DMAC RFP attch 2 PPQ.pdf

Solicitation FA4620-11-Q-B002 Attachment 2

DEPARTMENT OF AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS 92D AIR REFUELING WING (AMC)

FAIRCHILD AIR FORCE BASE, WASHINGTON

30 March 2011

MEMORANDUM FOR DMAC Contractors

FROM: 92 CONS/LGCA

110 W. Ent Street Fairchild AFB, WA 99011-8568

SUBJECT: Solicitation FA4620-11-R-B002, Demolition Multiple Award Contract (DMAC) Past Performance Questionnaire

1. The 92d Contracting Squadron is conducting a proposal evaluation for subject solicitation at Fairchild AFB, WA. Under the solicitation, the Government will perform a Past Performance/Price Trade-Off (PPT) evaluation. The contractor listed in Section A of the Attached questionnaire has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance and it also authorizes release of this information to our office.

2. The individual most knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall condition of performance rendered should complete the survey. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge with the judgment of others in their organization.

3. Please complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible by indicating your ratings and providing comments wherever applicable. For any rating of Unsatisfactory or Marginal, we request of you to provide an explanatory narrative and attach it to your response. The narratives need not to be lengthy, but should be detailed and descriptive. Use separate evaluation forms for each contract/order being evaluated.

4. Your time and effort in providing this information is greatly appreciated. The requested information is critical to our evaluation. Please complete and return the completed package as quickly as possible but no later than 12:00 pm PST, 20 June 2011 . Please fax to: 509-247-8685, email to rheame.griffin@us.af.mil or mail to:

92d Contracting Squadron

Attn: SSgt Griffin 110 W. Ent Street

Fairchild AFB, WA 99011-8568

5. Please call SSgt Griffin at (509) 247-4885 or Mr Richard Hedrick at (509) 247-4867 prior to transmission or if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records and once it is completed, it is considered to “Source Selection Sensitive Information” IAW FAR 3.104... Thank you for your cooperation.

////SIGNED///

xxx Contracting Officer

Attachment Past Performance Questionnaire (3 pages) mailto:rheame.griffin@us.af.mil

Solicitation FA4620-11-R-B002

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive Information IAW FAR 3.104

Past Performance Evaluation Questionnaire

SOLICITATION FA4620-11-R-B002, Demolition Services at Fairchild AFB, Washington

SECTION 1: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION (to be completed by the contractor requesting evaluation prior to mailing)

A. Contractor’s name and address:

B. Point of Contact:

C. Phone Number (with area code):

D. Contract Number:

E. Project Title or Description of Work performed under this project:

F. Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Indefinite Deliver/Indefinite Quantity Task Order Cost Reimbursement

G. Project Award Date: Schedule Completion Date:

Current/Final Completion Date:

H. Project Award Amount: Current/Final Project Amount:

I. Contractor being evaluated performed as the Prime Contractor Subcontractor

Supplier on the contract/order

J. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in SECTION B of this Questionnaire.

(Signature)

(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)

SECTION 2: RESPONDENT INFORMATION (to be completed by respondent)

EVALUATED BY:

(Signature) (Date) Address:

(Typed or Printed Name)

(Title)

Phone Number:

Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 3: PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

1 2 3 4 5 6

UNSATISFACTORY MARGINAL NONE SATISFACTORY VERY GOOD EXCEPTIONAL

Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.

There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.

No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

Performance met contract requirements.

There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.

Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.

EVALUATION AREAS:

a. Contractor provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

b. Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

c. Contractor completed the project within its specified period of performance 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

d. Contractor provided on-time submittals as required 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

e. Contractor acted promptly to resolve problems, ensuring compliance with contract requirements and safety regulations 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

f. Contractor was reasonable and cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings as needed, and maintained communication with the government to keep the project on schedule or minimize the delay

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

g. Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

h. Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

i. Contractor ensured the project manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

j. Contractor ensured site superintendent and quality control representative were consistently present on site when work was performed

1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

k. Contractor’s compliance with environmental federal, state, and local laws 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

l. Contractor’s responsiveness to contract changes and providing accurate, reasonable and supportable cost proposals 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

m. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

n. Would you award another contract to the Contractor? 1 2 3 4 5 6 N/A

REMARKS:

SECTION 4: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

1. What were the contractor’s greatest strengths in the performance of the contract?

2. What were the contractor’s greatest weaknesses in the performance of the contract?

3. Please provide any additional comment concerning the contractor’s performance, as desired.

4. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

No Yes Default Convenience Pending Terminations

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)

5. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “Remarks”. No Yes

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing address:

92d Contracting Squadron 110 W. Ent Street Fairchild AFB, WA 99011-8568

Or Fax to:

Or Email:

EVALUATION AREAS: