SXHT 161037 Qustns and Answrs 1 080625.pdf

PDF 79 KB Posted

Attached to
SXHT 16-1037 Repair Streets & Parking Various PSFB Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA252125B0010
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Space Command

About this file

This document is a Question and Answer Form for Project Number SXHT 16-1037, which involves repairing streets and parking areas at Patrick Space Force Base (PSFB) in Florida. The Q&A addresses multiple technical details about the construction project, including pavement and base replacement specifications, parking stop handling, testing requirements, and striping methods. Key clarifications include replacing existing asphalt and limestone base with 3.0" of asphalt paving in two courses and 9" of limestone base, removing and reinstalling existing parking stops, and using thermoplastic striping for final markings.

The associated federal contract opportunity is a small business set-aside construction contract with a project value between $500,000 and $1,000,000, categorized under NAICS code 237310 for highway, street, and bridge construction. Critical dates include badge requests due by 25 July 2025, a site visit on 31 July 2025, questions due by 5 August 2025, and bid submission due by 21 August 2025. The contract will have a 90-calendar day performance period after notice to proceed, and the government notes that funds are contingent on appropriation availability.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to SXHT 16-1037 Repair Streets & Parking Various PSFB, newest first.
File Type Posted
FA252125B0010_Abstract of Offers.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA252125B00100003 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment - FA252125B00100003.pdf PDF
A1 SXHT 16-1037 Rpr Strts and Prkng SPECS FNL REV 080725.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment - FA252125B00100002.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA252125B00100002 SF 30.pdf PDF
SXHT 161037 Qustns and Answrs 1 080625 REV.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment FA252125B00100001 SF 30.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment - FA252125B00100001.pdf PDF
Site Visit Sign in Sheet.pdf PDF
A12 Badge Request 45 SFS Form V14.pdf PDF
A8 SXHT 16-1037_Liquidated Damages 2025.pdf PDF
A9 Energy Management and Control Systems Standards.pdf PDF
A11 Small Business Self Performance Worksheet.pdf PDF
Solicitation - FA252125B0010.pdf PDF
A4 SXHT 16-1037 Rpr Str and Prk Var PAFB SOW 053025_Redacted.pdf PDF
A10 QUESTION AND ANSWER FORM.docx DOCX document
A14 SXHT 16-1037 CECC Form 3052.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A1 SXHT 16-1037 Rpr Strts and Prkng SPECS.pdf PDF
A5 SXHT 16-1037 GPP Certification.pdf PDF
A6 SXHT 16-1037 Haz Waste.pdf PDF
A7 SXHT 16-1037 ODS.pdf PDF
A12 Badge Request 45 SFS Form V14.pdf PDF
A2 SXHT 16-1037-G-001 071525 REV Drwngs.pdf PDF
A3 SXHT 16-1037- Submittal Register 062525.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A13 DBA Wage Determination_4Jul2025.pdf PDF
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

08/05/25

QUESTION AND ANSWER FORM #1

Project Number: SXHT 16-1037

Project Description: Repair Streets and Parking Various, PSFB

RFP Section:

Paragraph:

Specs/Drawings Paragraph/Page: SXHT 16-103 MAINTAIN STREETS AND PARKING, VAR, PSFB Revised Plans Sheet CP-103

Other (specify):

1. Question: Are we re-working the existing subbase and limerock base or removing and bringing in new?

Answer: Per “PAVEMENT MILL – OVERLAY SECTION 1,” Drawing CP-103, replace existing asphalt and limestone base with 3.0” of asphalt paving in 2 courses and 9” of limestone base.

Specs/Drawings Paragraph/Page: SXHT 16-103 MAINTAIN STREETS AND PARKING, VAR, PSFB Revised Plans Sheet CP-101

Other (specify):

2. Question: Are we removing and re-installing existing parking stops or installing new ones?

Answer: REMOVE, STORE, PROTECT, & REINSTALL PARKING STOPS.

Specs/Drawings Paragraph/Page: SXHT 16-103 MAINTAIN STREETS AND PARKING, VAR, PSFB Revised Plans Sheet CP-103

Other (specify):

3. Question: Are we responsible for providing our own proctor density testing for the stabilized subbase and limerock base?

Answer: Vendors that sell road construction products typically provide test results for the products they sell. The tests and road construction products must meet FDOT standards.

In place density tests are required per FDOT standards.

4. Question: What is the existing asphalt and base thickness on Challenger Ave.?

Answer: Assume 4” thickness of asphalt paving.

5. Question: What location can the contractor use for a laydown/staging area?

Answer: The Contractor may request a laydown area as part of the Submittal process. A laydown area near the Challenger Street site will be designated through the laydown area request process.

6. Question: In order to provide smooth transitions for all hatched areas, do the hatched areas need to be milled 1.5" and overlayed with the 2nd course 1.5" Type

SP-9.5?

Answer: Mill the joint area before and/or after paving operations to produce a relatively smooth transition. Feathering of the top asphalt overlay course may be necessary to create a relatively smooth transition.

7. Question: Is the final striping to be paint of thermo.?

Answer: Per Specification Section 32 17 23 use thermoplastic striping for the final striping.

Temporary striping can be painted.

8. Question: When is the anticipated NTP?

Answer: Typically, the preconstruction meeting is held within three weeks of contract award and Notice-To-Proceed is issued within a few days of the preconstruction meeting.

9. Question: Can FDOT crushed concrete base be used in lieu of limerock base?

Answer: Crushed concrete that meets FDOT specifications for Recycled Concrete Aggregate (RCA) base material. The crushed concrete must meet minimum LBR value, gradation, plasticity FDOT requirements for limerock base.

10. Question: Please confirm that an alternate spreadsheet can be used that clearly shows where all costs were derived including labor and equipment rates, subcontract pricing and material costs. Or would a unit priced bid form showing activity descriptions be preferrable?

Answer: Yes, alternate spreadsheets may be used. Per section L-5(4e) of the SF1442, a CECC Form 3052 or Similar Computer-generated form is acceptable to include the breakdown of disciplines and cost elements and the total price of the entire project.

1557397783A Underline

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .