Draft ISC Section L Attachments Consolidated.pdf

ATTACHMENT 1

PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SHEET (PPIS)

(NOTE: All information contained in a “NOTE”, including this line, may be deleted in the submittal to maximize the available space for responses.)

(NOTE: Provide the information listed below for each contract identified. Provide frank, concise comments regarding performance on the contracts you identify. Provide a separate completed form for each contract submitted.)

A. Offeror Name (Company/Division):

Cage Code:

DUNS Number:

(NOTE: If the company or division performing this effort is different than the offeror or the relevance of this effort to the instant acquisition is impacted by any company/corporate organizational change, note those changes below.)

B. Program title:

C. Contract Specifics:

1. Contracting agency or customer:

2. Contract number:

3. Contract type:

4. Period of performance:

5. Original contract $ value (do not include unexercised options):

6. Current contract $ value (do not include unexercised options):

7. If amounts for 5 and 6 above are different, provide a brief description of the reason below.

8. Original completion date:

9. Current scheduled completion date:

10. Estimated completion date:

11. Number of contract changes:

12. Enter primary cause for contract changes below:

DRAFT

D. Enter below a brief description of effort as Prime, Subcontractor or teaming arrangement.

(NOTE: Please indicate whether it was development and/or production, or other acquisition phase and highlight portions considered most relevant to the current acquisition and whether performance was as Prime or Subcontractor.)

E. Primary customer points of contact:

(NOTE: For Government contracts/orders, provide current information on all three individuals.

For commercial contracts, provide points of contact fulfilling these same roles.)

1. Program Manager and/or Site Manager

2. Procurement Contracting Officer

3. Lead Program Engineer

Name

Office

Address

Telephone

FAX No

E-mail

F. Address below any technical (or other) area about this contract considered unique.

G. Describe the relevancy of this contract to the technical aspects of the Integration Support Contract (ISC) Performance Work Statement.

(NOTE: Include ICBM and other related weapon system support experience)

H. Include below relevant information concerning your compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, on the contract you are submitting.

I. Subcontracting Plan Requirements

1. Was a subcontracting plan required? _______ If YES, go to # 2. If NO, go to item J

2. Planned goal (%) Achieved goal

3. Explain below why goals were not met.

J. Describe below the nature of the work to be performed on the contract by the business entity being reported here.

(NOTE: Also, estimate the percentage of the proposed ISC contract effort to be performed by this entity and whether this entity will be performing as the prime, subcontractor, joint venture/teaming arrangement (define relationship).

K. Briefly summarize the major contract issues and corrective actions taken for the contract listed in Paragraph B above.

L. Describe unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports and progress towards correction.

ATTACHMENT 2

SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER

LETTERHEAD

(Date)

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

The Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center’s Intercontinental Ballistic Missile

Systems Division (ICBMSD) of Air Force Materiel Command is in the process of selecting a contractor for the Integration Support Contract (ISC). The ISC will provide knowledge based sustaining engineering support to the ICBMSD for sustainment of the

ICBM weapon system. The current operational ICBM, Minuteman III (MMIII), is expected to remain in the AF inventory until 2030. This poses unique challenges in sustaining mission capability for an aging weapon system well beyond its original design life. All effort under this contract will fall into two primary requirement areas: sustaining engineering and modification support. The ISC vehicle will be used by the ICBMSD and

Global Strike Command to address sustainment and modification development issues for the ICBM weapon system.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. The Government depends on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on prior contracts.

The areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire.

The schedule is extremely tight, and the Government needs your written response no later than 14 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow the

Government sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically or by hand and emailed to Mr. Kirk Dean at

Kirk.Dean@hill.af.mil and David Lovett at David.Lovett@hill.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

_________________________ 1 Atch

Signature Questionnaire mailto:Kirk.Dean@hill.af.mil mailto:Andrew.hatch@hill.af.mil

ATTACHMENT X

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Offeror: Complete Section 1, then e-mail questionnaire to the customer points of contact listed on the Past Performance Information Sheet.

Offeror’s Evaluator: Complete Sections 2-5 and e-mail to: Kirk.Dean@hill.af.mil and

David.Lovett@hill.af.mil .

DO NOT PROVIDE A COPY BACK TO THE OFFEROR.

When filled in, this document is source selection sensitive information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:

C. Contract number:

D. Contract type:

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost:

H. Current/final contract cost:

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs: (enter below)

J. Description of service provided (enter below):

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (enter below)

Local_____ Nationwide_____ Worldwide_____ Other Command(s) _____ mailto:David.Lovett@hill.af.mil

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

1. Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or was satisfactory.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score

Technical Performance (General) B P G Y R N

T1. Ability to support Weapon System Sustainment.

T2. Ability to support System Engineering & Integration (SE&I)

T3. Ability to maintain configuration control and baseline management.

T4. Ability to maintain adequate tools and internal practices to effectively plan, execute, track, and report on test, evaluation and other activities.

T5. Demonstrated the technical capabilities and expertise required in the contract.

T6. Ability to deliver accurate technical data packages and

Technical Orders, effectiveness in performing Data

Management

T7. Ability to identify and handle Diminishing Manufacturing

Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) issues.

Technical Performance (Systems Engineering) B P G Y R N

T8. Overall effectiveness in performing Program Schedule

Management.

T9. Overall effectiveness in performing Acquisition Program

Documentation Preparation

T10. Overall effectiveness in performing Program Risk

T11. Overall effectiveness in performing Strategic Planning

T12. Overall effectiveness in performing Earned Value

T13. Overall effectiveness in performing Quality Assurance

T14. Overall effectiveness in performing Logistics Planning

T15. Overall effectiveness in performing Manufacturing and

Production Support

T16. Overall effectiveness in performing Business and Financial

T17. Overall effectiveness in performing Systems Engineering and

Integration for Modification and Replacement Programs

T18. Overall effectiveness in performing Test Support

T19. Overall effectiveness in development and implementation of training materials

T20. Ability to effectively transition responsibilities and functions

Program Management B P G Y R N

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, and control the program).

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes).

P3. Ability to understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements.

P4. Effectiveness of material management (including Government

Furnished Property or Material).

P5. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer.

P6. Ability to meet contract schedule

P7. Contractor was cooperative/successful dealing with other contractors (through an ACA) that weren’t subcontractors

Organization, Staff & Subcontractor Management B P G Y R N

O1. Ability to hire a qualified workforce for this effort.

O2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

O3. Contractor effectiveness in maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/ phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

Organization, Staff & Subcontractor Management B P G Y R N

O4. Effective management of its subcontractors/ teaming partners

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation B P G Y R N

S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

Cost Performance B P G Y R N

C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal), or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above

(use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___ No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: OVERALL PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

1. Describe the contractor’s greatest strong points in the performance of the contract.

2. Describe the contractor’s greatest shortcomings in the performance of the contract.

3. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Yes ____ No ____ (If yes, provide details/comments)

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please e-mail this completed questionnaire to: Kirk.Dean@hill.af.mil and

David.Lovett@hill.af.mil .

Questions or Comments can be directed to Kirk.Dean@hill.af.mil at (801) 777-5668 or

David.Lovett@hill.af.mil at (801) 777-5956.

mailto:andrew.hatch@hill.af.mil mailto:andrew.hatch@hill.af.mil

ATTACHMENT 4

SUBCONTRACTOR/TEAMING PARTNER CONSENT FORM FOR THE

RELEASE OF PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION TO THE PRIME

CONTRACTOR

Past performance information concerning subcontractors and teaming partners cannot be disclosed to a private party without the subcontractor's or teaming partner's consent.

Because a prime contractor is a private party, the Government will need that consent before disclosing subcontractor/teaming partner past performance information to the prime during exchanges. In an effort to assist the Government in assessing your past performance relevancy and confidence, we request that the following consent form be completed by the major subcontractors/teaming partners identified in your proposal. The completed consent forms should be submitted as part of your Past Performance Volume

(or Proposal).

SAMPLE

Dear (Contracting Officer)

We are currently participating as a (subcontractor/teaming partner) with (prime contractor or name of entity providing proposal) in responding to the Department of the Air Force, (location) request for Proposal (solicitation number) for the (program title or description of effort).

We understand that the Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections. In order to facilitate the performance confidence assessment process we are signing this consent form to allow you to discuss our past and present performance information with the prime contractor during the source selection process.

(Signature and Title of individual who has the authority to sign for and legally bind the company)

Company Name:

Address:

ATTACHMENT 5

COMMERCIAL CLIENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER

To assist the Government in performing a Performance Confidence Assessment Group of your present and past performance on relevant commercial contracts, the following letter shall be issued to your points of contact (POCs) for those commercial efforts that you identify to us in your past performance volume. A copy of the authorization letters for each commercial contract shall be included in your Past Performance Volume.

Note: This should be placed on company letterhead

SAMPLE

Dear (Commercial Client/Customer)

We are currently responding to the Department of the Air Force, Hill Air Force Base

Request for Proposal (RFP) #FA8214-12-R-0001 for the Intercontinental Ballistic

Missile Systems Division (ICBMSD) Integration Support Contract (ISC).

The Government is placing increased emphasis on past performance in order to obtain best value in source selections. The Government is requesting that clients of companies who submit proposals in response to their RFP for the ISC be identified and that their participation in the validation process be requested. Therefore, in the event you are contacted for information on work we have performed on (list program), you are hereby authorized to respond to those inquiries.

We have identified (Name) of your organization as the point of contact based on (his/her) knowledge concerning our work. Your cooperation is appreciated. Any questions may be directed to (Name, title, phone number and fax number for the POC).

Sincerely, (Offeror’s POC)

ATTACHMENT L-X

Team Subfactor 1: Systems

Engineering Subfactor 2: Transition Subfactor 3: Management

Business Size (Large or

Small)

CAGE

Code DUNS Number

(Prime Contractor)

(Subcontractor)

(Subcontractor)

(Subcontractor)

(Subcontractor)

(Subcontractor)

Team Subfactor 1: Systems

Engineering Subfactor 2: Transition Subfactor 3: Management

Business Size (Large or

Small)

CAGE

Code DUNS Number

ABC, Inc. X X X Small XXXX XXXXXXXX

XYZ, Inc. X X X Large XXXX XXXXXXXX

LMNOP, Inc. X Small XXXX XXXXXXXX

HIJK, Inc. X Small XXXX XXXXXXXX

(Subcontractor)

(Subcontractor)

Instructions: Please clarify the roles and responsibilities of each team member participating in your proposal for the Hill AFB solicitation (FA8xxx-xx-R-xxxx) by typing the name of each participating company in the appropriate column in the table above. Then mark an "X" for each subfactor that they will be participating in on this contract. Contractors not participating in a particular subfactor will not be evaluated for that subfactor. Also include the Business Size, Cage Code and DUNS Number for each as per the headings in the table. Please save the Excel file as your company name (e.g. ABCInc.xls).

See example below.

TEAM LIST, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES