Sec_L_Attch_10_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_3_Feb_14.doc

SECTION L ATTACHMENT 10

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Offeror: Complete Section 1, then e-mail questionnaire to the customer points of contact listed on the Past Performance Information Sheet.

Offeror’s Evaluator: Complete Sections 2-5 and e-mail to: Dustin.Huler@us.af.mil

DO NOT PROVIDE A COPY BACK TO THE OFFEROR.

When filled in, this document is source selection sensitive information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:

C. Contract number:

D. Contract type:

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost:

H. Current/final contract cost:

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: (enter below) J. Description of service provided (enter below):

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (enter below)

Local_____ Nationwide_____ Worldwide_____ Other Command(s) ____

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

1. Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE

PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or was satisfactory.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score

T1. Ability to effectively transition responsibilities and roles

T2. Ability to maintain transition schedule

T3. Ability to effectively transition tasks on a non-interference basis

T4. Ability to effectively manage transfer of GFP

T5. Ability to effectively transfer Data

T6. Ability to effectively identify and manage risks associated with transition of Weapon System

A1. Ability to identify and resolve system impacts related to Nuclear Hardness

A2. Ability to conduct system accuracy analysis and reporting

A3. Overall effectiveness in identifying and resolving system or performance anomalies and trends

A4. Overall effectiveness in performing Anomaly Program Schedule Management

A5. Overall effectiveness in performing Assessment Business and Financial Management

A6. Overall effectiveness in development and implementation of training materials

S1. Ability to support Weapon System Sustainment

S2. Ability to support Software assessment, development and integration

S3. Ability to maintain configuration control and baseline management

S4. Ability to maintain adequate tools and internal practices to effectively plan, execute, track, and report on test, evaluation and other activities

S5. Demonstrated the technical capabilities and expertise required in the contract

S6. Ability to deliver accurate technical data packages and Technical Orders, effectiveness in performing Data Management

S7. Ability to identify and handle Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) issues

S8. Overall effectiveness integrating Nuclear Surety requirements into systems engineering processes

S9. Overall effectiveness in performing Manufacturing and Production Support

S10. Overall effectiveness in performing Business and Financial Management of Sustainment Engineering Tasks

S11. Overall effectiveness in performing Systems Engineering and Integration for Modification and Replacement Programs

S12. Overall effectiveness in performing Test Support

S13. Overall effectiveness in development and implementation of Training Materials

S14. Ability to effectively Transition responsibilities and functions

I1. Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements

I2. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

I3. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

I4. Ability to meet contract schedule

I5. Contractor was cooperative/successful dealing with other contractors (through an ACA) that weren’t subcontractors

I6. How well did the production articles perform once they were delivered to the Government

I7. How well was the contractor able to react to Government mandated Engineering Change Proposals

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Overall effectiveness in performing Program Schedule Management

P4. Overall effectiveness in performing Acquisition Program Documentation Preparation

P5. Overall effectiveness in performing Program Risk Management

P6. Overall effectiveness in performing Strategic Planning

P7. Overall effectiveness in performing Earned Value Management

P8. Overall effectiveness in performing Quality Assurance

O1. Ability to hire a qualified workforce for this effort

O2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort

C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal), or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: OVERALL PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

1. Describe the contractor’s greatest strong points in the performance of the contract.

2. Describe the contractor’s greatest shortcomings in the performance of the contract.

3. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Yes ____ No ____ (If yes, provide details/comments)

Evaluator’s Signature

Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please e-mail this completed questionnaire to: Dustin.Huler@us.af.mil

Questions or Comments can be directed to Dustin.Huler@us.af.mil