FA2816-16-R-0008_Amendment_1_Released.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Update page 1 of the solicitation, SF 1442, Box 10 to clarify Disclosure of Magnitude IAW FAR 36.204.

2. Update Section L, paragraphs 3.1 - Proposal Delivery, 3.2 - Number of Proposals, 5.2 - Technical Subfactors and Criteria (Subfactor 2 - Seed Project, Criteria 2 - Minimum Design Documentation), 6.2 - Subcontractor/Teaming Partner Consent Forms, and 6.5 - Past Performance Questionnaires.

3. Update Section M, paragraphs 2.2.1 - Technical Subfactors and Criteria (Subfactor 2 - Seed Project, Criteria 2 - Minimum Design Documentation), and 2.2.3 - Relevancy.

4. Extend deadline for receipt by the Government of Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) and Volume 3: Past Performance, from Tuesday 22 November 2016 at 2:00 PM PST, to Friday 9 December 2016 at 2:00 PM PST.

5. All other terms and conditions remain the same.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 26

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 01-Dec-2016

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA2816-16-R-0008

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

08-Nov-2016

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 3 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

01-Dec-2016

CODE

SMC/PKO - FA2816

OPERATIONAL CONTRACTING

483 N. AVIATION BLVD.

EL SEGUNDO CA 90245-2808

FA2816 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA2816-16-R-0008

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required performance has changed from Project Title: Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineer Requirements (SABER)This solicitation is for a one year base contract plus four option years (with an optional six month extension).This solicitation is a SBA Certified 8(a) set-aside. It has been determined that competition will be limited to eligible 8(a) firms located within the geographical area serviced by the SBA Los Angeles District Office, and other 8(a) construction firms with a bona fide place of business within the geographical competitive area, and the assigned NAICS code. All other 8(a) BD Participants are deemed ineligible to submit offers.The contract will be a single award Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contract and will include a wide variety of individual construction type Delivery Orders (DOs). The disclosure of magnitude will be specified per individual Delivery Order.Contracts Manager: Ryan P. Kittle, 2d Lt, USAFPhone: 310-653-5614;

Email: ryan.kittle@us.af.milContracting Officer: Mr. Alan R. MakPhone: 310-653-1812; Email:

alan.mak@us.af.mil to Project Title: Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineer Requirements (SABER)This solicitation is for a one year base contract plus four option years (with an optional six month extension).This solicitation is a SBA Certified 8(a) set-aside. It has been determined that competition will be limited to eligible 8(a) firms located within the geographical area serviced by the SBA Los Angeles District Office, and other 8(a) construction firms with a bona fide place of business within the geographical competitive area, and the assigned NAICS code. All other 8(a) BD Participants are deemed ineligible to submit offers.The contract will be a single award Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) type contract and will include a wide variety of individual construction type Delivery Orders (DOs). For the SABER IDIQ, IAW FAR 36.204, the estimated contract value is "More Than $10,000,000.00." For the seed project and delivery orders, the disclosure of magnitude will be specified per individual Delivery Orders.Contracts Manager: Ryan P. Kittle, 2d Lt, USAF; Phone:

310-653-5614; Email: ryan.kittle@us.af.milContracting Officer: Mr. Alan R. Mak; Phone: 310-653-1812; Email:

alan.mak@us.af.mil.

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

SECTION L – INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

25 October 2016

Instructions to Offerors for the Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) program

1.0 PROGRAM STRUCTURE AND OBJECTIVES

Los Angeles Air Force Base (LAAFB) seeks to acquire a single award, indefinite delivery/ indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contract for construction services associated with the Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineer Requirements (SABER) program. This solicitation is a 100% Section (8)a set-aside. The relevant North American Industry Classification System code is 236220.

1.1 Budget/Funding Information

The Government’s projected funding profile for the contemplated SABER contract is shown in Table 1: Planned Government Funding, below. The Government does not guarantee that such funds will ever be appropriated for any particular fiscal year. This is provided for informational purposes only.

Table 1: Planned Government Funding

Base Year

FY17-FY18

Option 1

FY18-

FY19

Option 2

FY19-

FY20

Option 3

FY20-

FY21

Option 4

FY21-

FY22

Six Month Extension

Maximum Value

FY17-

FY22

$6M $6M $6M $6M $6M $3M $33M

Construction projects under this contract will generally range from $2K to $100K but can reach up to $1M.

1.2 Schedule Information

The proposed SABER contract will be a one year contract, plus four one-year options. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, will be included in the contract to accommodate a potential extension of services up to six months.

2.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

Each Offeror’s proposal must include all data and information requested in Section L – Instructions to Offerors, and be submitted in accordance with these instructions. In developing the proposal, the Offeror shall comply with all the requirements contained in the solicitation.

Non-conformance with the instructions provided in Section L – Instructions to Offerors, may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

The Government will evaluate proposals and reserves the right to award a contract without conducting discussions with the Offerors except for communications and clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(d) (3), Exchanges with Offerors after Receipt of Proposals. Therefore, the Offeror’s initial proposal should contain its best terms from the cost, price and technical standpoints.

The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated assertions. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements, but rather provide convincing rationale to address how the Offeror intends to meet these requirements. The Offeror shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of the Offeror’s capabilities and experience. The Government will perform its evaluation based on the information presented in the Offeror’s proposal.

Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not to be submitted. The proposal acceptance period is specified in Section A – Solicitation, Offer, and Award, of the SF 1442. The Offeror shall make a clear statement in Section A, Box 17, to be included in Volume 5: Contract Documentation, that the offer is valid for a minimum of 180 calendar days from proposal submission.

In accordance with FAR 4.8, Government Contract Files, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the Offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

2.1 General Information

2.1.1 Point of Contact

The Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), Mr. Alan R. Mak, is the sole point of contact for this acquisition. Address questions or concerns to the PCO at (310) 653-1812 or via e-mail at alan.mak@us.af.mil. On all e-mail correspondence, courtesy copy the lead Contract Specialist, 2d Lt Ryan P. Kittle, at ryan.kittle@us.af.mil.

2.1.2 Discrepancies, Errors, and Omissions

If an Offeror believes the requirements in these instructions lack clarity or contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the Offeror shall immediately contact the PCO in writing with supporting rationale and remedies the Offeror is asking the PCO to consider as related to the omission or error. The Offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

2.1.3 Electronic Reference Documents

Referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website at http://www.fedbizopps.gov. Potential Offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.

2.1.4 Communication

Exchanges of source selection information between Government and Offerors will be made only through the PCO via U.S. postal delivery, oral communication by telephonic or face-to-face meetings, or by facsimile. Email communication is not permitted.

2.1.5 Consideration of Alternate Proposals

Proposals that depart from the stated requirements within the Statement of Work (SOW) provided in this solicitation or do not meet program objectives will be considered alternate proposals, and will not be considered for award.

2.1.6 Debriefings

Offerors excluded from the competitive range or otherwise excluded from the competition before award may request a debriefing before award IAW FAR 15.505 – Pre-Award Debriefing of Offerors. The PCO will notify unsuccessful Offerors in the competitive range of the source selection decision after contract award IAW FAR 15.506 – Post-Award Debriefing of Offerors.

Upon such notification, unsuccessful Offerors may request and receive a post-award debriefing.

Offerors requesting a debriefing must do so IAW the requirements of FAR 15.506, as applicable.

Also, IAW FAR 15.505, Offerors whose initial or revised proposals are excluded from the competitive range at any point before contract award may request either a pre-award debriefing or a post-award debriefing, but only one debriefing will be provided. IAW FAR 15.306(c), the Government reserves the right to establish and revise a competitive range to exclude an Offeror’s proposal at any point prior to contract award if an Offeror’s proposal is determined not to be among the most highly rated or is necessary to achieve source selection efficiency.

3.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND ELECTRONIC FORMAT

3.1 Proposal Delivery

Electronic and hard copies of the original proposal must be received by Friday, 9 December 2016, 2:00 PM, Pacific Standard Time (PST). The delivery address for the proposals is as follows:

SMC/PKE

ATTN: Mr Alan R. Mak, PCO 483 North Aviation Blvd.

El Segundo, CA 90245-2808

A transmittal letter may be used to forward the proposal to the PCO. This letter is only for administrative purposes and will not be evaluated. Delivery of proposals shall be coordinated at least 24 hours in advance of the due date/time with the PCO. Proposals received after the due date stipulated above shall be treated in accordance with FAR 15.208, Submission, Modification, Revision, and Withdrawal of Proposals.

The Offeror shall submit Volume 3: Past Performance Proposal, to the address above by Friday, 9 December 2016, 2:00 PM PST. The Offeror’s proposal will not be accepted and evaluated if Volume 3: Past Performance Proposal, is received subsequent to this date and time.

3.2 Number of Proposals

The Offeror shall submit three hard copies of its proposal in the format described in Table 2:

Proposal Organization, below. In accordance with FAR 4.8, Government Contract Files, the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the Offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

3.3 Submission of Electronic Proposals

In addition to hard copies, the Offeror shall submit each volume in electronic format, using CDs or DVDs. Each volume shall be in a separate directory or folder. The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. In the event there are any inconsistencies between the hardcopy and softcopy of the proposal, hardcopies will take precedence. The CDs or DVDs shall be labeled with the Offeror’s name, submission date and the volume number(s). All electronic submittals shall be compatible with Adobe Portable Document Format Reader 9.0 (with “Select” and “Copy” enabled to allow for text and graphics transfer), or Microsoft Office 2010.

3.4 Proposal Organization

The Offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in Table 2, below. A complete proposal consists of the following:

Table 2: Proposal Organization

Volume Title 1 Executive Summary 2 Technical Proposal 3 Past Performance Proposal 4 Price Proposal 5 Contract Documentation

Each volume must include a table of contents and acronym list that will not count against the page count identified in Table 3: Proposal Page Limitations, below.

3.4.1 Page Limitations

Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal and excess pages will be returned to the Offeror as soon as practicable. Page limitations do not apply to title pages, tables of contents, list of figures, list of abbreviations, glossaries, or indexes. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume. Page limitations for each volume are as follows:

Table 3: Proposal Page Limitations

Volume Title Page Limit (Maximum) 1 Executive Summary 3 2 Technical Proposal 20 3 Past Performance Proposal 20 4 Price Proposal Unlimited 5 Contract Documentation Unlimited

3.4.2 Page Size and Format

A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages.

Proposals will be submitted on 8.5 x 11 inch paper except for fold-outs, which may not exceed 11 x 17 inches. Except for the reproduced sections of the solicitation document, the text size shall be no less than 12 point and single spaced. Use at least one inch margins on the top and bottom and 3/4-inch side margins. The Government will only evaluate information in section that follows the font and margin guidelines. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume.

These page limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals.

Legible tables, charts, graphs, and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, and plans. These displays shall be clear, legible and shall not exceed 11 x 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume, and count as two pages. Foldouts displaying printed material on both sides of the sheet shall count as four pages. Foldout pages may only be used for large tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, and schematics, but not for pages of text. All segments of the document that are primarily text shall use single-line spacing and no smaller than 12-point font, Times New Roman. Matrixes, spread-sheets, focus boxes, and tables shall use single-line spacing and be no smaller than 10-point font, Times New Roman. Text inside graphics shall be no less than 8-point font, Times New Roman.

Otherwise, text shall be used sparingly to describe the depicted pictures or graphics and shall use single-line spacing. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy proposals.

3.4.3 Binding and Labeling

Each hard copy or paper volume of the proposal should be separately bound in a D-3-ring loose-leaf binder, permitting the volume to lie flat when open. Staples shall not be used. Each binder shall have a cover, spine, and title page each clearly marked with the Offeror’s name, volume number, binder identifier, copy number, and solicitation identification. The volume number, binder identifier, and copy number shall be in no less than 16 point font, Times New Roman. The same identifying data should be placed on the spine of each binder. All unclassified document binders shall have applicable security designation colors other than red.

Be sure to apply all appropriate markings including those prescribed in accordance with FAR 52.215-1(e), Restriction on Disclosure and Use of Data, and FAR 3.104-4, Disclosure, Protection, and Marking of Contractor Bid or Proposal Information and Source Selection Information.

Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not to be submitted.

3.4.4 Cross-Referencing

To the greatest extent possible, each volume shall be written on a standalone basis so that its content may be evaluated with a minimum of cross-referencing to other volumes of the proposal.

Information required for proposal evaluation not found in its designated volume will be considered omitted from the proposal. Cross-referencing within a proposal volume is permitted where its use would conserve space without impairing clarity.

3.4.5 Indexing

Each volume shall contain a detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections.

4.0 VOLUME 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Volume 1 of the Offeror’s proposal will consist of the Executive Summary. The Executive Summary will provide an overview of the proposal, and is not evaluated, scored, or used to clarify other discrepant information in other volumes. Any summary material shall not be considered as meeting the requirements for any portions of other volumes of the proposal.

5.0 VOLUME 2: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Volume 2: Technical Proposal will consist of the Offeror’s Technical Proposal, consistent with the requirements as described within this section. Using the instructions provided below, Offerors shall provide, as specifically as possible, the actual methodology for accomplishing the requirements as stated within the subfactors.

All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. By submission of its proposal, Offerors are representing that all requirements specified in the solicitation will be performed.

Offerors shall not merely reiterate the objectives or reformulate the requirements specified in the solicitation. The Offeror's Technical Proposal shall not include cost or price information, with the exception of the Seed Project Proposal, but must be consistent with the price/coefficients proposed in the Offeror’s Price Proposal.

5.1 Volume Contents

The Offeror shall provide in Volume 2: Technical Proposal a table of contents, a brief introduction, and completely address each of the following elements described below.

5.2 Technical Subfactors and Criteria

Subfactor 1: Management Approach

Criteria 1: Key Personnel/Organizational Chart

The Offeror shall submit an organizational chart that identifies key personnel for the listed roles below. The functions, responsibilities, authorities, and qualifications of key personnel shall meet the minimum requirements of their respective roles:

1) Senior Project Manager (SPM):

In accordance with SOW sections 5.1.3, 5.1.7, 5.1.8, and 5.1.12

2) Quality Control Manager (QCM):

In accordance with SOW sections 5.1.4, 5.1.10, 5.1.12.2, 5.5, and 7.3

3) Professional Engineer:

In accordance with SOW section 5.1.12.1

4) Construction Superintendent:

In accordance with SOW section 5.4

All key personnel listed in the chart shall be identified by titled position within the company, and shall not be identified by name. The Offeror shall provide rationale as to why titled positions are sufficient to fill the roles listed above. Resumes of individuals are not being requested and will not be evaluated.

Criteria 2: Bonding Capability

The Offeror shall submit a letter from a surety attesting to the Offeror’s aggregate bondability of at least $5M.

Criteria 3: Subcontract Management

The Offeror shall submit a summary that addresses the following: the proposed level of subcontracting and in-house work for the contract in accordance with FAR 52.219- 14(c)(3-4) – Limitations on Subcontracting, the proposed support and interface between the Offeror and subcontractor, initial start-up and management of contingency situations, management of multiple subcontractors simultaneously, and a list of subcontractors that may be used for each of the following disciplines:

1) Electrical

2) Mechanical

3) Civil

4) Structural

5) Plumbing

6) Painting

7) Carpeting

8) Non-structural construction/repair

9) Landscaping

For each Offeror/subcontractor relationship, the Offeror shall state the length of the relationship in terms of years/months. The Offeror shall identify and provide rationale for any of the above disciplines that will not be performed by subcontractors.

Criteria 4: Workload Management

The Offeror shall submit a workload management summary that clearly defines on-site support for such aspects as management, technical, minimal design effort, and financial support. The summary shall also demonstrate the ability to execute 20-25 multi-discipline orders simultaneously in a compressed timeframe due to the cyclical nature of Government funding.

Subfactor 2: Seed Project

Criteria 1: RSMEANS-Based Proposal

The Offeror shall submit a complete estimate of the attached Seed Project in accordance with SOW sections 9, 12, 13, 14.3, 14.4, 14.5, and 15. The Seed Project proposal shall describe the investigative services, design and construction costs associated with the Seed Project. The Offeror shall use the base year coefficient submitted by the Offeror on Section B, and the current Los Angeles, California (CA), City Cost Index (CCI) as of the date of this solicitation’s release. The submitted RSMEANS-based proposal will not count against the Volume 2: Technical Proposal page count identified in Table 3 – Proposal Page Limitations, located in Section L – Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 3.4.1.

Criteria 2: Minimum Design Documentation

The Offeror shall submit a complete 35% construction design in accordance with SOW sections 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 14.3, 15.5, 42, and Appendix D, showing technical capability for the successful completion of the Seed Project. The Offeror shall include a list of assumptions used to develop the design. The submitted design documentation will not count against the Volume 2: Technical Proposal page count identified in Table 3 – Proposal Page Limitations, located in Section L – Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 3.4.1.

Please note, based on the response provided in Q&A #3, posted 16 November 2016, and Amendment #1: No additional design or changes to the Government-provided drawings located in “FA2816-16-R-0008 Attachment 5: Seed Project ACJP161091 Drawings” are required. Offerors shall submit the current version of the drawings as they appear in Attachment 5, to meet the requirements of Volume 2: Technical Proposal, Subfactor 2 – Seed Project, Criteria 2 – Minimum Design Documentation.

Criteria 3: Statement of Work

The Offeror shall provide a Seed Project SOW that addresses all elements required to accomplish the Seed Project in accordance with SOW section 14.3 and the attached Seed Project Statement of Objectives. The Offeror shall identify an appropriate performance period. The Offeror’s Seed Project SOW shall supported by the RSMEANS-based proposal and minimum design documentation. The submitted SOW will not count against the Volume 2: Technical Proposal page count identified in Table 3 – Proposal Page Limitations, located in Section L – Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 3.4.1.

6.0 VOLUME 3: PAST PERFORMANCE PROPOSAL

Volume 3: Past Performance Proposal shall consist of the Offeror’s Past Performance information, consistent with the requirements as described within this section. The Government will use Volume 3: Past Performance Proposal and any other pertinent information, to include Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System data, to evaluate the Offeror's overall past performance.

6.1 Volume Contents

Volume 3: Past Performance Proposal shall include a table of contents, brief introduction, and completely address each of the areas described below.

6.2 Subcontractor/Teaming Partner Consent Forms

The Offeror shall submit consent forms for all subcontractors, teaming partners and joint venture partners. Past performance information as submitted by the Offeror in Volume 3: Past Performance Proposal concerning subcontractors, teaming partners, and joint venture partners will not be disclosed without the subcontractor’s, teaming partner’s or joint venture partner’s consent. The consent form shall be completed by all subcontractors, teaming partners, and joint venture partners identified in the proposal. The completed consent forms will not be part of the Volume 3: Past Performance Proposal page count limitation. The Government will not be providing Subcontractor/Teaming Partner Consent Forms. The Government only requires a document that includes a signature by the subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture that indicates consent to discuss past performance information between the Government and the primary offeror.

6.3 Recent and Relevant Contracts

6.3.1 Recent Contracts

Past performance information submitted by the Offerors will meet the recency requirement by not having concluded more than five years prior to the issuance date of this solicitation. The Government will not consider past performance information on an effort that concluded more than five years prior to the issuance date of this solicitation.

6.3.2 Relevant Contracts

The Offeror shall submit a list of the most relevant contracts performed with similar scope to the SOW requirements of this solicitation in a tabular format as shown below in Table 4: Summary List of Submitted Relevant Contracts.

Table 4: Summary List of Submitted Relevant Contracts

# Contract Name

Contract Number

Period of Performance

Contract Value

Customer Agency

Customer

POC

Customer Contact Information

The Offeror shall submit no more than three relevant contracts or projects performed. If the Offeror is a joint venture, the joint venture Offerors shall submit no more than three relevant contracts per joint venture partner. The Government will not consider past performance information on an effort that concluded more than five years prior to the issuance date of this solicitation.

Relevant past performance information includes performance of efforts that are similar in scope, magnitude, and complexity to the effort described in this solicitation, and have a minimum value performed by the Offeror equaling or exceeding, the magnitude of construction identified for this project. As the resulting contract from this solicitation will involve the completion of several concurrently awarded delivery order projects, then a previous task/delivery order contract shall be considered more relevant than a contract for a single construction project. The Government is not bound by the Offeror’s opinion of relevancy.

6.4 Relevant Contract Documentation

Offerors shall explain what aspects of each contract are deemed relevant to the proposed effort.

For all current or past contracts deemed relevant, the Offeror must provide the following information:

a. Company/Division Name

b. Program Title

c. Contracting Agency

d. Contract Number

e. Type of Contract (firm-fixed-price, etc.)

f. Dates Performed

g. Coefficient/Contract Value (including any option years)

h. Name, Address & Telephone/Fax Number of Government Program

Director/Manager, Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) or PCO.

i. Explain in sufficient detail which aspects of each contract are deemed relevant to the proposed effort.

j. Relevancy Data: Indicate whether the Offeror was the prime contractor or a subcontractor and provide the name of the prime contractor if the Offeror was a subcontractor. Indicate the percentage of the project actually performed by the Offeror and the type of work that was performed. If the Offeror performed as part of a teaming arrangement or joint venture, provide the names of all team members and the work performed by each. If necessary, the Offeror may include additional comments to clarify the relevancy of the project.

k. Information currently available (such as letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) which demonstrate the level of customer satisfaction with overall job performance and quality of completed work.

l. Explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc.

6.5 Past Performance Questionnaires

For each relevant contract listed in Table 4 – Summary List of Submitted Relevant Contracts, the Government requests that the Offeror forward a copy of Attachment 3 – Past Performance Questionnaire, of the solicitation, to each customer point of contact. The questionnaires must be submitted to a verified point of contact. The Offeror is responsible for ensuring their customer point of contact provides a completed PPQ to the Government by Friday, 9 December 2016, 2:00 PM PST. Once the point of contact completes the PPQ, the information contained on the document must not be released to the Offeror. The completed PPQ must be emailed by the point of contact to the PCO at alan.mak@us.af.mil and lead Contract Specialist at ryan.kittle@us.af.mil. The Offeror must submit a list of PPQ customer points of contacts, containing a telephone number for each customer point of contact in Volume 3: Past Performance Proposal. The submitted PPQs will not count against the Volume 3: Past Performance Proposal page count identified in Table 3 – Proposal Page Limitations, located in Section L – Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 3.4.1. A minimum of one PPQ for each relevant contract shall be submitted; there is no maximum number of PPQs that can be submitted for each relevant contract.

6.6 Acknowledgement of Past Performance Information

If past performance information is not submitted as a part of the Offeror’s proposal, the entire proposal will be considered non-responsive and will not be considered for award. For those Offerors who do not have any relevant past performance information to submit, a statement to that effect will satisfy the requirement for a past performance volume.

In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance in accordance with FAR 15.305(a)(2)(iv). Therefore, the Offeror will be determined to have unknown past performance and assigned a performance confidence rating of “Neutral.” The rating of “Neutral” confidence is treated neither favorable nor unfavorably.

7.0 VOLUME 4: PRICE PROPOSAL

Volume 4: Price Proposal shall consist of the Offeror’s Price Proposal, consistent with the requirements as described within this section.

Only the pricing data located within Volume 4: Price Proposal will be evaluated.

In accordance with FAR 15.403-1(b), Prohibition on Obtaining Certified Cost or Pricing Data, and 15.403-3(a), Requiring Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data, data other than certified pricing data may be required to support a determination of price reasonableness. Data shall be provided in accordance with FAR 15.403-5, Instructions for Submission of Certified Cost or Pricing Data and Data Other Than Certified Cost or Pricing Data. If, after receipt of proposals, the PCO determines that there is insufficient data available to determine price reasonableness and none of the exceptions in FAR 15.403-1 apply, the Offeror may be required to submit additional pricing data (to include certified cost or pricing data) to the extent necessary to determine the reasonableness of the price.

7.1 Volume Contents

Volume 4: Price Proposal of the Offeror’s proposal must contain a brief introduction and completely address the contents described below.

7.2 Section B – Supplies or Services and Prices

The Offeror shall propose standard hour coefficients (as defined by SOW, paragraph 44.1) in accordance with SOW, section 10.

The Offeror shall propose non-standard hour coefficients (as defined by SOW, paragraph 44.2) in accordance with SOW, section 10. It is recognized that these conditions result in increased labor costs due to wage premiums or non-productive time.

The Offeror shall not include direct labor and direct materials in the proposed coefficients. The coefficient values will be applied to all projects associated with this contract.

The Offeror must propose coefficients for standard work and non-standard work hours for the base year and each option year period under the respective SubCLINs as identified in Section B

– Supplies or Services and Prices, of this solicitation.

7.3 Coefficient Rationale

The Offeror shall provide detailed rationale regarding the development of the proposed coefficients. The Offeror’s rationale must address, at a minimum, the perceived accuracy of the pricing within the unit price book (RSMEANS) as well as the CCI Weighted Average Total for Los Angeles, CA (this would include any increments or decrements included in the development of the proposed coefficient to adjust for the Los Angeles, CA CCI, the rates listed in Attachment 2 – General Decision CA160033 CA33, etc.); assumptions and adjustments made with regard to developing each proposed coefficient to account for the increased complexity in accomplishing work on an active DoD installation (i.e. additional paperwork, increased security and contractor vetting procedures, etc.); and the basis, assumptions and adjustments regarding the expected volume of work, in both dollars and number of task orders, and the sensitivity of each coefficient to the expected volume of work.

The submitted coefficient rationale will be evaluated in accordance with Section M – Evaluation Criteria, paragraphs 2.3.2 and 2.3.3.

7.4 Total Evaluated Price (TEP)

Based on the proposed coefficients filled-in in Section B (see Section L – Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 7.2 above), the Offeror shall calculate and submit the Offeror’s proposed TEP, located on page 2 of Attachment 9 –TEP Calculation Worksheet. The Offeror’s proposed TEP is for source selection evaluation purposes only.

The Government will verify the Offeror’s proposed TEP calculation. If erroneous, the Government will adjust the Offeror’s proposed TEP calculation.

8.0 VOLUME 5: CONTRACT DOCUMENTATION

Volume 5: Contract Documentation will consist of the Offeror’s Contract Documentation, consistent with the requirements as described within this section. The Offeror's signed solicitation, to include the sections listed below, shall be submitted in Volume 5: Contract Documentation of the proposal.

8.1 Volume Contents

Volume 5: Contract Documentation shall contain the contents described below.

8.2 Section A – Solicitation, Offer, and Award (Standard Form 1442)

The Offeror shall complete blocks 13 - 18, 19 (if applicable), and blocks 20A - 20C. Signature by the Offeror in block 20B constitutes an offer, which the Government may accept. In doing so, the Offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation, whose sections constitute the model contract. Hard copy #1 of the proposal must contain the original signature. The Offeror shall make a clear statement in the Standard Form 1442 that the proposal is valid for a period of not less than 180 calendar days from receipt.

8.3 Section B – Supplies or Services and Prices

The Offeror shall insert a filled-in copy of Section B – Supplies or Services and Prices, as it appears in Volume 4: Price Proposal.

8.4 Sections C – H

No required fill-ins by the Offeror. The Offeror shall not submit these pages.

8.5 Section I – Contract Clauses

The Offeror shall complete any necessary fill-ins for clauses identified therein. The Offeror shall submit only those pages that require fill-in.

The Offeror shall complete electronic annual representations and certifications at System for Award Management (SAM) as a part of required registration. The Offeror shall be registered in the SAM database prior to award of a contract in accordance with FAR 4.1102-1103. The PCO will validate the SAM database on prospective Offerors to ensure representation and certifications are complete in accordance with FAR 52.204-8, Annual Representations and Certifications.

8.6 Section J – List of Documents, Exhibits and Other Attachments

No required fill-ins by the Offeror. The Offeror shall not submit these pages.

8.7 Amendments

The Offeror must submit acknowledgement of any amendments to this solicitation issued, if applicable.

8.8 Other Information

The Offeror shall submit the name, title, and telephone number of the company/division point(s) of contact authorized to negotiate, make decisions for the Offeror, and obligate the Offeror contractually.

The Offeror shall submit the company/division’s mailing address, county, facility code, Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code, Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) code, Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN), and business size status.

The Offeror’s proposal must submit all data and information requested and in accordance with this solicitation. The Offeror shall comply with all requirements contained in the solicitation, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements.

Non-conformance with the instructions provided by the solicitation may result in ineligibility for award. The Offeror shall clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions, and shall provide complete accompanying rationale. The rationale will fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost, or other specific requirements of the solicitation.

9.0 SITE VISIT

A site visit for this acquisition will be scheduled for Thursday, 17 November 2016 at 9:00 AM PST at the LAAFB visitor’s center, 483 N. Aviation Blvd., El Segundo, CA 90245. The Offeror should arrive at the visitor’s center no later 8:30 AM PST. Access to LAAFB must be coordinated with the Government point of contact prior to the day of the site visit.

The Offeror must submit the full names of all attendees (not to exceed two), in addition to the Offeror’s name, gender, date of birth, and driver’s license number and state, to 2d Lt Kittle at ryan.kittle@us.af.mil no later than 4:30 PM PST on Monday 14 November 2016. This information must be provided in advance in order to ensure access to the military base/conference site and adequate seating for the conference attendees.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

EVALUATION CRITERIA

SECTION M – EVALUATION CRITERIA

25 October 2016

Evaluation Criteria for the Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering Requirements (SABER) Program

1.0 BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD

This is a competitive performance/price trade-off (PPT) source selection in which competing Offeror’s past performance history will be evaluated on a basis significantly more important than cost or price considerations. This source selection will be conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.3, Source Selection, as supplemented by the DoD Source Selection Procedures memorandum, dated 1 April 2016. These regulations are available electronically at http://farsite.hill.af.mil.

The Government intends to make a single contract award as a result of this solicitation, but reserves the right to not award a contract depending on the quality of the proposals submitted and the availability of funds.

By submission of its offer, the Offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements. All such offers will be treated equally except for their prices (coefficients), performance records, and technical approaches. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. Offerors shall clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale.

The Government will select the best overall offer, based upon an integrated assessment of Technical Acceptability, Past Performance, and Price. A contract may be awarded to the Offeror who is deemed responsible in accordance with FAR, as supplemented, whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements, and is judged, based on the evaluation factors and subfactors, to represent the best value to the Government.

This contract may be awarded to a higher rated, higher priced Offeror, where the decision is consistent with the evaluation factors, and the Source Selection Authority (SSA) reasonably determines the past performance of the higher priced Offeror outweighs the cost difference. The SSA will make an integrated assessment best value award decision in order to award to the Offeror who represents the overall best value to the Government based on the evaluation factors and subfactors.

The SSA will base the Source Selection Decision (SSD) on an integrated assessment of the proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation as described below. While the Government source selection team will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective and, therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the entire process. This best value decision shall be based on a comparative assessment of proposals against all source selection criteria in the solicitation, considering recommendations and minority opinions presented to the SSA. While the SSA may use reports and analyses prepared by others, the SSD shall represent the SSA’s independent judgment.

1.1 Number of Contracts to be Awarded

The Government intends to make a single contract award as a result of this solicitation, but reserves the right to not award a contract depending on the quality of the proposals submitted and the availability of funds.

1.2 Discussions

The Government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective Offerors. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest. If it is determined during the evaluation period by the Government to hold discussions, Offeror submittals in response to the request for Final Proposal Revision (FPR) will be considered in making the SSD.

2.0 EVALUATION PROCESS

The evaluation process will conducted as described below.

2.1 Volume 2: Technical Proposal

Volume 2: Technical Proposal will be evaluated to determine technical acceptability on a pass/fail basis. The Government will assign ratings of “Acceptable” (pass) or “Unacceptable” (fail), as shown below in Table 1: Technical Ratings, for each subfactor. Any factor or subfactor determined to be “Unacceptable” will render the entire technical proposal as “Unacceptable.”

Any technical proposal that receives an “Unacceptable” assessment will not be considered for award. Upon final determination that a proposal is “Unacceptable,” the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) will follow the procedures in Section L – Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 2.1.6

– Debriefings.

Table 1: Technical Ratings

Assessment Definition Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation

2.1.1 Technical Subfactors and Criteria

Subfactor 1: Management Approach

The Offeror must meet all Subfactor 1 – Management Approach criteria, described below, in order to be assessed as “Acceptable” for Subfactor 1 – Management Approach

Criteria 1: Key Personnel/Organization Chart

This criteria is met when the Offeror submits an organization chart that is complete and consistent with the requirements as set forth in the corresponding Section L – Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 5.2 – Technical Subfactors and Criteria, instructions.

Criteria 2: Bonding Capability

This criteria is met when the Offeror submits the required letter from a surety to meet the bondability amount as stipulated in the corresponding Section L – Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 5.2 – Technical Subfactors and Criteria, instructions.

Criteria 3: Subcontract Management

This criteria is met when the Offeror submits a subcontracting summary that is complete and consistent with the requirements as set forth in the corresponding Section L – Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 5.2 – Technical Subfactors and Criteria, instructions.

Criteria 4: Workload Management

This criteria is met when the Offeror submits a workload management summary that is complete and consistent with the requirements as set forth in the corresponding Section L

– Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 5.2 – Technical Subfactors and Criteria, instructions.

Subfactor 2: Seed Project

The Offeror must meet all Subfactor 2 – Seed Project criteria, described below, in order to be assessed as “Acceptable” for Subfactor 2 – Seed Project.

Criteria 1: RSMEANS-Based Proposal

The criteria is met when the Offeror submits a complete estimate consistent with the requirements as described in the corresponding Section L – Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 5.2 – Technical Subfactors and Criteria, instructions.

Criteria 2: Minimum Design Documentation

This criteria is met when the Offeror submits a complete 35% construction design consistent with the requirements as set forth in corresponding Section L – Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 5.2 – Technical Subfactors and Criteria, instructions.

Please note, based on the response provided in Q&A #3, posted 16 November 2016, and Amendment #1: No additional design or changes to the Government-provided drawings located in “FA2816-16-R-0008 Attachment 5: Seed Project ACJP161091 Drawings” are required. Offerors shall submit the current version of the drawings as they appear in Attachment 5, to meet the requirements of Volume 2: Technical Proposal, Subfactor 2 – Seed Project, Criteria 2 – Minimum Design Documentation.

Criteria 3: Statement of Work

This criteria is met when the Offeror submits a SOW that addresses all elements required to accomplish the Seed Project consistent with the requirements as set forth in corresponding Section L – Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 5.2 – Technical Subfactors and Criteria, instructions.

2.2 Volume 3: Past Performance Proposal

Volume 3: Past Performance Proposal will be evaluated to determine the recency, relevancy, and quality of Offeror’s past performance information. This data will be submitted by the Offeror, obtained from past performance questionnaires (PPQs), and data independently obtained from other Government and commercial sources.

IAW FAR 15.306(b), Exchanges with Offerors After Receipt of Proposals, Offerors may be given the opportunity to address any negative or derogatory past performance information received during this evaluation. The Government may request clarification of adverse or incomplete past performance information.

2.2.1 Integrated Past Performance Confidence Assessment Rating

Responsive Offerors will receive an Integrated Past Performance Confidence Assessment Rating, as described in Table 2: Integrated Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings, below, based on the Offerors’ past and present performance as it relates to the probability of successfully accomplishing the required effort.

Table 2: Integrated Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings

Integrated Past Performance

Confidence Assessment Rating

Definition

SUBSTANTIAL

CONFIDENCE

Based on the…