FIA2T_AtchL-10_PastPerfRatingForm_20160126.docx

DOCX document 45 KB Posted

Attached to
FLEXIBLE INFORMATION ASSURANCE ACQUISITION INFORMATION (FIA2T)
Solicitation number
FA830716R0049
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Rating Form

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FIA2T_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_20160217r.docx DOCX document
Amend_0004.pdf PDF
FIA2T_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_20160210.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_Section_M_20160202.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_AtchL-11_PastPerf_ClientAuthLtr_20160208.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_AtchL-5_Sample_Task_1_IMSTemplate_20160202.mpp MPP file
FIA2T_AtchL-4_Sample_Task_1_WBSDictionaryTemplate_20160202.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FIA2T_Atch_J-7_Section_L_20160208.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_AtchL-13_Cost-Price_V1_20160202.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FIA2T_AtchL-10_PastPerfRatingForm_20160202.docx DOCX document
Amend_0003.pdf PDF
FIA2T_AtchL-9_Tailored_FIA2T_EZSource__PPI_Tool_20160208.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_20160208.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_Section_L_Admin_Changes_20160127.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_RFP_Questions_and_Answers_20160127.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_Atch_J-7_Section_L_20160129.docx DOCX document
Amend_002.pdf PDF
FIA2TT_AtchL-4-Sample-Task_1_WBSDictionaryTemplate_20160129.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amend_0001_26_Jan_16.pdf PDF
ppi_tool.accdb —
PPI_Character_Limit.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_AtchL-11_PastPerf_ClientAuthLtr_20160126.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_AtchL-1_GlossaryAcronyms_20150728.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_AtchL-7_Sample_Task_2_PartsScheduleTemplate_20150728.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FIA2T_AtchL-12_BOE_RationaleForm_20150728.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_AtchL-2_Offerors_Library_Reference_Table_20150728.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA8307-16-R-0049.pdf PDF
RFP_COver_Letter_20_Jan_16.pdf PDF
FIA2T_AtchL-11_PastPerf_ClientAuthLtr_20150728.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_AtchL-6_Sample_Task_2_ECCCA-ProductionDescription_20150728.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_AtchL-13_Cost-Price_V1_20151006.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FIA2T_AtchL-9_Tailored_FIA2T_EZSource__PPI_Tool_20151019.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_AtchL-8_Sample_Task_2_Production_Task_Timeline_20150728.pptx PPTX presentation
FIA2T_AtchL-SB_Sample_Task_for_Set-Aside_20150923.rtf RTF text file
FIA2T_AtchL-3_Sample_Task_1_S-SRD_20150728.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_AtchL-10_PastPerfRatingForm_20150728.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_AtchL-14_SB_Choice_of_Competition_Form_20150915.docx DOCX document
FIA2T_AtchL-5_Sample_Task_1_IMSTemplate_20150728.mpp MPP file
FIA2T_AtchL-4_Sample_Task_1_WBSDictionaryTemplate_20150728.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 39

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA8307-16-R-0049

FIA2T Section L Attachment L-10 – Past Performance Rating Form 26 January 2016

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM

PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):

CONTRACTOR NAME:
Click here to enter text.
CONTRACTOR DUNS CODE:
Click here to enter text.
CONTRACTOR CAGE CODE:
Click here to enter text.
CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER:
Click here to enter text.
PROJECT TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS
FROM (dd-MMM-yyyy):

Click here to enter text.

TO (dd-MMM-yyyy):

Click here to enter text.

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):

CAUTION

If your response includes information requiring protected dissemination (e.g., Classified or Proprietary), contact the FIA2T Contracting Officer, Mr. Ralph Urias, at (210) 925-1072 or ralph.urias@us.af.mil for specific delivery instructions.

NAME:
Click here to enter text.
TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
AGENCY or CUSTOMER:
Click here to enter text.
PHONE:
Click here to enter text.
E-MAIL:
Click here to enter text.

Was the project contractual effort for Information Assurance related products (hardware and/or software), COMSEC equipment, cryptographic key material, data distribution management equipment, or ancillary and related equipment?

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, summarize the specific work the contractor performed (limit to 250 words).

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

Was the project solicited under or reported under a NAICS OR PSC CODE that correlates any NAICS CODE OR PSC CODE in Table 1?

|_| Yes

|_| No

If Yes, what was the predominate NAICS or PSC CODE that this project was solicited under or reported under in FPDS-NG or other documentation? (Provide only one)

NAICS CODE or PSC CODE:
Click here to enter text.

If No, use Table 1 to determine the predominate NAICS or PSC CODE that best relates to the project, in your best judgment. (Provide only one)

NAICS CODE or PSC CODE:
Click here to enter text.

For each of the Six (6) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control is N/A, Please explain why.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (limit to 250 words):

Click here to enter text.

2. SCHEDULE

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s/Buyer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Buyer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

3. COST CONTROL

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s/Buyer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Buyer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

Click here to enter text.

4. BUSINESS RELATIONS

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s/Buyer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Buyer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

5. MANAGEMENT OF KEY PERSONNEL

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s/Buyer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Buyer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

6. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s/Buyer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Buyer’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Click here to enter text.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .