Exhibit F Past and Present Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 34 KB Posted

Attached to
(PROJ: 573-16-603) BB - Install Parking Garage Protection
Solicitation number
36C24825R0118
Issued by

About this file

The file is a Past and Present Performance Questionnaire for a federal contract opportunity related to the Department of Veterans Affairs. The document provides a detailed template for collecting performance references, with 24 specific evaluation criteria ranging from project management and personnel capabilities to problem-solving, schedule adherence, and overall performance. References are asked to rate the contractor on a 6-point scale from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional, with the opportunity to provide narrative explanations for ratings.

The related federal contract opportunity is for installing parking garage fall protection at the Malcolm Randall VA Medical Center in Gainesville, FL. The project is set aside for SBA certified Veteran Owned Small Businesses (VOSB), with a construction magnitude between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000. Key project details include: installing ballistic quality screen mesh and physical barriers over open areas of three parking garages, 371 calendar days performance period, critical dates include a site walk on 06/24/2025, RFIs due 06/30/2025, and proposals due 07/17/2025. The contracting officer is Amber Milton, and the project is subject to fund availability.

View the file

Other files

Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

TITLE AS POSTED IN FBO sample “573-18-618 BB - Renovate Clinical Research Laboratories, at the Malcom Randall VAMC” Network Contracting Office (NCO) 8 Solicitation No. sample “36C24821R0129”

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTRACTOR

Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes). Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form and submit it according to the instructions, below. It is preferred that these are the same clients/projects that you provided with Exhibit A for ease of evaluation and comparison. Projects should be relevant (within the same magnitude of construction) and recent (within 5 years).

INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT

The contractor named below is submitting an offer for a United States Department of Veterans Affairs contract requirement, and has sent this form to you, in your role as a past performance reference contact. Please complete this form in full (all areas shaded in light yellow, below). ENSURE YOU EDIT THE HEADER. Once completed, please send the form to the Contract Specialist via email directly to:

Department of Veterans Affairs NCO 8 Contracting Office TO: Amber Milton, Contracting Officer REF: “solicitation number” Email Address: amber.milton@va.gov

Please return the completed form and return with your proposal package. If you have any questions, please contact Amber Milton via email. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

GENERAL INFORMATION [completed by Contractor]

Contractor Company Name

Street Address

Contractor Point of Contact Name

City

Point of Contact Phone Number

State

Reference Project Title

Zip Code

Contract POP (start to finish):

Email

Contract Number

Contract Dollar Value

Description of Work

Role of Contractor on This Project (check appropriate box)
☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Sub-contractor ☐ Key Personnel

RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact]

Company Name

Street Address

POC Name

City

Phone Number

State

Fax Number

Zip Code

Email

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2 in the applicable text box OR in the Remarks section, below (text box will expand to whatever extent is necessary).

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
NEUTRAL
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor are satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive
The Contractor …
1
2
3
4
5
6
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.

Narrative

☐☐☐☐☐☐
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
13.
Met established project schedules.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

Narrative:

☐☐☐☐☐☐
22.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
☐YES
☐NO
23
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.”
☐YES
☐NO
24
To the best of your knowledge, is the contractor rated in CPARS?
☐YES
☐NO

REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).

Printed Name/ TitleSignature
Source Selection Sensitive-See FAR Part 3.104Page 22 of 32

Source Selection Information--See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .