Attachment_4d_-_CAsPR_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 158 KB Posted

Attached to
Front Range Multiple Award Construction Contract (FRMACC) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA251719RA016
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Space Command

About this file

This document contains a Contractor Assessment and Performance Reporting questionnaire for evaluating contractor performance on federal construction projects. The questionnaire includes sections to evaluate project management, technical performance, schedule, safety and labor compliance, customer satisfaction, change and cost control management, and quality control. Ratings of exceptional, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory are provided for evaluation criteria within each section, with space for remarks. The related federal contract opportunity notice indicates the solicitation is for the Front Range Multiple Award Construction Contract and provides the solicitation number and agency. Interested parties are directed to monitor beta.SAM.gov for any changes or updates to the solicitation starting November 12, 2019, when FBO will be retired and beta.SAM will be the new government-wide point of entry.

Attachment 4d - CAsPR Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Front Range Multiple Award Construction Contract (FRMACC), newest first.
File Type Posted
FA251719RA016_Amendment_0007.pdf PDF
Attachment_20_-_RFP_Questions_67-69_&_Government_Responses.pdf PDF
Attachment_19_-_RFP_Questions_61-66_&_Government_Responses.pdf PDF
FA251719RA016_Amendment_0006.pdf PDF
FA251719RA016_Amendment_0006.pdf PDF
Attachment_19_-_RFP_Questions_61-66_&_Government_Responses.pdf PDF
Attachment_18_-_RFP_Questions_59-60_&_Government_Responses.pdf PDF
Attachment_7a_-_Financial_Information_Request_Contractor_(Fillable_PDF).pdf PDF
Attachment_8a_-_Bonding_Information_Request_Contractor_(Fillable_PDF).pdf PDF
Attachment_13_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment_8b_-_Bonding_Information_Request_Surety_(Fillable_PDF).pdf PDF
Attachment_7b_-_Financial_Information_Request_Financial_Institution_(Fillable_PDF).pdf PDF
Attachment_5_-_Section_L,_Instructions,_Conditions,_and_Notices_to_Offerors.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_-_Section_M,_Evaluation_Factors_for_Award.pdf PDF
Attachment_13_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_-_Section_L,_Instructions,_Conditions,_and_Notices_to_Offerors.pdf PDF
FA251719RA016_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
FA251719RA016_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Attachment_15_-_RFP_Questions_1-6_&_Govt_Responses.pdf PDF
Attachment_14_-_Draft_RFP_Questions_1-43_&_Govt_Responses.pdf PDF
FA251719RA016_Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
Attachment_2e_-_Fort_Carson_Specific_Requirements_MACC_2019_compressed.pdf PDF
Attachment_10_-_Sample_Client_Authorization_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_Construction_Wage_Determinations.pdf PDF
RFP_FA251719RA016.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_-_Financial_Information_Request_(Fillable_PDF).pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_FRMACC_Specifications_Div_1_-_46.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_-_Section_M,_Evaluation_Factors_for_Award.pdf PDF
Attachment_2d_-_Cheyenne_Mountain_Facilities_Excellence_Plan_(FEP).pdf PDF
Attachment_8_-_Bonding_Information_Request_(Fillable_PDF).pdf PDF
Attachment_9_-_Consent_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_13_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment_4c_-_Task_Order_Procedures.pdf PDF
Attachment_4a_-_Two-Tiered_Structure.pdf PDF
Attachment_2a_-_21_CES_Design_Guide.pdf PDF
Attachment_10_-_Client_Authorization_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_2c_-_Cheyenne_Mountain_Environmental_Business_Practices_for_Construction_Projects_Version_7.pdf PDF
Attachment_2e_-_Fort_Carson_Specific_Requirements_MACC_2019_compressed.pdf PDF
Attachment_2b_-_Buckley_AFB_IFS_Pre-Final.pdf PDF
Attachment_9_-_Consent_Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_8_-_Bonding_Information_Request_(Fillable_PDF).pdf PDF
Attachment_6_-_Section_M,_Evaluation_Factors_for_Award.pdf PDF
Attachment_11_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(PPQ).pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_FRMACC_Specifications_Div_1_-_46.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_-_Section_L,_Instructions_to_Offerors.pdf PDF
FRMACC_Draft_Solicitation_-_FA251719RA016.pdf PDF
Attachment_4b_-_On-Off_Ramping_Procedures.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_Construction_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
Attachment_2d_-_Cheyenne_Mountain_Facilities_Excellence_Plan_(FEP)_20140422.pdf PDF
Attachment_4c_-_Ordering_Guide.pdf PDF
Show all 50

Front Range Multiple Award Construction Contract (FRMACC) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

The document you are trying to load requires Adobe Reader 8 or higher. You may not have the Adobe Reader installed or your viewing environment may not be properly configured to use Adobe Reader.

For information on how to install Adobe Reader and configure your viewing environment please see http://www.adobe.com/go/pdf_forms_configure.

Contractor Assessment and Performance Reporting (CAsPR) Questionnaire This form must be filled out by each Civil Engineering Squadron (CES)/Department of Public Works (DPW) and submitted to the local contracting organization.

through Section 1: Task Order Information Page of Section 2: Evaluation Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor's performance by marking the performance scale indicated in the in the appropriate block. The scale is defined as follows:

CODE

PERFORMANCE LEVEL

E EXCEPTIONAL -- The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

S SATISFACTORY -- The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL -- Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY -- Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contract's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE -- Unable to provide a rating.

NOTE:

Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Exceptional (E), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), and Unsatisfactory (U) in response to the questions below.

A. Project Management A1. Demonstrated effectiveness of overall project management (including ability to effectively lead, manage, control, and deliver on-time).

Remarks:

Page of A2. Complied with contractual terms and conditions and required minimal Government direction regarding technical, schedule, and cost requirements.

Remarks:

A3. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative skills to: manage subcontractors, hire and retain qualified personnel, resolve disagreements/disputes, and address or replace subcontractors or in-house personnel with poor performance (if necessary).

Remarks:

B. Technical Performance B1. Proposed realistic and achievable technical solutions (design or construction approach).

Remarks:

B2. Provided design and/or construction submittals with minimal corrections needed.

Remarks:

Page of C. Schedule C1. Proposed and met realistic schedule milestones.

Remarks:

C2. Managed schedule in response to unexpected technical or contract changes and if applicable, were delays resolved in a timely manner.

Remarks:

D. Safety/Labor Compliance D1. Complied with labor laws/standards to include timely submission of payrolls for prime and subcontractors.

Remarks:

E. Customer Satisfaction E1. Reasonable and cooperative in dealing with the customer (demonstrated professionalism and courtesy, resolved disagreements/disputes, and encouraged open communication).

Remarks:

E2. Responded to customer questions concerning technical/service/administrative issues and resolved contract problems without extensive customer guidance.

Remarks:

Page of F. Change and Cost Control Management F1. Submitted realistic and reasonable costs for original contract and if applicable, change order requests with minimal negotiation.

Remarks:

F2. Submitted timely, accurate and complete progress reports and invoices.

Remarks:

G. Quality Control Program G1. Provided an adequate quality control plan and implemented the plan with success.

Remarks:

G2. Performed quality work with minimal rework needed and corrected deficiencies in a timely manner.

Remarks:

Section 3: Evaluator Information 6.2.0.20160331.1.924316.921890

TextField5:
TextField6:
DateField1:
DateField2:
NumericField1:
NumericField2:
CurrentPage:
PageCount:
TextField21:
:
TextField20:
PhoneNum:
email:
TextField15:
Name:
SignatureField1:
DateField3:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .