Attachment L-02 Q & A template no later than (NLT) five business days after issuance of the RFP. All inquiries shall be in writing and submitted electronically to the PCO and the Contract Specialist (CS) at organizational email: AFICC.R3F.WORKFLOW@US.AF.MIL. The contracting office will provide a notice of receipt, but if none is received, it is the Contractor's responsibility to follow up to the PCO. The Government will post all questions and responses pertaining to the solicitation and supporting documents to SAM.gov.

2.1.1 Discrepancies

If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unclear or unsound, the Offeror shall notify the PCO in writing with supporting rationale immediately, but NLT 10 days after release of the RFP or as specified in any subsequent RFP amendments.

2.1.2 Debriefings

The PCO will promptly notify Offerors of any decision to exclude an Offeror from the competitive range; where upon the contractor may request and receive a pre-award debriefing IAW FAR 15.505, or the Offeror may choose to wait until after award of the contract to request a post-award debriefing IAW FAR 15.506.However, Offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing.

2.1.3 Exclusions of Non-Compliant Proposals

The Government may exclude a proposal from this competition without evaluating the proposal against the evaluation factors as defined in Section M, if an initial assessment of the proposal shows the proposal to be non-compliant. Non-compliant proposals are proposals that fail to address essential requirements of the solicitation in the Volume Content and Evaluation section (5.0). Essential requirements include bonding documents, warranty certifications, L-03 Roofing

Contract Evaluation, L-04 Regional Experience Outline, L-05 Superintendent Outline, L-06 Project Manager Outline, L-07 QCM Outline, and 1 page document per roofing type identified. Failure to furnish information demonstrating compliance with mandatory solicitation requirements set forth in the solicitation will result in the offeror's proposal to be deemed non-compliant.

2.1.4 Teaming

Use of Teaming Partners: The Government intends to award directly to firms that perform roofing, repair and replacement for roofing projects with or without use of teaming partners. Offerors are advised that the sharing of teaming partner's resources in the technical proposal is not permitted. For Volume II (Technical Capability), a Prime Offeror may not use a first-tier subcontractor's roofing type experience to satisfy the 9 of 17 roofing type requirement unless the Prime and subcontractor are in a valid teaming agreement. If the Offeror intends to rely on a first-tier subcontractor's roofing type experience for Volume II, the Offeror must submit a copy of the executed teaming agreement in Volume I. Absent such an agreement, roofing type experience will be evaluated based solely on the Prime Offeror's capabilities. However, for a small business prime contractor that includes a proposed team of small business subcontractors and specifically identifies the first-tier subcontractor(s) in the proposal, the previous experience of each first-tier subcontractor that is part of the team will be considered the experience of the small business prime contractor for Volume IV (Previous Experience) if the previous experience of the small business prime does not independently demonstrate previous experience necessary for award.

2.1.5. Conglomerate and Affiliated Business Rules:

a. Definitions - FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SOLICITATION ONLY, THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS APPLY:

Stand-Alone Company. A company that does not have a parent, sister, or subsidiary business relationship with any other entity.

Conglomerate Structure. A business arrangement where the entities of the Parent or Holding Company remain totally separate from each other.

In this arrangement, entities do not have manage mentor business decision rights over Parent, Subsidiary, and/or other related entities.

Affiliated Structure. For the purpose of this solicitation, entities are affiliates of each other when one controls or has the power to control the other, or a third party or parties, controls or has the power to control both. It does not matter whether control is exercised, so long as the power to control exists.

Project. A completed TO or single, stand-alone Contract may be considered a single project. If a TO or stand-alone Contract includes multiple phases of completion, each with its own separate and distinct milestones, then each phase can be considered a "project." An IDIQ type contract, in and of itself, is NOT considered a project.

DoD Installation. DoD installations is a facility controlled or operated by United States DoD, encompassing various military bases, camps, and other activities that support military operations.

Subcontractor. A subcontractor is a company hired by a prime contractor to perform all or part of the work outlined in a federal contract.

b. Prohibition of Multiple Proposal Submissions

Entities of a Conglomerate Structure: Multiple entities of a conglomerate structure may submit individual proposals. Only one proposal may be submitted per entity under a conglomerate business arrangement, provided that the parent or holding company does not also submit a proposal -further, individual conglomerate entities may not submit key personnel from another entity of that conglomerate.

Entities of an Affiliated Structure: Affiliated businesses shall submit only one proposal across all entities contained within the affiliated business arrangement.

Proposals received from more than one entity under an affiliated business arrangement will not be evaluated. In the case where one entity submits multiple proposals, all proposals from that affiliated business structure may be removed from consideration.

c. Technical Proposal Limitations

Offerors are ONLY permitted to submit experience and/or key personnel qualifications from an affiliate entity or a parent company if the Offeror's business status is that of an affiliate entity. Accordingly, offerors that submit experience and/or key personnel qualifications from a non-affiliate entity that is part of a conglomerate business arrangement will not be considered.

3.0 VOLUME ORGANIZATION

3.1 Volume I - Offeror Information shall include the following:

Cover page Signed SF 33 and all SF 30 amendments (signed) Representations and Certifications (SF 33 Section K) IAW FAR 52.204-8 and the following:

52.209-7 -Information Regarding Responsibility Matters 52.219-14- Limitations on Subcontracting 52.230-7- Proposal Disclosure-Cost Accounting Practice Changes.

252.203-7005- Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials 252.204-7007- Alternate A, Annual Representations and Certifications 252.204-7008- Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls 252.225-7055- Representation Regarding Business Operations with the Maduro Regime 252.225-7057- Pre-award Disclosure of Employment of Individuals Who Work in the People's Republic of China

3.2 Volume II - Factor 1 - Technical Capability shall include the following:

3.2.1 Subfactor 1 - Prime Contractor Capability with Roofing Systems, see attachment L-03 (Not to exceed (NTE) 1 page per roofing type)

Roofing Contract Evaluation Document (Attachment L-03) fill out document in its entirety. For items that are not able to be filled in, place "N/A" or "None" in the box.

3.3 Volume III - Factor 2 - Industry Standard Compliance shall include the following:

3.3.1 Subfactor 1 - Warranty Work - Warranty Program Documentation (NTE five pages (The narrative is limited to five pages and does not include the supporting ))documentation.

3.3.2 Subfactor 2 - Bonding Capacity - Performance and Payment Bonding Confirmation (NTE five pages (The narrative is limited to five pages and does not include the )supporting documentation.)

3.3.3 Subfactor 3 - Roofing Certification (NTE five pages ( )The narrative is limited to five pages and does not include the supporting documentation.)

Submit Attachment L-04 with Volume III to identify regions and locations where the contractor is willing to work and regions previously worked in for future task order purposes. This document will not be evaluated but will be used for planning purposes to identify areas of availability. Attachment L-04 will not go against the page count.

3.4 Volume IV - Factor 3 - Previous Experience shall include the following:

3.4.1 Subfactor 1 - Prime Contractor Experience (NTE five pages ( )The narrative is limited to five pages and does not include the supporting documentation.)

3.4.2 Subfactor 2 - Prime Contractor Experience Managing Subcontractors on a DoD Installation (NTE five pages (The narrative is limited to five pages and )does not include the supporting documentation.)

3.4.3 Subfactor 3 - Prime Contractor Key Personnel Experience with Roofing Systems (NTE nine total pages)

3.4.3.1 Superintendent - (NTE three pages) (Attachment L-05)

3.4.3.2 Project Manager - (NTE three pages) (Attachment L-06)

3.4.3.3 Quality Control Manager - (NTE three pages) (Attachment L-07). Must have a minimum of a combined five years from the solicitation release date in DoD and commercial roofing construction.

4.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT

4.1 Sufficient Detail

The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Offeror(s) shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of the Offerors' facilities and experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the Offeror's proposal.

4.1.1 Electronic Proposal Submission

(a) Electronic Copy Proposal Submission: The electronic copy of the proposal submission shall be submitted via the Solicitation module in the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment at PIEE.eb.mil. (see Attachment L-08: PIEE Vendor Registration). To send files, access https:// piee.eb.mil/, each Offeror shall register with PIEE by requesting the user role within PIEE. Once in the system, the Offeror will enter the CAGE Code number and click the search button. Once Offeror data is retrieved from SAM.gov, confirm the information by clicking the "Confirm" button. Once the Offeror information is confirmed, a dashboard will appear displaying four options. Select "Proposal Actions" and you will be redirected to the proposal submission screen. On the new proposal submission screen, you can select (1) New Proposal, (2) Update Proposal, or (3) Withdraw Proposal. Select the desired option from the dropdown and fill in the required input fields: fiscal year end date, and if it isa partial year submission. Click the "Browse" button to select your file(s) for proposal submission (you may add multiple files at one time); A list of files will be displayed once they are uploaded prior to clicking the "Submit" button. When file upload is complete click the "Submit" button. A receipt is then generated and sent to the email address on file.

(b) Complete electronic proposals containing all Volumes shall be submitted in searchable Adobe Acrobat Portable Document File (pdf) format; zip files will not be accepted. The electronic files shall be live and contain fully traceable formulas and shall not contain references to external workbooks, with all equations and functions fully functional, unlocked, and unhidden.

(c) Each volume shall be compatible with the following available Government equipment and software products:

Adobe Acrobat Reader Microsoft Office 365

(d) Sound, video (e.g. MPEG), or other files shall not be embedded into the proposal files.

4.1.2 Page Format Restrictions and Limitations

(a) Pages shall be 8.5 x 11 inches.

(b) Text pages shall be portrait oriented. Graphics and tables may be landscape oriented if required to properly present the information.

(c) Pages shall be typed with at least single line spacing. No condensed fonts allowed. Fonts shall be limited to Times New Roman, Arial, or Calibri only.

The font size shall be no less than 11-point except for the following: tables, charts, graphs, and figures shall be no smaller than 10-point.

(d) Margins on all four edges of each sheet shall be at least one inch for Offeror-created documents. Offerors shall use the margins and font sizes established in Section L attachments.

(e) Proprietary statements, security markings, and page numbers can fall within the defined margin area and shall be no smaller than 10 font size.

(f) Page limitations shall be treated as maximum. If page limits are exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal.

4.2 Proposal Evaluation Methodology

4.2.1 Basis for Contract Award

Award will be made to each and all qualifying Offerors that provide a technically acceptable proposal IAW Volume II -Technical Capability, Volume III - Industry Standard Compliance and Volume IV -Previous Experience. Trade-offs are not permitted. If an offeror identifies less than nine roofing types on Attachment L-03, Roofing Contractor Evaluation, the proposal will be considered unacceptable. The proposal will be considered unacceptable if the Offeror is unable to provide the required documentation for roofing type examples, key personnel, warranty, bonding, and certification types. If an offeror is determined unacceptable for a subfactor, they will be found unacceptable for the entire factor and will be unawardable.

4.2.2 Evaluation

To be considered for evaluation and contract award, Offerors are required to submit all volumes with the Offeror's proposal. Each proposal will be independently rated against the criteria. While the Government source selection evaluation team and the SSA will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process is subjective by nature and professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process. To arrive at a source selection decision, the SSA will integrate the source selection team's evaluations of the factors described below.

5.0 VOLUME CONTENT AND EVALUATION

5.1 VOLUME I - OFFEROR INFORMATION

5.1.1 Cover Page and Validity Statement

The Cover page shall address the Offerors point of contact including the authorized signing representative. The Offeror shall make a clear statement that the proposal will remain in effect for 90 calendar days after RFP closing date in the R3F solicitation and any resulting amendments. Any applicable restriction on disclosure and use of the data provided in the Offeror's proposal shall include the appropriate markings prescribed in FAR 52.215-1(e), "Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data," and FAR 3.104-4, "Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information."

5.1.2 Contractor Data Information

In the event the Offeror has issues with PIEE for their proposal submittal, it is the responsibility of the Offeror to contact the contracting officer to receive additional guidance for proposal submission prior to the deadline. It is highly encouraged to submit proposals as early as possible to minimize delays in the PIEE system.

5.1.3 Contractor Responsibility

IAW FAR9.103(b), prior to being eligible for award, the PCO must make an affirmative determination of responsibility for potential awardees. The information requested in this volume is necessary to establish Contractor responsibility. Information will not be considered as part of the technical evaluation but will be used solely for the purpose of determining Contractor responsibility.

5.1.4 Representations and Certifications

The Offeror shall review FAR 52.204-8 and DFARS 252.204-7007 and certify in the cover page that paragraph (d) applies such that the Offeror has updated SAM IAW 52.204-8(d) and 252.204-7007(d). The Offeror may use DFARS 252.204-7007(e) for this certification on the cover page. The NAICS code for this solicitation is 238160. The size standard for this NAICS is $19M. The Offeror shall provide the fill-in for the representations and certifications listed in Section K of the SF1442 and refer to the Offeror's entries in SAM.gov.

5.2 VOLUME II - FACTOR 1 - TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

5.2.1 Prime Contractor Capability with Roofing Systems

5.2.1.1 Summary Information: The Offeror shall fully complete and provide Attachment L03, Roofing Contract Evaluation, detailing the types of roofing that it has installed or replaced in Column D of the attachment. There are 17 roofing types required for this program and information is required for at least 9 of the roofing types no less than 500 square feet each completed within the last 10 years from the solicitation release date. For each roofing type that is checked, the Offeror shall provide a complete description of the project as well as the location where the roof was installed and the name of the customer.

An Offeror shall provide at least one project completed on a Department of Defense (DoD) installation for each proposed region of interest. If the answer in Column D is "Yes," the entire row must be completed in its entirety. General construction companies may provide an example where the Offeror had to replace a roof in conjunction with the rest of the Offeror's work, or a standalone roofing project, to show experience in managing roofing work. Roofing type capability must be demonstrated by the Prime Offeror. Roofing type experience from a first-tier subcontractor will not be considered for this subfactor unless the Prime Offeror and subcontractor are in a valid teaming agreement in accordance with Section 2.1.4. If the Offeror intends to rely on a first-tier subcontractor's roofing type experience to meet the 9 of 17 requirement, the Offeror must submit a copy of the executed teaming agreement in Volume I.

Absent such an agreement, roofing type capability will be evaluated solely on the Prime Offeror's experience.

5.2.1.2 Section L Submission Requirement: The Offeror (Prime Contractor) shall complete and submit Attachment L-03, Roofing Contractor Evaluation detailing the types of roofing that it has installed or replaced in Column D. Each project identified shall not exceed one page per project. The Offeror shall provide information demonstrating that it can install at least 9 of the 17 roofing types, each with no less than 500 square feet and completed within the last 10 years from the solicitation release date. The Offeror shall provide at least one project completed for a DoD installation for each proposed region.

NOTE: Roofing type 2A and 2B are considered as a single roofing type. The Offeror will need an additional eight more roofing types to be considered acceptable for technical capability. If the Offeror has more than nine "Yes" answers in Column D, offeror may choose to enter a yes on 2A or 2B, both are

.not required for #2 to be included in the technical capability evaluation

5.2.1.3 Section M Evaluation Method: An acceptable rating will be assigned when the Offeror fills out and submit Attachment L-03, Roofing Contract Evaluation Document, in its entirety to show they have experience installing or replacing 9 of the 17 roofing types (each with a minimum of 500 square feet and completed within the last 10 years from the solicitation release date). In order to be considered technically acceptable for a specific region, the Offeror must provide at least one project completed for a DoD installation for the proposed region.

5.3 VOLUME III - FACTOR 2 - INDUSTRY STANDARD COMPLIANCE

5.3.1 Subfactor 1 - Warranty Work

5.3.1.1 Summary Information: Complete and provide Attachment L-03, Roofing Contractor Evaluation, Columns G and J of the attachment. If the answer is "No" on any of the entries provide an explanation in Column V.

5.3.1.2 Section L Submission Requirement: The Offeror shall provide a description of the Offeror's warranty program on installation services and materials NTE five pages to include the manufacturer's warranty; the qualifications and availability of assigned personnel to handle warranty issues; and the effectiveness of the coordination process with subcontractors, if applicable.

5.3.1.3 Section M Evaluation Method: To be considered acceptable for this evaluation factor, Offeror must provide Warranty Program documentation that demonstrates the warranty meets the UFGS requirements. The Offeror's warranty program must include the following: proof of the manufacturer's warranty, and the point of contact for handling warranty issues and concerns.

5.3.2 Subfactor 2 - Bonding Capacity

5.3.2.1 Summary: Offeror shall provide a copy of the Offeror's Bond Certification Letter to be considered acceptable for this evaluation factor.

5.3.2.2 Section L Submission Requirement: The Offeror shall provide performance and payment bonding confirmation of $1M per TO and a $5M aggregate. The list of approved sureties can be found at http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/suretyBnd/c570_a-z.htm.

5.3.2.3 Section M Evaluation Method: An acceptable rating will be assigned when the Offeror provides a letter from a Surety that is approved on the Approved List of Sureties found athttp://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/suretyBnd/c570_a-z.htm and the letter demonstrates a single bonding capacity of $1M bond and an aggregate bonding capacity of $5M. Surety letters must be from an approved surety listed with the Department of Treasury.

Letters must be notarized and signed by an individual that represents the surety in order to be considered acceptable. Letters signed by agents are unacceptable unless accompanied by a Power of Attorney granting proper authority to the agent.

5.3.3 Subfactor 3 - Manufacturer's Roofing Certification

5.3.3.1 Summary: Offeror shall provide documentation proving manufacturers' certification on identified roofing types in Attachment L-03, Roofing Contractor Evaluation, on any roofing types that the Offeror answered "Yes" to in Column G.

5.3.3.2 Section L Submission Requirement: If the Offeror has experience in a particular roofing type, it shall mark "yes" in Attachment L-03, Roofing Contract Evaluation and provide documentation proving manufacturer's certification on identified roofing types. The roofing types that are identified in the Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) that do not require certifications are not required to have information submitted by the Offeror (e.g., Slate Shingles, Concrete Tile Roofing Replacement or Repair, and Clay Tile Roofing, Replacement or Repair).The UFGS requires 14 of the 17 roofing types listed to have a manufacturer's certification.

5.3.3.3 Section M Evaluation Method: An acceptable rating will be assigned when the Government has verified that the submitted certifications are current and directly correspond to the roofing types identified in Attachment L-03, Roofing Contract Evaluation, as applicable. The contractor's certifications must abide by the UFGS requirements for installation.

5.3.4 Information Only

5.3.4.1 Submit Attachment L-04 with Volume III to identify regions and locations where the contractor is willing to work and regions previously worked in for future task order purposes. This document will not be evaluated but will be used for planning purposes to identify areas of availability. Attachment L-04 will not go against the page count.

5.4 VOLUME IV - FACTOR III PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE

5.4.1 Subfactor 1 - Prime Contractor Experience

5.4.1.1 Summary: An Offeror, whether general or a roofing contractor, shall demonstrate that it has experience replacing or installing each roof type identified as a prime contractor. This subfactor is met when the Offeror's proposal provides Attachment L-03, Roofing Contractor E valuation, complete Column Q and attach project data for one roofing project (any type of roofing) per region and a minimum of three projects completed within the last five years from the solicitation release date with a minimum of one project on a DoD installation where the offeror performed as the prime contractor. For this subfactor (Volume IV - Previous Experience), the previous experience of a first-tier subcontractor that is part of the Offeror's proposed team may be considered the experience of the small business prime contractor when the prime's own previous experience does not independently demonstrate previous experience necessary for award. This exception applies only to Volume IV and does not authorize the use of subcontractor roofing type experience for Volume II (Technical Capability) unless a valid teaming agreement is provided in accordance with Section 2.1.4.

5.4.1.2 Section L Submission Requirement: An Offeror, whether general or a roofing contractor, shall demonstrate that the Offeror has experience replacing or installing each roof type identified as a prime contractor. This subfactor is met when Attachment L-03, Roofing Contract Evaluation, Column Q is filled out, and a one-page description is provided on the roofing types that the Offeror selected "Yes" on in Column D. The Offeror shall describe projects on Attachment L-03, Roofing Contract Evaluation, Column Q for each proposed region. The Offeror will provide project data for one roofing project for each region they are proposing on. The Offeror shall provide an example for each of the roofing types that it has listed as performing work in Attachment L-03, Roofing Contractor Evaluation. The Offeror shall provide at least one roofing project on a DoD installation where the offeror performed as the prime contractor. Subcontractor previous experience may be submitted and considered under this subfactor only as described in Section 5.4.1.1 and does not apply to Volume II roofing type capability unless supported by a valid teaming agreement per Section 2.1.4.

5.4.1.3 Section M Evaluation Method: An acceptable rating will be assigned when the Offeror's proposal provides Attachment L-03, Roofing Contractor Evaluation, complete Column Q and attach project data for one roofing project (any type of roofing) per region and a minimum of three projects completed within the last five years from the solicitation release date with a minimum of one project on a DoD installation where the offeror performed as the prime contractor. Subcontractor previous experience will be evaluated under this subfactor only as permitted in Section 5.4.1.1 and will not be considered for Volume II roofing type capability unless a valid teaming agreement is provided.

5.4.2 Subfactor 2 - Prime Contractor Experience Managing Subcontractors on a DoD Installation

5.4.2.1 Summary: An offeror, whether general or a roofing contractor, must demonstrate that the Offeror has managed subcontractors. FAR 52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting is applicable. This subfactor is met when Attachment L-03, Roofing Contractor Evaluation, Column Qis completed and a description NTE one page is provided on the roofing types that the Offeror selected "Yes" on in Column D. An Offeror shall identify if it has served as a prime contractor, managing subcontractors, on a DoD installation to verify that the Offeror understands the processes of providing proper documentation and submittals.

5.4.2.2 Section L Submission Requirement: An Offeror, whether general or a roofing contractor, must demonstrate that the Offeror has managed subcontractors. This subfactor is met when Attachment L-03. Roofing Contract Evaluation, Column Q is completed and a description NTE one 8.5 x 11 page is provided on the roofing types that the Offeror selected "Yes" on in Column D. The Offeror shall provide a minimum of three projects performed with subcontractors. One project must be performed within each region proposed as a prime contractor. For example, if you propose in three regions, you shall submit a completed project in each of the three regions. If you proposed in four regions, you shall submit a completed project in each of the four regions.

An Offeror, whether general or a roofing contractor, must demonstrate that the Offeror has managed subcontractors. The Offeror shall provide a subcontractor final release form for each submitted project. The Offeror shall provide at least one roofing project on a DoD installation where the offeror performed as the prime contractor, managing subcontractors.

5.4.2.3 Section M Evaluation Method: In order to be considered acceptable, the Offeror must provide subcontractor final release forms verifying completion of a minimum of three projects as the prime contractor, inclusive of subcontractor management, with at least one project performed on a DoD installation and at least one project completed in every region proposed.

5.4.3 Subfactor 3 - Prime Contractor Key Personnel's Experience with Roofing Systems

5.4.3.1 Summary: The Offeror shall provide Key Personnel Summary Matrixes defining the process and personnel used for installing and replacing roofing types (Attachments L-05, L-06, and L-07). This experience should define the contractor's key personnel's experience with roofing systems. An Offeror, whether general or a roofing contractor, shall demonstrate that the Offeror has key personnel with roofing expertise and the Offeror has key personnel available at the TO level with roofing expertise to perform on the installation as well as manage subcontractors efficiently and effectively.

5.4.3.2 Section L Submission Requirement: The Offeror shall provide experience of key personnel to demonstrate the Offerors experience and ability to fulfill the responsibilities of an on-site superintendent, project management, and on-site quality control management by filling out Attachments L-05, L-06, and L-07, respectively. The Offeror shall provide specific criteria to demonstrate key personnel experience, demonstrate the Offeror has managed projects in specific regions it is proposing on, and demonstrate that it has managed subcontractors on DoD installations. This experience should define the Contractor's key personnel experience with roofing systems, and the Prime Contractor's ability to manage subcontractors. All key personnel must be employed by the Prime Contractor. Information and experience identified below:

Superintendent. NTE three pages. IAW FAR clause 52.236-6 Superintendent Experience by the Contractor. The offerors shall submit a completed Attachment L-05 describing the experience and qualifications for their proposed Superintendent. In order to be considered acceptable, the Superintendent must demonstrate IAW UFGS 01 30 00, a minimum of five years' combined experience in last 10 years from the solicitation release date in roofing construction with at least two of those years as a Superintendent on projects similar in size and complexity IAW para.

5.2.1.2 above. The individual must be familiar with the requirements of UFGS 01 30 00, para. 1.7.1, EM 385-1-1 and have experience in the areas of hazard identification and safety compliance. The individual must be capable of interpreting a critical path schedule and construction drawings IAW UFGS 01 3000 Administrative Requirements paragraph 1.7.1. An Offeror shall provide an example of what an onsite Superintendent's job is responsible for and what the Offeror provides for executed roofing projects.

Project Manager (PM). NTE three pages. The offerors shall submit a completed Attachment L-06 describing the experience and qualifications for their proposed PM. In order to be considered acceptable, the PM must demonstrate a minimum of five years combined experience in the last 10 years from the solicitation release date in the following positions: Project Superintendent, QCM, Project Manager, Project Engineer, and/or Construction Manager on roofing projects similar in size and complexity IAW para 5.2.1.2. Of the five years combined experience a minimum of two years shall be as a PM. The individual must be capable of managing the project IAW UFGS Division 00 and 01 requirements.

Quality Control Manager (QCM). NTE three pages. The offerors shall submit a completed Attachment L-07 describing the experience and qualifications for their proposed Quality Control Manager (QCM). In order to be considered acceptable, the QCM must demonstrate IAW UFGS 01 45 00, a minimum of five years combined experience in the last 10 years from the solicitation release date in the following positions: Project Superintendent, QCM, Project Manager, Project Engineer, and/or Construction Manager on roofing projects similar in size and complexity IAW para 5.2.1.2. Of the five years combined experience the individual shall have at least two years of experience as a QCM and be familiar with the requirements of UFGS 01 45 00, para. 1.6.2.2, EM 385-1-1. The QCM must also have experience in the areas of hazard identification, safety compliance, and sustainability.

5.4.3.3 Section M Evaluation Method: The Government will evaluate the information contained in Attachments L-05, L-06, and L-07 to determine whether the Superintendent, Project Manager, and QCM meets the qualifications and experience requirements referred to IAW Section5.4.3.2. An acceptable rating will be assigned when the Offeror's proposal demonstrates that its personnel are compliant with the aforementioned section.