Questions and Answers 28 Oct 2009.pdf

PDF 99 KB Posted

Attached to
Small Business Acquisition & Sustainment Tool (SbAST) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
fa8530-09-R-22309
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Robins Air Force Base

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Small Business Acquisition & Sustainment Tool (SbAST), newest first.
File Type Posted
Questions and Answers 28 June 2010.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 16.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 20 Jan 2010.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 13 Jan 2010.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 19 Nov 2009.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 16 November 2009.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 12 Nov 2009.pdf PDF
2_CDRLS_SbAST.pdf PDF
FA853009R22309______0002.pdf PDF
16_Appendix C_SbAST.doc DOC document
8_Contractor_Pricing_Submission_SbAST.xls XLS spreadsheet
15_TEP Calculation Example_SbAST.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 3 Nov 2009.pdf PDF
FA853009R22309______0003.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 29 Oct 2009.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 23 Oct 2009.pdf PDF
FA853009R22309______0001.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 20 Oct 2009.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 25 Sept 2009.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 16 Sept 2009.pdf PDF
Interested Parties.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 14 Sept 2009.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 9 Sept 2009.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers 3 Sept 2009.pdf PDF
5_Reqts_Traceability_Matrix_SbAST.xls XLS spreadsheet
FA853009R22309.pdf PDF
4_Labor Categories_SbASTl.xls XLS spreadsheet
3_DD254_SbAST.pdf PDF
8_Contractor_Pricing_Submission_SbAST.xls XLS spreadsheet
1_PWS_SbAST.doc DOC document
12_Client Authorization Letter_SbAST.doc DOC document
9_Clause Matrix_SbAST.xls XLS spreadsheet
14 _FACT SHEET_Subcontractor_SbAST.DOC DOC document
2_CDRLS_SbAST.pdf PDF
10_ Subcontractor_Teaming_Consent_Form _SbAST.doc DOC document
6_Minimum_Capabilities_Matrixes_SbAST.xls XLS spreadsheet
11_CDRL Attachment_SbAST.doc DOC document
Show all 37

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SbAST RFP FA8530‐09‐R‐22309 Questions & Answers

QUESTION # 64: Since the rates as required per RFP section L‐9002)(f)(iii) are limited to critical subcontracts and only one non‐critical subcontractor (for categories 79 thru LC84) to fulfill the MCM requirements. Is the answer to question 63 expanding the requirement to allow Offerors to submit subcontractors rates in categories that are not being utilized to fulfilled Critical Subcontractor MCM requirements as defined by L‐900(2)(f)(iii) but future work such as RTM related efforts?

Answer # 64: The subcontracting pricing submission is serving as a composite set of rates that will be “Not To Exceed” rates applicable to all subcontractors. The MCM is the Minimum Capability Matrix but the Offer also must be able to address all areas of the PWS.

Do to the different requirements that could be placed on this contract in the future, the contractor needs to propose rates on all labor categories that could possibly be applicable to subcontractors in the future. If the contractor plans on doing 100% of the work for that labor category, technically they would not have to propose a subcontractor rate.

Background: Reference the Government answer to question 63. “Since the submitted Subcontractor Composite Rate Table is serving as Not to Exceed (NTE) rates that will be applicable to all subcontractors, the offeror needs to propose rates for all labor categories that could be used in the future.”

Question #65: In cases where the Prime Contractor is fulfilling a specific MCM requirement and no Critical Subcontractor IAW L‐900(2)(f)(iii) is required. Can the offeror propose a subcontractor NTE rate where no Critical Subcontractor is required to fulfill the future state subcontractor labor categories requirements?

Answer #65: If the Offeror is planning on completing 100% of the work for a specific labor category, then the Offeror would not have to propose a subcontractor rate for that labor category. The issue that may arise on future requirements is that any subcontract rate that is not proposed will not have an established NTE and will not be available to be proposed on future order requirements.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .