FA486118RC0030002_Nellis_ADAIR_II_Amendment_02.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Revise and replace the pricing w orksheet

2. Extend the solicitation period until 4 April 2018, 4:30 PM.

3. Prospective offerors are requested to e-mail revised pricing w orksheet and SF33 w orksheet.

4. All other terms and conditions remain the same ****Please see summary of changes****

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 15

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 03-Apr-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA486118RC003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03-Mar-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

03-Apr-2018

CODE

99 CONS/LGCC

5865 SWAAB BLVD, BLDG 588

NELLIS AFB NV 89191-7065

FA4861 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

702-652-9903 james.gallagher.11@us.af.mil

FA486118RC003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 02-Apr-2018 04:30 PM to 04-Apr-2018 04:30 PM.

The number of offeror copies required has decreased by 2 from 3 to 1.

SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS

The following have been modified:

LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

Section J – List of Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments Document Type Description Application Date

Attachment 1 PPI Tool Access File N/A 1a PPI Tool Instructions PDF File 2 March 2018

Attachment 2 Oral Presentation Slide Master PowerPoint File 2 March 2018 Attachment 3 Small Business Subcontracting

Plan Checklist

Attachment 4 ADAIR II Pricing Worksheet (Revised)

Excel File 3 April 2018

Attachment 5 Wage Determination WD 15- 5593 (Rev. -8)

Word Document

16 January 2018

Attachment 6 DD Form 254 PDF File 2 March 2018 Attachment 7 Past Performance Questionnaire Word

Document 22 March 2018

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

SSP Attachment 3: Section L - Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors

THIS SECTION IS FOR SOLICITATION PURPOSES ONLY. THIS SECTION WILL BE PHYSICALLY

REMOVED FROM ANY RESULTANT AWARD

1.0. L-1 GENERAL INFORMATION TO OFFERORS:

1.1. Points of Contact:

1.1.1. Address all questions or concerns you may have to the following:

1.1.1.1. Capt. James Gallagher, 99 CONS, 5865 Swaab Blvd, Bldg 588, Nellis AFB, 89191 Telephone (702)- 652-9903 E-mail: james.gallagher.11@us.af.mil

1.2. All email correspondence must reference the solicitation number first in the subject line: FA4861-18- R-C003

1.3. ***All questions regarding this solicitation must be submitted 14 days prior to the close of the solicitation. The Government reserves the right to discard any questions presented to the Government beyond this date/time.***

1.4. Discrepancies. If an offeror believes the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the CO, in writing, with supporting rationale as well as the remedies the offeror is asking the CO to consider as related to the omission or error. The offeror is reminded the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

This reservation includes matters of additional or substitute pages of the initial proposal.

1.5. Evaluation. Offers will be evaluated using the factors and Subfactors in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award. Noncompliance with the RFP may be grounds to eliminate the proposal from consideration for contract award. Offerors are advised proposals are presumed to represent the offeror’s best efforts and most complete responses to this solicitation. Cursory responses or responses which merely reiterate the Performance- Based Work Statement (PWS) will be considered unacceptable. Demonstration of capability and qualifications that clearly support the offeror’s claims are essential. The absence of such evidence will adversely influence evaluation of the proposal.

1.6. Proposal Delivery. Proposals (electronic and paper copies) shall be hand delivered or mailed to arrive at the following addresses:

1.6.1. 99th Contracting Squadron, ATTN: Capt James Gallagher, 5865 Swaab Blvd, Bldg 588, Nellis AFB

NV, 89191

1.6.2. james.gallagher.11@us.af.mil

1.7. Proposal Suspense Dates. Proposals in both hard copy and electronic format are due NLT 2 April 2018 at 4:30PM PST.

1.8. Electronic Reference Documents. All referenced documents for this solicitation are available at the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website at http://www.fedbizopps.gov. Potential offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for Solicitation No. FA4861-18-R-C003.

1.9. Retention of Proposals. In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. The Government will destroy extra copies of unsuccessful proposals.

1.10. Unnecessary Elaboration and Formatting. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, or detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and not desired.

1.11. Classified Materials. Proposals shall be unclassified.

1.12. Operation of Nellis AFB Local Area Network (LAN) and Base Information Transfer System (BITS) Offerors shall be advised that contractors operate LAN and BITS; therefore, if proposal information is submitted through either source, the possibility exists that another contractor may have access to the proposal information.

mailto:james.gallagher.11@us.af.mil

1.13. Completing the SF33. Complete blocks 13 through 17 of the SF33. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the SOLICITATION, with attachments. The SOLICITATION constitutes the model contract.

1.14. Mandatory Representations and Certifications. Complete the necessary fill-ins and representations and certifications (Reps and Certs) in provisions if Reps and Certs differ from content posted to https://www.sam.gov.

1.15. Proposal Acceptance Period. A statement that the offer presented is valid for no less than 180 calendar days from the proposal due date at the location identified in Block 9 of the SF 33.

1.16. Late Proposals. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(c)(3)(ii)(A) “Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers.”

2.0. L-2 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARATION OF PROPOSALS

2.1. Instructions – Instructions contained herein are for preparing proposals and providing data and presentations to the Government in response to this solicitation.

2.2. Compliance – Proposals must comply fully with these instructions. Proposals which fail to do so may be rejected as non-responsive. Proposals shall include all of the information requested in these instructions.

2.3. Electronic Copies – In addition to the paper copies required by Table L-2-1, the entire proposal shall be submitted on a virus-free CD-ROM/DVD (no thumb drives) in electronic file formats compatible with Microsoft Office 2013 or higher applications. The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. Each CD-ROM shall be clearly identified with the Contractor’s Name, and Solicitation Number. Use separate folders / files to permit rapid location of all portions, including Subfactors, exhibits, annexes, and attachments, if any. Do not password protect or compress files. In the event there are any discrepancies between the hard copies and electronic copies of a proposal, the hard copies will be used for evaluation. Replacement CD-ROMs will be required if the proposal is revised or if a final proposal revision is requested.

2.4. Cost/Pricing – All cost or pricing information shall be addressed ONLY in the Cost/Price Proposal and Model Contract / Representations & Certifications Volumes. Cost/price information may be used in other volumes only as appropriate for presenting rationale for alternatives or decision-making processes.

2.5. Proposal Organization, Preparation, and Specifications.

2.5.1. Binder Organization – Volumes shall be contained in standard three-ring, loose-leaf binders permitting the binders to lay flat when completely opened and allow for easy removal and replacement of pages.

Staples and paper clips shall not be used. Binder contents, page limitation, and number of copies are identified in Table L-2-1 of this section. Each binder cover shall clearly identify the Company Name, Point of Contact, Address, Volume Number, Volume Title, “Original” or “Copy,” RFP Number, and RFP Title. Apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed in accordance with FAR 52.215-1, paragraph (e), Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data, and FAR 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information. All references to the company name should be removed from the written proposal contents.

Only the cover page should have reference to the company. References from the company name are not required to be removed from oral presentation content.

2.5.2. Clarity of Proposal – The proposal shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of the offeror’s facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.

https://www.sam.gov/

2.5.3. Cross-Referencing- To the greatest extent possible, each volume shall be written on a stand-alone basis so that its contents may be evaluated with a minimum of cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal.

2.5.4. Glossary - Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, and with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes.

2.5.5. Illustrations and Tables - Proposals shall be prepared on 8 ½ x 11-inch paper except for foldouts used for charts, illustrations, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11 x 17 inches. For page count purposes, foldout pages will count as two (2) 8 ½ x 11-inch pages and shall only be used for graphics and exhibits, not text. All information (except for document numbers, page numbers, etc.) shall be provided within an image area of 9 x 15 inches. For page count purposes, each printed side of foldout page shall count as two (2) pages each. Text used for call-outs on graphics and exhibits shall be no smaller than Times New Roman or Arial, 8-point in height after final reduction. Call-outs may be single-spaced.

2.5.6. Indexing - Each volume shall contain a Table of Contents to identify the section and paragraph subjects within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to separate and identify both Volumes and Sections. Tab indexes should remain in place when binders are placed in a vertical position in a storage cabinet.

2.5.7. Page - A page is defined as each face of an 8 ½ x 11-inch sheet of paper containing information. Page margins shall be a minimum of 1-inch each for the top, bottom and sides. All material shall be contained within the page limitations in Table L-2-1 of this section. The page limitations shall be treated as maximum limits to assist in the evaluation of each proposal. Total page count will be based on the printed proposal submission. If page limitations are exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal and will not be returned to the offeror. Double-sided printing is acceptable, but counts as two (2) pages. Number pages sequentially by volume. The background color of each page of the proposal submission shall be white or ivory paper only. If Final Proposal Revisions (FPRs) are required, the same page limitations apply.

2.5.8. Font – Font shall be Times New Roman or Verdana, no smaller than 11-point with normal proportional spacing. Text lines will be no less than single-spaced. EXCEPTION: For RFP Attachment 1, Past Performance Information (PPI) Tool, the Government will accept the format generated from the PPI Tool.

Table L-2-1 – Volume / Volume Title / Page/Slide Limit / Method of Evaluation / COPIES

Volume Volume Title Page/Slide Limit** Method of Evaluation

COPIES

Paper/Electronic****

Volume I Factor 1 Technical Oral and Written (see below)

Volume I

Subfactor 1:

Aircraft Key Performance Parameters

Oral* 10/1***

Volume I Subfactor 2:

Implementation Approach

10 pages** & ***** Written 3/1

Volume I

Subfactor 3:

Logistics Sustainment Approach

10 pages** Written 3/1

Volume I Subfactor 4:

Management Approach

10 pages** Written 3/1

Volume II Factor 2: Past Performance 20 pages** Written 3/1

Volume III Factor 3:

Cost/Price Use Excel Pricing Matrix Written 3/1

Volume IV Solicitation, Offer, and Award No page limit Written 3/1

* No presentation shall exceed 90 minutes, are required to bring ten (10) printed PowerPoint presentations, and a virus-free CD-ROM/DVD of the presentation on the day of the assigned oral presentation.

** Excluded from Page Limitation: Blank Pages, Dividers, Cover Pages, Title Pages, Tabs, Indexes, Table of Contents, Glossaries, Accident Preliminary Reports, Synopsis Reports, Final Reports, Data Summary, and/or any other equivalent Department of Defense crash investigation board results, Consent Letters, Past Performance Questionnaires.

*** Any and all information contained in the PowerPoint slides not orally presented will not be considered as part of the offeror’s oral evaluation. There is no limit on slide page count.

**** Submit virus-free CD-ROM(s) containing the entire proposal in a sleeve(s) placed in the front of the “Original” binder #1.

***** Aircraft Accidents and Corrective Action Steps shall be addressed in the oral presentation and written proposals.

Note: Offerors are responsible for providing sources of information for validating claims such as speed, radar range, climb rate, etc. Examples of sources of information are Janes, aircraft information manuals, expert opinions, and OEM documentation.

3.0. Oral Presentations (FAR 15.102)

3.1. Each offeror is requested to notify the Government via email james.gallagher.11@us.af.mil of their desire to provide an oral presentation two weeks after the release of the request for proposal. No oral presentation may exceed 90 minutes. Three paper copies and one electronic copies (via CD-ROM) of all materials shall be submitted on the due date identified in block 9 of the RFP. Offerors shall be limited to no more than two participants for each presentation. Briefing charts are to provide structure to the oral presentation. It is recommended that offerors structure their oral presentation to follow the order of items in Attachment 2. The oral presentation shall be the basis for evaluation of Factor 1: Technical - Subfactor 1: Aircraft Key Performance Parameters and Aircraft Accidents and Corrective Action. Any and all information contained in the slides not orally presented will not be considered as part of the offeror’s oral evaluation.

3.2. Offerors may not present any classified information either in their proposals or during oral presentations.

3.3. The location of the face-to-face oral presentations shall be in Las Vegas, Nevada. Prospective offerors will not be compensated for travel and proposal prepartion expenses. Presentations shall tentatively begin the week of April 2nd, 2018, however presentations will not occur prior to the due date of proposals.

3.4. The order of oral presentations shall be randomly generated. The Contracting Officer will notify offerors within one (1) week prior to the proposal close date by phone, email, or FAX of the offeror’s date, location and time of presentation. Offeror’s shall provide the Government with a primary and alternate point of contact to which the Contracting Officer should contact for scheduling purposes.

3.5. All oral presentations will be video/audio recorded.

3.6. Offerors are not required to submit PowerPoint presentations as part of their written proposal. Offerors are permitted to bring their PowerPoint presentation on the assigned date and time for Oral Presentations. Offerors shall bring a digital copy on a CD-ROM/DVD and ten (10) printed copies for Government evaluators on the date of oral presentations.

Note: The Government reserves the right to ask clarification questions after the 90 minute presentation following a short break for consultation. The Q&A session will be considered in the offeror’s oral evaluation. Q&A does not constitute formal discussions. Any and all information contained in the slides not orally presented will not be considered as part of the offeror’s oral evaluation.

4.0. L-3 VOLUME I – TECHNICAL

4.1. General. Ensure the Technical volume is specific and complete. Legibility, clarity, and coherence are very important. The responses provided will be evaluated against the Technical Subfactors in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award. Using the instructions provided below, provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology that would be used for accomplishing/satisfying these Subfactors. All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. By submitting a proposal, the offeror is representing that the offeror’s firm will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation. It is not necessary or desirable for the offeror to tell the government so in the offeror’s proposal. Do not merely reiterate the objectives or reformulate the requirements specified in the solicitation. Technical volume will be the primary basis for evaluating the proposed approach to meeting or exceeding the minimum performance or capability requirements of each Technical Subfactor. Offeror’s proposal shall describe the capability of the offeror’s organization to perform this contract including pertinent aspects of the proposed approach such as teaming or subcontracting arrangements.

4.2. Organization of Volume I - Technical Factor

4.2.1. Section I.

4.2.1.1. Table of Contents

4.2.1.2. List of Tables and Drawings

4.2.1.3. Volume Glossary of Abbreviations

4.2.2. Section II. Subfactor 1 Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation for Oral Presentations

4.2.3. Section III. Subfactor 2 Written Proposal

4.2.4. Section IV. Subfactor 3 Written Proposal

4.2.5. Section V. Subfactor 4 Written Proposal

5.0. Technical Factor. Offerors shall submit a proposal addressing requirements within the Performance Work Statement. In the technical volume, address your technical solution for meeting the Government’s minimum or objective requirements for each technical sub-factor.

5.1. Subfactor 1 – Aircraft Key Performance Parameters – Methodology 1: Separate Technical/Risk Rating Process. The offeror proposals will be technically evaluated IAW FAR 15.3 and DoD Source Selection Procedures. This Subfactor is met when the offerors present a sound and realistic proposal to achieve all requirements within the Performance Work Statement. The following are highlighted to indicate to offerors where the Government intends to base a best value decision, more specifically the offeror’s oral presentation must clearly demonstrate that aircraft meet or exceed the following key performance parameters:

5.1.1. Aircraft Speed Element

5.1.1.1. Minimum: Sustained Level Flight at Mach .80 +/-.02 at 35,000 ft. Mean Sea Level (MSL)

5.1.1.2. Objective: Sustained Level Flight at Mach 1.5 +/-.02 at 35,000 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL)

5.1.2. Aircraft Radar Element

http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USA004370-14-DPAP.pdf

5.1.2.1. Minimum: Fire-control radar capable of providing targeting data of a 2M2 target out to 20 nautical miles (NM). Radars must provide an aircraft and the pilot the capability to detect, track, and simulate ordnance employment against an opposing aircraft.

5.1.2.2. Objective: Fire-control radar capable of providing targeting data of a 1M2 target out to 50 nautical miles (NM). Radars must provide the capability to deliberately detect, track, and simulate ordnance employment against an opposing aircraft.

5.1.3. Aircraft Turn Element

5.1.3.1. Minimum: Min Sustained Rate: 7.50 deg/sec. Min Instantaneous Rate: 13.50 deg/sec. (Parameters:

15,000 feet MSL with 50% internal fuel, with no external stores)

5.1.3.2. Objective: Sustained Rate: 12.5 deg/sec. Instantaneous Rate: 18 deg/sec. (Parameters: 15,000 feet MSL with 50% internal fuel, with no external stores)

5.1.4. Number of Aircraft Element

5.1.4.1. Minimum: Must be able to have the ability to generate and sustain a baseline turn pattern of a “8 turn 6” within 180 days after award.

5.1.4.2. Objective: Shall have the ability to generate and sustain a baseline turn pattern of a “12 turn 10” within 180 days after award.

5.1.5. Aircraft Service Ceiling Element

5.1.5.1. Minimum: 35,000 ft.

5.1.5.2. Objective: 50,000 ft.

5.1.6. Aircraft Range Element

5.1.6.1. Minimum: Launch and climb to 20K’ MSL and proceed 100nm from point of departure. Maintain Mach 0.8 +.02 for 45 minutes with internal fuel only, or at least 60 minutes with external fuel tanks. Return to point of departure.

5.1.6.2. Objective: Launch and climb to 20K’ MSL and proceed 100nm from point of departure. Maintain Mach 0.8 +.02 for 60 minutes with internal fuel only, or at least 75 minutes with external fuel tanks. Return to point of departure.

5.1.7. Missile Replication Element

5.1.7.1. Minimum: Aircraft shall have the capability to replicate active and semi-active missiles out to a range of 20NM.

5.1.7.2. Objective: Aircraft shall have the capability to replicate active and semi-active missiles out to a range of 50NM.

5.2. Subfactor 2 – Implementation Approach – Methodology 1: Separate Technical/Risk Rating Process. The offeror proposals will be technically evaluated IAW FAR 15.3 and DoD Source Selection Procedures.

This Subfactor is met when the offerors present a sound and realistic proposal to achieve requirements within the Performance Work Statement. The following are highlighted to indicate to offerors where the Government intends to base a best value decision, more specifically the offeror’s written proposal must clearly demonstrate the delivery and mobilization schedule for providing airworthy aircraft to Nellis AFB for ADAIR services.

5.2.1. Delivery/Mobilization Schedule Element.

5.2.1.1. Offerors shall provide a detailed plan that describes:

5.2.1.2. How many aircraft are planned to be dedicated and provided that meet the technical specifications for this contract.

5.2.1.3. When the requisite amount of aircraft that meet the minimum turn pattern called for in the PWS (8 turn 6 within 180 days after award) are available.

5.2.2. Contemplated Post-Award Aircraft Modifications Element.

5.2.2.1. Offerors shall provide a plan that describes:

5.2.2.2. What equipment(s) and timeframe(s) are needed for modification or replacement in order to meet minimum PWS requirements (if none, state N/A).

5.2.2.3. What equipment and timeframe is contemplated for modification or replacement in order to meet or exceed objective PWS requirements.

5.2.3. Aircraft Possession Element.

5.2.3.1. Offerors shall demonstrate current or future aircraft possession. Greater consideration may be given to offerors that can demonstrate current possession of aircraft. Examples of current or future aircraft possession are:

Aircraft FAA registration certificates, lease agreements, purchase agreements, or a future plan for ownership. Proof should be submitted in writing as an attachments/handouts for written proposals and the reports will not be limited by any page limitation.

5.2.4. Aircraft Accidents and Corrective Action Steps Element.

5.2.4.1. Offerors shall fully disclose all past aircraft incidents and accidents (as defined by NTSB 830). Offers will provide Preliminary Reports, Synopsis Reports, Final Reports, Data Summary, and/or any other equivalent Department of Defense crash investigation board reports. These reports should be submitted in writing as an attachments/handouts for oral presentations and the reports will not be restricted by any page limitation as part of written proposals. ****Note: Offers shall present pertinent details about past aircraft incidents and accidents as part of the oral presentation****

5.2.4.2. In response to previous incident(s), please describe corrective actions taken to reduce or eliminate possible future occurrences.

5.2.4.3. Offerors shall describe how the offeror will respond to future incident(s) or accident(s) to reduce or eliminate future risk.

5.3. Subfactor 3 – Logistics Sustainment Approach – Methodology 1: Separate Technical/Risk Rating Process. The offeror proposals will be technically evaluated IAW FAR 15.3 and DoD Source Selection Procedures.

This Subfactor is met when the offerors present a sound and realistic proposal to achieve requirements within the Performance Work Statement. The following are highlighted to indicate to offerors where the Government intends to base a best value decision, more specifically the written proposal must clearly demonstrate the logistics and sustainment approach for long-term sustained flight operations at Nellis AFB.

5.3.1. Component Lifecycle Tracking and Supply Chain Management Methodology Element.

5.3.1.1. Offerors shall present a plan that describes how life limited parts and components will be tracked and replaced. What tools, processes, and procedures have been or will be developed in order to track these components.

Offers shall also present the planned or known supply chain for obtaining parts and components, planning for various types of maintenance events based upon 5,600 flight hours per year, and staff training and development to ensure uninterrupted services throughout each year of service.

5.3.2. Staffing Plan Element.

5.3.2.1. Offerors shall provide a staffing overview to include details for hierarchy, hiring, retaining, and developing staff necessary to conduct flight operations, maintain aircraft, and manage the overall ADAIR II program. Offers are required to identify a Program Manager for the ADAIR II program that will directly interface with Government management officials for day-to-day operations.

5.4. Subfactor 4: Management Approach – Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method. The offeror proposals will be technically evaluated IAW FAR 15.3 and DoD Source Selection Procedures. This Subfactor is met when the offerors present a sound and realistic proposal to achieve requirements within the Performance Work Statement. The following are highlighted to indicate to offerors where the Government intends to base a best value decision based upon acceptable/unacceptable criteria, more specifically the offeror MUST have these items in order to be eligible for award.

5.4.1. Facility Security Clearance Element.

5.4.1.1. The offeror present evidence of currently having a SECRET Facility Clearance and are able to obtain SECRET security clearances for pilots whom will conduct flight operations in classified airspace.

5.4.2. Small Business Participation Commitment Document Element.

5.4.2.1. Small Business Participation Commitment Document (Applies ONLY to Large Businesses; and IAW FAR 19.702 (b)(3) applies to work performed in the United States AND ITS OUTLYING AREAS ONLY) The Offeror shall include all information concerning Extent of Small Business Participation Commitment Document, if applicable.

5.4.2.2. The offeror’s Small Business Participation Commitment Document shall provide a narrative describing the Prime’s corporate commitment in providing subcontracting opportunities for small business, small disadvantaged business, women-owned small business, HUBZone small business, and service disabled veteran-owned small business. Describe the strength and specificity of each corporate commitment (i.e., what type of commitment, how binding is the commitment, how specific is the commitment to this proposed effort, and what types of tasks are included in these subcontracting opportunities).

5.4.2.3. A narrative describing the proposed goals and targets for subcontracting to the following:

Small Business 10% of total awarded dollars

Small Disadvantaged Business 10% of total subcontracting dollars

Woman Owned Small Business 5% of total subcontracting dollars

HUBZone Small Business 3% of total subcontracting dollars

Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business 3% of total subcontracting dollars

5.4.2.4. Offeror shall describe how specific subcontracting percentage goal and targets will be met for the contract expressed in dollars and in percentages of the total subcontracting dollars for subcontracting to each socio-economic small business category listed above. The subcontracting goals and other targets may be met by any combination of subcontracts, other business teaming arrangements or vendor purchases, and should make use of small businesses to the maximum extent practicable.

5.4.2.5. These goals are not applicable to work performed in foreign countries. However, these goals are applicable to any products, materials, supplies and/or services purchased CONUS, or its outlying areas.

5.4.2.6. For proposal purposes only, assume the total anticipated awarded dollars (for CONUS and Outlying Areas) to be $50,000,000. Therefore for proposal purposes, $5,000,000 must be reserved for Small Business concerns.

5.4.3. Small Business Subcontracting Plan Element.

5.4.3.1. Provide completed Attachment 3, Small Business Subcontracting Plan Checklist.

5.4.3.2. If submitting as a Large Business concern under the applicable NAICS Code, submit a Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR 19.7.

5.4.3.3. A Small Business Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR 19.7 is not required for small business concerns.

6.0. L-4 VOLUME II –PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

6.1. General. Only references for relevant contracts are desired. Each offeror shall submit a past performance volume with its proposal, containing past performance information in accordance with the format contained in RFP Attachment 1, “Past Performance Information (PPI) Tool.” This information is required on the offeror and all subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners who are proposed to perform 20 percent or more of the proposed effort based on the Total Evaluated Price or perform aspects of the effort the offeror considers critical to overall successful performance. Offerors are cautioned that the Government will use data provided by each offeror in this volume and data obtained from other sources in the evaluation of past performance.

6.2. Past performance information submitted shall be recent and relevant. Recent is defined as work completed or ongoing during the five (5) years prior to the Government due date for proposals. The Government is not bound by the offeror’s opinion of relevancy or quality, and will perform an independent assessment of relevancy and quality of the data provided or obtained. If the offeror has no recent or relevant past performance information, this should be documented in Volume II. The Government reserves the right to determine whether any relevant past performance information exists and its relevancy, notwithstanding the alleged absence thereof by any offeror.

6.3. Organization of Volume II – Past Performance Information

6.3.1. Table of Contents

6.3.2. List of Tables and Drawings

6.3.3. Volume Glossary of Abbreviations

6.3.4. Organizational Structure Change History

6.3.5. Past Performance Information (PPI) Tool generated documentation

6.3.6. Completed Past Performance Questionnaires

6.3.7. Other Supporting Documentation

6.4. Organizational Structure Change History.

6.4.1. Many companies have acquired, been acquired by, or otherwise merged with other companies, and/or reorganized their divisions, business groups, subsidiary companies, etc. In many cases, these changes have taken place during the time of performance of relevant past efforts or between the conclusion of recent past performance efforts and this request for proposal. As a result, it is sometimes difficult to determine what past performance is relevant to this acquisition. To facilitate this relevancy determination, if applicable, include in this proposal a “roadmap” describing all such changes in organization for the offeror, joint venture partner(s) and proposed major subcontractors. As part of this explanation, show how these changes impact the relevance of any efforts you identify for past performance evaluation / performance confidence assessment. Since the Government intends to consider past performance information provided by other sources as well as that provided by the offeror(s), your “roadmap” should be both specifically applicable to the identified efforts and general enough to apply to efforts on which the Government receives information from other sources.

6.5. PPI Tool Instructions.

6.5.1. All offerors must use the PPI Tool to generate past performance information. The PPI Tool and instructions included in Attachment 1 can be downloaded at https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USAF/ACC/99CONS/FA4861-18-R-C003/listing.html

6.6. Past Performance Questionnaires

6.6.1. The Government requests the offeror send out Past Performance Questionnaires (Ref RFP Atch 7), with the attached transmittal letter from the Contracting Officer, to the Points of Contacts, for present and past performance information. Completed questionnaires shall be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer and will become part of the offeror’s proposal. Completed questionnaires shall be submitted no later than the due date of the RFP. The offeror may include their own cover letter requesting completion of the questionnaire in addition to the transmittal letter provided.

7.0. L-5. VOLUME III- PRICE PROPOSAL

7.1. Since this is a competitive acquisition, with adequate price competition anticipated, the pricing documentation is considered data other than certified cost or pricing data and shall not be certified in accordance with FAR Part 15.403-1(c). Should adequate price competition not exist after receipt of proposals, the provisions of FAR Part 15.403-4 shall apply, and the offeror will be asked to provide certification of cost or pricing data.

7.2. ADAIR II Budget Information. The Government has a planned budget of the following amount for the Nellis ADAIR II program:

7.2.1. Fiscal Year 2018 - $56,000,000

7.2.2. Fiscal Year 2019 - $56,000,000

7.2.3. Fiscal Year 2020 - $56,000,000

7.2.4. Fiscal Year 2021 - $56,000,000

7.2.5. Fiscal Year 2022 - $56,000,000

7.2.6. Total - $280,000,000

7.2.7. Budgetary information is for planning purposes only.

7.2.8. An Affordability Cap of $25,000.00 per flight hour (to include the cost of fuel per flight hour) has been established. This dollar value is based on market research for the Government cost to operate an F-16. Offerors whose proposed price per flight hour exceeds the Affordability Cap will not be eligible for award.

7.3. Cost/Pricing Content. The offeror is required to complete the revised ADAIR II Pricing Matrix Worksheet, Attachment four (4).

7.3.1. The Government emphasizes the technical capability of the aircraft proposed as stated in RFP Section L, paragraph 5.1 and following, and Section M, paragraph 7.3 and following. In those paragraphs, the Government https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USAF/ACC/99CONS/FA4861-18-R-C003/listing.html provided Minimum Key Performance Parameters and Objective Key Performance Parameters. The ratings of the Technical Factors will include awarding Strengths for Technical Subfactors 1, 2, and 3 [Aircraft Key Performance Parameters, Implementation Approach, and Logistics Sustainment Approach] per Section M, paragraph 3.0.

7.3.2. With that direction, the Government requires the Offeror to assess the following sample training scenarios and identify which combination, if any, of their proposed aircraft would best meet the requirements of the scenarios resulting in the greatest capabilities in overall performance.

7.3.3. Scenario A: Air Combat Maneuvering: 4 adversaries to execute ACM in a BVR to WVR fluid maneuvering environment to test blue’s ability to facilitate a coordinated attack with mutual support. Adversaries have the capability to employ red weapons BVR and WVR.

7.3.4. Scenario B: Tactical Intercepts/Integration: 8 adversaries to execute long-range coordinated/missionized engagements in a BVR environment to enable blue integrated forces in a complex scenario to WVR fluid maneuvering against a thinking, realistic adversary.

7.3.5. Instructions:

7.3.6. Aircraft Price Sheet Tabs (Each Year):

7.3.7. - Enter type of aircraft (Make & Model), cost per flying hour (dry), average fuel consumption in GPH, and Fuel cost per hour ($3 per gallon)

7.3.8. - Accomplish this for each type of aircraft proposing on the contract

7.3.9. Scenario Cost Sheet Tabs (Each Year):

7.3.10. - Complete the scenario specifics

7.3.11. Scenario A:

7.3.12. - Column B: Proposed aircraft

7.3.13. - Column C: Aircraft cost/hr dry – same as Aircraft Price Sheet tab cost listed

7.3.14. - Column D: Average Sortie Duration (use 1.7)

7.3.15. - Column E: Formula automatically calculated from inputs in column C and D

7.3.16. - Scenario Cost is automatically calculated from the sum of each aircraft, cost per hour, and ASD for the entire scenario.

7.3.17. Scenario B:

7.3.18. - Column G: Proposed aircraft

7.3.19. - Column H: Aircraft cost/hr dry – same as Aircraft Price Sheet tab cost listed

7.3.20. - Column I: Average Sortie Duration (use 1.7)

7.3.21. - Column J: Formula automatically calculated from inputs in column H and I

7.3.22. - Scenario Cost is automatically calculated from the sum of each aircraft, cost per hour, and ASD for the entire scenario.

7.3.23. - Scenario A Annual Cost is automatically calculated from inputs above

7.3.24. - Scenario B Annual Cost is automatically calculated from inputs above

7.3.25. - Total Evaluated Price is automatically calculated from the addition of Scenario A Annual and Scenario B Annual costs.

8.0. L-6 VOLUME IV –SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD

8.1. General. The purpose of the volume is to provide information necessary to the Government for preparing the contract document and supporting file.

8.2. Organization of Volume IV – Solicitation, Offer, and Award

8.3. Section I

8.4. Table of Contents

8.5. Volume IV Glossary of Abbreviations (if required)

8.5.1. Signature Page (SF33 – Solicitation with Amendments/ Contract Form)

8.5.2. Proposal Expiration Statement

8.5.3. Solicitation (Sections E – J)

8.5.4. Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors (Section K)

8.6. Section II

8.6.1. Company Information

8.6.2. Authorized Offeror Personnel

8.7. Section III. Exceptions to Solicitation / Contract, if any

8.8. Section IV. Government Agencies

8.9. Section V. Other information, if any

8.10. The offeror shall submit the following:

8.10.1. Signature Page – Complete blocks 13 through 16 and signature and date for blocks 17 and 18 of the Standard Form (SF) 33. Signature by the offeror on the SF33 constitutes an offer, which the Government may accept. The "Original" copy shall be clearly marked under a separate cover without punched holes, and placed in the “Original Binder.” Provide copy of the signature page in binders containing copies.

8.10.2. Proposal Expiration Statement – A statement that the offer presented is valid for no less than 180 calendar days from the proposal due date at the location identified in Block 9 of the SF 33.

8.10.3. Solicitation / Contract –Sections E through J.

8.10.4. Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements of Offerors (Section K)

8.11. Company Information – Provide company/division's street address, county and facility code; CAGE code; DUNS code; TIN; size of business; and labor surplus area designation. This same information must be provided if the work for this contract will be performed at any other location(s). List all locations where work is to be performed and indicate whether such facility is a division, affiliate, or subcontractor, and the percentage of work to be performed at each location.

8.12. Authorized Offeror Personnel – Provide the name/title, physical and e-mail address, and phone/fax number of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate the offeror contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government.

8.13. Exceptions to Solicitation Requirements – Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or Subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken. Provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost, and specific requirements of the solicitation. This information shall be provided in the format and content shown at Table L-8-1.

8.14. Table L-8-1 - Solicitation Exceptions

Solicitation Document Page / Paragraph Requirement / Portion Rationale PWS, Attachments, Section L, Model Contract, etc.

Applicable Page and Paragraph Numbers

Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken

Describe why the requirement can/will not be met

8.15. Exchanges. The Government intends to award without discussions and make an award based on initial proposals; however if inadequate competition exists based upon unacceptable technical proposals, discussions or negotiations may be held and result in a Final Proposal Revision (FPR). If it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to hold discussions, the Government will make a Competitive Range determination, evaluation notices may be issued to Offerors in the competitive range, responses will be requested from applicable Offerors, and discussions will be opened. The competitive range may be further reduced for purposes of efficiency pursuant to FAR 15.306(c)(2). Formal responses to evaluation notices (if applicable), discussion items, and final proposal revisions will be considered in making the award decision.

8.16. Any revision or non-concurrences to contract terms and conditions submitted in the FPR may not be subject to further discussion or negotiation, and may render the offer unacceptable to the Government. This provision is not intended to restrict the Offeror’s opportunity to revise figures (e.g., prices, rates, etc.); rather, it is intended to preclude any misunderstandings by the Government, which could result if new or revised terms and conditions are submitted in the FPR that have not been fully disclosed, discussed and understood during discussions or negotiations. Hence, such new or revised terms and conditions are not solicited and, if submitted in the FPR, may render the offer unacceptable to the Government.

8.17. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in Section L.

Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the Contracting Officer reserves the right to award a contract(s) without the opportunity for proposal revision.

[END OF SECTION L]

(End of Summary of Changes)

SSP Attachment 3: Section L - Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors