RFI_FA302225R0001 TLF Responses_28May25.docx

DOCX document 57 KB Posted

Attached to
Temporary Lodging Facilities (TLFs) and Magnolia Inn
Solicitation number
FA302225R0001
Issued by

About this file

This Request for Information (RFI) concerns a comprehensive renovation project for ten Temporary Lodging Facility (TLF) units across five buildings at Columbus Air Force Base. The project involves standardizing the units with identical upgrades, focusing on sustainable principles and life cycle cost-effectiveness. Key renovation requirements include electrical system upgrades, potential mold/mildew remediation, ADA compliance for Unit 7202A, and various interior and exterior improvements such as new drywall, kitchen updates, and electrical system enhancements.

The solicitation (FA302225R0001) is issued by the Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command, with a project value estimated between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000. A mandatory site visit was scheduled for 09 April 2025, with RFIs due by 14 April 2025. The renovation will address multiple technical aspects, including electrical grounding, fire alarm systems, smoke detectors, and compliance with various UFC (Unified Facilities Criteria) standards. Contractors must complete Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) training and obtain base access to participate in the solicitation process.

View the file

Other files

Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFI – Temporary Lodging Facilities (TLFs)

1. Will there be any costs associated with badging for the contractor to bare?

NO

2. Will past performance projects/reference letters for commercial projects be acceptable in lieu of government past project/CPARS?

YES

3. Is there a page limit to the technical narrative portion of this proposal?

NO

4. Please confirm the contractor is responsible for all design fees associated with this project.

YES

5. Section A of the solicitation is blank, does submitting SF 1442 fulfill the proposal requirements of Section A?

YES

6. Please confirm that Section B is to be submitted with our proposal.

YES

7. Is there any anticipation to encounter hazardous materials during construction such as asbestos or lead paint?

CONS to provide available asbestos reports. The Government does not have official reports regarding lead paint, but Environmental suspects that LBP is on some of the door frames and exterior eves of the buildings.

8. Please clarify if the contractor’s bid guarantee is to be submitted on SF42 or the surety's standard form.

Submitted on SF24

9. Section L, Paragraph 4.4 references a Technical Synopsis. Please clarify if this is the same information as outlined in Section M Paragraph 2.1 Technical Evaluation to be submitted.

NO. Your technical synopsis is part of your proposal. It demonstrates your understanding of the project as a whole and will contribute to determining technical acceptability.

10. Paragraph 2.1, of the SOW, refers to incorporating "Sustainable Principles, including Life Cycle Cost Analysis". With the level of well-written detail provided in the SOW in regard to finishes, fixtures, etc. we don't see an opportunity for Life Cycle Analysis. Please provide more information on what is expected.

Further in the ‘sustainable principles’ sentence is mention of UFC 1-200-02 (High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements). Life Cycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) is explained within. In summary, LCCA is required for systems contributing to the energy footprint of the building including, but not limited to, HVAC, domestic hot water, the building envelope, and renewable energy generating systems. LCCA should be applied to such systems within the SOW. Read the UFC for full requirements.

11. Is there specific scheduling software required for this project?

NO

12. If qualified, can the CSS dually serve as the QCM?

YES

13. Does the government expect any other testing to be required on this project, outside of TAB?

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. The SOWs have been updated to include testing for the new ABA ramp and new handicap van-accessible parking spot (both now located only at Unit 7202A) as well as testing of the water damaged areas within Unit 7210A.

14. Are existing smoke detectors located outside of the 36" clearance for ceiling fans or will the contractor be required to relocate and rewire?

Record drawings have been provided (CONS to release). The SOWs have been updated to demolish existing heat and smoke detection and alarm systems of each unit.

15. Paragraph 2.3.6 refers to light fixtures in existing Office 01 and a new ADA compliant hallway restroom, however we do not see these rooms within the plans. Please clarify if this is intended for this project SOW has been updated to reflect the correct verbiage.

16. Please clarify if toilets shall be tank type or flush valves. If flush valve, has it been confirmed that there is enough water to support this type of system?

New toilets shall be tank type to stay with the existing equipment type. New tank type toilets shall be installed in all facilities. SOWs have been updated to reflect the correct verbiage.

17. The SOW parameters outline cabinets to be 36" tall. These do not meet the ADA requirements of 34" tall. Please clarify which is to be provided.

SOW has been updated to reflect the correct dimensions.

18. We do not see any requirements for ADA restrooms, entrys, ramps, or openings. Please confirm these facilities are not to meet ADA requirements.

The scope of the SOW has changed. Unit 7202A is no longer to be an ADA compliant reception area. Unit 7202A will instead be the ADA compliant TLF unit. Unit 7202B is now to be a non-ADA compliant TLF. The SOW has been updated to reflect this change. All units of Buildings 7204, 7206, 7208, 7210, and 7212 are not required to be ADA compliant.

19. The SOW states for welded door frame to be installed on the rear exterior of each unit. If brick veneer is present, this will require additional extensive selective demo to remove and replace brick. Please confirm this is what is required.

Knock-down frames shall be used instead of welded. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change.

20. For plumbing scopes, it states to reuse all existing plumbing to the max extent possible and replace/repair as needed. Is the extent of this referring to hookups/connections that are exposed outside of the wall that would require minor repair replacement or are the extents to include the entire system as a whole? If it is to include the extents, please provide a baseline for bidders to ensure fair and competitive metrics for bidding.

“Replace/repair as needed” refers to the hookups/connections that are exposed outside of the walls and floors.

21. During the site visit, it was observed that at least one unit showed signs of roof leaks. There are no provisions for addressing roof leaks of roof repairs. Please provide further instruction on if provisions for repairs to damaged areas/roof should be included in the contractor’s proposal. If so, please provide a basis of bid to establish equal extents of repairs to be addressed for all contractors.

After further review of the suspected unit, it is determined that the damage to the ceiling was not due to a roof leak. Provisions for roof repair are not necessary.

22. During the site visit it was observed that at least one unit showed signs of termite damage. There are no provisions for addressing termite damage or treatment. Please provide further instruction on if provisions for treatment and repairs should be included in the contractor’s proposal. If so, please provide a basis of bid to establish equal extents of repairs to be addressed for all contractors.

There are no active reports of animal/pest damage or infestation. There are currently no provisions for addressing termite damage or treatments.

23. Without access to all units at the site visit, contractors are unable to quantify extents of repairs such as drywall, ceilings, floor types to be demoed, soffit replacement, functionality of existing plumbing, HVAC, and electrical systems. For equal bidding amongst contractors, please provide a percentage of repairs to be made for each scope to use as a basis of bid.

A percentage will not be provided since all facilities were accessible during the second site visit on 23 APRIL 2025.

24. At the site visit, it was stated that a sidewalk would be installed connecting the ADA TLF to the parking lot. However, it is not shown on 7202A Parking Lot Plan. Please revise drawing to show extents of the new sidewalk.

The scope of the SOW has changed. There is no longer a proposed sidewalk connecting Unit 7202A to the existing parking lot. The SOW has been updated to reflect these changes.

25. Is the contractor submitting two proposals/technical narratives, one for the Five TLF renovations and one for the TLF conversion, or only one proposal/technical narrative to include them both as one complete?

Only one proposal / technical narrative, that includes both portions of the project, is required. Ensure that you clearly identify the total price (Grand Total) for the entire requirement.

26. Is the contractor to provide any information on Funding SLIN only line item listed in Section B? If so, please provide further clarification of what information is required here.

NO

27. Per paragraphs 2.3.35 & 2.3.36, please provide a percentage of stud replacement/ceiling member replacement to provide an equal basis of bid amongst contractors.

The Government cannot provide a percentage. If stud and framing replacement is required and necessary, it will be considered an unforeseen site condition.

28. Please confirm that all new drywall to be installed throughout each TLF shall be 5/8" moisture resistant.

New drywall to be installed throughout each TLF shall be 5/8” moisture resistant in areas prone to moisture (bathrooms, kitchens, exterior entry storage room, etc.) and the ceilings. All other areas will have 5/8” non-moisture resistant drywall.

29. Paragraph 2.3.50 references "Inspiration Photos" for Faux Rock Wall however this was not included in the solicitation documents. Please provide so that pricing can be provided.

The scope of the SOW has changed. Unit 7202A is no longer being converted into a reception office. Therefore, the logo is no longer in scope. The SOW has been updated to reflect these changes.

30. Please confirm that the logo referenced in paragraph 2.3.51 is in reference to the logo for the faux rock wall and that only one logo is required for this project.

The scope of the SOW has changed. Unit 7202A is no longer being converted into a reception office. Therefore, the logo is no longer in scope. The SOW has been updated to reflect these changes.

31. At the 2nd site visit, it was observed that there is not enough distance from the existing front door to the edge of existing carport pavement to provide an ADA compliant ramp. A portion of the existing carport would need to be demoed in order to extend the slope of the ramp the required distance for ADA compliance. Please advise which method is desired.

The existing carport structure shall not be demolished. The existing carport pavement can be demolished, only to comply with ADA requirements.

32. Paragraph 2.3.44 states to use metal framing for new interior walls, however this building is currently constructed using wood framing. Standard practice would be to go back with wood framing. Please clarify if wood or metal is to be used.

Framing will be made of wood. SOW has been updated to reflect this change.

33. At the 2nd site visit, it was observed that Unit 7210A experienced a long-term leak originating from an appliance in the kitchen. There was heavy moisture present beneath the kitchen floor, living room floor, and seepage through the front exterior wall. Is the contractor to include costs for 3rd party mold/mildew remediation or will the base address this cleanup and remediation ahead of this contract being awarded?

The Contractor shall obtain an independent, third-party mold and mildew testing and remediation service for affect areas. The SOW has been updated to reflect this additional task.

34. Will testing of subgrade, base course, and concrete be required on new ADA parking spot, ADA ramps, and sidewalk?

The scope of the SOW has changed. There is no longer a proposed sidewalk. There is no longer a proposed ADA parking spot to have been extended off the existing parking lot. The SOW has been updated to reflect these changes. Testing will be required of the new ABA ramp and new handicap van-accessible parking spot (both now located only at Unit 7202A). The SOW has been updated to reflect this requirement.

35. The proposed sidewalk connecting the new ADA parking spot and existing carport on unit 7202A is bound by existing grades on each end. Without performing a survey of the existing grades, it is unknown if this proposed sidewalk will meet the slope requirements to be ADA compliant. If it is not ADA compliant, it will require a handrail full length. Please advise how contractors should price.

The scope of the SOW has changed. There is no longer a proposed sidewalk from the existing parking lot to the existing carport of Unit 7202A. The SOW has been updated to reflect this change.

36. Paragraph 14.B on SF30 states proposals are due at 12:00 AM, please clarify if this is the correct time.

This has been updated as the proposal due date has changed.

37. Will all furniture/furnishings including but not limited to tables, tvs, pictures, lamps, and beds be removed and disposed of by the contractor?

No. All furniture and furnishings, except for electrical appliances in the kitchens, will be disposed of prior to this contract’s demolition/construction. Electrical appliances in the kitchens are to be demolished by the Contractors per SOWs.

38. Will two hard copies be required for all project submittals or just design package submittals?

Design only.

39. Technical Proposal, Past Performance - please confirm what submission documentation this section is required to contain. Is the contractor to reference past performance questionnaires submitted on their behalf or is the Airforce reviewing available past performance data independently?

The Air Force will review SAM, CPARS, and any other available sources. The contractor may provide additional past performance, but it is not mandatory.

40. Technical Proposal, Past Performance - please confirm if we are required to provide a complete Past Performance Questionnaire for the projects submitted within this section? Also, if affirmative, when will the Past Performance Questionnaire sheet be issued?

Past Performance questionnaires are nor required.

41. Can Final CPARS evaluations be submitted in lieu of obtaining new PPQs?

Yes, will be verified.

42. Can PPQs recently completed by clients for other solicitations be utilized in lieu of obtaining new PPQs?

Yes, will be verified.

43. Will the renovation be conducted unit-by-unit, or is there a specified phasing plan that must be followed?

All units will be unoccupied. Renovation can occur on all units simultaneously.

44. What are the access control procedures for contractors on base, and are there any working hour restrictions?

CONS to provide additional information as necessary. See Section 4.14 Construction Security of the SOWs for access control procedures. See Section 4.3 Scheduling of the SOWs for hours of work rules.

45. Has a recent hazardous materials survey been conducted (asbestos, lead-based paint, mold, etc)? If so, please provide the report.

CONS to provide available asbestos reports. The Government does not have official reports regarding lead paint, but Environmental suspects that LBP is on some of the door frames and exterior eves of the buildings.

46. Are there any known structural deficiencies or reports available on the foundation, framing, or roofing of the units?

There are no known structural deficiencies or reports.

47. How should contractors coordinate temporary shutdowns of water, power, or HVAC systems with base operations?

Contractors shall not disrupt any CAFB use of services without prior CO approval. Contractors shall coordinate with CO to connect with necessary actors for temporary shutdown of services.

48. Are there any updates required for fire alarm, sprinkler, or suppression systems, and do they need to be brought up to current NFPA/UFC standards?

There are no current sprinkler or suppression systems in the facilities, therefore, no updates are required. The fire alarm scopes of the SOWs have changed. The SOWs have been updated to include these changes. The SOWs have been updated to include specifications.

49. Will the government provide a list of approved materials/finishes, or is contractor-submitted product data required for approval?

The Government will not provide a list of approved materials/finishes. Contractor submitted product data is required for approval.

50. Will any upgrades or additions be required for data, telecom, or cable systems in the units?

The scope of the SOW has changed. There are no longer units that require upgrades or additions for data, telecom, or cable systems. The SOW has been updated to reflect this change.

51. Are the units required to meet current ADA or UFAS standards, including Fair Housing, and if so, which elements must be upgraded?

The scope of the SOW has changed. Unit 7202A is no longer being converted into a reception office achieving ADA standards. Unit 7202B is no longer the ADA compliant TLF. Unit 7202A will now be the ADA compliant TLF. The SOW has been updated to reflect these changes. Unit 7202A is now the only TLF unit requiring accessible elements and spaces. This unit is required to achieve current ABA standards (UFAS are the set of design requirements developed under ABA). The SOW has been updated to reflect the correct verbiage from ADA to ABA. Elements and spaces needing to achieve ABA compliance are identified in the SOW.

52. Are there any historical preservation or environmental regulations applicable to these units that could impact the renovation?

There is no historical preservation applicable to these units. See Chapter 6 Safety, Health, and Environmental Protection of the SOWs for environmental regulations.

53. Will commissioning be required for any systems (e.g., HVAC, electrical), and what are the specific closeout documentation requirements (O&M manuals, warranties, etc.)?

See UFC 3-410-01 Mechanical Engineering, Section 3-7.15 for commissioning requirements. See Chapter 4 Administration of Construction of the SOW for close-out documents, warranties, etc.

54. Have there been any reports of termite or rodent infestation in these units? If so, are mitigation or preventative measures part of the scope?

There are no active reports of animal/pest damage or infestation. There are currently no provisions for addressing termite damage or treatments.

55. Are there any government-furnished materials (GFM), or should contractors account for potential long-lead procurement in their schedules?

The Government will not furnish any material or equipment for this project.

56. Are fire suppression/alarm systems required throughout?

There are no current sprinkler or suppression systems in the facilities, therefore, no updates are required. The fire alarm scopes of the SOWs have changed. The SOWs have been updated to include these changes. The SOWs have been updated to include specifications.

57. Are specific dust containment or HEPA filtration systems required for interior demolition and renovation?

See UFC 1-200-02 High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements, Section 2-5.3.3 for protecting indoor air quality during Construction.

58. What is the average processing time for contractor and subcontractor base access or security badging?

We required that names be submitted to CONS 72 hours in advance of the individuals needing access to the base.

59. Will the base provide designated staging and laydown areas near the units? If so, please provide a site map.

Columbus AFB will provide designated staging and laydown areas adjacent to Atlanta Drive, the road the units are on. Exact locations will not be determined until pre-construction, so a site map will not be provided at this time.

60. Will each unit require individual metering for water, electricity, or gas, or is existing shared metering acceptable?

There is no shared metering currently. Each duplex facility currently has 2 water meters (one for each half) and 2 natural gas meters (one for each half). Electricity is not metered by Columbus AFB, instead it is metered and billed by our utility provider. No changes to the metering systems are necessary.

61. Is government approval required for all subcontractors, or only for specific scopes or trades? (e.g. Material deliveries, trash hauling, etc.,) We required that names be submitted to CONS 72 hours in advance of the individuals needing access to the base.

62. What are the required hold points for government inspection (e.g., rough-in, insulation, final finishes)?

Material will be submitted through the submittal process for approval of material.

63. The current 1AWG service feeders appear undersized, even for the existing 200A disconnects, and will need to be replaced. Will the new service conductors be supplied under a separate contract, or will they be included in this contract? If they are part of this contract, please provide all relevant details regarding these feeders.

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change

64. Furnish and install one (1) new welded case opening frame and associated hardware and fasteners in the existing door opening." Welded case frames will require wall framing to be demo and reframed around the welded casement. This will also require drywall removal on the walls. Do we proceed with this option or would a knock down frame be considered?

Knock-down frames shall be used instead of welded. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change.

65. The scope of work calls for remove and replacing ceiling and insulation. During walk through, water damaged was observed on the ceilings. Have all roof leaks been repaired or we to assume inspection and repairs to roofs. If the roofs have been replaced, can documentation be provided on when that occurred?

All facilities have been reroofed late-2014, early-2015. Documentation cannot be provided due to sensitive information. Inspection and repairs to roofs are not included in these SOWs.

66. Do the Superintendent, SSHO and QC Manager need to be 3 separate individuals?

Superintendent can fill the SSHO role but not the QCM role.

67. (If building is occupied) Are there any phasing requirements? How many people will be in the building? Are there any temporary heating/cooling requirements?

Buildings will be unoccupied during these projects.

68. Can the period of performance be extended after award once the material/equipment lead times are confirmed due to current market conditions for the equipment for this project?

A suspension of work may be issue if we receive a letter from the manufacturer of the delay of material/equipment.

69. Are soil boring reports available? If not, it will be assumed that excavation will be clear of rocks and obstructions.

Soil boring reports are not available. Testing of subgrade and base course are required of the new ABA ramp and new handicap van-accessible parking spot (both now located only at Unit 7202A). The SOW has been updated to reflect these requirements.

70. Please provide bidding quantities for deteriorated underlayment (roofing)/base course (paving).

Roof underlayment is not part of this renovation; therefore, quantities will not be given. Paving quantities will not be given as two site visits were scheduled to view areas requiring concrete and paving.

71. Please confirm the manufacturer of the existing roofing system and who carries the current warranty of the roofing system.

The manufacturer of the current roofing system was Graham Roofing Incorporated.

72. Please confirm Johnson Metasys is the building management system and provide contact information.

Yes, control systems are Johnson Controls Metasys.

73. Is there a bulk water fill i.e. a hydrant or water source we can pump from for grading operations in close proximity?

There are hydrants near the project sites. Contractors shall not disrupt the use of hydrant services without prior CO approval. Contractors shall coordinate with CO to connect with necessary actors for hydrant services.

74. Please confirm whether asbestos or lead is present on this project, and if so, provide relevant the documentation.

CONS to provide available asbestos reports. The Government does not have official reports regarding lead paint, but Environmental suspects that LBP is on some of the door frames and exterior eves of the buildings.

75. Is this project tax exempt?

No taxes will be charge to the government.

76. Is there a preference for mechanical equipment as basis of design (i.e. Trane, Carrier, etc.)?

Columbus AFB does not have any sole source for any equipment within this project.

77. Please explain what is required to be entered for "000101 Funding SLIN only. NAF PR COLUF50002".

You will bill to CLIN 0001.

78. Please explain what is required to be entered on line item "000201 Funding SLIN only. NAF PR COLUF50002".

You will bill to CLIN 0002.

79. Please confirm all kitchen equipment to be used in order to confirm kitchen exhaust, ventilation requirements.

All existing kitchen equipment do not have direct to outside exhaust. All new kitchen equipment will not have direct to outside exhaust.

80. Please confirm commissioning is by contractor, not government.

See UFC 1-200-02 High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements, Section 2-2.2 for commissioning requirements. In summary, commissioning includes an experienced commissioning provider, who should be independent of the project design and construction team, and from the operations team. The Government will not perform commissioning. Read the UFC for full requirements.

81. Are as-built drawings available?

Access to any drawings must be requested in SAM. You must complete the CUI training that is attached in this solicitation.

82. Please confirm if the government is furnishing laundry equipment. If yes, please provide equipment specifications. If not, please provide the quantity and type of equipment needed.

The users of the facilities will furnish laundry equipment. Appliance selection is undergoing review and approval for purchase. Appliances’ specifications cannot currently be provided.

83. Please provide contact information for Fire Alarm system. Are there any approved or preferred manufacturers or product lines for the addressable fire alarm system components?

Columbus AFB does not have any sole source for any equipment within this project.

84. Please confirm the manufacturer, model, and version (hardware/software) of the existing Monaco Base Wide System for compatibility validation.

Exact manufacturer/model/version of the existing Base system will not be provided as this information is provided to individuals with a need to know. There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs. Compatibility with the base-wide system is not necessary.

85. Are there additional UFC or NFPA sections applicable beyond UFC 3-600-01 (e.g., UFC 4-021-01 for Mass Notification)?

Contractors shall comply with UFC 4-711-01, UFC 3-600-01 and applicable publications referenced within (including NFPA where referenced).

86. Please confirm the exact model/version of the existing Monaco Base Wide System to ensure compatibility with the new transmitters/transceivers?

Exact manufacturer/model/version of the existing Base system will not be provided as this information is provided to individuals with a need to know. There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs. Compatibility with the base-wide system is not necessary.

87. What are the required transmission frequencies and protocols (e.g., digital/analog, modulation type) for compatibility with the base-wide system?

There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs. Compatibility with the base-wide system is not necessary.

88. How much message storage is required (e.g., number of messages, time duration)?

See UFC 3-600-01 Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities for these requirements when referring to smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and alarms.

89. Is non-volatile memory required for message retention during power outages?

See UFC 3-600-01 Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities for these requirements when referring to smoke and carbon monoxide detectors and alarms.

90. Is there a specific process or format for requesting and programming identity codes from the Base Fire Department?

There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs, therefore, programming of identity codes is not required.

91. Who is responsible for programming the identity codes—contractor or government personnel?

There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs, therefore, programming of identity codes is not required.

92. Can you clarify what tools or interface are required to set the identity code in the field? Is special training or software needed?

There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs, therefore, programming of identity codes is not required.

93. Are there specific environmental ratings (e.g., NEMA, IP) or mounting requirements for the transmitter housing due to exposure?

There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs, therefore, mounting equipment is not a concern.

94. What is the expected format or content of the automatic and manual test signals?

There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs, therefore, test signals are not required.

95. Is there a required protocol for logging or verifying receipt of the daily test transmissions?

There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs, therefore, daily test transmissions are not required.

96. Who is responsible for initiating the polling process (if required)—the base system or the new transmitter?

There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs, therefore, polling processes are not required.

97. Are polling intervals standardized or adjustable?

There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs, therefore, polling intervals are not required.

98. What are the power requirements for each transmitter (voltage, current)?

There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs, therefore, power requirements are not of concern.

99. Are backup power or battery systems required? If so, what specifications apply? What is the minimum required standby and alarm duration for the battery backup system per NFPA 72?

There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs, therefore, standby and battery backup power are not of concern.

100. If replacement parts are not immediately available, does the 48-hour repair completion window allows for exceptions?

Please see 4.8.7 of the statement of work.

101. Is the 24-hour on-site service requirement limited to regular business days, or does it include weekends and holidays?

Please see 4.3.6 of the statement of work.

102. Can you provide a list of approved third-party inspectors or required qualifications for the lightning protection system inspection?

These facilities will not require lightning protection system inspection.

103. In cases of LPS addition to existing systems, can you provide as-built drawings or layout of the existing LPS?

Access to any drawings must be requested in SAM. You must complete the CUI training that is attached in this solicitation.

104. Under what circumstances would a Class B design be permitted, if at all, despite the stated Class A requirement?

More information is needed to answer this question (i.e. specifying Class A/B design for electrical, architecture, etc.).

105. If a diesel fire pump is selected, what type and size of fuel system is required, and are there refueling or containment requirements?

See Section 9-5.4 of UFC 3-600-01 Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities regarding diesel engine driven fire pumps.

106. Can you provide the applicable ATFP seismic design criteria or zone classification for piping installation?

See Standard 19. Equipment Bracing of UFC 4-010-01 DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings regarding seismic design criteria for overhead utilities. See UFC 3-301-01 Structural Engineering for risk categories.

107. If fire alarm panel reprogramming is required, must it be performed by a Base-certified vendor or can a subcontractor perform it?

There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs, therefore, reprogramming is not required.

108. Please confirm if all rooms require both smoke and heat detectors or only heat detectors where specified.

The fire alarm scopes of the SOWs have changed. The SOWs have been updated to include these changes. Smoke detectors are required in each sleeping room and shared/common space of the units. SOW has been updated to better define this requirement.

109. Please provide bidding quantities for demolished existing roof soffit and carport soffit that cannot be reused.

The SOW has been updated to keep the existing roof and carport soffit. New soffits shall be installed in areas that are missing soffit completely, matching best to existing. SOW has been updated to reflect these changes. Soffit quantities will not be given as two site visits were available to view soffit conditions. Contractors shall provide bidding quantities for areas missing soffit.

110. No labor rate for fire sprinkler fitters is listed. Please provide this documentation.

If it’s not listed, select the best one that will fit that category.

111. This does not appear to have any Fire Protection Systems in the TLF's. Is a fire suppression system required?

The SOWs have been updated to reflect the change in protection, detection, and alarms. There will be no new fire suppression systems to be installed in the TLFs. Read the UFCs for full requirements.

112. For exterior lighting, please confirm acceptable fixture model series and required color temperature (e.g., 3000K, 4000K).

The Government does not have a sole source justification for exterior lighting equipment and cannot specify fixture model series. See UFC 3-530-01 Interior and Exterior Lighting Systems, Section 4.2 for exterior lighting equipment requirements. In summary, exterior light sources shall be no greater than 3000K. Read the UFC for full requirements. SOWs have been updated to reflect the color temperature.

113. For new ceiling fans with lights, are combination wall controls (fan speed + dimmer) acceptable?

Yes, combination wall controls are acceptable. SOWs have been updated to reflect this addition.

114. Must all newly installed communication conduit runs include innerduct for future fiber installation?

The scope of the SOW has changed. There is no longer telecommunication work involving innerducts to be completed. The SOW has been updated to reflect this change.

115. For the drinking fountain, is a chilled unit required or is a standard ADA-compliant non-refrigerated model acceptable?

The scope of the SOW has changed. Unit 7202A is no longer being converted into a reception office. Therefore, the drinking fountain is no longer in scope. The SOW has been updated to reflect this change.

116. Is commissioning furnished by the contractor or government?

See UFC 1-200-02 High Performance and Sustainable Building Requirements, Section 2-2.2 for commissioning requirements. In summary, commissioning includes an experienced commissioning provider, who should be independent of the project design and construction team, and from the operations team. The Government will not perform commissioning. Read the UFC for full requirements.

117. If existing fire alarm control panels require reprogramming, will government-provided vendors be required or can a subcontractor propose the programming?

There are no existing fire alarm panels on the TLFs. Reprogramming is not required.

118. The standard electrical requirements provided with this project include specific conduit and panel specifications. As this is a housing facility, could you please confirm whether there is an allowance for using non-metallic electrical cable to match the existing wiring?

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change. See UFC3-501-01 Electrical Engineering, Section 3-2 for interior distribution systems. In summary, nonmetallic sheathed cables are acceptable per UFC. Consult with NEC, too. Read the UFC for full requirements.

119. The main disconnect for each unit lacks proper grounding and uses undersized conduit and wire for the existing 200-amp panels. I recommend upgrading all 6 services to better supply power to the buildings.

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems, including grounding. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change.

120. Many receptacle locations throughout the duplexes do not have grounding means. Some units have older cloth wire that should be replaced and not reused. Do we need to price for rewiring all units or only change out the ungrounded wire?

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems, including grounding. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change.

121. Fire alarm stated in SOW for remodel states to add to existing fire alarm. Each unit now has stand alone smoke detectors with no monitoring. Will the existing fire alarm be sufficient?

The SOWs have been updated to reflect the change in protection, detection, and alarms. There will be no new fire alarm panels to be installed in the TLFs. The SOWs have been updated to include these specifications. Read the UFCs for full requirements.

122. According To the Base Standards Included in the New Download the Fire Alarm Requires Class A Or B Wiring Systems. This Is a New Fire Alarm System Addition and Communication Between Systems for Adjoing Units. Please Indicate If This Applies to Capitol Village.

See Section 9-18 Fire Alarm Requirements of UFC 3-600-01 Fire Protection Engineering for Facilities for fire alarm wiring requirements.

123. Please note that parts of the existing wiring could be the old possibly asbestos containing, not verified.

The Government does not have asbestos reports that sampled and tested the existing wiring. If the Contractor is concerned and suspects asbestos in existing wiring, they are responsible for obtaining this independent, third-party contract.

124. The ADA requirement will require the adjustment of the electrical devices throughout the building.

The scope of the SOW has changed. The ADA-compliant TLF is now to be within Unit 7202A. The SOW has been updated to reflect this change. The SOW has been updated to include ADA compliant electrical devices.

125. The 3 prong outlets were noted in parts of the buildings and shared with 2 prong device receptacles. After investigation, it was verified that a 3-prong grounding outlet had been installed on a 2-wire cable. Therefore, it is believed that the buildings are wired 2 wire cable not 3 wire ground type cable. It is also noted that all wiring should be replaced with 3 wire or more conductors to accommodate the grounding requirement and meet code.

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems, including grounding. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change. Electrical system shall be designed and installed in accordance with UFC 3-501-01, NFPA 70 (NEC), and applicable publications mentioned within.

126. All GFCI outlets are not fully functional and it is noted that all devices need to be brought up to meet base standards with spec grade receptacles. I assume the base can make the designation as to if the devices should be residential or spec grade, spec grade is the standard I read as part of the doc’s included with this download RFP.

See UFC 3-520-01, Section 3.6 Cable and Raceway Criteria for receptacles requirements. The SOWs have been updated to include this verbiage. Read the UFC for full requirements.

127. With the ground an issue the panels were not 4 wire and the ground bus was shared with the neutral, suitable for the time period. Does the base want a new panel with bonding jumper and ground bus used to replace the existing panel?

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems, including grounding. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change.

128. The panel in the adjoining buildings are located across from the Water heater and intruding into the safe working space of the electrical panel. This would require the removal and relocation of the electrical panel or the water heater to make room for 3 ft clearance. Please advise.

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems, including grounding. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change. The location of the new electrical panel shall be installed in the location of the existing. The SOWS have been updated to include this specification.

129. The outdoor panels with 2 – 200-amp breakers feeding the TLF’s are not loaded at that amount it is believed. The feed to the building is not rated for the 200-amp breaker and violates code from the transformer to the feeder of the exterior enclosed breaker assembly panel. Also the feed from the 200 amp breakers have very undersized sub feeds feeding the panels in each unit. Please advise that the feeds from the transformer should be sized to accommodate the long distance of the lateral considering voltage drop and meet the overcurrent protection of the breakers feeding each unit, and the feed from the breakers to the associated panels needs to be sized to meet code. This would require the removal on the conduit (if not sized correctly), removal of the conductors from transformer to the dual exterior breaker panel and provide the newly sized lateral, the replacement of the feed from the existing breaker panel inside the mech room to the exterior panel. It is also noted that the 200 amp breakers may be oversized and based on demand load and the code allowed panel sizing guide in the NEC a smaller exterior panel as well as interior panel could be resized down a small amount. Please advise as to keep the existing electrical service and sub feed, and to keep the existing panel or provide new? The existing situation is not up to NEC code.

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems, including grounding. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change. Electrical system shall be designed and installed in accordance with UFC 3-501-01, NFPA 70 (NEC), and applicable publications mentioned within.

130. The newest NEC will require all equipment to have ground fault protection devices on the washer, dryer, exterior AC, range, other equipment listed in the NEC. In order for the system to function as per NEC a ground system should be installed as per code at the service point of each.

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems, including grounding. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change. Electrical system shall be designed and installed in accordance with UFC 3-501-01, NFPA 70 (NEC), and applicable publications mentioned within.

131. TLF facility and bond the ground at that point and then extend a 4 wire feed to a new panel that has a separate grd bar. Replacement of the service equipment will be needed throughout to ensure this. An EARTH TO GROUND TEST with a ETG test meter will be needed and documented by code to make sure one single grd rod would provide the necessary Ohm’s to safely protect the occupants. Please advise as to meeting this new code, not knowing what edition of the NEC is considered Valid. I am referring to the latest in all the electrical questions noted herein.

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems, including grounding. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change. Electrical system shall be designed and installed in accordance with UFC 3-501-01, NFPA 70 (NEC), and applicable publications mentioned within.

132. The NEC required a neutral be ran and installed in every switch box where a motion type device can and or will be installed, This code refers to a residential wiring code and also fits some commercial rooms as pointed out in the code. Will this neutral be required in all switch locations where a motion switch can be installed now and in the future?

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems, including grounding. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change. Electrical system shall be designed and installed in accordance with UFC 3-501-01, NFPA 70 (NEC), and applicable publications mentioned within. Lighting system shall be designed and installed in accordance with UFC 3-530-01 and applicable publications mentioned within.

133. The NEC also requires the use of ARC FLASH protection devices as well where there could be areas people sleep, an example would be a living room, and others listed in the CODE. Is this requirement be enforced in the TLF’s?

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems, including grounding. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change. Electrical system shall be designed and installed in accordance with UFC 3-501-01, NFPA 70 (NEC), and applicable publications mentioned within.

134. Para 2.3.3 might need to be edited where it says to reuse existing components where necessary. It appears nothing is suitable to be reused other than outlet boxes and raceway type components, please verify?

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems, including grounding. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change.

135. The UFC and LSC 101 require exits and emergency egress lighting for the interior and exterior in the event of power loss. Exit lights (of the standard design) may be an issue with the ceiling height of the TLF’s. Please verify that EXITS will be required.

The scope of the SOW has changed. Unit 7202A is no longer being converted into a reception office. Therefore, exit signs are no longer required. The SOW has been updated to reflect this change.

136. The emergency lighting for egress will require battery back up for 90 minutes or a UPS type emergency power source to power the regular LED lights inside and on the porches? please advise if one type is more accepted by the CAFB?

The scope of the SOW has changed. Unit 7202A is no longer being converted into a reception office. Therefore, emergency lighting is no longer required. The SOW has been updated to reflect this change.

137. Para; 2.3.9, not sure this fits the existing conditions of the TLF’s. It appears to need a completely new FA system throughout. Advise?

The scope of the SOW has changed. The SOWs have been updated to reflect the change in protection, detection, and alarms. The SOWs have been updated to include these specifications. Read the UFCs for full requirements.

138. Is it the intent to have TVSS on the service panel for each TLF?

See UFC 3-520-01, Section 3-4 Surge Protective Devices (SPDS) for surge protection requirements. The TLFs do not have sensitive or critical electronic equipment, as required by the activity. Surge protection shall be required for sensitive or critical electronic equipment, as required by equipment manufacturer, of equipment installed per Contractor’s approved equipment submittals. See UFC 3-530-01, Section 2-2 Interior Lighting Equipment and Section 4-2 Exterior Lighting Equipment surge protection requirements.

139. It appears as a summary statement that the service lateral from the transformer, the outdoor panels, interior panels, feeders, all are not in accordance with current code and needs to be resized and new installed. The SOW does not indicate this to be replaced? The interior wiring being what is thought to be a 2-wire system needs completely demolished and replaced to meet all new codes, UFC’s, with a ground containing cable with appropriate device installed, 20 AMP devices used on #12 cable, per base standards? Load centers shall not be used according to base standards so all electrical panels must be Panelboards, the panels currently used in the TLF’s are Load centers. Please answer that according to the NEC, UFC and base standards the existing wiring from point of service throughout (for the most part) must be replaced. This seems to be more than the SOW was asking for so please advise.

The scopes of the SOWs have changed. All TLF facilities will require an upgrade to their electrical systems, including grounding. The SOWs have been updated to reflect this change. Electrical system shall be designed and installed in accordance with UFC 3-501-01, NFPA 70 (NEC), and applicable publications mentioned within.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .