Amendment 03 to FA441821R00020003 20201110.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 9

101 E HILL BLVD

CP 843 963 5155

CHARLESTON AFB, SC 29404-5021

United States Byron Faison, Email: byron.faison@us.af.mil Telephone: (843) 963-5167

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

FA441821R0002

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10/16/2020

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE R

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

0003 11/10/2020 A007719 DKGV 1073189

6. ISSUED BY CODE FA4418 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

FA4418 628 CONS LGC

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended.

is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

See Section G

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return 1 copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

SEE CONTINUATION PAGE

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Robert Melton

Email: robert.melton.6@us.af.mil

Telephone: 673-5173

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) mailto:byron.faison@us.af.mil mailto:robert.melton.6@us.af.mil

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FA441821R00020003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The Purpose of This Amendment Is: The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Extend proposal due date from 19 November 2020 at 03:00 PM EDT to 1 December 2020 at 03:00 PM EST.

2. Invite contractors to 2nd site visit. The 2nd site visit will be 18 November 2020 at 09:00 AM EST located at 1646 Redbank Rd., Goose Creek, SC 29445, the Visitor's Center at the JB Charleston Naval Weapon's Station.

3. Add CLIN 0003 for a Fire Alarm System Replacement. See attachments 10-13

a. Attachment 10 - Addendum 1 for Complete Fire Alarm System Replacement

b. Attachment 11 - JBC Section 28 31 36

c. Attachment 12 - Barracks Building drawings for 2408. Building 2408 is identical to building 2405 and 2406.

d. Attachment 13 - Gypsum Board Specifications - JBC Section 09 29 00

4. Update Attachment 5 - AF Form 66 Submittal Register with Revised AF Form 66 Submittal Register.

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Contract Description

...Project Magnitude: Between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000.

...Project Magnitude: Between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000.

Section B - Supplies or Services & Prices or Costs

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

NOTICE TO OFFERORS:

* All proposals must include a proposed unit price cost for CLINs 0001, 0002, and 0003

* CLIN 0003 - Fire Alarm System Replacement is an option. The government reserves the right to award some, all or none of CLINS 0001, 0002 or 0003.

Item

Supplies/Service

Quantity

Unit

Unit Price

Amount

All work as required by drawings and specifications for Project , Repair HVAC, Dormitory, Building 2405-2406 Product Service Code: Z2JA Firm Fixed Price Product Service Code: Z2JA

Firm Fixed Price

Job

Fire Damper Replacement: Replacement of 110 (Estimated) Fire Dampers Product Service Code: Z2JA Firm Fixed Price

Each

Option Line Item

Bid Option #1 Fire Alarm System Replacement - All work as required by drawings and specifications

Job

The following CLIN(s) / SLIN(s) were added:

INFORMATION VALUE

Description Bid Option #1 Fire Alarm System Replacement - All work as required by drawings and specifications

Product/Service Services

Quantity 1

Unit of Measure Job

Option Yes

Exercised Option No

Section E - Inspection and Acceptance

The inspection and acceptance locations for the following CLIN(s) / SLIN(s) were added:

Option Line Item 0003 - Bid Option #1 Fire Alarm System Replacement - All work as required by drawings and specifications

Inspection and Acceptance Location - F1M3E2 - 437 CES CECC

INFORMATION VALUE

Action Both

Location Destination

Inspection and Acceptance Location

F1M3E2

437 CES CECC

100 W STEWART AVE BLDG 661 RM 101

AF BPN NO MILSBILLS PROCESSES

CHARLESTON AFB, SC 29404-4827

UNITED STATES

Cage Code :

DUNS Number :

DUNS+4 :

Instructions None

Point of Contact (POC) Name Leander Ferguson

POC Phone Number Office (843) 794-4334

POC Email leander.ferguson@us.af.mil

The inspection and acceptance locations for the following CLIN(s) / SLIN(s) were modified:

0001 - All work as required by drawings and specifications for Project , Repair HVAC, Dormitory, Building 2405-2406 Product Service Code: Z2JA Firm Fixed Price

Inspection and Acceptance Location - F1M3E2 - 437 CES CECC

INFORMATION FROM TO

POC Phone Number (843) 794-4434 (843) 794-4334

0002 - Fire Damper Replacement: Replacement of 110 (Estimated) Fire Dampers Product Service Code: Z2JA Firm Fixed Price

Inspection and Acceptance Location - F1M3E2 - 437 CES CECC

INFORMATION FROM TO

POC Phone Number (843) 794-4434 (843) 794-4334 mailto:leander.ferguson@us.af.mil

Section F - Deliveries or Performance

The delivery information for the following CLIN(s) / SLIN(s) were added:

Option Line Item 0003 - Bid Option #1 Fire Alarm System Replacement - All work as required by drawings and specifications

Place of Performance - F1M3E2 - 437 CES CECC

INFORMATION VALUE

Address

Place of Performance - F1M3E2 - 437 CES CECC F1M3E2

437 CES CECC

100 W STEWART AVE BLDG 661 RM 101

AF BPN NO MILSBILLS PROCESSES

CHARLESTON AFB, SC 29404-4827

UNITED STATES

Cage Code :

DUNS Number :

DUNS+4 :

Point of Contact (POC) Name Leander Ferguson

POC Phone Number (843) 794-4334

POC Email leander.ferguson@us.af.mil

Delivery 550 Calendar Days, From Date of Notice to Proceed Receipt to completion of performance

Section J - List of Attachments

The following attachments were added:

Attachment 13 - New Section 09 29 00 gypsum board Attachment 5 - AF 66-Revised Submittal Register Attachment 10 - Addendum 1 Fire Alarm System Replacement Attachment 12 - Joint Base Charleston - Barracks Building Drawings Attachment 11 - New JBC Section 28 31 76 FINAL 2405 2406

The following attachments were deleted:

02 Performance Time-B2405-2406 15 Submittal Register

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

Attachment 1- Drawings // Date: 17 June 20 // Pages:

Attachment 2 - Specifications // Date: 17 June 20 // Pages 411 Attachment 3 - Green Procurement // Date: 17 June 20 // Pages: 3 Attachment 4 - HVAC Plans duct dimensions // Date: 3 Nov 20 // Pages: 8 Attachment 5 - AF Form 66-Revised ( Schedule of Material Submittals) // Date: 10 Nov 20 // Pages: 12 Attachment 6 - Wage Determination SC20190023 // Date: 3 Jan 20 // Pages: 5 Attachment 7 - Attic Sprinkler Iso Vlv Loc PDF // Date: 3 Nov 20 // Pages: 16 Attachment 8 - Sign-In Sheet from 24 Sep 2020 Site Visit // Date: 3 Nov 20 // Page: 1 Attachment 9 - Pre-Bid Questions for B.2405 and 2406 // Date: 3 Nov 20 // Pages: 10 Attachment 10 - Complete Fire Alarm Replacement // Date: 10 Nov 20 // pages: 2 Attachment 11 - New JBC Section 28 31 26 // Date: 15 May 18 // pages: 45

Attachment 12 - Barracks Building drawings for 2408 // Date: 15 May 18 // pages: 38 Attachment 13 - Gypsum Board Section 09 29 00 // Date: 15 May 18 // pages: 9 mailto:leander.ferguson@us.af.mil

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

1. Instructions for Preparation and Submission of Proposals:

a. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Proposals must be complete, self-sufficient, and respond directly to the requirements of this solicitation. The response shall consist of two (2) separately bound parts:

Part I - Price Proposal Part II - Past Performance Information

b. The Contracting Officer has determined there is a high probability of adequate price competition in this acquisition. Upon examination of the initial offers, the Contracting Officer will review this determination and if, in the Contractor Officer's opinion, adequate price competition exists no additional cost information will be requested and certification under FAR 15.406-2 (Certificate of Current Cost or Pricing Data) will not be required. However, if at any time during this competition the Contracting Officer determines that adequate price competition no longer exists; offerors may be required to submit information, to the extent necessary, for the Contracting Officer to determine the reasonableness of price.

2. PART I - PRICE PROPOSAL - Submit 1 original (hardcopy) proposal and 1 virus scanned, READ ONLY CD /R (or DVD/R). Do not submit CD/RW's, DVD/RW's or flash drive formatted CD's or DVD's

a. SF 1442- Solicitation/Contract: complete Blocks 14 through 20 Section A. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in this solicitation Sections A through K. This constitutes the model contract.

b. Pricing Schedule: Insert proposed unit and extended prices in Section B for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) including all Bid Options. The total price shall then be inserted into the fill-in positions for each CLIN.

c. Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in section I through K. Section K shall be returned in its entirety. For sections C through I, the offeror shall submit only those pages that require a fill-in.

d. Standard Form 24, Bid Bond

3. PART II - PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION Limited to no more than three (3) pages per contract listed. Only references for same or similar type contracts are desired. Submit original and 1 virus scanned, READ ONLY CD/R (or DVD/R). Do not submit CD/RW's, DVD/RW's or flash drive formatted CDS's or DVD's formatted as flash drives, CDC/RW's or DVD/RW's.

a. Quality and Satisfaction Rating for Contracts Completed in the Past Three Years: Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, and customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrate customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed products for the same or similar type contract. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, etc.

b. Past Performance Surveys: The Government will evaluate the quality and extent of offerors experience deemed relevant to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will use information submitted by the offeror and other sources such as other Federal Government offices and commercial sources, to assess experience. Provide a list of no more than five (5) of the most relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the last three (3) years from the issue date of this solicitation. (Provide no more than five (5) contracts total for the Prime and major Subcontractors). Relevant performance includes performance of multi-discipline efforts involving restoration or repair of commercial structures, including removal and replacement of HVAC equipment systems that are similar or greater in scope, magnitude, and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to the instant acquisition. Furnish the following information for each contract referenced:

(i) Company/Division Name

(ii) Product/Service

(iii) Contracting Agency

(iv) Contract Number

(v) Contract Dollar Value

(vi) Period of Performance

(vii) Verified, up-to-date name, organization, email address, & telephone number of the contracting officer, project manager, or contracting officer's representative who evaluated performance

(viii) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(ix) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions

(x) Role of the Offeror in Effort (state which): Prime Contractor or Subcontractor

If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement: including any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangements with the same partner, and evidence of tasking appropriate to meet the subcontracting qualification. If this is a first time joint effort, each partner to the arrangement must provide a list of past relevant projects. Teaming partners will be treated and evaluated as subcontractor arrangements.

c. Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor's consent. Provide with the proposal a letter from all subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement, consenting to the release of their past performance information to the prime contractor.

4. GENERAL INFORMATION: Submitted documents must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following:

a. Requirements of the solicitation (Contract Line Items (CLINs) & Specifications/drawings) and government standards and regulations pertaining to this project.

b. Evaluation factors for award in Section M of this solicitation.

c. Pages exceeding the page limitations set forth in this Section L will not be read nor evaluated, but will be removed from the proposal.

d. Format for the proposal for PART II shall be as follows:

(1) The proposals will be 8 1/2" X 11" paper except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11" x 17"

(2) A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information.

(3) Typing shall not be less than 12 pitch.

(4) Elaborate formats, binding or color presentations are not desired or required.

e. Offerors shall submit a complete, original signed paper proposal as well as one copy in CD/R (or DVD/R) format to be received in the Contracting Office no later than the date and time posted for receipt of proposals.

The CD/R or DVD/R must be virus scanned and read only. Emailed, faxed, CD/RW, or DVD/RW proposals and modifications/revisions will not be accepted. The Contracting Office will accept modifications and revisions to the proposal via DOD SAFE at https://safe.apps.mil. In order to facilitate the sending and receiving of proposal modifications/revisions, offerors must first contact the Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer via email to alert the Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer to monitor their email for a DOD SAFE recipient notification. Once the offeror has accessed DOD SAFE and uploaded/sent the proposal modification/revision, the offeror will receive an automated sender notification email. When sending modifications/revisions via DOD SAFE, file suppression utilities, including but not limited to zip files, will not be accepted.

f. Visitor Control: Offerors are cautioned that Joint Base Charleston has a visitor control procedures requiring individuals not affiliated with the installation to obtain a visitor's pass prior to entrance. SOME DELAY SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED WHEN HANDCARRYING OFFERS. Offerors should allow sufficient time to obtain a visitor pass (requiring valid driver's license, vehicle registration, and current proof of insurance) and arrive at the location for submission PRIOR to the time established for receipt of offers. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with the provisions of FAR 52.215-1(c)(3), "Submission, modification, revision, and withdrawal of proposals."

g. Disclosure of the Magnitude of Construction Projects (IAW FAR 36.204(f)):

The estimated amount of this project is: Between $5,000,000 - $10,000,000

h. Offer Guarantee and Bond Requirements: The proposed price, for the purpose of the offer guarantee, is construed to mean the total of CLIN 0001-0003. The contract price, for the purpose of the performance and payment bonds, is construed to mean the sum of CLIN 0001-0003.

(End Of Section L)

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Basis of Contract Award: This is a competitive best value source selection in which competing offerors' past performance history will be evaluated on a basis significantly more important than cost or price considerations.

By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, and will be determined technically acceptable. All such offers shall be treated equally except for their prices and performance records. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The evaluation process shall proceed as follows:

FACTOR 1 - PRICE EVALUATION

Initially offers shall be ranked according to price. An offeror's proposed price will be determined by multiplying the quantity identified in Section B by the proposed unit price for the Contract Line Item Numbers (0001) and (0002) and (0003) to confirm the extended amount. Offerors whose total evaluated price is unreasonable (in accordance with FAR 15.404 and FAR 31.201-3), or unbalanced (in accordance with FAR 15.404-1), may not be considered for award. The price evaluation will document (for the offers evaluated under paragraph a below) the reasonableness and affordability of the proposed total evaluated price.

FACTOR II - PAST PERFORMANCE/EXPERIENCE

(a) The contracting officer shall seek relevant performance information on the lowest priced offerors (usually the lowest two to five) based on (1) the past and present efforts provided by the offeror and (2) data independently obtained from the offeror, as solicited, questionnaires tailored to the circumstances of the acquisition, and sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, Contactor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), or other databases; interviews with Contracting Officers, Program Managers, Contracting Officers Representatives, Fee Determining Officials or the Defense Contract Management Agency. The Government reserves the right to seek information on higher priced offerors if none of the lower priced offerors receive a Substantial Confidence Performance Assessment Rating.

(b) Relevant performance includes performance of multi-discipline efforts involving renovation or repair of HVAC systems that are similar or greater in scope, magnitude, and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the Government to assess the offeror's ability to perform the effort described in this solicitation, based on the offeror's demonstrated present and past performance. There are four levels of relevancy as shown in DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table 4. With respect to relevancy, more relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

Table 4. Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method Adjectival Rating Description

Very Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and

Not Relevant: Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and

(c) The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Neutral Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence, as defined in DoD Source Selection Procedures, Table 5. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will not be considered as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror. Offerors with no relevant past or present performance history shall receive the rating "Neutral Confidence," meaning the rating is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably. The Source Selection Authority may determine that "Substantial Confidence" or "Satisfactory Confidence" is worth more than "Neutral Confidence".

Table 5. Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Method Adjectival Rating Description

Substantial Confidence: Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence: No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror's performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence: Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence: Based on the offeror's recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(d) In evaluating past performance, the Government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.

(e) If the lowest priced evaluated offer is judged to have a "Substantial Confidence" performance assessment, that represents the best value for the Government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers. If the lowest priced offeror is not judged to have a "Substantial Confidence" performance confidence assessment, the next lowest priced offeror will be evaluated and the process will continue (in order by price) until an offeror is judged to have a "Substantial Confidence" performance assessment or until all offerors are evaluated. The Source Selection Authority shall then make an integrated assessment best value award decision.

(f) Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in Section L. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal (for example, the relevance of past performance information) or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

(g) The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest. If, during the evaluation period, it is determined to be in the best interest of the government to hold discussions, offeror responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs) and the Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the source selection decision. If the offeror's proposal has been evaluated as acceptable at the time discussions are closed, any changes or expectations in the FPR are subject to evaluation and may introduce risk that the offeror's proposal be determined unacceptable and ineligible for award.

(End Of Section M)