TA_QASP_I_reacq.docx

Attachment 3, Certificate of Service Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

Transient Alert (TA) and Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) at

PETERSON AFB CO

Contract #FA2517-15-C-XXXX

The following members of the MFT have approved implementation of this QASP on behalf of the entire MFT:

______________________Date:_______

21 OSS/MA

Senior Contracting Officer Representative

21 CONS/LGCB

Contracting Officer

21 SW/PMD

Quality Assurance Manager

Plan effective: X XXX-15

Prepared By:

Quality Assurance Manager: Jim Richey Email Address: Jimmy.Richey@Peterson.af.mil Telephone Number: 719-554-2810

DSN 692-2810

CHANGE CONTROL SUMMARY.

Table of Contents

Attachments

1. OVERVIEW

1.1. Objective. Contractor provides non-personal Transient Alert (TA) and Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) management to include special events/emergency and exercise support, order and turn-in of parts to/from the Air Force Supply System, and requested vehicle escorts at Peterson AFB CO, to include scheduled aircraft for the Arrival/Departure Air Control Group (A/DACG) facility located approximately two (2) miles east of the military operating ramp. Ensure contract performance requirements are met, on schedule and within budget. This plan addresses Performance Assessment and Performance Management.

2. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

2.1. Multi-Functional Team (MFT)

2.1.1. Executes the contract throughout the life of the program. The team includes Government representatives from the technical, procurement, financial, and legal communities; stakeholders of the service acquisition; and the contractor who provides the services. This team consists of various sub-groups responsible for routine contract actions. Participation is contingent upon program or contract needs.

2.1.2. The core MFT consists of a Quality Assurance Manager (QAM) from the Government Program Management Office, Contracting Officer (CO), Contracting Officer Representative (COR), Financial Analyst and the Customer Representative and/or Requirements Subject Matter Expert.

2.1.3. General duties and responsibilities of the MFT members include, but are not limited to the following:

2.1.3.1. Management of contract performance and assessment.

2.1.3.2. Development and fostering of partnerships for the common goal of continuous improvement and establishment of effective communications with the contractor for the overall success of the contract.

2.1.3.3. Identification of opportunities to improve performance throughout the life of the contract. This includes benchmarking against industry, identifying initiatives, assessing risk associated with these initiatives, using the QASP for implementing initiatives and monitoring success of implementation.

2.1.3.4. Support to senior leadership by providing meaningful performance metrics, data reporting, briefings and early warning of significant variances in cost, schedule or performance.

2.1.3.5. Development of Performance Objectives (PO) identifying mission-critical or operationally vital Performance Work Statement (PWS) requirements requiring periodic evaluation by the Contracting Officer Representative (COR).

2.1.3.6. Development, implementation and maintenance of the QASP. The Contracting Officer (CO), Quality Assurance Manager (QAM) and Senior Contracting Officer Representative (SCOR) sign the QASP. These individuals are responsible for conducting an annual review of this plan and implementing any changes to maintain effectiveness and meet mission needs.

2.1.3.7. Review of PWS requirements on a periodic basis to keep abreast of changes to customer requirements. Preparation of documentation and advocacy for funding any changes to the PWS.

2.1.3.8. Review of Performance Assessment Reports (PAR) with Findings prior to issuing to the contractor. The QAM may issue PARs with Findings during field audits without MFT review.

2.1.3.9. Validation that performance-based contract requirements are clearly stated and enforceable.

2.1.3.10. Validation that initial evaluation of contractor performance takes place within 30 days after the contractor assumes full performance responsibilities IAW AFI 63-138, Acquisition of Services.

2.2. Contracting Officer (CO)

2.2.1. Ensures adherence to the requirements of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and its supplements. Ensures compliance with the terms of the contract and safeguards the interests of the Government. Ensures contractors receive impartial, fair and equitable treatment.

2.2.2. The CO is the only person with the authority to direct the contractor and make interpretations of and changes to the contract. The CO resolves disputes or conflicts with the contractor.

2.2.3. Delegates, in writing, authority for inspection and/or acceptance in accordance with (IAW) the terms of the contract. Informs the contractor of the names, duties and limitations of authority for all COR(s) assigned to the contract.

2.2.4. Conducts contract-specific training for COR(s) before they perform quality duties.

2.2.5. Inputs contract registration data into CPARS within 30 days of contract award.

2.3. Senior Contracting Officer Representative (SCOR)

2.3.1. Ensures assessment, documentation and reporting on the contractor’s performance is accomplished.

2.3.2. Assigns primary and alternate CORs for each functional area. Forwards written nomination letters to the CO.

2.3.3. Ensures CORs receive Local COR, appropriate computer based and contract specific training prior to conducting performance assessment duties.

2.3.4. Prepares and submits a monthly Certificate of Service (COS) to 21 CONS/LGCBA with collected performance data from COR’s assessments during the previous month. The COS is due NLT than the 10th workday of the month; the COS format is contained in Attachment 3.

2.3.5. Issues PAR with Findings and maintains a PAR with Findings Log.

2.3.5.1. Coordinates with the MFT prior to issuing a PAR with Findings.

2.3.5.2. Evaluates contractor response for adequacy of corrective actions, correction of the root cause and actions taken to prevent recurrence.

2.3.5.3. Ensures follow up assessments are conducted as necessary.

2.3.6. Evaluates CORs to ensure assessment, documentation and reporting is performed.

2.3.7 Focal point for COR performance assessment activities, documentation and reporting.

2.4. Contracting Officer Representative (COR). In addition to the duties outlined in paragraph 2.3:

2.4.1. Prepares and maintains performance assessment documentation.

2.4.2. Submits monthly performance assessment information to the SCOR, if assigned, for inclusion in the COS.

2.5. Quality Assurance Manager (QAM). In addition to the duties outlined in paragraph 2.4:

2.5.1. Advises the COR(s) on quality assurance practices and provides assistance in resolving issues affecting performance standards.

2.5.2. Assists in development of performance objectives for the PWS and Services Summary items.

2.5.3. Leads the MFT in developing the QASP.

2.5.4. Reviews PARs with Findings prior to issuing to the contractor.

2.5.5. Participates in contract specific training

2.5.6. Ensures an annual review of this plan is completed.

2.6. Quality Assurance Program Coordinator (QAPC)

2.6.1. Manages and implements the Quality Assurance Training Program.

2.6.1.1. Provides initial Local COR training for all COR(s) to include acknowledgement of the following requirements prior to performance of their official assessment duties:

2.6.1.2. Provides annual COR refresher training.

2.6.1.3. Maintains documentation of training.

2.6.1.4. Assists in development of quality assurance related training as requested.

2.6.1.5. Develops COR training lesson plans.

2.6.1.6. Upon notification of assignment, provides SCOR orientation training within 30 days of their commencement of duties.

2.6.2. Evaluates and documents contractor performance IAW the QASP.

2.6.2.1. Notifies the contracting officer of any significant performance deficiencies and provides recommendations to improve the QASP or PWS.

2.6.2.2. Maintains surveillance documentation.

2.6.3. If requested, provides support to the MFTs in the development of contract requirements, ensuring requirements are clearly stated and enforceable; aids in development of the Services Summary (SS) and QASP.

2.6.4. CPARS Focal Point.

2.6.4.1. Provides COR(s) and the contractor with necessary access to CPARS.

2.6.4.2. Assesses narratives and ratings for CPARS if requested and provides help and advice to the CPARS representatives.

2.6.5. Provides SAV services for COR(s), if requested.

2.7. Quality Manager (QM)

2.7.1. Manages the 21st Space Wing’s Contract Quality Assurance Program including Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) development, implementation, and performance assessment activities.

2.7.2. Functions as the primary focal point for all quality-related issues or concerns.

2.7.3. Selects and ensures implementation of quality auditing techniques and procedures for assessment evaluation teams.

2.7.4. Advises MFT and its customers of the appropriate methods and measures of performance assessment for contracted services.

2.7.5. Stays abreast of changing philosophies, techniques and procedures for quality assurance and informs QAMs and MFTs of the changes.

2.7.6. Conducts COR Staff Assistance Visits (SAV) as needed.

3. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT

3.1. Strategy. The strategy is to rely to the maximum extent on the Contractor’s Quality System to ensure requirements are met with sufficient periodic validation by COR(s). This plan identifies the strategy, methods and tools the MFT will use to ensure it receives services as specified in the PWS. COR(s) will assess the contractor’s performance in a manner to sufficiently validate delivery of services and gain confidence in the contractor’s quality system. The level of assessment is adjusted as needed to maintain confidence.

3.2. Assessment Methods.

3.2.1. One-Hundred Percent Inspection. The COR assesses the contractor’s performance each time the task is performed. The results of the contractor’s overall performance are evaluated to determine acceptability of the service provided.

3.2.2. Periodic Inspection. The COR assesses these items on a periodic schedule such as daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, etc.

3.2.3. Customer Feedback. Customer Feedback is used as a method of performance assessment. The COR establishes customer feedback processes to enable customers to provide positive as well as negative feedback on the service being provided.

3.2.3.1. Negative Customer Feedback.

3.2.3.1.1. COR will validate negative customer feedback against PWS requirements.

3.2.3.1.2. For invalid negative feedback received, COR will inform the customer of the reason(s) why it is not valid.

3.2.3.1.3. For valid negative comments received, COR will notify the contractor’s representative to allow opportunity for investigation. If warranted, COR prepares a PAR with Finding. COR provides feedback to the customer on the status of the validated negative feedback.

3.2.3.2. Positive Customer Feedback. Positive customer feedback should be reported in the COS.

3.2.4. Metrics. Metrics are to be used to track contractor progress in meeting stated performance objectives. If contractor generated metrics are used, COR(s) must validate the accuracy of those metrics to a degree that establishes confidence in the metrics reporting.

3.2.5. External Assessments. External assessments may include Environmental-Safety-Occupational Health Compliance Assessment Management Program, Air Force or Defense Contract Management Agency audits, Airfield Traffic Safety Evaluation Program, Defense Security Service, and others. All reports produced by external assessment teams should be provided to the MFT. PARs with Findings may be issued for deficiencies within the scope of the PWS.

3.2.6. Trending. CORs analyze performance assessment data for performance trends. This trending data, whether positive or negative, may be used in subsequent reporting of contract performance.

3.3. Performance Assessment Tools

3.3.1. Performance Objectives (PO) The POs listed in Attachment 1 identify the minimum performance assessment requirements that must be accomplished on a periodic basis.

3.3.1.1. POs mirror the Services Summary (SS) in the PWS. Additionally, the MFT may develop Assessment Items (AI) used to ensure compliance in functional areas not covered by the POs. Each PO has a corresponding performance threshold that is the minimum acceptable performance level and the associated PWS reference paragraph.

3.3.1.2. The Government maintains the right to assess all contract requirements to the extent practicable at all times and places during the term of the contract. The Government will perform assessments in a manner that will not delay the contractor's workflow. The COR(s) will document and report Assessments of POs or AIs. When PWS requirements not identified as POs or AIs are assessed, results must also be documented and reported.

3.3.2. Performance Assessment Report (PAR). A PAR (see Attachment 2) is used to document assessments of POs, AIs, and other PWS requirements assessed. PAR Section I is used to document assessment results. PAR Section II is used to document findings identified during the assessment documented in Section I and forwarded to the contractor for response.

3.3.3. Findings.

3.3.3.1. Contractor-identified non-conformities are reviewed by the COR. The Government may issue a PAR with Findings. COR(s) will take the following actions:

3.3.3.2. Determine whether the finding was corrected. If the finding has been resolved, review the corrective action taken and any applicable procedures the contractor has established to prevent recurrence of the finding.

3.3.3.3. In instances where the finding has not been resolved and the contractor has established an Estimated Completion Date (ECD) for resolution, COR(s) will monitor the contractor’s resolution efforts. Notify the MFT if the ECD appears to be excessive based on the nature of the finding.

3.3.3.4. COR-identified findings. A PAR with findings is used to document the nonconformity and to request a corrective action plan. COR(s) will:

3.3.3.4.1. Notify the MFT and the contractor of a suspected finding.

3.3.3.4.2. Investigate to determine if the contractor has self-identified the finding within their quality system.

3.3.4. Performance Assessment File. CORs establish and maintain a Performance Assessment File. Multiple CORs may share common documents. The Performance Assessment File must contain:

Section 1 - Contract Documents: Includes the PWS Section 2 - Quality Documents: Includes the Government QASP and the Contractor’s Quality Control/Program Plan.

Section 3 - Activity Log: A chronological record of actions taken in the performance of COR duties providing a brief synopsis of contract inspection activities, meetings and conversations with the contractor regarding contract performance. The Activity Log does not replace the PAR. Items contained in this log are at the discretion of the COR.

Section 4 - Nomination Letter/Designation Letter/Training Certificates: Copies of the COR’s Designation Letter from the CO, the Nomination Letter from the SCOR, and Training Certificates.

Section 5 - Records: Includes PARs for each PO and other contract requirements assessed.

Section 6 - Other Items (Optional): Optional use for any other records or data pertinent to this contract.

3.4. Performance Assessment Phases. Performance Assessment is accomplished in multiple phases:

3.4.1. COR Assessment. As a minimum, CORs assess and document the POs and AIs outlined in Attachment 1. CORs periodically assess and document other requirements within their functional area not formalized as a PO or an AI. Report results in the monthly COS.

3.4.2. Contractor Self-Assessment. The contractor assesses his own performance and maintains records of all audits and inspections IAW the PWS.

4. Performance Management

4.1. Performance Management Approach. Purpose is to manage the contract to ensure the contractor is meeting cost, schedule and performance requirements and to ensure COR(s) are following this plan. The MFT utilizes performance outcomes or any other applicable indicators to continuously access and implement improvements.

4.2. Performance Management Methods. The MFT utilizes performance management and assessment tools to ensure the program meets contract requirements and to validate CORS(s) meet QASP requirements.

4.3. Performance Management Tools.

4.3.1. MFT Meetings. The MFT meets to review on-going issues, special projects, and cost and performance. CORs, functional experts, and the contractor participate as required. Minutes of meetings are recorded and distributed by the contracting office to members of the MFT, excluding the contractor for “Government only” meetings.

4.3.2. Market Research. Research to keep the MFT informed of current commercial technologies and industrial capabilities. Results should be considered for use to improve performance.

4.3.3. Certificate of Service (COS). COR(s) report performance assessment results in a monthly COS to the 21st Contracting Squadron. Performance data reported in the COS certifies services provided were accepted by the Government, provides performance data for the annual CPAR, execution reviews, and other reports to senior leadership, and provides feedback to the contractor.

4.3.4. Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR). The CPAR is an annual assessment of contractor performance based on performance assessment and management data. The report serves as the contractor’s performance report card and is used to provide past performance information for consideration in other acquisition efforts.

5. Disposition of Records. The contract quality assurance assessment records will be maintained in the performance assessment folder, other designated records locations or the contract file for the life of the contract or as specified by the records disposition schedule. The CO may specify a periodic transfer of these records to the contracting office or at the conclusion of the contract for contract file inclusion. COR must contact the CO for the final disposition instructions upon contract completion.

Attachment 1, Performance Objectives

FA2517-15-R-6000

Attachment 6

Frequency:

Monthly Evaluator:

COR

PO #1: Provide Ground Aircraft Operations. (Ref: PWS Para 1.1)

Threshold: One (1) Minor Finding during assessment results in a failed assessment. Three (3) failed assessments in a single month due to minor findings will constitute an unsatisfactory rating for this Performance Objective.

A major finding during any assessment for the month will result in a failed Performance Assessment Report (PAR) along with an unsatisfactory rating for that particular Performance Objective for the month.

Assessment Method: COR to evaluate 15 Ground Aircraft Operations per month and complete the appropriate checklist for selected services for each aircraft evaluated (One Aircraft evaluation = One assessment) IAW PWS Para 1.1. Ground Aircraft Operations. Assessments will include safety compliance.

Frequency:

Monthly Evaluator:

PO #2: Provide Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) management. (Ref: PWS Para 1.2)

Threshold: One (1) Minor Finding results in a failed assessment. Any two (2) failed assessments in a single month due to a minor finding will constitute an unsatisfactory rating for this Performance Objective.

A major finding during any assessment for the month will result in a failed Performance Assessment Report (PAR) along with an unsatisfactory rating for that particular Performance Objective for the month.

Assessment Method: COR to evaluate four (4) Scheduled / Unscheduled AGE maintenance services per month and complete the AGE services checklist(s) for selected units (or the appropriate checklist for selected services evaluated) IAW PWS Para 1.2. Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) Management. (One scheduled/unscheduled AGE maintenance evaluation = One assessment). Assessments will include Safety compliance.

Frequency:

Monthly Evaluator:

PO #3: Other Programs (Ref: PWS Para 1.3.)

Threshold: Two (2) Minor Findings results in a failed assessment. Any failed assessment during a single month due to minor findings will constitute an unsatisfactory rating for this Performance Objective.

A major finding during any assessment for the month will result in a failed Performance Assessment Report (PAR) along with an unsatisfactory rating for that particular Performance Objective for the month.

Assessment Method: COR to evaluate one (1) activity per month and complete the appropriate checklist for selected activity evaluated IAW PWS Para 1.3. (One activity evaluation = one assessment)

A2.1. PAR GENERATION PROCESS (as it applies to the COR or SCOR) A2.1.1. COR(s) discovers findings with services. COR(s) researches to confirm findings and discusses with contractor.

A2.1.1.1. Investigates to determine if the contractor has self-identified the nonconformity within their quality system and is taking action to correct the nonconformity and implement preventive actions. If so, the MFT may decide not to issue a PAR with Findings and monitor the contractor’s corrective and preventive actions.

A2.1.1.2. Notifies the SCOR of the nonconformity and the impact.

A2.1.2. COR(s) drafts PAR with Finding and sends to the MFT for review and discussion.

A2.1.3. MFT will return with instructions on how to proceed.

A2.1.3.1. PAR is justified, finding category and rating determined.

A2.1.3.2. Proceed with issue to contractor.

A2.1.4. SCOR (with written issuing authority) will forward the PAR with Finding to the Contractor, Contract Manager and others as required. Copy the MFT.

A2.1.5. Contractor is required to reply by the suspense date (COR must monitor).

A2.1.6. Review response and determine if preventative actions are acceptable, and coordinate contractor response with MFT prior to accepting or rejecting contractor response.

A2.1.7. If acceptable, mark blocks 17-20 to close the PAR with Finding. Send closure reply to the contractor and to the MFT.

A2.1.8. If unacceptable, the MFT determines the course of action.

A2.1.9. PAR with Finding remains open until resolved.

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT REPORT (PAR)

For Check Blocks, enable and lock Forms Toolbar

Section I. Performance Assessment

|_| No Finding |_| Minor Nonconformity |_| Major Nonconformity

7. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT—DESCRIBE CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE

Section II. Nonconformities Identified

13. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FINDING (Include PWS reference narrative)

14. FINDING IMPACT

15. INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CONTRACTOR: If a suspense date is entered in block 13, respond with a corrective action plan that details the corrective action of the cited deficiency, the cause of the deficiency, and actions taken to prevent recurrence. If date was not entered in Block 13, the Contractor is not required to provide a response.

16. COR ASSESSMENT TO CONTRACTOR’S CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN

|_| Accepted |_| Rejected

Continuation Sheet

INSTRUCTIONS. The PAR is used to document contract performance assessments, to report nonconformities to the contractor and to request correction actions taken by the contractor to prevent recurrence. Instructions are included for blocks not self-explanatory.

SECTION I. PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT. Use document assessments of contractor performance with PWS requirements. At a minimum, document assessments of Performance Objectives (PO) and Assessment Items (AI) from the QASP.

Block 4, Finding Category: Check one block only.

NO FINDING: Performance meets PWS requirements.

MINOR FINDING: An unsatisfactory condition requiring repair or correction, but does not endanger personnel, affect safety or safety of flight, jeopardize equipment reliability, or warrant discontinuing a process or equipment operation. If the same minor finding is identified within a 6-month period, it may be an indication that a Major Finding has occurred because the Contractor’s quality system has not acted to prevent recurrence. In this case, the Minor Finding may be elevated to the level of a Major Finding and a new PAR initiated.

MAJOR FINDING: An unsatisfactory condition requiring repair or correction, endangering personnel, jeopardizing equipment or system reliability, affecting safety or safety of flight, or warranting discontinuation of the process or equipment operation. This includes the following items:

1. Significant mission degradation in any Contractor-operated function.

2. A situation that is likely to result in hazardous or unsafe conditions for individuals (or any other Government resource) coming into contact with the work.

3. Failure to provide adequate corrective action to prevent reoccurrence of Government identified findings, to include minor findings.

4. Failure of the contractor to provide corrective action to self-identified findings within a reasonable time frame dependent on finding complexity.

5. Any failure to adhere to security regulations resulting in a security incident.

Block 5, Contract Requirement: Identify contract requirement, i.e., Transient Alert.

Block 7, Performance Assessment: Enter the particular details and results of the assessment. Detailed results of assessments are required to report and manage contract performance. Avoid Pass/Fail descriptions of contract performance when possible.

SECTION II, NONCONFORMITIES IDENTIFIED: Used to document nonconformities identified during an assessment. Section II is used to notify the contractor of the finding and request corrective action.

Block 10, Control Number: Assigned by the issuing authority. Track all findings with a Control Number containing the first two or three letters of the name of the site or contract - the last two digits of the fiscal year - and a three digit number starting with 001 and progressing upward through the fiscal year. For example, the 1st PAR finding for Peterson for FY10 is: PE-10-001. When the QAM issues a PAR with Findings, the QAM will use the same format and add a “Q” designator after the last two digits of the fiscal year. For example, PE-10Q-001.

Block 11, Issuing Authority/Name/Grade: Enter the Grade/Name. The issuing authorities for a PAR with Finding are the SCOR, CO, and the QAM.

Block 12, Response Suspense Date: Enter the date the response is due from the contractor for the cited nonconformity. Normally, this is two calendar weeks unless extenuating circumstances exist. The response suspense date is for initial response from the contractor and not necessarily the complete corrective action plan.

Block 13, Brief Description of the Finding (Include PWS reference): Clearly and briefly, state the details of the finding including the PWS reference and proposal. For example:

PWS para 3.4 reads: “The contractor shall maintain an MSDS in the work area for all hazardous materials used in the work center.” The contractor did not have the MSDS for “Simple Green” in the building 100 work area.

Block 14, Finding Impact: Enter the impact the finding has, or could reasonably have, on mission accomplishment.

Block 15, COR Assessment to Contractor’s Corrective Action Plan: Indicate if the contractor has corrected the nonconformity and if the preventive actions appear to be sufficient to prevent recurrence.

PAR Continuation sheet: The PAR continuation sheet may be used to expand upon information in Section I or II. The continuation sheet may also be used to document recurring assessments during the contract year. For example, if the QASP requires the COR to assess a certain PWS requirement every 30 days, a table of those checks could be developed and inserted into the continuation sheet. This allows the COR to have only one PAR per year generated for each recurring assessment requirement. If a deficiency is identified, complete a separate PAR for that particular finding. For Example:

PWS Reference

Attachment 2, Performance Assessment Report

Date

MEMORANDUM FOR: 21 SW/PMD(S) or (O)

FROM: Applicable SCOR

SUBJECT: Contract Number, Certificate of Service (COS) for Month and Year

SECTION I: Performance Summary. Services rendered were accepted for the reporting period. This COS is not all-inclusive of all performance data; other data sources may be used in preparing the CPAR or for other assessment purposes.

Element A: Performance Assessment by Functional Area. Report services received for each area as accepted or not accepted. For services not accepted, include descriptive information in Section II or Section III.

Example:

Chapter 1 Example:

Security and Protection of Resources Example:

Accepted

Element B: Performance Assessment by Services Summary (SS).

Example:

PO-1. Security Alarms are maintained and operational. Chapter 1, paragraph 1.4.

Example:

Contractor-controlled availability is maintained at 98.8% Example:

Met: 99.8%

Element C: Performance Assessment by Assessment Item (AI) prescribed in the QASP.

Example:

AI-1: Security Alarms are maintained and operational. Chapter 1, paragraph 1.4.

Example:

Contractor-controlled availability is maintained at 98.8% Example:

Met: 99.8%

Element D: Performance Assessment Reports with Findings Summary

Element E: External Assessments. Report summary of external party assessments such as Special Interest Inspections, COMSEC, GSU Support Team, external ESOHCAMP, ATSEP, etc.

SECTION II: Additional Comments. Include performance information to include strengths not otherwise reported, comments from the Senior Contracting Officer Representative or Functional Director, Quality Assurance Manager, Contracting Officer, Quality Assurance Specialist, or other MFT members.

SECTION III: COR Listing and SOW Functional Area:

Rank/ Name

Example:

TSgt John Smith Example:

Security Forces COR

As applicable

Cc: Contracting Contractor