14 _FACT SHEET_Subcontractor_SbAST.DOC

RFP ATTACHMENT 14

RFP NUMBER: FA8530-09-R-22309

Present/Past Performance “FACTS Sheet”

SUBCONTRACTOR’S ACTUAL WORK PERFORMANCE

(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR)

Request the offeror complete a separate FACTS Sheet for each relevant contract. See Section L, Clause L-900(2)(f)(i), Instructions to Offerors, of this RFP for detailed instructions and limits of number and recency of contracts. Offeror is requested to use the format below and provide frank, concise comments regarding present/past performance on the program identified in paragraph B, below.

A. OFFEROR: (Including: (1) Name (Company/Division), (2) Address, (3) CAGE Code)

B. CONTRACT NUMBER: D/TO No.:

C. PROGRAM NAME AND DESCRIPTION:

D. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

1. Original schedule:

2. Current schedule:

3. Estimate @ completion:

4. How many times has scheduled changed and what are/were the primary causes:

E. CONTRACT VALUE:

1. Original contract dollar value and current dollar value:

2. Estimated value at completion and primary causes of changes to original contract dollar value:

3. If award fee contract, what percentages of the fee have been awarded in each of last three years:

F. NAME OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY OR CUSTOMER:

G. CONTRACT TYPE(S) – PLEASE LIST ALL THAT APPLY (pricing arrangements i.e. Firm Fixed Price, T&M, etc)

H. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF ACTUAL WORK PERFORMED

1. As a part of this narrative description, highlight portions considered most relevant of actual work performed addressing how and to what extent the proposed effort relates to the program work effort identified in paragraph B. above.

To supplement the data provided in the response to this paragraph, complete the following regarding relevancy of the effort identified in paragraph B to the proposed effort. This is limited to two pages beyond the page limitation of the FACTS sheet information.

2. This paragraph shall also include details to support the offeror’s record of actual work performed, including, but not limited to: timely delivery, technical quality, cost control, problem solving and resolving significant issues affecting contract performance, and the quality of business relations during work performance identified in paragraph B. above.

3. Discuss your compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business

Concerns. That is, did you carry out the policy of the United States in the awarding of subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and woman-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance? This is applicable to all offerors.

PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror’s opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.

I. PRIMARY POINTS OF CONTACT: (The offeror is responsible for ensure that current information is provided for all individuals. Five attempts will be made to contact and interview point of contacts provided. If the Government is unsuccessful in contacting any point of contact on the effort the contract’s past performance will receive an Unknown Confidence Rating. )

J. Specify, by name, key individual(s) who have active involvement in the program identified in paragraph B. above. Describe how participation of these key personnel contributed to the success of the actual work performed on the program identified in paragraph B. above, and how this indicates probability of success on the proposed effort.

K. Use this space to address any aspect about this program considered unique in connection with actual work performance. Describe quality awards or certifications that indicate the offeror possesses a high-quality process related to actual work performance.

L. Summarize contract issues relative to the number and severity of quality deficiencies recorded/contract discrepancy reports issued, cure notices, show cause letters, termination for default or cause, disputes, claims, latent defects, and corrective actions taken for the contract listed in paragraph B.

M. Additionally, for those efforts where the offeror is cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining “fixes” made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. This narrative portion is limited to one (1) additional page beyond the FACTS Sheet required page limitation. It is not presumed that the offeror’s performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of the offeror’s ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes. Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised) and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed by the offeror, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.

N. Was this contract effort (as identified in paragraph B, above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous WR-ALC procurement. Yes____ No_____. If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION – See FAR 3.104

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY RFP