FA488721R0014 Consolidated RFI Responses.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 13 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Maintenance & Repair (M&R) IDIQ, Luke AFB, AZ
- Solicitation number
- FA488721R0014
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFI Log
| REQUEST FOR INFORMATION LOG | |||||||||
| CONTRACT #: | PROJECT # / TITLE: | ||||||||
| TBD | M&R | ||||||||
| TO BE COMPLETED BY CONTRACTOR | TO BE COMPLETED BY GOVERNMENT | ||||||||
| RFI # | DATE | DOCUMENT | SHEET / PAGE / PARA | DISCIPLINE | QUESTION / ISSUE | RESPONSE DATE | RESPONSE | POC | |
| OFFICE SYM | NAME | ||||||||
| 001 | 17-Mar-21 | Attachment 18 | Section L, Paragraph 3, subparagraph g) | General | Offerors are directed to submit all Volumes of their proposal electronically via DoD Secure Access File Exchange Service (DoD SAFE) at the link indicated, with each Volume included as a separate file. However, Attachment 8 of the solicitation, entitled Luke AFB Disk Submittal Guidance, is directing Offerors to submit their proposals “Solicitation Volumes I, II, III, and IV, on a CD with a printed label”. | 17-Mar-21 | Attachment 18 outlines instructions to offerrors in regards to solicitation submission. Attachment 8 outlines instructions and guidance for disk submittals. Attachment 8 guidance would be pertaining to post award actions and will have no affect on current soliciation submissions. | PKB | Grimes, Bailey |
| 002 | 17-Mar-21 | Attachment 19 | Section L, Paragraph 2 | General | Section L , Paragraph 2, indicates that the Offeror’s proposal will consist of three (3) parts or Volumes, not four (4), i.e., Price Proposal, Technical Execution Plan, and Past Performance Information, respectively. | 17-Mar-21 | Attachment 18 outlines instructions to offerrors in regards to solicitation submission. Attachment 8 outlines instructions and guidance for disk submittals. Attachment 8 guidance would be pertaining to post award actions and will have no affect on current soliciation submissions. | PKB | Grimes, Bailey |
| 003 | 17-Mar-21 | Attachment 8 | General | Attachment 8 is directing the submittal of “Project As-Builts, O&M Manuals and Warranty Documents” via a CD. Are these documents considered post-award and associated with the completion of specific Task Orders or projects? Please clarify. | 17-Mar-21 | Attachment 18 outlines instructions to offerrors in regards to solicitation submission. Attachment 8 outlines instructions and guidance for disk submittals. Attachment 8 guidance would be pertaining to post award actions and will have no affect on current soliciation submissions. | PKB | Grimes, Bailey | |
| 004 | 17-Mar-21 | General | This is an M&R Contract, but the solicitation is also requesting as-builts which are usually only necessary for a design build contract. Will the winning contractor also be expected to provide design services? | 17-Mar-21 | In accordance with section 7 of the Statement of work, Attachment 1, As-built drawings are included in the scope of work. The SOW also allows for small renovations and as such those changes would need to be captured through as-built drawings. As-built drawings are not exclusive to design-build efforts. | PKB | Grimes, Bailey | ||
| 005 | 17-Mar-21 | General | If maintenance is performed on a building, and that building currently doesn’t have as-builts drawings, is the contractor to provide new as-built drawings for the building? | 19-Mar-21 | Maintenance work should not require as-built as maintained work is not changing anything. If the scope of work changes such that the facilities infrastructure/architecture becomes altered, updated as-built drawings will be required for archive. | CES | Sean Sussman | ||
| 006 | 17-Mar-21 | Statement of Work | General | In the SOW it states that the contractor shall provide drawings using AutoCAD 2017. Will the government always provide the existing as-built in AutoCAD 2017 for the contractor to change? Or, does the government intend to provide PDF’s of old drawings and expect the contractor to convert all the governments existing drawings into AutoCAD 2017? | 19-Mar-21 | All available DWG/PDF files will be provided if the scope of work depicts that as-built will require updating. | CES | Sean Sussman | |
| 007 | 17-Mar-21 | General | If the government will provide existing as-built in AutoCAD 2017, will they already comply to the Tri-Service Center’s A/E/C and Spatial Data Standard? | ||||||
| 19-Mar-21 | No | CES | Sean Sussman | ||||||
| 008 | 17-Mar-21 | General | Will the contractor be expected to convert the governments existing drawings to the Tri-Service Center’s A/E/C and Spatial Data Standard? | 19-Mar-21 | No. Any as-built that meet the Tri-Service Center’s A/E/C and Spatial Data standard will be expected to be corrected and returned in Tri-Service Center’s A/E/C and Spatial Data standard. Any provided as-built that does not meet the Tri-Service Center’s A/E/C and Spatial Data standard will be expected to be corrected and returned in the same standard that was provided. | CES | Sean Sussman |
Solicitation: FA488720REC01 Attachment 5: RFI Log Date: 15 June 2020
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .