Attach 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

7TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON (ACC)

381 THIRD STREET

DYESS AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS 79607-1581

Global Power For America

MEMORANDUM FOR PROSPECTIVE EVALUATORS

FROM: 7 CONS/LGCA

381 Third Street

Dyess AFB TX 79607-1581

SUBJECT: Solicitation FA4661-10-R-0002, Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineer Requirements (SABER)

Indefinite Delivery-Requirements, Past Performance Questionnaire

1. The 7th Contracting Squadron is conducting a proposal evaluation for subject solicitation at Dyess AFB, TX.

Under the solicitation, the Air Force will perform a Performance Price Tradeoff (PPT) evaluation. The contractor listed in Section A of the attached questionnaire has identified your office as a source to evaluate the contractor’s past performance and it also authorizes release of this information to our office.

2. The individual most knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall condition of performance rendered should complete the survey. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge with the judgment of others in their organization.

3. Please complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible by indicating your ratings and providing comments wherever applicable. For any rating of E, M, or U, request you provide an explanatory narrative and attach to your response. The narratives need not be lengthy, but should be detailed and descriptive. Use separate evaluation forms for each contract/order being evaluated.

4. Your time and effort in providing this information is greatly appreciated. The requested information is critical to our evaluation. Please complete and return the completed package as quickly as possible but not later than 2:00 PM CST 17 May 2010. You may email a scanned copy to kristine.baldwin@dyess.af.mil, FAX it to

(325)696-4084, or mail it to the following address:

7th Contracting Squadron

Attn: 1Lt Baldwin/Mr. Rogiano

381 Third Street

Dyess AFB TX 79607

5. If you have any questions, please call Lt Kristine Baldwin at (325) 696-1458 or Mr. Anthony Rogiano at

(325) 696-1454. Thank you for your cooperation and quick response to this request.

RONALD G. MILLER

Contracting Officer

Attachment 3: Past Performance Questionnaire Solicitation FA4661-09-R-0008

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE

SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor requesting evaluation prior to mailing. NOTE: Contractor shall also include a verbatim copy of each SECTION A (completed and mailed to the proposed respondents) and corresponding respondents’ name/address in VOLUME II (Past Performance), Refer paragraph L-4)

A. Contractor’s name and address:

B. Point of Contact:

C. Phone/Fax Numbers (with area code) & E-mail Address:

D. Contract number:

E. Project Title or Description of Work performed under this project:

F. Contractor’s Role (Prime, sub, designer, etc.) _______________________________________________________________________

G. Contracting or Procurement Official (Name & Contact information): ____________________________________________________

H. Project Designer of Record (Name & Contact information): ____________________________________________________________

I. Contract Type: Firm-Fixed-Price Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Task Order Cost-Reimbursement

J. Project Award Date: Scheduled Completion Date:

Current/Final Completion Date:

K. Project Award Amount: Current/Final Project Amount:

L. Comments (if desired): _________________________________________________________________________________________

M. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in SECTION B of this Questionnaire.

(Signature)

(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by respondent.)

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature) (Date)

Address:

(Typed or Printed Name)

(Title)

Phone/Fax Numbers (with area code) & E-mail Address

NOTE: The identity of individual(s) providing reference information shall not be disclosed.

Performance Evaluation Instructions: When responding to the descriptive statements, select the letter which most accurately describes the contractor's performance or situation. If the contractor has no record of past performance relevant to a particular question, select "Neutral".

E

Exceptional/Substantial Confidence:

Based on the offeror’s performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the successful offeror will successfully perform its required effort.

V

Very Good/Satisfactory Confidence:

Based on the offeror’s performance record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

S

Satisfactory/Limited Confidence:

Based on the offeror’s performance record, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the

N

Neutral/Unknown Confidence:

No performance record identifiable (see FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iii)&(iv))

M

Marginal/Little Confidence:

Based on offeror’s performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Changes to the offeror’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract performance.

U

Unsatisfactory/No Confidence:

Based on the offeror’s performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE

EVALUATION AREAS

I. QUALITY CONTROL: E V S M N U

1. Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures that resulted in a quality-finished project.

2. Contractor developed and submitted realistic progress schedule(s).

3. Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements.

4. Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications, resulting in minor, if any, punchlist items.

5. Contractor designs were all concise, accurate and captured all details of the site visit.

6. Contractor thoroughly reviewed design package proposals for accuracy, completeness and compliance with contract requirements

II. TIMELY PERFORMANCE: E V S M N U

1. Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time, as scheduled.

2. Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a

CURE NOTICE or a SHOW CAUSE LETTER (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances on a separate sheet of paper and identify if Liquidated

Damages were assessed)

3. Contractor provided timely cost/design proposals.

4. Contractor submitted the progress schedule and interim progress reports as required in a timely manner and the schedule was approved prior to actual construction.

5. Contractor provided on-time submittals as required.

6. Contractor provided payrolls for both their firm and their subcontractors’ employees as required and scheduled.

7. Contractor provided timely resolution of all punchlist items.

III. MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS: E V S M N U

1. Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work.

3. Contractor hired, maintained, and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers.

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE

4. Contractor ensured the site manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule.

5. Contractor ensured the site manager was consistently present on site when work was performed.

6. Contractor provided timely and satisfactory response to warranty issues after project completion.

7. Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required.

8. The contractor cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings and maintained communication to assure satisfactory resolution.

IV. PRICING: E V S M N U

1. The contractor submits proposals that accurately represent the work required.

2. The contractor’s supporting price/cost information for modifications is accurate, complete and reasonable (not over inflated or under estimated).

3. How would you rate the contractor’s overall Pricing performance.

V. MANAGEMENT/SUPERINTENDENCE: E V S M N U

1. Site Manager ensured compliance to contact requirements and safety regulations.

2. Site Manager acted promptly to resolve problems and ensure work quality.

3. Site Manager had sufficient authority to make decisions or take actions during project performance.

4. Site Manager consistently present on site when work was performed.

VI. COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR STANDARDS: E V S M N U

1. Submitted payrolls in a timely manner.

2. Payrolls were complete and correct.

3. Compliance with labor laws and regulations with specific attention to the Davis-Bacon Act.

VII. COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY STANDARDS: E V S M N U

1. Adequacy of Safety Plan.

2. Implementation of Safety Plan.

VIII. GENERAL PERFORMANCE:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE ON PROJECTS/TASK

ORDERS. (EXAMPLE: WERE ANY NOT ACCEPTED DUE TO THE QUALITY OF

WORKMANSHIP?)

(If yes, please briefly explain circumstances in comments section below)

Please rate the contractor in this area. E V S M N U

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY COMPLIED WITH THE

SPECIFICATIONS.

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON FOD (FOREIGN OBJECT DAMAGE)

AND THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSE TO FOD ISSUES.

(If yes, please briefly explain circumstances in comments section below)

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY ADHERE TO BASE

STANDARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES. (EXAMPLE: SITE CLEANED UP)

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY CONDUCT AND

DOCUMENT DAILY SELF-INSPECTIONS.

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THE COMPLY WITH

SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. (EXAMPLE: DOES THE CONTRACTOR

INSTALL/USE THE MATERIALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL OR

DO THEY SUBSTITUTE "OTHER MATERIALS" NOT APPROVED BY THE

GOVERNMENT WITHOUT NOTICE?)

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON "MAJOR DIFFERING SITE CONDITIONS"

AND HOW THEY ROUTINELY IMPLEMENT/NEGOTIATE CONTRACT

MODIFICATIONS.

PLEASE INCLUDE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (LIMIT TO TWO PAGES)