FIA2T_Section_L_Admin_Changes_20160127.docx

FIA2T RFP FA8307-16-R-0049 - Section L Administrative Changes 29 January 2016

Rationale: L.5.9 2) is the reference for “Performance Rating Form”.

Question: Does the Government plan to publish an errata statement?

This document serves at the Errata Statement

Correct, the reference should be for L.5.9. 2).

“Acceptable Sources of Past Performance Ratings”.

Issue: The first sentence “The PPI tool information shall be submitted through the website included in the instructions in (Reference Microsoft Word File, “FIA2T_AtchL-9 Tailored FIA2T EZSource PPI Tool_20151019.docx”.” does not belong in this section.

Rationale: This section’s scope is “PPIRS/CPARS”, not “PPI Tool”. The PPI Tool scope in the first sentence is for providing the Contractor’s proposal in electronic form using the “EZSource PPI Tool” (previously identified in Section L.5.1., third paragraph and Attachment L-9.). Also, there is no website identified in “FIA2T_AtchL-9” for submission of the PPI information. The “website” provided in attachment 9 is “FedBizOpps (https://www.fbo.gov/) website” where the PPI Tool is supposed to be downloaded from, which nothing to do with PPIR/CPARS. Recommend deleting this sentence.

Question: Does the Government plan to publish an errata statement?

Added the PPI tool the FIA2T solicitation on FedBizOps website via amendment 1.

The first sentence of paragraphs L 5.5 and L 6.5 should be ignored because it is already referenced in L 5.1 and L 6.1.

and Para L.6.5 subparagraph 2)

“Acceptable Sources of Past Performance Ratings”

Issue: L.5.5 and L.6.5. subparagraph 2) references “in accordance with Section (Reference Microsoft Word File, “FIA2T_AtchL-9 Tailored FIA2T EZSource PPI Tool_20151019.docx”.” is incorrect. It should read as ” “in accordance with (Reference Microsoft Word File, “FIA2T_AtchL- 10_PastPerfRatingForm_20150728.docx”.

Rationale: This section’s scope is “Past Performance Ratings”, not “PPI Tool”.

Question: Does the Government plan to publish an errata statement?

Sentence should read “in accordance with ““FIA2T_AtchL- 10_PastPerfRatingForm_20160126.docx”.

“PPIRS Past Performance” Issue: The second sentence references “… using the Past Performance Rating Form (Section (Reference Microsoft Word File, “FIA2T_AtchL-9 Tailored FIA2T EZSource PPI Tool_20151019.docx”.” is incorrect. It should read as ” “in accordance with (Reference Microsoft Word File, “FIA2T_AtchL- 10_PastPerfRatingForm_20150728.docx”.

Rationale: This section’s scope is “Past Performance Ratings”, not “PPI Tool”.

Question: Does the Government plan to publish an errata statement?

Sentence should read “in accordance with ““FIA2T_AtchL- 10_PastPerfRatingForm_20150728.docx”.

“Past Performance Rating Forms” Issue: The first sentence references “the Offeror shall submit a Past Performance Rating Form using the template” is incorrect.

Rationale: The Offeror is not to submit a Past Performance Rating Form directly to the Government. Rather, the Offeror shall request their pervious rater/customer to submit the completed Past Performance Rating Form directly back to the Government PCO.

Question: Does the Government plan to publish an errata statement Sentence should read “the Offeror shall request their rater/customer submit a Past Performance Rating Form using the template in, “FIA2T_AtchL-10_PastPerfRatingForm_20160126.docx”.

“Past Performance Rating Forms” Issue: The first sentence if L.5.7 and L.6.7 references “in Section 2),” this is incorrect.

Rationale: The reference “in Section 2),” is meaningless, no relevant location.

Question: Does the Government plan to publish an errata statement?

Sentence should read, “in “FIA2T_AtchL-10_PastPerfRatingForm_20160126.docx”

“Past Performance Rating Forms” Issue: L.5.7 and L.6.7 subparagraph 1) references “in Section 2),” is incorrect.

Rationale: The reference “in Section 2),” is meaningless, no relevant location.

Question: Does the Government plan to publish an errata statement?

Sentence should read, “in “FIA2T_AtchL-10_PastPerfRatingForm_20160126.docx”

Past Performance Rating Forms Issue: L.5.7 and L.6.7 subparagraph 2) references “in Section 3),” this is incorrect.

Rationale: The reference “in Section 3),” is meaningless, no relevant location.

Question: Does the Government plan to publish an errata statement?

Sentence should read, “in “FIA2T_AtchL-11_PastPerf_ClientAuthLtr_20160126”

Issue: The instructions state that the ”PPI Tool” can be downloaded by accessing the FedBizOpps (https://www.fbo.gov/) website via the solicitation postings “ppi tool” link “ppi.tool.accdb” from the “All Files” column. The “ppi tool” link “ppi.tool.accdb” is not available in the “All Files” column of the solicitation page.

Rationale: This tool has not been seen by the contractor in any final form and may have associated questions, such as providing on electronic media (CD ROM), formatting of exported past performance reports, etc.

Question: When does the Government plan to provide the link? Will the contractor have opportunity to submit questions concerning the PPI Tool after the PPI Tool is available?

Added the PPI tool the FIA2T solicitation on FedBizOps website via amendment 1.