Solicitation Amendment FA281626Q00020005 SF 30.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

J

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

20 May 2026

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE

REQUISITION NUMBER

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE FA2816

FA2816 SMC PK PKO

CP 310 653 6118, 483 N AVIATION BLVD BLDG 272

EL SEGUNDO, CA 90245-2808

UNITED STATES

Dorian Maynard, Email: dorian.maynard.1@spaceforce.mil VICTOR MENDOZA, Email: victor.mendoza.4@spaceforce.mil Telephone: 3106535651

7. ADMINISTERED BY (if other than Item 6)

CODE

SCD: PAS:

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

CODE: FACILITY CODE:

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

FA281626Q0002

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11 Mar 2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; 1 or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (if required) See Section G - Contract Administration Data

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK

ONE

A.THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.)

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The purpose of this amendment is to;

1. Answer the third set of questions.

2. Correct the verbiage in RFO 52.212-2. The correct verbiage is "if there is NO price submitted for the option years".

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Victor Mendoza

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

27 May 2026

Computer generated. Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Solicitation/Contract Form

The following modifications were made:

Information From To Solicitation Number FA281626Q00020004 FA281626Q00020005

List of Attachments

The following Header Attachment(s) were added:

Information Value Other Attachment Questions and Answers Set 3 Attachment Name Question and Answers Set 3 Date 27 May 2026 Number 06

Evaluation Factors for Award

Additional Regulation or Supplemental Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

The following Clause modifications were made:

52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Deviation) (Tailored) Feb 2026 hereby reads as follows:

RFO 52.212-2 Evaluation--Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Deviation Date)

(a) Evaluation factors. The Government will award contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

Factor 1: Technical Capability

The Government will evaluate the offeror's Technical Capability based on two subfactors: (1) Credentials & Certifications, and (2) Technical Approach.

Subfactor 1: Credentials & Certifications (Evaluated as Acceptable/Unacceptable) The Government will evaluate the offeror's provided credentials and certifications to ensure they meet the minimum mandatory requirements outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). This subfactor will be evaluated strictly on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

Acceptable: The prime contractor and/or subcontractor have all required credentials and certifications.

Unacceptable: The prime contractor and/or subcontractor is missing one or more required credentials or certifications. (Note: An "Unacceptable" rating at the subfactor level renders the entire Technical Factor Unacceptable and the proposal unawardable.)

Subfactor 2: Technical Approach The Government will evaluate the offeror's proposed technical approach and execution plan to meet the nine (9) performance objectives listed under the Description of Services within the PWS. The evaluation will assess the offeror's understanding of the requirements, the feasibility of their approach, and the associated performance risks.

The Government will assess the approach using these definitions:

Strength: An aspect of an offeror's proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government.

Weakness: A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness: A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Deficiency: A material failure of a proposal to meet a government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

Feasibility: the Government's assessment of the practical likelihood that the Offeror's proposed technical approach, methods, and processes will successfully achieve the Performance Work Statement (PWS) objectives. This evaluation considers the realism of the proposed timeline, the adequacy of the resources

FA281626Q00020005

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

assigned, and the technical achievability of the solution within the specific operational constraints of the Los Angeles Air Force Base and Fort MacArthur network environments.

Exceptional Understanding: The proposal provides a comprehensive, highly detailed, and logically sound methodology that clearly anticipates complexities and proactively mitigates risks associated with LAAFB and Fort MacArthur's specific operational network environments. It leaves no doubt that the offeror has mastered the PWS requirements.

Thorough Understanding: The proposal provides a complete, sound, and detailed methodology that clearly addresses all PWS requirements and demonstrates a firm grasp of the operational environment and its standard challenges.

Adequate Understanding: The proposal meets the baseline PWS requirements with sufficient detail to demonstrate it can perform the work, but lacks the depth, proactive risk mitigation, or comprehensive detail found in higher-rated approaches.

Performance risk: The probability that an offeror's proposed approach will cause disruption of schedule, degraded performance, the need for increased Government oversight, or the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

Subfactor 2 will be assigned a percentage score and rating descriptor in accordance with the table below:

Excellent Approach (40%): All credentials are present. The proposal demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the 9 PW objectives with multiple strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Good Approach (30%): All credentials are present. The proposal demonstrates a thorough understanding of the 9 PW objectives with at least one strength. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Adequate Approach (20%): All credentials are present. The proposal demonstrates an adequate understanding of the 9PWS objectives. The approach meets the baseline requirements of the solicitation. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Unacceptable (0%): Missing mandatory credentials (Subfactor 1 Unacceptable) OR the quote provides an unacceptable/no technical approach to the PWS objectives.

Proposal contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable.

Factor 2: Past Performance

Submission Requirements:

The offeror shall submit a list of exactly three (3) relevant previous government contracts. To be considered recent, the work must be ongoing or have been completed within the last five (5) years from the date of solicitation issuance (e.g., performance occurring in 2021 or later).

For each contract reference, the offeror must provide:

Contract Number Offeror's Role (Prime Contractor or Subcontractor) Total Dollar Value of the contract A brief description of the work performed The Contracting Officer Assigned to that Contract

Evaluation Methodology:

The Government will evaluate the offeror's Past Performance to assess the relative risks associated with the offeror's likelihood of success in performing the solicitation's requirements. The Government will evaluate both the Relevancy (Magnitude, and Role) and the Quality (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) ratings or similar performance records).

Assessment of Offeror Relevancy

1. Role (Prime vs. Subcontractor):

While the Government will evaluate past performance for work performed as either a Prime Contractor or a Subcontractor, the Offeror's role determines the relevancy of the management experience. Because the successful awardee for this requirement will act as the Prime Contractor, they will be responsible for total contract performance, overarching schedule and quality control, risk management, and direct interface with the Government Contracting Officer. Therefore, past performance references where the Offeror performed as a Prime Contractor may be deemed more relevant or assigned a higher confidence rating than references where the Offeror performed solely as a Subcontractor, as subcontractor experience may not demonstrate the comprehensive management and administrative capabilities required to execute this contract.

2. Magnitude (Dollar & Days):

For the purposes of evaluating magnitude in the criteria below:

"Same/greater magnitude" is defined as a total contract value comparable to or exceeding the Government's estimated value for this requirement AND a period of performance of at least 365 days.

"Significantly lower magnitude" is defined as a total contract value less than 50% of the Government's estimated value and/or a period of performance of less than 365 days.

(Note: The government estimate will not be disclosed to protect the integrity of the solicitation process.)

Assessment of Offeror Quality (CPARS/ Performance Record Rating):

For the purposes of this evaluation, a CPARS rating of "Satisfactory" is considered a positive rating, as it demonstrates the contractor successfully met all contractual requirements. "Neutral" is not a performance rating; it is strictly reserved for instances where no performance record exists.

Assessment of Quality (CPARS Mapping)

Positive (Good/Excellent): Consists of Exceptional, Very Good, and Satisfactory CPARS ratings. This indicates the offeror's past performance record demonstrates that they successfully met or exceeded all contract requirements.

Neutral / No Record: Consists of N/A (No Record Available). This indicates the offeror has no recent or relevant performance record, or the record is so sparse that no meaningful assessment can be assigned.

Negative / Adverse: Consists of Marginal and Unacceptable CPARS ratings. This indicates the offeror's past performance record indicates a failure to meet one or more critical contract requirements. (Note: Quotations presenting Negative/Adverse CPARS may be rated Unacceptable overall).

The Government will assign a Past Performance score based on the highest tier the offeror achieves across their submitted references, in accordance with the criteria below:

Prime Contractor (40%): Previous contracts demonstrate the same/greater magnitude (comparable dollar value and at least365 days of performance) for essentially the same requirement, and positive PARS or equivalent ratings.

Prime Contractor (35%): Previous contracts demonstrate the same/greater magnitude (comparable dollar value and at least365 days of performance) for essentially the same requirement, and neutral/no CPARS available on record.

Prime Contractor (30%): Previous contracts demonstrate significantly lower magnitude (less than 50% of the anticipated dollar value and/or less than 365 days of performance) for essentially the same requirement, and positive CPARS or equivalent ratings.

Prime Contractor (25%): Previous contracts demonstrate significantly lower magnitude (less than 50% of the anticipated dollar value and/or less than 365 days of performance) for essentially the same requirement, and neutral/no CPARS available on record.

Subcontractor (20%): Previous contracts demonstrate the same/greater magnitude (comparable dollar value and at least365 days of performance) for essentially the same requirement, and positive CPARS or equivalent ratings.

Subcontractor (15%): Previous contracts demonstrate the same/greater magnitude (comparable dollar value and at least365 days of performance) for essentially the same requirement, and neutral/no CPARS available on record.

Subcontractor (10%): Previous contracts demonstrate significantly lower magnitude (less than 50% of the anticipated dollar value and/or less than 365 days of performance) for essentially the same requirement, and neutral/no CPARS available on record.

Neutral (N/A): Previous contracts demonstrate no relevant past performance. Offerors lacking a record of relevant past performance will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably.

(Note: If an offeror submits a relevant contract but has negative/adverse CPARS ratings (Marginal/Unacceptable), the Government reserves the right to assign a lower score or determine the risk of unsuccessful performance to be Unacceptable.)

(Note: If an offeror submits a combination of Prime Contractor and Subcontractor references, the Government will evaluate and score each of the three (3) references individually using the tiers above. The offeror's final Past Performance score will be the calculated average of those individual reference scores.)

Factor 3: Price

Price is evaluated for reasonableness and completeness but is the least heavily weighted factor. While Price is less important than Technical Capability and Past Performance, it is still a material evaluation factor.

Pricing Instructions:

Offerors shall submit their pricing via the Standard Form (SF) 1449 -FA2816Q00020003.

Offerors must provide a proposed price for all X001 series CLINs (e.g., CLIN 0001, 1001, 2001).

Offerors must leave all X002 series CLINs (e.g., CLIN 0002, 1002, 2002) at a value of $0.00.

Compliance Warning: Quotations that include dollar values for the X002 series CLINs will be considered non-compliant with solicitation instructions. The Government reserves the right to reject such quotations as unacceptable without further evaluation or discussion.

Basis for Award (Factor Weights & Tradeoff)

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose quotation represents the Best Value to the Government, price and other factors considered.

The Government will perform a comparative assessment of quotations based on the following weighted criteria:

Evaluation Factor Weight

Factor 1: Technical Capability: 40%

Factor 2: Past Performance: 40%

Factor 3: Price: 20%

Technical Capability and Past Performance are of equal importance (40% each). When combined, the non-price factors (80%) are significantly more important than Price (20%). Because this is a Best Value Tradeoff procurement, the Government reserves the right to select a quotation that offers a higher price if the Government determines that the technical superiority and/or stronger past performance history warrants paying the price premium.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced or if there is NO price submitted for the option years. The evaluation of options does not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) Notice of award. A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(The Government will perform a comparative assessment of quotations. A quotation with a higher Past Performance rating may be selected over a lower-priced quotation if the Government determines the higher-rated quotation provides better value.)

When offerors submit a response to the solicitation include a completed copy of the , Offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial provision at 52.212-3 Products and Commercial Services, with offer.

ADDENDUM to RFO 52.212-2

All provisions and clauses can be found in this SF 1449 - FA2186Q00020003 attachment. The full text of provisions and clauses may be accessed electronically at Revolutionary FAR Overhaul (RFO) and are incorporated under the Federal Acquisition Circular 2026-02The solicitation document, and all incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through the www.acquisition.gov framework.

FA281626Q00020005

https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.acquisition.gov