Sec_J _Attachment_3_-_SOW__3_Oct_12_(Master).pdf

FA8629-12-R-2400

Section J, Attachment 3, SOW

Statement of Work (SOW)

Combat Rescue Helicopter (CRH) Program

3 Oct 12

0.1 INTRODUCTION: Throughout this SOW the following applies: CRH System is defined as:

the CRH air vehicle and all support equipment, training systems, and technical data necessary to meet the requirements herein. The CRH Training System is defined as: the Aircrew Training Devices (ATDs), Maintenance Training Devices (MTDs), courseware, support equipment, and technical data necessary to meet the requirements herein.

0.2 SCOPE: The scope of this SOW is to design, integrate, test, certify, manufacture, deliver, and sustain aircraft and training systems that meet the requirements as defined in this contract.

0.3 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

0.3.1 Department of Defense (DoD) Specifications and Standards

DoD AIMS 04-900(A), Cryptographic Interface Standard for the Mode 4/5 Cryptographic Computer, 22 Jan 09 MIL-STD-129P, Military Marking for Shipment and Storage, 19 Sep 07 MIL-STD-130N, Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property, 17 Dec 07 MIL-STD-196E, Joint Electronics Type Designation System, 17 Feb 98 MIL-STD-464C, Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Requirements for Systems, 1 Dec 10 MIL-STD-498, Software Development and Documentation MIL-STD-881C, Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items, 3 Oct 11 MIL-STD-882D, System Safety Program, 10 Feb 00 MIL-STD-1472G, DoD Design Criteria Standard – Human Engineering, 11 Jan 12 MIL-STD-1530C, Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP), 1 Nov 05 & Note 1, 3 Aug 10 MIL-STD-1796A, Avionics Integrity Program (AVIP), 13 Oct 11 MIL-STD-1798B, Mechanical Equipment and Subsystems Integrity Program, 24 Jan 10 MIL-STD-3013A, Glossary of Definitions, Ground rules, and Mission Profiles to Define Air Vehicle Performance Capability, 9 Sep 08 MIL-STD-3024, Propulsion System Integrity Program (PSIP), 15 Apr 08 MIL-STD-31000, Technical Data Packages, 5 Nov 09 MIL-PRF-49506, Logistics Management Information, 11 Nov 96

0.3.2 DoD Handbooks (to be used as Guidance only)

MIL-HDBK-61A, Configuration Management Guidance, 7 Feb 01 MIL-HDBK-240A, Hazards of Electromagnetic Radiation to Ordnance Test Guide, 10 Mar 11 MIL-HDBK-502, Acquisition Logistics, 30 May 97 MIL-HDBK-516B Expanded, Airworthiness Certification Criteria, 26 Sep 05

MIL-HDBK-896, Manufacturing and Quality Program, 8 Aug 08 MIL-HDBK-1512, Electroexplosive Subsystems, Electrically Initiated, Design Requirements and Test Methods, 30 Sep 97 MIL-HDBK-1568, Materials and Processes for Corrosion Prevention and Control in Aerospace Weapons Systems, 18 Jul 96

0.3.3 Other Government Documents, Drawings and Publications.

Air Force Flight Standards Agency (AFFSA) White Paper Primary Flight Reference Endorsement Process (AFFSA White Paper), 15 Aug 07 Air Force Instruction (AFI) 11-202 V3, Flying Operations, General Flight Rules, 22 Oct 10 AFI 20-114, Air and Space Equipment Structural Management, 7 Jun 11 AFI 21-102, Depot Maintenance Management, 19 Jul 94 AFI 21-103, Paragraphs 2.25 and 2.26, Equipment Inventory, Status and Utilization, 14 Dec 05 AFI 63-101 Section 3.48 and 3.94, Acquisition and Sustainment Life Cycle Management, 17 Apr AFI 90-1301, Implementing Military Flight Operations Quality Assurance, 1 Apr 08 AFI 91-202, U.S. Air Force Mishap Prevention Program, 1 Aug 98 AFI 99-103, Capabilities-Based Test and Evaluation, 26 Feb 08, w/Change 2, 20 Mar 09 Air Force Joint Instruction (AFJI) 63-108, Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP), 15 May 80 Air Force Manual (AFMAN) 23-110, USAF Supply Manual, 1 Apr 09, w/Chg 10, 1 Oct 11 AFMAN 36-2236, Guidebook for Air Force Instructors, 12 Nov 03 AFMAN 63-119 template 21 AFMAN 63-128, Chapter 12, Guide to Acquisition and Sustainment Life Cycle Management, 5 Oct 09 Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) Supplement to AFI 90-1301, 15 Jul 09 AFMC Instruction (AFMCI) 21-101Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 63-14, 6 Feb 01 AFPD 90-13, Military Flight Operations Quality Assurance (MFOQA), 28 Mar 08 Aviation Critical Safety Item Management Handbook, dated 4 August 2005 CJCSI 6212.01E, Interoperability and Supportability of Information Technology, 15 Dec 08 Corrosion Prevention and Control Planning Guidebook Spiral 3, September 2007 CRH Airworthiness Plan CRH Airworthiness Specification CRH Computer Resources Life Cycle Management Plan CRH Information Assurance Strategy CRH Information Support Plan CRH Program Protection Plan CRH Programmatic Environmental, Safety and Occupational Health Evaluation CRH Systems Engineering Plan CRH Test and Evaluation Master Plan (TEMP) DoD Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Guidebook, SD-22, Sep 10

DoD Integrated Master Plan and Integrated Master Schedule Use and Preparation Guide, 21 Oct 05 DO-178B, Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification Department of Defense (DoD) 5200.1-R, Appendix DoD 5220.22.M, National Industry Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM), 28 Feb 06 DoD Directive (DoDD) 4151.18, DTIC, 31 Mar 04 DoDD 5000.1, Defense Acquisition System, 20 Nov 07 DoD Instruction (DoDI) 1322.26, Development, Management and Delivery of Distributed Learning, 7 Dec 06 DoDI 5000.02, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System, 8 Dec 08 DoDI 5000.67, Prevention and Mitigation of Corrosion on DoD Military Equipment and Infrastructure, 1 Feb 10 DoDI 8320.04, Item Unique Identification (IUID) Standards for Tangible Personal Property, 16 Jun 08 DoDI 8500.2, Information Assurance (IA) Implementation, 6 Feb 03 DTM-09-016, 25 Mar 10 FED-STD-595C, Colors Used in Government Procurement, 16 Jan 08 ISO 9000, Quality Management Systems – Fundamentals and Vocabulary, 17 Apr 01 Key Practices and Implementation Guide for the DoD Comprehensive National Cybersecurity Initiative 11 Supply Chain Risk Management Pilot Program MIL-PRF-32239, Coating System, Advanced Performance, for Aerospace Applications, 3 May MTX Blue Force Tracker Interface Control Document National Aerospace Standard 411, Hazardous Material Management Program, 19 Jan 95 OSJTF MOSA Program Manager's Guide, Ver 2.0, Sep 04 OSD/AT&USSE's Defense Acquisition Program Support Methodology, Ver 2.0, 9 Jan 09 Program Support Review Awareness Briefing Technical Order (TO) 00-5-16, Software Managers Manual, 15 Oct 03 TO 00-20-1, Aerospace Equipment Maintenance Inspection Documentation Policies and Procedures, 1 Sep 10 TO 00-20-2, Maintenance Data Documentation, 15 Apr 07 TO 00-25-254-1, System Manual – Comprehensive Engine Management System (CEMS) TO 00-35D-54, USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation and Resolution, 1 Oct 09 TO 1-1-8, Application and Removal of Organic Coatings, Aerospace and Non-Aerospace Equipment, 30 Jan 08 TO 1H-1-23, System Peculiar Corrosion Control, 1 Dec 07 Society of Allied Weight Engineers (SAWE) RP #7

0.3.4 Non-Government Standards and other Publications.

ANSI/GEIA-STD-0009, Reliability Program Standard for Systems Design, Development and Manufacturing, 20 Aug 09 ANSI C84.1, Electrical Power Systems and Equipment, Voltage Ratings (60 Hertz), 14 Aug 94 RTCA Special Committee SC-216, Aeronautical Systems Security, Dec 10

0.3.5 Training Applicable Documents:

AETCI 36-2219 Air Education and Training Command Instruction, 18 Apr 08 AETCI 36-2205 Vol 1 Formal Flying Training Administration and Management, 29 May 09 AETCI 36-2205 Vol 8 Formal Flying Training Administration and Management-Special Operations/Combat Search and Rescue, 15 Apr 10 AETCI 36-2211 Flying Training Course and Special publications Development AETCI 36-2203 Technical and Basic Military Training Development, 12 Aug 09 AF HDBK 36-2235, Information for Designers of Instructional systems Vol. 7 (Design guide for device-based aircrew training), & Vol. 8 (Application to Aircrew Training) AFI 11-2HH-60 Vol. 1 HH-60 Aircrew Training, latest date AFI 11-2HH-60 Vol. 2 HH-60 Aircrew Evaluation Criteria, latest date Career Field Education and Training Plan (CFETP) 1A1X1 (Flight Engineer)* Career Field Education and Training Plan (CFETP) 1A7X1 (Aerial Gunner)* Training System Requirements Analysis (TSRA) for Aircrew Training System Requirements Analysis (TSRA) for Maintenance (*Note: These two documents will be combined into a Career Field Education and Training Plan (CFETP) 1A9X1 (Special Missions Aviation) at a date to be determined)

1.0 REQUIREMENTS/TASKINGS: The work required by this contract shall meet the requirements stated in the CRH System Specification, Training System Specification, and Airworthiness Specification.

1.1 Air Vehicle (AV): The contractor shall design, integrate, test, certify, manufacture, and deliver CRH Air Vehicles to meet all contract requirements IAW Annex E. The contractor shall instrument and configure CRH aircraft to be used for developmental testing. The contractor shall perform sustaining engineering for the air vehicle.

1.2 Systems Engineering

1.2.1 Requirements and Verification:

1.2.1.1 System Specification (SS): The contractor shall implement and maintain the CRH SS.

The SS shall contain the performance requirements for hardware, software, and data management/processing requirements for the CRH System. (DI-IPSC-81431A, B072)

1.2.1.2 Airworthiness Specification (AWS): The contractor shall implement, update and maintain a CRH Airworthiness Specification, using MIL-HDBK-516B Expanded, as a guide. (DI-

SESS-81766/T, B021)

1.2.1.3 Reserved

1.2.1.4 Air Vehicle Subsystem Specification (AVSS): The contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain a CRH AVSS. The AVSS shall be derived from and maintain traceability to the CRH SS. The AVSS shall contain the performance requirements for hardware, software, and data management/processing requirements for the entire CRH Air Vehicle. (DI-IPSC-81431A/T, B008)

1.2.1.5 Training System Specification (TSS): The contractor shall implement and maintain the CRH TSS. The TSS shall contain the performance requirements for hardware, software, and data management/processing requirements for aircrew and maintenance training devices. (DI-

IPSC-81431A/T, B067)

1.2.1.5.1 The contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain Subsystem and Detail Specifications for the Aircrew Training Devices (Weapon System Trainer, Operational Flight Trainer, and Avionics Desk Top Trainer). The Aircrew Training Devices’ Subsystem and Detail Specifications shall be derived from and maintain traceability to the CRH TSS and ultimately

CRH SS. (DI-IPSC-81431A, B067; DI-SDMP-81464A, B076)

1.2.1.5.2 The contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain Subsystem and Detail Specifications for the Maintenance Training Devices (Avionics Desk Top Trainer, Airframe Systems Trainer, Hoist Part Task Trainer, Landing Gear Part Task Trainer, and Rotor Blade Part Task Trainer). The Maintenance Training Devices’ Subsystem and Detail Specifications shall be derived from and maintain traceability to the CRH TSS and ultimately CRH SS. (DI-

IPSC-81431A, B067; DI-SDMP-81464A, B076)

1.2.1.6 Aircraft Product Attributes Specification (APAS): The contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain a CRH APAS. The APAS shall be derived from and maintain traceability to the CRH SS. The APAS shall describe the product baseline of the air vehicle subsystems, and modifications. (DI-SDMP-81493A/T, B035)

1.2.1.7 Interface Control Documents (ICDs): The contractor shall establish, develop and maintain ICDs using MIL-HDBK-61A as a guide. The contractor shall manage all interfaces at the Configuration Item (CI) level and higher. The contractor shall coordinate all ICDs with equipment suppliers. (DI-CMAN-81248A/T, B037)

1.2.1.8 Program Support Reviews (PSRs): The contractor shall support the Government technical review process in the PSR focus areas: OSD-led Defense Acquisition Program Support (DAPS), Technology, Manufacturing, Logistics, Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health (ESOH), Technical Documentation, and Integration Risk. (DI-MISC-80508B/T, A070; DI-

ADMN-81250A/T, A030)

1.2.2 Technical Management

1.2.2.1 Systems Engineering Process: The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) for the CRH System. The SEMP shall address the overall approach of the contractor’s technical management of the program. The SEMP shall, at a minimum, include Modular Open System Approach (MOSA) (using the OSJTF

MOSA Program Manager's Guide as a guide and addressing all MOSA criteria and focus questions in OSD/AT&USSE's Defense Acquisition Program Support Methodology), and all topics in the Government CRH Systems Engineering Plan (SEP). (DI-SESS-81785/T, A084)

1.2.2.1.1 Systems Engineering Process Compliance: The contractor shall comply with their documented and approved systems engineering processes. (DI-MISC-80508B/T, A088)

1.2.2.1.2 Systems Integration: The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a Systems Integration Plan (SIP). The SIP shall address the complete CRH System functional configuration integration process. The contractor shall address all topics in the Government’s draft Information Support Plan (ISP). (DI-MGMT-80004A/T, A083)

1.2.2.1.3 Modeling and Simulation Support Plan: If the contractor intends to use Modeling and Simulation, then the contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a Modeling and Simulation Support Plan (MSSP). (DI-MGMT-80004A/T, A094)

1.2.2.1.4 Item Unique Identification (IUID) Plan: The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain an IUID Plan IAW MIL-STD-130N. The contractor shall apply IUID markings permanently to CRH system components and maintain serialized item management tracking (e.g., automatic identification technology, and unique identification) processes IAW MIL-STD- 130N and DFAR 252.211-7003. The contractor shall enter the UID data for all marked components into the Wide Area Work Flow (WAWF) data base. (DI-MGMT-81803/T, A040, DI-

MGMT-81804/T, A041)

1.2.2.2 Airworthiness: The contractor shall implement, and maintain a CRH Air Vehicle Airworthiness program, documented in a CRH Airworthiness Plan, for obtaining United States Air Force (USAF) airworthiness certification that addresses all topics in the Government CRH Airworthiness Plan. The contractor shall perform all activities necessary to maintain Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airworthiness certification of the aircraft, if applicable, including any certification activities with the FAA Military Certification Office (MCO). The contractor shall ensure verification criteria compliance is properly integrated in the DT&E program. ( DI-MGMT- 80004A/T, B022)

1.2.2.3 Problem Tracking: The contractor shall develop and implement a problem identification, tracking and reporting process. (DI-MISC-81627/T, A023)

1.2.2.4 Deficiency Reporting: The contractor shall provide investigation, analysis, testing and reporting in support of the Government's Joint Deficiency Reporting System (JDRS) IAW USAF TO 00-35D-54. The contractor shall participate in the Government Materiel Improvement Project (MIP) review board. (DI-MGMT-80258A/T, A007)

1.2.2.5 Requirements Traceability Toolset: The contractor shall document bi-directional requirements, design, and test traceability between documents in the specification tree including systems, hardware, and software documents. The contractor shall use a commercially available requirements traceability toolset and facilitate the Government usage of the requirements traceability toolset and common contractor/Government requirements traceability database.

The contractor shall provide the Government remote access to the requirements traceability toolset. (DI-MGMT-80004A/T, A085; DI-MISC-80508B/T, A087)

1.2.2.6 Working Groups: The contractor shall participate in working groups, as specified in Annex A, Tables 1 and 1B, to include: hosting and attending working group meetings, providing technical briefings, working assigned action items, generating agendas, tracking issues and action items, and developing and distributing meeting minutes. (DI-ADMN-81249A, A029; DI-

ADMN-81250A/T, A030)

1.2.2.7 Technical Reviews: The contractor shall conduct and host technical reviews as indicated in the Integrated Master Plan (IMP) and Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) as identified in a representative listing in Annex B, Table 2. Technical reviews may be accomplished incrementally with Government approval and participation.

1.2.3 System Design

1.2.3.1 Vulnerability: The contractor shall accomplish CRH System vulnerability analyses to support CRH design requirements. The contractor shall address all topics in the draft Survivability/Vulnerability Analysis Plan including ballistic tolerances and crashworthiness. The contractor shall include Failure Modes, and Effects Analysis (FMEA) of flight critical and mission essential components. The contractor shall implement vulnerability reduction techniques. (DI-MISC-80564/T, A059; DI-SESS-80980A/T, B039)

1.2.3.2 Electromagnetic Environment: The contractor shall analyze electromagnetic environmental effects (E3) IAW MIL-STD-464C Electromagnetic Environmental Effects Requirements for Systems. This analysis shall include the effects of electromagnetic pulse, electromagnetic interference, and electromagnetic compatibility on aircraft systems to determine affected and/or degraded systems and identify critical communications, navigation, and instruments. This analysis shall include a co-site analysis to determine the electromagnetic effects on integrated systems. (DI-MISC-80508B/T, A072)

1.2.3.3 Flight Performance and Flight Dynamics Data: The contractor shall develop and provide all data and technical analysis necessary to evaluate aircraft performance, flight dynamics, handling qualities, and perform accurate analyses and simulation of air vehicle rigid-body dynamic motions, flight path, and response to controls or configuration changes. The contractor shall provide these data and the Standard Aerodynamic Characteristics Charts as part of the Substantiating Data Report (using MIL-STD-3013A as a guide). (DI-MISC-80711A/T, B009, B010, B011)

1.2.3.4 Gas Turbine Engine Performance Data: The contractor shall maintain an Engine Cycle Performance Deck capable of modeling engine performance on the CRH AV. (DI-MISC- 80711A/T, B012)

1.2.3.5 Mission Planning System: The contractor shall develop and implement both the on-board and off-board Mission Planning System (MPS) to include the Mission Planning Environment. The contractor shall develop the MPS to ensure that the on-board and the off-board system interface and work in conjuction with each other. The contractor shall provide all MPS documents in support of both the on-board and off-board systems. The contractor shall develop all necessary ICDs for both the on-board and off-board system. The contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain both the on-board MPS Management Plan as well as the off-board MPS Management Plan to include but not limited to the overall contractor’s management approach. The contractor shall participate in the Mission Planning Working Group. The contractor shall support the communications navigation surveillance / air traffic management (CNS/ATM) audit. (DI-MGMT-80004A/T, A092; DI-MISC-80508B/T, A098; DI-CMAN-81248A/T, B037)

1.2.3.6 National Geospatial Intelligence: The contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain a National Geospatial Intelligence plan to facilitate Government, NATO, and coalition mapping and imagery products stated in the “Mission Planning System – GEOINT Data Products” of the CRH System Specification necessary for CRH mission planning and operations. The contractor shall participate in National Geospatial Intelligence working group meetings. (DI-MGMT- 80004A/T, A093)

1.2.3.7 Blue Force Tracker (BFT): The contractor shall integrate the Blue Force Tracker (BFT) transmitter, provided as GFE, per the BFT Interface Control Document (ICD) provided in the Bidder’s Library. The contractor shall support all Government planning activities associated with the CRH BFT. The contractor shall develop the necessary Interface Control Documents to facilitate the incorporation of the Government-developed and certified BFT. The contractor shall establish an Associate Contractor Agreement (ACA) with the BFT developer. The contractor shall ensure the full cooperation of any CRH subcontractors with the BFT developer. (DI-

CMAN-81248A/T, B037)

1.2.3.8 Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) Mode 4/5: The contractor shall provide an IFF Mode 4/5 crypto solution which is compatible with either the Government-provided KIV-77 or KIV-78 Cryptographic appliqués IAW DoD AIMS 04-900(A). The contractor shall support all Government planning activities associated with the CRH IFF Mode 4/5. The contractor shall develop the necessary Interface Control Documents to facilitate the incorporation of the Government-developed and certified KIV-77 or KIV-78. (DI-CMAN-81248A/T, B037)

1.2.4 Environment, Safety and Occupational Health (ESOH): The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain an ESOH program to integrate ESOH efforts into the systems engineering and program management processes as defined below:

1.2.4.1 System Safety: The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a system safety program, documented in a System Safety Program Plan (SSPP), which implements system safety, software safety, safety critical function processes, and demonstrates compliant industrial/ground/flight safety programs. The SSPP shall address both civil (AC 25.1309-1A, SAE ARP 4761, SAE ARP 4754 and IEEE 1228) and military MIL-STD-882D processes as appropriate for system design safety analysis, human factors, test and evaluation and system safety program management. The contractor shall identify the specific hazard analysis and the associated techniques to be performed and summarize the cumulative results of those analyses in a Safety Assessment Report (see para 1.2.4.3). As an element of the plan, the contractor shall establish, implement and maintain a process for hazard risk communication and formal ESOH hazard risk acceptance by the Government IAW MIL-STD-882D, prior to exposing people, equipment or the environment to a given risk. The plan shall address the contractor’s hazard tracking system to include mishap hazards, material hazards, noise emissions, and pollutants. (DI-SAFT-81626/T, A036)

1.2.4.1.1 Critical Safety Items: The contractor shall develop and maintain a list of critical safety items based on the criteria contained in the Aviation Critical Safety Item Management Handbook. (DI-SAFT-80970A/T, A032)

1.2.4.1.2 System Safety Hazard Assessment (SSHA): The contractor shall conduct, maintain and update an SSHA. The SSHA shall document the identification and evaluation of both hardware and software hazards, along with providing effective hazard mitigation that either controls or eliminates the hazard risk. (DI-SAFT-80101B/T, A035)

1.2.4.1.3 Aircraft Information Program (AIP): The contractor shall assist the CRH program office to define AIP requirements (parameter attribute values, storage mechanisms, analysis requirements, data formats, data partitions/folders, etc.), using the CRH AIP Data Folder Structure as a guide, for inclusion in the appropriate ICDs and subordinate specifications. The contractor shall provide updates of relevant AIP data.

1.2.4.1.4 Software Safety: The contractor shall use DO-178B, Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification, as a guide. The contractor shall make the Designated Engineering Representative (DER) or equivalent representative software safety assurance documentation available to the Government. (DI-MGMT-81453A/T, A001)

1.2.4.2 Environment and Occupational Health:

1.2.4.2.1 Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT): The contractor shall establish, implement and maintain a program to eliminate/reduce non-manufacturing HAZMAT (i.e. HAZMAT imbedded in the system or used for operation or maintenance of the system including Hexavalent Chromium) where possible, and properly control HAZMAT used in the CRH System throughout the CRH life-cycle complying with National Aerospace Standard 411, Hazardous Material Management Program. To comply with the DOD policy on the use of hexavalent chromium, the contractor shall identify opportunities to reduce its use and to implement those opportunities where cost effective. The HAZMAT control program shall include identification and quantification of HAZMAT, including ozone depleting substances (ODS), used and hazardous waste generated, during normal Operations and Maintenance (O&M) and emergency situations. The data shall include the locations, amounts, disposal requirements, and special training requirements for the hazardous materials. The contractor shall describe the processes in a Hazardous Materials Management Program (HMMP) Plan. As an element of the plan, the contractor shall address the process for collaborating with the Government to determine the materials to be prohibited, restricted or simply tracked. The contractor shall provide required information on specific

HAZMAT and hazardous waste in HMMP Reports. (DI-MISC-81397B/T, A079; DI-MGMT- 81398B/T, A078)

1.2.4.3 Safety Assessment Report (SAR): The contractor shall provide a summary of the safety data collected during the design and development of the system. (DI-SAFT-80102B/T, A034)

1.2.4.4 ESOH Hazard Risk Tracking: The contractor shall establish, implement and maintain an ESOH hazard risk data tracking process compatible with the Integrated Digital Environment (IDE) as detailed in paragraph 1.3.3.1. The Hazard Risk Tracking System shall include, but not be limited to, mishap hazards, material hazards, occupational and environmental noise emissions, and pollutants. The contractor shall provide the Government with unrestricted access to the hazard risk tracking process. The hazard risk tracking process shall be transferable to the Government when the CRH System is fielded. (DI-SESS-81694B/T, B038)

1.2.4.5 Environmental Analysis Data: The contractor shall collect, analyze, document and provide an Environmental Analysis Data Report as required to support the Government’s National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis requirements. (DI-MISC-80508B/T, A077)

1.2.4.6 Corrosion Prevention and Control: The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a System Peculiar Corrosion Control and Prevention Concept Plan IAW DoD Directive (DoDD) 5000.1, DoD Instruction (DoDI) 5000.02, DODI 5000.67, DoDD 4151.18, AFI 20-114, MIL-HDBK-1568 and Corrosion Prevention and Control Planning Guidebook Spiral 3. (DI-

MFFP-81403/T, B020)

1.2.5 Information Assurance (IA)

1.2.5.1 Information Assurance (CRH Air Vehicle and Supporting Equipment)

1.2.5.1.1 The contractor shall update, implement, and maintain the CRH Certification and Accreditation (C&A) supporting documentation which shall include: the IA Strategy (IAS) based on the Government provided draft Aircraft IAS, security requirements, security requirement Verification and Validation (V&V), sensitivity of the data being processed, identify the system vulnerabilities, and identify existing and planned countermeasures. (DI-MGMT-80004/T, A095)

1.2.5.1.2 The contractor shall identify and document the applicable information assurance controls of DODI 8500.2 (Mission Assurance Category (MAC) 1, classified) for CRH. The contractor shall use the systems engineering process to incorporate the applicable IA controls into the requirements, design, integration, and testing processes. (DI-MGMT-81845/T, A096)

1.2.5.1.3 Monitoring/Implementing Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA) SC- 216: The contractor shall monitor the progress of RTCA Special Committee SC-216, Aeronautic Systems Security, as part of the contractor’s Information Assurance effort. The contractor shall brief status/progress at program management reviews.

1.2.5.2 Information Assurance (CRH Training System and Supporting Equipment)

1.2.5.2.1 The contractor shall update, implement, and maintain the CRH C&A supporting documentation which shall include: the IAS based on the Government provided draft Training System IAS, security requirements, security requirement V&V, sensitivity of the data being processed, identify the system vulnerabilities, and identify existing and planned countermeasures. (DI-MGMT-80004/T, B069)

1.2.5.2.2 The contractor shall identify and document the applicable information assurance controls of DODI 8500.2 (MAC 2, classified) for CRH. The contractor shall use the systems engineering process to incorporate the applicable IA controls into the requirements, design, integration, and testing processes. (DI-MGMT-81845/T, B070)

1.2.6 Human Engineering

1.2.6.1 Human Systems Integration (HSI) Program: The contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain a HSI Program, documented in a HSI Program Plan that describes implementation strategy of the human integration and issue-resolution processes across all HSI domains (Manpower, Personnel, Training, Human Factors, Environment, Safety, Occupational Health, Survivability, and Habitability) throughout the program. (DI-HFAC-81743/T, A074)

1.2.6.2 Human Engineering Design Approach Document-Operator (HEDAD-O): The contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain the HEDAD-O that describes the operator's interfaces.

The contractor shall use MIL-STD-1472G as guidance for any new or modified operator or maintainer interfaces. (DI-HFAC-80746B/T, B013)

1.2.6.3 Human Engineering Design Approach Document-Maintainer (HEDAD-M): The contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain the HEDAD-M that describes the maintainer's interfaces. The contractor shall use MIL-STD-1472G as guidance for any new or modified operator or maintainer interface. (DI-HFAC-80747B/T, B014)

1.2.7 Mass Properties: The contractor shall develop weight and balance status reports IAW Society of Allied Weight Engineers (SAWE) RP #7. The contractor shall prepare per SAWE RP #7 Charts A and E or FAA equivalent if applicable. The contractor shall weigh each aircraft prior to delivery and deliver with a completed Weight and Balance Handbook per SAWE RP #7. (DI-

MGMT-81501A/T, B015)

1.2.8 Weapon Systems Integrity (WSI): The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain the WSI programs as described in the below subparagraphs. The contractor shall identify FAA equivalent programs required for continuous airworthiness if applicable. The contractor shall document all plans, tasks, test data and reports associated with WSI programs and provide access to the Government.

1.2.8.1 Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP): The contractor shall develop and implement an ASIP IAW MIL-STD-1530C. (DI-MISC-80508B/T, B019)

1.2.8.2 Mechanical Equipment and Subsystems Integrity Program (MECSIP): The contractor shall develop and implement a MECSIP IAW MIL-STD-1798B. (DI-MISC-80508B/T, B018)

1.2.8.3 Propulsion System Integrity Program (PSIP, replacing Engine Structural Integrity Program (ENSIP)): The contractor shall develop and implement a PSIP IAW MIL-STD-3024.

(DI-MISC-80508B/T, B016)

1.2.8.4 Avionics Integrity Program (AVIP): The contractor shall develop and implement an AVIP IAW MIL-STD-1796A. As part of the AVIP program, the contractor shall develop and implement a Military Flight Operations Quality Assurance (MFOQA) program IAW AFPD 90-13, AFI 90-1301, and the Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) Supplement to AFI 90-1301. (DI-

MISC-80508B/T, B017)

1.2.9 Software

1.2.9.1 Software Development Program: The contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain a CRH System Software Development program as documented in a CRH Software Development Plan using MIL-STD-498 as a guide. The contractor shall address management of the total software development effort, including subcontractor software development efforts.

(DI-IPSC-81427A/T, B025)

1.2.9.1.1 Software Quality Assurance Program: The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a software quality assurance program, documented as part of the Software Development Plan. Major activities and events within the Software Quality Assurance Program shall be reflected in the IMP. Major activities and events include Software Quality Audits, Software Configuration Audits, and Software Qualification Testing. Software Quality Assurance shall be flowed to subcontractors that produce software products used in meeting the requirements of the CRH System. (DI-IPSC-81427A/T, B025)

1.2.9.2 Software Deliverables: The contractor shall develop, implement, and maintain a System/Subsystem Design Description, and the following software deliverables that address each Computer Software Configuration Item (CSCI) proposed for development: Software Requirements Specifications, Software Design Descriptions, Software Test Plans, Software Test Descriptions, Software Test Reports, Software Product Specifications, Interface Requirements Specification, and Software Version Descriptions. (DI-IPSC-81442A/T, B034; DI-

IPSC-81433A/T, B031; DI-IPSC-81435A/T, B026; DI-IPSC-81438A/T, B027; DI-IPSC-

81439A/T, B028; DI-IPSC-81440A/T, B033; DI-IPSC-81434A/T, B032; DI-IPSC-81441A/T, B029; DI-IPSC-81432A/T, B030)

1.2.9.3 Air Vehicle and Simulator Compatibility: The contractor shall retain ARINC 610 simulator compatibility in unmodified baseline air vehicle equipment and software. The contractor shall incorporate ARINC 610 standards into the design of newly developed air vehicle equipment and software.

1.2.10 Technology Readiness

1.2.10.1 Technology Maturity: For each Critical Technology Element (CTE), the contractor shall document in their SEMP how they will mature each CTE to technology readiness level (TRL) 9.

In addition, the contractor shall include how they will mature each CTE to TRL 7 or above prior to Milestone C. The contractor shall report on the maturation progress of the CTEs and support the Government in the conduct of the Milestone C Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) IAW the Department of Defense (DoD) Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Deskbook.

(DI-MISC-80508B/T, A086; DI-SESS-81785/T, A084)

1.2.11 Reliability and Maintainability (R&M) Program: The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain an R&M program to ensure achievement of the performance requirements of the CRH SS. The R&M program shall include R&M and Built-In Test (BIT) analyses and test tasks for the CRH air vehicle. The contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that the R&M levels achieved by their subcontractors and suppliers are consistent with the performance requirements of the CRH SS. Reliability activity updates shall be presented by the contractor at technical interchange meetings (TIMs) and program design reviews. (DI-MGMT-81453A/T, A001)

1.2.11.1 Reliability and Maintainability Program Plan (RMPP): The contractor shall document their R&M activities in a RMPP utilizing ANSI/GEIA-STD-0009 as a guide. The plan shall address the schedule, output, and staffing for each R&M analysis and test/demonstration. The R&M plan shall also describe the R&M activities that support development of maintenance support activities (e.g., Maintenance Task Analysis (MTA), Level of Repair Analysis, development of IETM trouble-shooting procedures, Condition Based Maintenance (CBM) program, Condition Based Maintenance Plus (CBM+), and Reliability Centered Maintenance (RCM) activities.) The contractor shall conduct maintainability demonstrations to verify compliance with maintainability requirements, in conjunction with Technical Order certification and verification. The maintainability portion of the program shall address, but is not limited to

(a) maintainability allocations, models, predictions and updates, and (b) testability analyses.

(DI-SESS-81613/T, A091)

1.2.11.2 Reserved

1.2.11.3 System Reliability Math Models, Allocations and Predictions: The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a statistical system reliability model, allocation, and simulation prediction for the CRH air vehicle. To support this process, the contractor shall use existing estimates or preferably, fielded reliability statistical distributions or MTBF of existing equipment provided that all assumptions employed are consistent with the CRH program. At minimum, the system model shall be used to (1) generate and update the R&M allocations from the system level down to lower indenture levels, (2) aggregate system-level R&M based on R&M estimates from lower indenture levels, and (3) identify single points of failure. The contractor shall update the system R&M model whenever new failure modes are identified, failure definitions are updated, operational & environmental load estimates are revised, or design and manufacturing changes occur throughout the life cycle. The contractor shall perform reliability model simulation analysis in order to assess if the design (including COTS, NDI, and GFE) is capable of meeting R&M requirements in the environments defined in the CRH SS. For newly designed or modified equipment, the contractor shall perform reliability modeling using Stress Analysis.

The contractor’s part-level stress analysis shall verify derating is being applied in accordance with the contractor’s derating guidelines. Pertinent information from other analyses shall be used as applicable (e.g., thermal analyses, worst case analysis). The contractor shall combine assessments using actual field data on existing CFE and GFE with predictions from newly designed or modified CFE and GFE to quantify an overall CRH reliability estimate. (DI-RELI- 81496/T, A090)

1.2.11.4 Manufacturing Quality Screening: In the R&M program plan, the contractor shall address, but not limited to, the use of manufacturing quality screening for all development and production hardware to eliminate or reduce latent defects, parts problems, workmanship, manufacturing problems. The contractor shall recommend, with adequate justification, the approach to be used from incoming component level inspection through air vehicle acceptance to ensure the manufacturing processes do not degrade the inherent reliability of the design.

1.2.11.5 Failure Reporting, Analysis, and Corrective Action System (FRACAS). The contractor as part of the reliability program, shall define and implement a closed loop failure reporting, analysis and corrective action system for the CRH program during development and production.

The contractor shall provide for visibility and traceability of all reported failures and BIT anomalies from discovery to close-out. The contractor shall maintain an electronic FRACAS database, available to the Government, that includes all R&M data and metrics needed to evaluate the CRH R&M, including but not limited to, applicable health monitoring requirements.

(DI-SESS-81315A, B040)

1.2.11.5.1 Failure Reporting: The contractor shall record all failures, BIT anomalies or non-conformances experienced on all components, LRU’s, SRU’s, and end-items during laboratory, qualification, R&M tests & demonstrations, incoming inspection, integration tests, flight tests and production acceptance tests. The contractor’s R&M program plan shall establish the formal reporting, analysis and corrective action system to be used.

1.2.11.5.2 Failure Analyses: The contractor shall perform failure analyses, on all failures and BIT anomalies recorded, to the level required to determine the root cause of failure, define the failure mechanism and to develop corrective actions to eliminate or limit their recurrence. For existing equipment or GFE that is integrated in the aircraft, the contractor’s analysis shall include an assessment of applicable installation provisions (e.g., power, signal, environment) to determine their adequacy.

1.2.11.5.3 Corrective Action: The contractor shall develop and implement effective corrective actions to eliminate or minimize recurrence of all failure and BIT anomalies and their effects.

The contractor shall demonstrate analytically or by test effective corrective actions and schedule for incorporation into production equipment.

1.2.11.6 Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). The contractor shall perform a Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) on the CRH air vehicle that includes a criticality analysis (this constitutes the FMECA under this paragraph). To support the FMECA, existing FMEA’s and FMECA’s may be used provided that all assumptions employed are consistent with the CRH program. The analysis shall be performed for the CRH mission profile under the CRH SS environmental conditions. The FMECA shall clearly identify those failure modes which are detectable by BIT. Newly designed or modified equipment shall document all failure modes down to the Shop Repairable Assembly (SRA) and piece part level. The contractor shall identify, evaluate and minimize during design process, all single point failure modes having the most serious effects, particularly the single point failures which directly result in mission failure or create unsafe conditions. The contractor shall identify and control reliability critical items, which require RCM attention because of complexity, life limit, application of advanced state of the art techniques, and the impact of potential failure on safety, readiness, mission success, or the demand for maintenance/logistics support. The FMECA shall support the CRH RCM for all assemblies, subassemblies, and applicable components of the CRH program. The contractor shall incorporate into the FMECA any new failure modes and effects discovered during laboratory life or accelerated life tests and flight tests within 60 days of an occurrence. The contractor shall reduce high risk identified failure modes to ensure CRH safety of flight and the reliability CRH SS requirements are achieved by the conclusion of the CRH Initial Operational Test program. The contractor shall conduct failure mode risk mitigation to include one or more of the following strategies: (a) elimination of the failure mode, (b) reduction of the failure mode’s probability of occurrence or frequency, (c) incorporation of redundancy, (d) mitigation of the failure mode’s effects (e.g., fault recovery, degraded modes of operation, advance warning of impending failure). ( DI-SESS-80980A/T, B039)

1.2.11.7 Reliability Growth Plan: The contractor's Reliability Growth Plan shall describe the iterative design process, as the design matures to identify actual (via testing) and growth potential (via analysis) sources of failures. The Reliability Growth Plan shall also include the contractor's process for additional future design effort spent on correcting any CRH SS R&M deficiencies in the product design or manufacturing processes discovered via the R&M modeling and simulation analysis. As part of the R&M program plan, the contractor shall include the following: (a) amount of testing, test schedule and resources available for achieving the specification requirements, (b) reliability growth planning curve as a function of each phase of lab and flight test hours, to grow the reliability to the specification value, (c) use of subsystem or equipment reliability growth testing to identify failure modes and BIT anomalies, which if uncorrected could cause the equipment to exhibit unacceptable levels of reliability performance during operational usage. The contractor shall conduct classical reliability development test or a Highly Accelerated Life Test (HALT) for all newly designed CFE and significantly modified CFE and GFE. The contractor shall make available for Government witness the growth testing, and

(d) project and track system reliability growth with a statistical methodology (e.g., Crow AMSAA (NHPP), Crow Extended – Continuous Evaluation, AMSAA Maturity Projection).

1.2.11.8 Reliability, Maintainability, and BIT Flight Test Monitoring: The contractor shall monitor Reliability, Maintainabilty, and BIT parameters on all systems and equipments required to meet the requirements of the CRH SS performance. The contractor shall maintain an electronic database, available to the Government, that includes all R&M data and metrics needed to evaluate the CRH SS R&M requirements. A contractor and Government staffed Joint Reliability Maintainability Evaluation Team (JRMET) shall evaluate the maintenance actions, failures, elapsed time, maintenance man-hours expended and BIT indications during CRH DT and OT.

The contractor shall be responsible for correcting all deficiencies identified in the equipment during the flight test program and incorporating the necessary modifications into the development item prior to the final phase of developmental testing. The contractor shall monitor the maintenance activity for the complete flight test program.

1.2.12 Reserved

1.2.13 Reserved

1.2.14 System Supportability: The contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a comprehensive design approach for system supportability, testability and self-diagnostic capabilities including cost benefits, lifecycle cost drivers, cost reduction opportunities, effectiveness, and risk. The approach shall include commonality, modularity, standardization, technology maturity, information assurance, and other contractor identified system supportability enhancements. The contractor shall document the results of the trade studies, reliability and maintainability analysis, design alternatives considered, and the details of the weapon system support requirements in terms of maintenance and support tasks, and the projected support resources. The contractor shall integrate engineering and logistics analyses and modeling efforts to quantify support resources (e.g., support equipment, spares, personnel, and facilities) to minimize CRH logistics footprint while meeting operational requirements at each operational location. The contractor shall use MIL-HDBK-502 as a guide. (DI-MISC-80508B/T, A011)

1.2.15 Configuration Management : Using MIL-HDBK-61A as a guide, the contractor shall develop, implement and maintain a CRH System life-cycle focused hardware and software configuration and data management program as documented in a Configuration Management Plan (CMP). The contractor’s CMP shall address management and control of the CRH functional, allocated and product baselines. The contractor’s CMP shall address management of the CRH System configuration baselines and shall include the contractors and subcontractors' configuration management principles, practices, and metrics. The configuration management program shall manage, track and control CRH System change activities, release formal baseline changes, provide traceability to training and design requirements, track configuration of all fielded assets, and produce status accounting reports. The contractor shall update and maintain applicable specifications, through the use of Engineering/Contract Change Proposals (ECP/CCP) and Notice of Revisions (NOR). The contractor shall produce, implement, maintain and deliver a CRH Training System configuration and data management program as a clearly identifiable, segregated subset of the CRH System CMP. The contractor shall ensure the configuration management and data management processes are compatible with the IDE as necessary to meet data delivery requirements. (DI-CMAN-80643C/T, B001; DI-

CMAN-80639C/T, A003; DI-CMAN-80640C/T, A006; DI-ADMN-81401B/T, A004; DI-CMAN-

80642C/T, A009; DI-CMAN-80858B/T, A005)

1.2.15.1 Specification Tree: The contractor shall prepare a specification tree that follows the contract work breakdown structure (CWBS) and provides requirements traceability from the System Specification and the Training System Specification to the lowest level specifications in the tree and from the lowest level back up to the System Specification and the Training System Specification. (DI-SESS-81785/T, A084; DI-CMAN-80858B/T, A005)

1.2.15.2 Configuration Items (CIs): The contractor shall identify system hardware and software recommendations for designation as CIs and Computer Software Configuration Items (CSCIs) and provide recommendations to the Government for review and concurrence. The contractor shall develop, document, and process Request for Nomenclature for newly developed electronic CIs lAW MIL-STD-196E and all other newly developed CIs using MIL-HDBK-1512 as a guide.

The contractor shall develop, document, and process Automatic Computer Program Identification Numbers IAW TO-00-5-16 for all CSCIs. (DI-MISC-81454B/T, B002; DI-SDMP-

81493A/T, B036; DI-CMAN-81254A/T, A008; DI-MCCR-80700/T, A052)

1.2.15.3 System Verification Reviews (SVRs)/Functional Configuration Audits (FCAs) and Physical Configuration Audits (PCAs): The contractor shall conduct and host SVRs/FCAs and PCAs for all CRH System CIs and CSCIs IAW the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL).

SVRs/FCAs and PCAs shall be accomplished as outlined in the IMP and IMS and IAW the CDRL. SVRs/FCAs and PCAs may be accomplished incrementally with Government approval and participation to support the SVR/FCA and Initial and Final PCAs. (DI-SESS-81646/T, A010)

1.2.15.4 Training System Configuration Management / Concurrency: The contractor shall ensure that the Training System maintains concurrency with the Air Vehicle. This concurrency process shall be documented in the Configuration Management Plan (CMP) and shall assess potential impacts to courseware, training devices, Distributed Mission Operations (DMO), and Data Base Generation System (DBGS) due to changes in CRH air vehicle configuration, tactics, environment, sustainment, technology insertion, etc. The contractor shall deliver ATDs and MTDs in the same baseline configuration of the first aircraft delivered to the associated site with the exception of OFT8 which shall be delivered with the most current configuration at time of delivery. The contractor shall also ensure that instructional materials are concurrent with CRH System technical data. The contractor shall establish ACAs with the follow-on training sustainment support contractor(s) in order to ensure concurrency between the aircraft and the training system. (DI-CMAN-80858B/T, A005)

1.2.15.5 Configuration Status Accounting (CSA): The contractor shall develop, maintain and document CSA information…