Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 21 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FA5004-09-R-C001 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA5004-09-R-C001
About this file
ATTCH 4 Past Performance Questionairre
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 42
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA5004-09-R-C014
Attachment 4
PRESENT / PAST PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
FA5004-09-R-0001
Section A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor prior to mailing or faxing)
a. Contractor’s name and address: ________________________________________
b. Point of Contact: _____________________________________________________
c. Phone #: _____________________________________
d. Contract Number: ________________________ Contract Type: ____________________
e. Project Title: __________________________________________________________________
f. Period of Performance: __________________________________________________________
g. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in Section B of this Questionnaire.
| ___________________________________________ | _______________ | |
| Signature and Title | Date |
SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (To be completed by Past Performance Evaluation respondents).
a. Respondent’s name and address: __________________________________________
b. Respondent’s Name: ____________________________________________________
c. Phone #: ___________________ E-Mail: ________________________ Fax #: __________________
| d. Contract Number: ____________________________ | Contract Type:_________________________ |
| e. Award Amount: _____________________________ | Final Amount: __________________________ |
f. Project Title: _____________________________________________________________
g. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________
Please mail or FAX the completed questionnaire to:
| 354 CONS/LGCB |
| 3112 Broadway Ave Unit 5B |
| Eielson AFB, Alaska 99702 |
| FAX: (907) 377-2389 |
Performance Evaluation Instructions: When responding to the descriptive statements, select the letter, which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. If the contractor has no record of past performance relevant to a particular question, select “Neutral”.
| E |
| V |
| S |
| N |
| M |
| U |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Neutral |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the Government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner. |
| Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the Government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner. |
| Performance met contract requirements. There were some minor problems, and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| No record of past performance, or the record is inconclusive. |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective. |
| Performance did not meet contractual requirements. There were serious problems, and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
Evaluation of the Contractor’s Performance:
I. Quality Control
1. Were you satisfied with the quality of services received? E V S N M U
2. The contractor maintained accurate work order log records, and files; and provided accurate, timely reports? E V S N M U
3. Able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from government counterparts? E V S N M U
4. The contractor provided the necessary equipment and materials to meet the contract requirements? E V S N M U
5. Display responsiveness/timeliness relative to settling of customer complaints?
E V S N M U
6. The contractor provided an effective Quality Control / Inspection procedure, and personnel? E V S N M U
7. The contractor demonstrated the ability to remedy deficiencies in management and overall contract performance? E V S N M U
8. Effective in interfacing with the Government’s staff? E V S N M U
II. Management Effectiveness: To what extent did the contractor…
1. Provide experienced managers, and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements. E V S N M U
2. The contractor demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain and replace in a timely manner, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. E V S N M U
3. Allow site manager sufficient authority to make decisions or take actions during project performance. E V S N M U
4. Contractor responsiveness / timeliness relative to settling of customer complaints. E V S N M U
5. Has the contractor demonstrated unreasonable and uncooperative behavior in resolving customer complaints? YES NO
6. Is the contractor flexible in satisfying the requirements of their customer?
E V S N M U
7. Did this offeror have the necessary experience in “Military Family Housing Maintenance”? YES NO
Explain any negative comments:
III. COST CONTROL:
1. Contractors ability to meet the terms of the contract within the contractually agreed price. E V S N M U
2. Were there any contract concessions/changes/termination’s made due to the contractor failure to accurately estimate costs? YES NO
3. Were there any contract concessions/changes/termination’s made due to the contractors inability to meet technical requirements and / or delivery schedules? YES NO
4. Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? YES NO
5. Modifications were priced within reason as compared to the Government estimate? YES NO
6. Did modifications require extensive negotiations? YES NO
IV. TERMINATION HISTORY:
1. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience?
YES DEFAULT CONVENIENCE NO
If yes, explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
2. Are there any pending terminations? YES NO
If yes, explain and indicate the status. ______________________________________________________________________________________________
3. Have there been any Contract Discrepancy Reports (CDR’s) issued, or are there any pending? YES NO
If yes, explain and indicate the status. __________________________________________________________________________________________
V. OVERALL PERFORMANCE:
1. Rate the contractors overall performance? E V S N M U
2. Would you award to this contractor again? YES NO
3. Briefly describe the contractor’s predominant STRENGTHS and/or WEAKNESSES:
ONCE COMPLETED THIS SURVEY WILL BE CONSIDERED GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL USE ONLY
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .