Attachment_7_-_PPQ_Cover_Letter_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 182 KB Posted

Attached to
Nellis AFB ADAIR II Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4861-18-R-C003
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

Attachment 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Nellis AFB ADAIR II, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment_4_-_Revised_ADAIR_II_Pricing_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA486118RC0030002_Nellis_ADAIR_II_Amendment_02.pdf PDF
Nellis_ADAIR_II_RFP_Q&A_3.pdf PDF
Nellis_ADAIR_II_RFP_Q&A_2.pdf PDF
FA486118RC0030001_Nellis_ADAIR_II_Amendment.pdf PDF
Nellis_ADAIR_II_RFP_Q&A.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_-_ADAIR_II_Pricing_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
ADAIR_II_Industry_Day_Attendance_Roster.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_-_WD_15-5593_(Rev._-8).pdf PDF
Attachment_1a_-_PPI_Tool_Instructions.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_-_Oral_Presentation_Slide_Master.pptx PPTX presentation
Attachment_4_-_Pricing_Worksheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_6_-_DD_Form_254.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_Small_Business_Subcontracting_Plan_Checklist.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_PPI_Tool.accdb MDB file
FA486118RC003_Nellis_ADAIR_II_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Industry_Briefing.pdf PDF
Section_L_007.pdf PDF
Section_M_009.pdf PDF
ADAIR_PWS.pdf PDF
Base_Access_Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 21

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFP # FA4861-18-R-C003

Attachment 7

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE INSTALLATION CONTRACTING AGENCY

MEMORANDUM FOR

(Respondent) (Date)

FROM: 99th Contracting Squadron

Airfield Sustainment Flight 5865 Swaab Blvd, Bldg 588 Nellis AFB, NV 89191

SUBJECT: Request for Present and Past Performance Information, Solicitation No. FA4861-18-R-C003

1. Air Force Combat Command, 57th Adversary Tactics Group is in the process of selecting contractors for award of a Adversary Air (“Nellis ADAIR II) contract for the period of thirty six 36 months for the base year, plus two (2), twelve

(12) month ordering periods.

2. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s Present and Past Performance on contracts, which reflects the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.

3. Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the attached questionnaire, which we have requested be forwarded by the offeror to his customers. Please fill out and return this questionnaire to the respective offeror for submission with their proposal.

4. Your assistance is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this award process.

//Signed// JAMES P. GALLAGHER Jr., Capt, USAF Contracting Officer

1 Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire

War-winning capabilities … on time, on cost

RESPOND NLT: 2 APRIL 2018 RFP No. FA4861-18-R-C003

RFP Attachment 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 3.104

A. GENERAL INFO (Company being evaluated): Respondent, please correct information known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name:

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________________Dollar Amount:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: __________________________________________

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION (Person Completing Questionnaire):

Name of Respondent: Relationship to Contractor:

Address:

Telephone Number: Fax Number:

Email Address:

C. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Please rate the contractor’s quality of performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate column that best describes their effort in accordance with the following descriptions.

1 2 3 4 5 N/A

Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very Good Exceptional Neutral/

Unknown Confidence

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractor performance of the factor or subfactor contains a problem(s) for which the con-tractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance does not meet some con-tractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the factor or subfactor being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor’s pro-posed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance meets contrac-tual require-ments. Con-tractual per-formance of the factor or subfactor con-tains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s (or customer’s) benefit. The con-tractual per-formance of the factor or subfactor being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual require-ments and exceeds many to the Government’s (or customer’s) benefit.

The contractual performance of the factor or subfactor being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

The question does not apply. No performance record identifiable within the area of evaluation.

Technical Capability and Management Approach

Did the contractor provide sufficient personnel with sufficient breadth and depth of experience /expertise to respond to the PWS?

Did the contractor effectively monitor team performance and quality of work?

Did the contractor effectively communicate between contractor employees and/or the Government counterparts?

Did the contractor provide reasonable and cooperative support in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

Did the contractor meet schedule and respond to unexpected surges in work activity?

Technical Capability and Management Approach (Cont’d) 1 2 3 4 5 N/A If required, did the contractor avoid, neutralize, or mitigate Organizational Conflicts of Interest?

Did the contractor demonstrate a sound technical approach, and overcome technical challenges, if encountered, during the period of performance?

Did the contractor have technically qualified personnel at the time of award? If not, did the contractor recruit, hire and retain appropriately qualified personnel throughout the remaining period of performance?

If personnel were replaced during the period of performance, did the contractor recruit and hire personnel with the appropriate required experience and essential technical expertise necessary to ensure successful contract performance?

Cost

Did the contractor accurately forecast contract costs, including future costs?

Did the contractor develop and meet realistic project cost estimates?

Did the contractor promptly alert the Government of unforeseen cost increases?

Did the contractor demonstrate effectiveness in handling unforeseen cost increases?

Did the contractor provide accurate and timely cost reporting?

Did the contractor provide accurate and complete cost proposals reflecting all aspects of work for the required effort?

D. Briefly summarize any efforts that resulted in implemented innovative and/or creative problem solving solutions.

E. Briefly summarize the quality and timeliness of customer service provided.

F. Would you award a similar contract to this company? Yes___ No ____ Maybe _____

Printed Name of Respondent:

Respondent Signature:

PLEASE E-MAIL THIS COMPLETED “PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE” DIRECTLY TO THE GOVERNMENT

AT JAMES.GALLAGHER.11@US.AF.MIL

ATTENTION: CAPT JAMES GALLAGHER NO LATER THAN: 2 APRIL 2018/4:30 P.M. PST

Your prompt response is appreciated. Thank you for your assistance!

mailto:JAMES.GALLAGHER.11@US.AF.MIL

Cost
D. Briefly summarize any efforts that resulted in implemented innovative and/or creative problem solving solutions.
E. Briefly summarize the quality and timeliness of customer service provided.
Printed Name of Respondent:
Respondent Signature:

File details come from the government source that posted it.