Solicitation Amendment FA448426R00010003 SF 30.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

25 Aug 2026

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE

REQUISITION NUMBER

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE FA4484

FA4484 87 CONS PK

BLDG 2402 CP 609 754 2413, 2402 VANDENBERG AVE

JBMDL, NJ 08641

UNITED STATES

Christina Vargas, Email: christina.vargas.1@us.af.mil JAMES KELLY, Email: james.kelly.13@us.af.mil Telephone: 609-754-5782

7. ADMINISTERED BY (if other than Item 6)

CODE

SCD: PAS:

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE: FACILITY CODE:

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

FA448426R0001

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

20 Jul 2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; 1 or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required) See Section G - Contract Administration Data

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK

ONE

A.THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.)

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

See Schedule

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Contracting Officer

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

25 Aug 2026

Computer generated. Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this amendment is to post answers to vendor questions received. As a result, the following revisions Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

have been made:

1) Addendum 52.212-2(F)(2)(b) has been revised to include "The government will evaluate the price of any possible extension by dividing the price in the last option period by twelve, multiplying that figure by six, and adding it to the total price of the base and all options."

2) Addendum 52.212-2(F)(3)(a) Recency has been revised to remove "up to three (3)" and read as follows: To be determined recent, performance surveys and performance questionnaires received by the government shall reference projects that have been awarded, completed, or are ongoing within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation.

3) Provisions/Clauses R-DFARS 252.204-7021 and 252.204-7025 have been removed.

4) PWS Sec 6 Att. 4. Notional schedule has been updated.

5) Addendum to 52.212-1(a)(E.) Specific Instructions has been updated; Redaction should include company names. logos, and identifying information.

6) Burlington County SCA WD 15-4191 has been updated to Revision 34 dated 22AU26.

7) Attachment 14 - Fieldcraft_FA448426R00010003_Vendor Questions has been added.

The Solicitation closing date is not extended. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

Solicitation/Contract Form

The following modifications were made:

Information From To Solicitation Number FA448426R00010002 FA448426R00010003

Contract Clauses

Additional Regulation or Supplemental Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

The following Clause(s) were deleted:

DFARS Clauses Incorporated by Full Text 252.204-7021 Contractor Compliance with the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Level Requirements. (Oct 2025)

CONTRACTOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE CYBERSECURITY MATURITY MODEL CERTIFICATION LEVEL REQUIREMENTS (NOV 2025)

(a) . As used in this clause- Definitions

"Controlled unclassified information" means information the Government creates or possesses, or information an entity creates or possesses for or on behalf of the Government, that a law, regulation, or Governmentwide policy requires or permits an agency to handle using safeguarding or dissemination controls (32 CFR 2002.4(h)).

"Current" means-

(1) With regard to Conditional Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) Status-

(i) Not older than 180 days for Conditional Level 2 (Self) assessments and Conditional Level 2 (certified third-party assessment organization (C3PAO)) assessments, with-

(A) No changes in compliance with the requirements at 32 CFR part 170 since the Conditional CMMC Status date (see 32 CFR 170.16 and 170.17); and

(B) A corresponding affirmation of continuous compliance by an affirming official (see 32 CFR 170.4); and

(ii) Not older than 180 days for Conditional Level 3 (Defense Industrial Base Cybersecurity Assessment Center (DIBCAC)) assessments, with-

(A) No changes in compliance with the requirements at 32 CFR part 170 since the Conditional CMMC Status date (see 32 CFR 170.18); and

FA448426R00010003

(B) A corresponding affirmation of continuous compliance by an affirming official;

(2) With regard to Final CMMC Status-

(i) Not older than 1 year for Final Level 1 (Self), with-

(A) No changes in compliance with the requirements at 32 CFR part 170 since the Final CMMC Status date (see 32 CFR 170.15); and

(B) A corresponding affirmation of continuous compliance, not older than 1 year, by an affirming official;

(ii) Not older than 3 years for Final Level 2 (Self) assessments and Final Level 2 (C3PAO) assessments, with-

(A) No changes in compliance with the requirements at 32 CFR part 170 since the Final CMMC Status date (see 32 CFR 170.16 and 170.17); and

(B) A corresponding affirmation of continuous compliance, not older than 1 year, by an affirming official; and

(iii) Not older than 3 years for Final Level 3 (DIBCAC) assessments, with-

(A) No changes in compliance with the requirements at 32 CFR part 170 since the Final CMMC Status date (see 32 CFR 170.18); and

(B) A corresponding affirmation of continuous compliance, not older than 1 year, by an affirming official; and

(3) With regard to affirmation of continuous compliance (32 CFR 170.22), not older than 1 year with no changes in compliance with the requirements at 32 CFR part 170.

"Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) status" means the result of meeting or exceeding the minimum required score for the corresponding assessment.

The potential statuses are as follows:

(1) Final Level 1 (Self).

(2) Conditional Level 2 (Self).

(3) Final Level 2 (Self).

(4) Conditional Level 2 (C3PAO).

(5) Final Level 2 (C3PAO).

(6) Conditional Level 3 (DIBCAC).

(7) Final Level 3 (DIBCAC).

"Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification unique identifier (CMMC UID)" means 10 alpha-numeric characters assigned to each CMMC assessment and reflected in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) for each contractor information system.

"Federal contract information (FCI)" means information, not intended for public release, that is provided by or generated for the Government under a contract to develop or deliver a product or service to the Government. It does not include information provided by the Government to the public, such as on public websites, or simple transactional information, such as information necessary to process payments.

"Plan of action and milestones" means a document that identifies tasks to be accomplished. It details resources required to accomplish the elements of the plan, any milestones in meeting the tasks, and scheduled completion dates for the milestones, as defined in National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication

800-115 (32 CFR 170.21).

(b) . The Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) is a framework for assessing a contractor's compliance with applicable information security Framework protections (see 32 CFR part 170).

(c) . The CMMC assessments will not duplicate efforts from any other comparable DoD assessment, except for rare circumstances when a reassessment Duplication may be necessary, for example, when there are indications of issues with cybersecurity and/or compliance with CMMC requirements.

(d) . The Contractor shall- Requirements

(1)(i) Have and maintain for the duration of the contract a current CMMC status at the following CMMC level, or higher: __CMMC Level 1 (Self) __ for all information systems used in Contracting Officer insert: CMMC Level 1 (Self); CMMC Level 2 (Self); CMMC Level 2 (C3PAO); or CMMC Level 3 (DIBCAC) performance of the contract, task order, or delivery order that process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI; and

(ii) Consult 32 CFR 170.23 related to the flowdown of the CMMC requirements, and flow down the correct CMMC level to subcontracts and other contractual instruments;

(2) Only process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI on contractor information systems that have a CMMC status at the CMMC level required in paragraph (d)(1) of this clause, or higher;

(3) Complete on an annual basis, and maintain as current, an affirmation, by the affirming official (see 32 CFR 170.4), of continuous compliance with the requirements associated with the CMMC level required in paragraph (d)(1) of this clause in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) ( ) for each https://piee.eb.mil CMMC UID applicable to each of the contractor information systems that process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI and that are used in performance of the contract;

(4) Ensure all subcontractors and suppliers complete prior to subcontract award, and maintain on an annual basis, an affirmation, by the affirming official (see 32 CFR 170.4), of continuous compliance with the requirements associated with the CMMC level required for the subcontract or other contractual instrument for each of the subcontractor information systems that process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI and that are used in performance of the subcontract; and

(5) If the Contractor has a CMMC Status of Conditional, successfully close out a valid plan of action and milestones (32 CFR 170.21) to achieve a CMMC Status of Final.

(e) . The Contractor shall- Reporting

(1) Submit to the Contracting Officer-

(i) The CMMC UID(s) issued by SPRS for contractor information systems that will process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI during performance of the contract;

and

(ii) Any changes in the CMMC UIDs generated in SPRS throughout the life of the contract, task order, or delivery order, if applicable;

(2) Enter into SPRS the results of a current self-assessment for each CMMC UID, not covered by a C3PAO assessment or DIBCAC assessment, applicable to each of the contractor information systems that process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI and that are used in performance of the contract; and

(3) Complete in SPRS on an annual basis and maintain as current an affirmation of continuous compliance by the affirming official (see 32 CFR 170.4) for each self-assessment, C3PAO assessment, or DIBCAC assessment required under the contract in SPRS.

(f) . The Contractor shall- Subcontracts

(1) Insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (f) and excluding paragraph (e)(1), in subcontracts and other contractual instruments, including those for the acquisition of commercial products or commercial services, excluding commercially available off-the-shelf items, if the subcontract or other contractual instrument will contain a requirement to process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI; and

(2) Prior to awarding a subcontract or other contractual instrument, ensure that the subcontractor has a current CMMC certificate or current CMMC status at the CMMC level that is appropriate for the information that is being flowed down to the subcontractor based on the requirements at 32 CFR 170.23.

(End of clause)

List of Attachments

The following Header Attachment(s) were added:

Information Value Attachment Description Proposal Attachment Name Fieldcraft_FA448426R00010003_Vendor Questions_24AUG26 Date 24 Aug 2026 Number 14

The following Header Attachment modifications were made:

Burlington County SCA WD 15-4191 Rev 32 dated 13MAY26

Information From To Attachment Name Burlington County SCA WD 15-4191 Rev 32 dated 13MAY26 Burlington County SCA WD 15-4191 Rev 34 dated 22AU26 Date 13 May 2026 22 Aug 2026

PWS Sec 6 Attachment 4_FY27 Notional, Example Fieldcraft Course Summary Schedule Information From To

Attachment Name PWS Sec 6 Attachment 4_FY27 Notional, Example Fieldcraft Course Summary Schedule

PWS Sec 6 Attachment 4_FY27 Notional Example Fieldcraft Course Summary Schedule

Date 29 Apr 2026 24 Aug 2026

Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

THIS SECTION IS FOR SOLICITATION PURPOSES ONLY. THIS SECTION WILL BE PHYSICALLY REMOVED FROM ANY RESULTANT AWARD BUT WILL BE

DEEMED INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.

52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS--COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES

Addendum to 52.212-1(b), Period for Acceptance of Offers. The paragraph is tailored as follows: "The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 120 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers."

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1(a), SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

A. To ensure timely and equitable evaluation of the proposal, the offeror must follow the instructions contained herein. The proposal must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of four (4) separate parts: Part I - Technical Proposal, Part II - Price Proposal, and Part III - Past Performance Information, and Part IV - Continuation of Essential Contractor Services Plan.

B. The contracting officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the contracting officer will review this determination and if, in the contracting officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional data will be requested and certification under RFO 15.403-4 will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the contracting officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit cost data to the extent necessary for the contracting officer to determine the reasonableness and affordability of the price.

C. Notice to Offeror(s)/Supplier(s): Funds are not presently available for this effort. No award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.

D. This Executive Summary has been prepared as an aid to you, the potential offeror. The Government has made every effort Executive Summary / General Summary:

to accurately reflect the requirements and information contained in this solicitation. However, if there are any inconsistencies between the executive summary and the solicitation, the solicitation will govern.

a) The U.S. Air Force 87 Contracting Squadron (CONS), Joint Base MDL, New Jersey, on behalf of the USAF Expeditionary Center (EC) located on JB-MDL, NJ. has a requirement for providing Fieldcraft Training Support Services in accordance with Performance Work Statement (PWS) (Section 1.2, Attachment 0001) dated 19 MAY 2026. Services shall be provided for one (1) 12-month period plus four (4) 12-month option periods from 12 DEC 2026 - 11 DEC 2031. In addition, the government may extend the total length of the contract by no more than (6) months after the end of the last option year, if necessary, and IAW with RFO 52.217-8.

b) The Government intends to award a single Firm Fixed Price (FFP) Requirements Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract to a Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB). The acquisition is based upon competition to represent the Best Value IAW RFO 15.101 to the Government. For proposal instructions and submittal information, see RFO 52.212-1, entitled Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Products and Commercial Services. For the basis of award, see RFO 52.212-2, entitled Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services.

c) This is an all-electronic solicitation release. Hard copies are not available. The Government will post all information pertaining to the solicitation and award of this requirement to the Government Point of Entry (GPE), also known as SAM.gov. It is the responsibility of each offeror to review the web page for postings of amendments, updates, or changes to current information.

d) Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale.

e) Questions regarding this RFP shall be submitted via email, and subsequent answers will be posted to SAM.gov. If Offerors have questions, they are requested to submit them in writing grouped by solicitation section and make reference to the particular section / subsection number. Questions must be received via email no later

The than 5 August 2026 at 1600 Eastern Time Christina Vargas at christina.vargas.1@us.af.mil and MSgt Lewis Hampton at lewis.hampton@us.af.mil. to both decision whether to respond to questions and requests for clarification made after Q&A suspense date closing shall be at the sole discretion of the Contracting Officer.

Failure of a prospective offeror to submit any questions will be construed to mean that the prospective offeror fully understands all requirements of the solicitation.

f) Clarifications: Clarifications, exchanges of information between Government and offerors, will be controlled by the Contracting Officer. The Government intends to award a contract without negotiations with respective offerors. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct negotiations if deemed in its best interest.

g) Proposals submitted in response to this RFP must be submitted via email Christina Vargas at christina.vargas.1@us.af.mil and MSgt Lewis Hampton at to both To ensure successful delivery, lewis.hampton@us.af.mil. Proposals not sent to both addresses will be considered nonresponsive and will not be evaluated forward.

contractors shall obtain confirmation from the Contracting Officer that their proposal has been received and reviewed. Email submissions can occasionally be misplaced or routed to junk folders, so it is the contractor's responsibility to secure direct confirmation from the Contracting Officer that the government has both received and acknowledged their proposal. Failure to obtain email confirmation of receipt from the Government may result in your offer not being received and, consequently, not being evaluated. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with RFO 52.212- 1(c) "Late submission, modifications, revisions, and withdrawals of offers."

h) The anticipated PoP is as follows: The government expects the contractor to be able to perform the requirements of this contract on 12 Dec 26. (Optional) Phase-In Period, One (1) Month PoP from 12 Nov 2026 through 11 Dec 2026 is included, if needed, at no cost to the Government.

(1) Base Period, Twelve (12) Month PoP from 12 Dec 2026 through 11 Dec 2027.

(2) Option Year 1, Twelve (12) Month PoP from 12 Dec 2027 through 11 Dec 2028.

(3) Option Year 2, Twelve (12) Month PoP from 12 Dec 2028 through 11 Dec 2029.

(4) Option Year 3, Twelve (12) Month PoP from 12 Dec 2029 through 11 Dec 2030.

(5) Option Year 4, Twelve (12) Month PoP from 12 Dec 2030 through 11 Dec 2031.

i.) All options, if exercised, will be exercised in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Requirements IDIQ. Option Clauses incorporated in the solicitation are as follows:

a. RFO 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (CD 2026-O0027 18 December 2025)

b. RFO 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services (CD 2026-O0027 18 December 2025)

c. RFO 52.217-9, Option to Extend the Term of the Contract (CD 2026-O0027 18 December 2025)

i) A Contracting Officers Representative (COR) will monitor Contractor's performance in accordance with Solicitation Attachment 0004, Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP).

j) Contractor Manpower Reporting is a requirement under CLIN 0010 and applicable for the entire life of the resultant contract.

k) The provision RFO 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications - Commercial Items, shall be returned along with the Representations and Certifications:

proposal. You must include all Representations and Certifications with your quote or reflect they are completed in SAM.gov. Pursuant to RFO 52.204-7(d), "Processing time, which normally takes 48 hours, should be taken into consideration when registering. Offerors who are not registered should consider applying for registration immediately upon receipt of this solicitation." See https://sam.gov for information on registration. Identify and include the company's CAGE Code, UEI Number, and business-size standard under the applicable NAICS of 611699.

l) If the offeror is a joint venture, the offeror shall provide all required solicitation information for all parties including a copy of the joint venture Joint Ventures:

agreement with proposal. The agreement shall include information which identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract. The agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind each entity of the joint venture. Either party to the joint venture may submit performance information on behalf of the joint venture. Joint venture performance will be evaluated and rated based on either party's performance. The SBA must receive Joint Venture Agreements prior to proposal due date and approved before award of a resulting contract. If a joint venture is contemplated, then the assigned SBA Business Opportunity Specialist (BOS) must be advised as soon as possible. Ensure the agreement is submitted to the BOS in sufficient time to permit a regulatory compliance review. Any corrections and/or changes requested must allow for review time by the BOS before the RFP due date.

No corrections and/or changes are permitted after the time for submission of offers.

m) If the offer is based on a teaming/partnering relationship, the offeror shall provide all required solicitation information for all parties Teaming/Partnering Offerors:

including a copy of the teaming/partnership agreement. The agreement shall include information which identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract.

The agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind each entity of the teaming/partnering relationship.

n) In compliance with RFO 4.309(a), the Government will retain one (1) copy of all unsuccessful proposals and will destroy all extra copies. No destruction certificate will be provided.

o) THE FOLLOWING FEDERAL LEGAL HOLIDAYS ARE OBSERVED BY THIS BASE:

New Year's Day 1st of January

Martin Luther King's Birthday Third Monday in January

Presidents Day Third Monday in February

Memorial Day Last Monday in May

Juneteenth 19th of June

Independence Day 4th of July

Labor Day First Monday in September

Columbus Day Second Monday in October

Veterans Day 11th of November

Thanksgiving Day Fourth Thursday in November

Christmas Day 25th of December

NOTE 1: Please note observation dates are subject to change depending on whether the holiday falls on a weekend (i.e. holiday that falls on a Sunday, thus may be observed the following Monday).

NOTE 2: COMPLETE UNIT PRICES AND TOTAL AMOUNTS. TOTAL MUST BE WITHIN TWO DIGITS OF THE DECIMAL POINT.

NOTE 3: IN CASE OF VARIATION BETWEEN THE UNIT PRICE AND EXTENSION, UNIT PRICE WILL BE CONSIDERED THE OFFER.

NOTE 4: FAILURE TO PROVIDE PRICING ON ALL CLINS WILL BE CONSIDERED A NON-CONFORMING PROPOSAL AND WILL PRECLUDE THE PROPOSAL

FROM ANY FURTHER

AWARD CONSIDERATION.

NOTE 5: CLAUSES AND PROVISIONS IN THIS DOCUMENT WILL BE NUMBERED IN SEQUENCE BUT WILL NOT NECESSARILY APPEAR IN CONSECUTIVE

ORDER.

NOTE 6: INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS FOR COMMERCIAL ACQUISITIONS, OFFEROR REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATION - COMMERCIAL ITEMS AND PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS WILL BE PHYSICALLY REMOVED FROM ANY RESULTANT AWARD BUT WILL BE DEEMED TO BE

INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN THE AWARD.

E. Specific Instructions:

a.) Continuation of Essential Contractor Services Plan. The government has identified all, or a portion of the contractor services performed under the Fieldcraft Training Support Service's PWS as essential services in support of mission-essential functions. Therefore, in accordance with R-DFAR S237-7602 the contractor is required to submit a written plan for continuing the performance of this service with their offer. The plan must contain, at a minimum, the elements identified in R-

DFARS 237-7602.

b.) All offers remain valid for 120 calendar days. Multiple offers will not be accepted.

c.) Volume Organization: Proposals shall be submitted to the Government in four (4) separate parts as set forth below:

1) - - Limited to no more than 50 pages. PART I -TECHNICAL PROPOSAL Submit two (2) copies, one (1) original and one (1) copy redacted of all vendor logos The government will evaluate the quality of the proposal based on technical specifications. The Technical proposal is comprised of and identifying information.

only one single technical factor. Each proposal must clearly explain how it will meet the technical requirements outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and demonstrate an understanding of all tasks specified in the PWS and describe the approach to perform the requirements of the technical factor. The technical factor will receive an individual rating of "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable." There will not be an overall rating for Technical and Technical Risk. The offeror shall provide the following plans/approach(s):

i.) The offeror shall provide a staffing plan to recruit and retain the Technical Factor(s): Organizational Staffing and Manning Utilization Plan/Approach:

skill sets required listed in Attachment 0001, Performance Work Statement, dated 19 MAY 2026. Requirements are met when the offeror provides a staffing plan to include a staffing chart that describes qualified personnel, recruitment, and retention plan considering local market conditions, classroom capabilities and course overlap necessary to meet instructional and administrative requirements of the PWS. Resumes are not to be included.

2) - No maximum number of pages. PART II - PRICE PROPOSAL Submit two (2) copies, one (1) original and one (1) copy redacted of all vendor logos and identifying information.

i.) Complete blocks 17a, 17b, 30a, 30b, and 30c of the SF1449. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the SOLICITATION, with attachments. The SOLICITATION constitutes the model contract.

ii.) Insert proposed unit and extended prices in the Pricing Schedule in the SF 1449. The extended amount must equal the whole dollar unit price multiplied by the number of units. Prices shall not extend past the second decimal point for unit and extended amounts. The proposed price shall include all personnel, supplies, services, management, overhead, other direct costs, G&A, and profit to fulfill the contractual requirements of PWS and any attachments. The price proposal(s)must be submitted for one (1) 12-month base period plus four (4) 12-monthoption periods and a six (6) month option to extend IAW RFO 52.217-8.

iii.) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions.

3) - - Only references for relevant contracts are desired. If electronic, PART III - PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION submit two (2) copies, one (1) The government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror's original copy and one (1) copy redacted of all vendor logos and identifying information.

performance deemed recent and relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. Recent past performance would include any efforts within the past five years. Relevant performance includes performance of efforts involving Fieldcraft Training Support Services as specified in the PWS that involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. The government will use information submitted by the offeror and other sources such as other Federal government offices, Contractor Performance Assessment Systems, government date systems and commercial sources, to assess performance and help make a responsibility determination in accordance with RFO Subpart 9.104.

i.) Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Five Years:

customer surveys, independent surveys.) which demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed product for relevant past efforts/contracts (similar in scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires). In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc.

ii.) : The government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror's performance deemed relevant to the requirements of this Performance Surveys RFP. The government will use information submitted by the offeror and any other sources of information available to the Government to assess past performance. Provide a list of no more than five (5), of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within

Relevant contracts include similar services to those specified in the PWS. The evaluation of past performance information will the last five (5) years.

take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition. Furnish the following information for each contract listed:

(i) Company/Division name

(ii) Product/Service

(iii) Contracting Agency/Customer

(iii) Contract Number

(iv) ontract Dollar Value C

(v) Period of Performance

(vi) Verified, up-to-date name, address, FAX & telephone number of the contracting officer

(vii) compliance with contract terms and conditions Comments regarding

(viii) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

(ix) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

iii.) : The offeror will provide the government furnished questionnaire ("Past Performance Questionnaire") to those Performance Questionnaires federal agencies and commercial customers whose performances are deemed recent and relevant and direct them to return the completed questionnaires to the point of contact listed on the questionnaire. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have recent, relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition.

iv.) Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the Subcontractor Consent:

subcontractor's consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.

NOTE: PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES WILLNOT BE ACCEPTED FROM THE OFFEROR; IT MUST BE SUBMITTED BY THE RATER. IT IS THERESPONSIBILITY OF THE OFFEROR TO ENSURE PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCEQUESTIONNAIRES ARE

SUBMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT.

JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENTS - Joint venture agreements must be received by the Small Business Administration (SBA) prior to proposal due date and approved before award of any resultant contract. If you are contemplating a joint venture on this project, you must advise your assigned SBA Business

Opportunity Specialist (BOS) as soon as possible. It is also recommended that the agreement be submitted as soon as practicable to ensure compliance with established regulations. Any corrections and/or changes needed can be made only when your BOS has adequate time for a thorough review before the proposal's due date. NO CORRECTIONS AND/OR CHANGES ARE ALLOWED AFTER TIME OF SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL.

If this is a first-time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of no more than five (5) of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last 5 years.

If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner.

4) - Proposals must include a Continuation of Essential Contractor Services Plan Part IV - CONTINUATION OF ESSENTIAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES PLAN in accordance with R-DFARS 252.237-7023, Continuation of Essential Contractor Services and will be assessed on a pass/fail basis.

i.) plan must describe in detail how the offeror will continue to provide all required services under all circumstances, ensuring uninterrupted The written support to DoD missions and responsibilities.

ii.) submit this plan will render the proposal nonresponsive. Failure to iii.) The Government will evaluate the quality and feasibility of the Contractors' Continuation of Essential Contractor Services Plan based on the extent to which it demonstrates the offeror's ability to maintain performance during unforeseen or adverse conditions, including but not limited to: Installation or facility closures, Severe or inclement weather, natural disasters, security incidents, and situations in which the installation is under attack or otherwise compromised.

vi.) should clearly identify the offeror's strategies, resources, personnel considerations, communication methods, and continuity procedures that The plan ensure essential services remain operational during such events.

Additional Regulation or Supplemental Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

The following Clause(s) were deleted:

DFARS Clauses Incorporated by Full Text 252.204-7025 Notice of Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Level Requirements. (Oct 2025)

NOTICE OF CYBERSECURITY MATURITY MODEL CERTIFICATION LEVEL REQUIREMENTS (NOV 2025)

(a) . As used in this provision, "controlled unclassified information (CUI)," "current," "Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) status," Definitions "Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification unique identifier (CMMC UID)," "Federal contract information (FCI)", and "plan of action and milestones" have the meaning given in the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement 252.204-7021, Contractor Compliance With the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Level Requirements, clause of this solicitation.

(b)(1) . The CMMC level required by this solicitation is: Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) level _ ___CMMC Level 1 (Self) [Contracting Officer . This CMMC level, or higher (see 32 CFR part 170), is required insert: CMMC Level 1 (Self); CMMC Level 2 (Self); CMMC Level 2 (C3PAO); or CMMC Level 3 (DIBCAC)] prior to award for each contractor information system that will process, store, or transmit Federal contract information (FCI) or controlled unclassified information (CUI) during performance of the contract.

(2) The Offeror will not be eligible for award of a contract, task order, or delivery order resulting from this solicitation if the Offeror does not have, for each of the contractor information systems that will process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI and that will be used in performance of a contract resulting from this solicitation-

(i) The current CMMC status entered in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) ( ) at the CMMC level required by paragraph (b)(1) of https://piee.eb.mil this provision; and

(ii) A current affirmation of continuous compliance with the security requirements identified at 32 CFR part 170 in SPRS.

(c) . If the Offeror has a CMMC Status of Conditional, the Offeror shall successfully close out a valid plan of action and milestones (32 Plan of action and milestones CFR 170.21) to achieve a CMMC Status of Final.

(d) . The Offeror shall provide, in the proposal, the CMMC unique identifier(s) (CMMC UIDs) issued by SPRS for each contractor information CMMC unique identifiers system that will process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI during performance of a contract, task order, or delivery order resulting from this solicitation. The Offeror also shall update the list when new CMMC UIDs are generated in SPRS. The CMMC UIDs are provided in SPRS after the Offeror enters the results of self-assessment(s) for each such information system.

(End of provision)

Evaluation Factors for Award

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

Addendum to RFO 52.212-2 -- Evaluation -- Commercial Products and Commercial Services

A. This is a competitive best value source selection in which Tradeoff procedures IAW RFO 15.103-1 to make an integrated assessment for best value award decision. To arrive at a best value decision, evaluations of the factors described in this provision will be completed. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the best value tradeoff process, by its nature, is subjective; therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the selection process. Award will be made to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms to all required terms and conditions, includes all required representations and certifications, meets all requirements set forth in the RFP, and also provides the best value to the Government based on the results of the evaluation as described in paragraph below. Technical will be F evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis and tradeoffs may be made between past performance and price, with past performance considered significantly more important than price.

B. Email correspondence conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors shall not constitute conducting negotiations per RFO Part 15.105-2. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of past performance information) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute negotiations and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision. Offeror's may be restricted to a short suspense (i.e., less than 24 hours) in responding to the Contracting Officer during any negotiation period if necessary.

C. Rejection of Unreasonable Offers: The Government may reject any proposal that is evaluated to be unreasonable in terms of program commitments, or contract terms and conditions, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risks of the program.

D. Contractor Responsibility: In accordance with RFO 9.1, the Contracting Officer shall award contracts only to responsible vendors. No purchase or award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them. At the discretion of the contracting officer, the government may require acceptable evidence of the prospective contractor's current sound financial status, as well as the ability to obtain required resources if the need arises. In regard to resources, the contractor must be prepared to present acceptable evidence of subcontracts, commitments or explicit arrangements that will be in existence at the time of contract award, to rent, purchase or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, services, materials, other resources or personnel. Consideration of a prime contractor's compliance with limitations on subcontracting shall be taken into account for the time period covered by the contract base period or quantities, plus option periods or quantities, if such options are considered when evaluating offers for award. Pursuant to RFO 9.104-5, the contracting officer reserves the right to request adequate evidence of responsibility on the part of any prospective subcontractor(s). In the absence of information clearly indicating that the prospective contractor is responsible, the contracting officer shall make a determination of non-responsibility.

E. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined unacceptable. All technically acceptable offers will be considered as equal. The tradeoff will occur only between the past performance factor and the price factor. Offerors whose total evaluated price is unreasonable (in accordance with RFO 15.4 and RFO 31.201-3), unbalanced (in accordance with RFO 15.404-6), or unaffordable (not within any budgetary information included in the solicitation) may not be considered for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale.

F. EVALUATION PROCESS: The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

1. . Initially, the government's technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable/unacceptable basis, assigning Technical Acceptability ratings of Acceptable or Unacceptable. The proposals shall be evaluated against the following factor:

a. Technical Factor The offeror shall provide a staffing plan to recruit and retain the skill sets - Organizational Staffing and Manning Utilization Plan/Approach:

required of the PWS. Requirement Is met when the offeror provides a written staffing plan to include a staffing chart that describes qualified personnel, recruitment and retention plan considering local market conditions, classroom capabilities and course overlap necessary to meet instructional and administrative requirements of the PWS. Resumes are not to be included.

2. Next, the government shall rank all technically acceptable offers by price, including any option prices if applicable. An offeror's proposed prices will Price Evaluation.

be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in Section B by the proposed unit price for each Contract Line Item Number or Subcontract Line Item Number to confirm the extended amount for each.

a. Complete blocks 17a, 17b, 30a, 30b, and 30c of theSF1449. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the SOLICITATION, with attachments as well assigning/acknowledging any amendments. In doing so, the offeror agrees to the contract terms and conditions as written in the RFP.

b. Insert proposed unit and extended prices in the Pricing Schedule in the SF 1449. The extended amount must equal the whole dollar unit price multiplied by the number of units. Prices shall not extend past the second decimal point for unit and extended amounts. The proposed price shall include all personnel, supplies, services, management, overhead, other direct costs, G&A, and profit to fulfill the contractual requirements of PWS and any attachments. The price proposal(s) must be submitted for one (1) 12-month base period plus four (4) 12-month option periods and a six (6) month option to extend IAW RFO 52.217-8.

The government will evaluate the price of any possible extension by dividing the price in the last option period by twelve, multiplying that figure by six, and adding it to the total price of the base and all options. (Optional) Phase-In Period, One (1) Month PoP from 12 Nov 2026 through 11 Dec 2026 is included, if needed, at no cost to the Government.

3. Past Performance Evaluation: The government will then evaluate the quality and extent of offeror's performance based on the recency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor's performance, all which shall be considered. Any effort submitted must be similar in scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity to this effort. These are combined to establish one (1) performance confidence assessment rating for each offeror.

There are two (2) aspects to the quality of the past performance evaluation: recency and relevancy. Past performance references and data of either party to a joint venture or teaming arrangement will be considered to apply equally to the joint venture or teaming arrangement.

a. Recency: To be determined recent, performance surveys and performance questionnaires received by the government shall reference projects that have been awarded, completed, or are ongoing within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation (SF 1449 Block 3). Past performance information that does not meet this requirement will not be evaluated.

b. Relevance: Includes performance of efforts involving Fieldcraft Support services as specified in the PWS that involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires. Complexity is defined as the ability to perform and manage several task orders at the same time and successfully perform similar or higher magnitudes than described in the solicitation. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the government to assess the offeror's ability to perform the requirement described in the solicitation based on the offeror's demonstrated past performance. Past performance of greater relevancy will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance. The relevance ratings in Table 1 below shall be used when assessing offeror's efforts.

Table 1- Past Performance Relevance Ratings

Adjectival Rating Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

c. Performance Confidence Assessment: Efforts that are determined recent and relevant will then receive a confidence assessment rating in accordance with Table 2 below. The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, or Neutral Confidence as defined in DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table 5. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will be rated as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror. Offerors with no recent/relevant performance history or if the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned shall receive the rating "Neutral Confidence," meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably (neutral).

i. If teaming partners/joint ventures both have prime…