36C24825R0118 0001.pdf

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

CODE

6. ISSUED BY

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED

PAGE OF PAGES

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED

BPA NO. 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FACILITY CODE CODE

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

E. IMPORTANT:

is extended,

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR

ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

(REV. 11/2016)

is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office. is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

15C. DATE SIGNED

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES

SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER

Contractor

16C. DATE SIGNED

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

STANDARD FORM 30 PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

(Type or print) (Type or print)

(Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code)

(If other than Item 6)

(Specify type of modification and authority)

(such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

(If required)

(SEE ITEM 11)

(SEE ITEM 13)

(X)

CHECK

ONE

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

0001 07-16-2025

573-16-603

36C248

Department of Veterans Affairs

Network Contracting Office 8 (NCO 8)

10,000 Bay Pines Blvd

Bay Pines FL 33744

36C248

Department of Veterans Affairs

Network Contracting Office 8 (NCO 8)

8875 Hidden River Parkway

Suite 525

Tampa FL 33673

To all Offerors/Bidders

36C24825R0118

06-18-2025

X

X X

** HOUR & DATE for Receipt of Offers is EXTENDED to: 07-24-2025 1300 EDT

See CONTINUATION Page

Project Number: 573-16-603 Project Title: BB Install Parking Garage Fall Protection for the Malcolm Randall VAMC

Location: Malcolm Randall VA Medical Center, 1601 Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL 32608.

POP: 371 Calendar Days from the NTP

Magnitude of Construction: Pursuant 36.204(g) $1,000,000.00 and $5,000,000.00.

AMEND 0001

Proposal due date has changed from 07/17/2025 1300 EST to 07/24/2025 1300 EST.

UDPATED Line Item Number for clarification

UPDATED Wage Determination: DBA FL20250194 03/14/2025 applies to this project.

UPDATED I. GENERAL PROPOSAL INFORMATION and III. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD AND PRICE

ATTACHED Site walk sign in sheet, WD DBA, Exhibit E, RFI Responses, Supporting design documents

CONTINUATION PAGE

A.1 PRICE/COST SCHEDULE

ITEM INFORMATION

ITEM

NUMBER

DESCRIPTION OF

SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

1.00 JB ____________ ___________

ITEM I (BASE BID) : PN: 573-16-603 BB Install Parking Garage Fall Protection at the Malcom Randall VAMC. Contractor will provide all labor, materials, and supervision to install parking garage fall protection at the Malcom Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center located in Gainesville FL. The scope of the project will requires closure at existing wall and stairwell openings around the perimeter of exterior garage walls on all levels. Closure has been previously provided on the P2 Parking Garage, Independence, and new work at the deck openings is to generally match that design of square tubular frame with wire mesh.

Unclimbable wire mesh panels will be installed on the top levels of the parking decks. The closure of the curved “bullnose” landings of the stair towers will be accomplished with EIFS on metal stud walls. The work includes garages P1 and P3 on the western portion of the site as described by the drawings and specifications.

PRINCIPAL NAICS CODE: 236220 - Commercial and Institutional Building Construction PRODUCT/SERVICE CODE: Z1LZ - Maintenance of Parking Facilities

GRAND TOTAL ____________

I. GENERAL PROPOSAL INFORMATION

1. Solicitation, attachments, and any issued amendments will be posted at www.sam.gov. This is the only official location where these documents can be obtained and where updates are posted. No “hard copy” solicitation materials are available.

2. All references to “Bid” or “Bidder” shall be understood to mean “Offer” or “Offeror”.

3. MAGNITUDE OF THIS PROJECT: Between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 in accordance with (IAW)

VAAR 836.204(f)(2).

4. North American Industry Classification (NAICS) code: The applicable NAICS code for this procurement is 236220 Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The Small Business size standard is $45 Million.

5. PROPOSAL DUE DATE: Standard Form (SF) 1442, block 13a (or as amended on SF 30), refers to proposals due date.

6. SITE VISIT: An organized site visit has been scheduled. Refer to FAR 52.236-27 SITE VISIT

(CONSTRUCTION) (FEB 1995) Alternate I (FEB 1995) for location, date, and time details.

7. OFFER ACCEPTANCE PERIOD: Offers providing less than one-hundred and eighty (180) calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due will not be considered and will be rejected.

8. REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION/QUESTIONS: Requests for Information (RFIs) (Exhibit A) or questions shall be submitted via email to amber.milton@va.gov by the Prime Offeror. Prime offeror should consolidate RFIs/questions from its team members and submit as one submission to the maximum extent practicable.

8.1. Offerors may submit RFIs or questions via email to amber.milton@va.gov at any time; however, RFIs or questions received after the due date may not be answered.

8.2. To easily identify all RFIs or questions for this project, email subject line shall be submitted using titled using the following format: RFI – SOLICITATION NUMBER – OFFEROR COMPANY NAME.

8.3. No telephone RFIs/Questions will be accepted.

9. SPECIFICATIONS AND DRAWINGS: All applicable specifications and drawings will be provided electronically along with the solicitation. No hard copies will be made available to offerors.

9.1. Any reference contained within contract specifications and/or drawings to the “VA Engineer”, “Resident Engineer”, “Senior Resident Engineer”, “Project Manager”, Contracting Officer Technical Representative, or their abbreviations are to be replaced with “Contracting Officer Representative

(COR)”

10. LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING (LOS) (Exhibit B) (Reference Contract Clause FAR 52.219-14 for further information): By submission of an offer and execution of a contract, the Offeror agrees http://www.sam.gov/ mailto:amber.milton@va.gov that in performance of the contract, the concern will perform at least fifteen (15) percent of the cost of the contract, not including the cost of materials, with its own employees.

11. FUNDS: Funds are not presently available for this acquisition. The Government does not compensate offerors for proposals’ development. Award is subject to availability of funds, in accordance with FAR 52.232-18 Availability of Funds.

12. BONDS: Performance Bonds (SF25) and Payment Bonds (SF25A) are required. Offeror must refer to

SF1442 Block 12a for Payment and Performance Bond requirements. Refer to FAR 52.228-15 for additional information on applicability.

13. OFFER GUARANTEE (BID BOND) (SUBMIT WITH PRICE PROPOSAL): Offeror must refer to SF1442

Block 13b (Bid Bond) requirement. Per FAR Clause 52.228-1 Bid Guarantee, the amount of the bid guarantee shall be 20 percent of the bid price or $3,000,000, whichever is less. NOTE: A legible electronic copy of the original is acceptable.

13.1. The bid bond will be submitted with Price Proposal in a separate pdf document (do not combine/save with other documents) and shall be named “BID BOND – SOLICITATION NUMBER –

OFFEROR COMPANY NAME”.

14. SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD (SUBMIT WITH PRICE PROPOSAL): Offerors shall submit with their proposal a completed (Exhibit C) - Safety or Environmental Violations and Experience Modification Rate (EMR) Form, which supplies the Government information pertaining to your firm’s past Safety and Environmental record. A submitted Attachment 03 represents a certification of your firm’s past Safety and Environmental record identifying serious, willful, or repeat violations from OSHA or any EPA violations within the last 3 years. Please attach explanation for any violations.

14.1. All Offerors shall submit information regarding their current Experience Modification Rate (EMR) equal to or less than 1.0. This information shall be obtained from the offeror’s insurance company and be furnished on the insurance carrier’s letterhead and included with the completed attachment.

14.2. Self-insured contractors or other contractors that cannot provide their EMR rating on insurance letterhead must obtain a rating from the National Council on Compensation Insurance, Inc. (N1CCI) by completing/submitting ERM-6 Form and providing the rating on letterhead from NCCI. Include this letter with the completed Note: Self-insured contractors or other contractors that cannot provide EMR rating on insurance letterhead from the states or territories of CA, DE, MI, NJ, ND, OH, PA, WA, WY, and PR shall obtain their EMR rating from their state-run worker’s compensation insurance rating bureau and include this letter with the completed attachment.

14.3. A Determination of Responsibility will be accomplished for the apparent awardee prior to processing the award. The information provided, along with other information obtained from Government systems, such as the OSHA and EPA online inspection history databases will be used to make the Determination of Responsibility. Offerors with an EMR greater than 1.0 will be considered ineligible and will not be evaluated.

15. VETS-4212, Federal Contractor Veterans’ Employment Report (SUBMIT WITH PRICE PROPOSAL):

Offerors are required to provide verification of their submission of the annual form VETS-4212 (https://www.dol.gov/agencies/vets/programs/vets4212). This verification shall be the emailed confirmation of receipt notification sent to the offeror after successful submission of their report.

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/vets/programs/vets4212

15.1. The verification will be submitted with the Price Proposal in a separate pdf document (do not combine/save with other documents) and shall be named “VETS 4212 – SOLICITATION NUMBER –

OFFEROR COMPANY NAME”.

16. PERFORMANCE PERIOD: Refer to SF1442, Block 11, for performance period. Performance period shall be commenced upon receipt of written Notice to Proceed (NTP) performed in concurrent or sequential phases as indicated or required.

17. WAGE DETERMINATION & CONSTRUCTION WAGE RATE REQUIREMENTS (DAVIS BACON ACT): See

Block 10 for wage rate determination. The applicable Davis Bacon WD for this solicitation is incorporated as an attachment to this solicitation.

18. Funding: Award is contingent upon the availability of appropriated funds. The Government does not compensate vendors for proposal development and submission.

19. Superintendence: The offeror shall provide, from their own staff, a competent 30-hour

OSHA certified superintendent. This individual shall be 100% full time dedicated to supervision and assigned to this project while work is being performed on site. The offeror shall not divide or split up their superintendence duties among multiple projects at the same facility. Each project stands alone and requires a dedicated superintendent to be allocated and funded to that particular project.

20. Holidays: The following federal holidays are observed:

New Year's Day MLK Jr.’s Birthday President's Day Memorial Day Juneteenth Independence Day

Columbus Day Labor Day Thanksgiving Day

Christmas Day Veterans Day

20.1. Any other holiday proclaimed by the President as a Federal Holiday.

20.2. When a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday will be observed as a legal holiday. When a holiday falls on a Saturday, the preceding Friday is observed by U.S.

Government agencies.

21. Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS): Upon completion of contract performance and annually if performance is longer than 365 days, the Contracting officer will evaluate contractor performance for use in future contract award decisions. The

Contractor shall be provided an opportunity to comment on the contracting officer’s evaluation. If you wish to familiarize yourself with this system, you can find it at https://www.cpars.gov/.

21.1. The government retains the evaluations, contractor responses, and review comments, if any, as part of the contract file. The evaluations are available for Federal Agencies for support of future award decisions through CPARS.

21.2. The contractor must provide the contracting officer with the name and email address of the contractor CPARS POC. This is the person responsible for responding to these evaluations.

https://www.cpars.gov/

This person will be granted access to CPARS during the award and assigned the system role of contractor representative (CR).

22. E-VERIFY SYSTEM: Companies awarded a contract with the federal government shall enroll in E- Verify within 30 days of the contract award date. They shall also begin using the E-Verify system to confirm that all their new hires and their employees directly working on federal contracts are authorized to legally work in the United States. E-Verify is an Internet-based system that allows an employer, using information reported on an employee's Form I-9, to determine the eligibility of that employee to work in the United States. There is no charge to employers to use E-Verify. (FAR 52.222-54).

23. Section 743(a)(3) of Division C of Public Law 111-117: Companies awarded a contract with the federal government shall comply with the annually reporting requirements of 52.204-14, Service Contract Reporting Requirements and 52.204-15, Service Contract Reporting Requirements for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts. Note that the contracting officer shall make the contractor’s failure to comply with the reporting requirements a part of the contractor’s performance information under FAR Subpart 42.15.

- - - END OF GENERAL PURPOSE INFORMATION - - -

III. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD AND PRICE EVALUATION

1. EVALUATION FACTORS AND PRICE INSTRUCTIONS

1.1. This section outlines the criteria the Government will use in evaluating the offerors’ capabilities and proposals for the solicitation. The Government will compare each offeror’s capabilities and proposal elements against the predetermined evaluation criteria related to the Government’s requirement defined herein. This is a competitive, best value subjective tradeoff, source selection that will be conducted in accordance with (IAW) Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 15 and 36.

1.2. Best Value Evaluation: The Government will evaluate all proposals received against Technical (Factor 1), Past Performance (Factor 2), and Price (Factor 3). As stated in Section 1 of proposal preparation instructions, General Information will be used as part of the separate determination of Contractor responsibility IAW FAR 9.1 Responsible Prospective Contractors. Proposals will be evaluated, and award will be made utilizing a Trade-Off process which includes use of a combined Technical/Risk rating methodology for Factor 1 considering all three facets of the rating definitions (demonstrated Approach and Understanding, relationship of the strengths and weaknesses, and degree of Risk) when determining the Technical Factor rating. The Government will conduct evaluations at the subfactor level, however an individual rating for each subfactor within Factor 1 will not be assigned. Instead, the Government will assign a single rating (one at the Factor 1 level) based on the evaluation findings and risk associated with each of the subfactors. The subfactors within Factor 1 are equal in importance. Factor 2 will receive an overall confidence assessment rating. Factor 3 will not be given a rating or scored. Factors 1 and 2 when combined, are equal to price.

1.3. The evaluation factors consist of Factor 1 - Technical Approach, Factor 2 - Project Planning/Safety/IC/QC, Factor 3 –Project Schedule, Relevant Past Performance each factor shall have equal importance to Price.

2. FACTOR 1: TECHNICAL APPROACH AND TECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS

2.1. Describe in detail how the offeror intends to meet or exceed all performance areas stated in the solicitation/statement of work/attachments that are related to this project. Provide technical methods and procedures that reflect a construction approach unique to the site and facility. NOTE: Vague, general narratives that include the restatement of the Statement of Work will be rated less favorably.

2.2. Schedule and minimizing downtime are crucial. Describe a plan to complete the project in a timely manner without causing disruptions to facility operations, especially during normal business hours. Also, describe actions to be taken by the offeror if completion of work is anticipated to fall behind schedule. It is critical to the VA mission that services remain intact with minimal disruption.

2.3. Describe any technical difficulties that may be encountered in a project of this type. Provide a narrative of preventative measures or potential solutions to overcome these issues that are included in the offeror’s proposal.

3. FACTOR 2 – PROJECT PLANNING/SAFETY/IC/QC

3.1. Describe your plan for phasing this project in addition to the phasing indicated in the contract documents.

3.2. Describe approach to infection control (IC) and determination of infection control risk assessment for work outside the project area.

3.3. Submit Quality Control (QC) monitoring procedures that will ensure a high level of construction quality that is applicable to the Specific and General requirements of the project.

3.4. Develop and include procedures involving key subcontractors in the quality of the construction processes.

3.5. Describe the commissioning process throughout the project.

3.6. Provide the precautions the contractor will take to avoid damage to the facility (include how pre-existing conditions will be documented) and the proposed remediation that will take place if any damage is done to existing elements.

4. FACTOR 3 – PROJECT SCHEDULE

Table 1. Evaluation Criteria

Volume I - Technical Combined Technical/Risk Rating

Technical/Management

Approach

Factor

Not Assigned Individual Technical Rating

Project Planning/Safety/IC/QC Factor

Not Assigned Individual Technical Rating

Project Schedule Factor

Not Assigned Individual Technical Rating

Volume II – Relevant Past Performance

Confidence Rating

Volume III - Price Total Evaluated Price (TEP)

4.1. Submit a preliminary (CPM) Critical Path Method schedule (sample provided) (Exhibit D) for the design and construction satisfying the requirements of this project. A practicable schedule showing the order in which the Contractor proposes to perform the work, and the dates on which the Contractor contemplates starting and completing the several salient features of the work (acquiring materials and equipment, mobilization, demolition, installation, commissioning, etc.).

4.2. The schedule shall be in the form of a progress chart (Gantt chart) of suitable scale to indicate appropriately the percentage of work scheduled for completion by any given point during the period. Most importantly, indicate length of downtime required for any utilities affecting the operation of other parts of the facility on the schedule. The schedule shall show key milestone dates and switchover and start-up of equipment.

4.3. The schedule is not included in the page limit. To be considered technically acceptable, the proposed “draft” project schedule shall not exceed the project duration stated on the solicitation and include divisions of work required to successfully complete the project:

4.3.1. Identify the tasks required to execute the project, being as detailed as possible using a work breakdown structure to break down the tasks into manageable elements in the logical order of execution.

4.3.2. Identify the time for each task. Set start and finish times.

4.3.3. Calculate the slack.

4.3.4. Determine intermediate phases and total project duration.

4.3.5. Clearly identify the critical path

Table 2. Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low.

Good Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is not awardable.

https://www.levelset.com/blog/work-breakdown-structure/

5. RELEVANT PAST PERFORMANCE/ EXPERIENCE

5.1. Offeror is responsible for providing project descriptions in sufficient detail to permit evaluation of project relevancy to this procurement. Information shall be provided by completing Performance Relevancy Form (Exhibit E) for relevant project(s). Provide a total of four(4) work experience projects meeting the requirements of this solicitation in performance at any point during the previous five (5) years from the solicitation date or currently ongoing (at least 50% construction complete) that best represent the Offeror’s work experience required on this solicitation. The information provided will be used to evaluate the relevancy and depth of each Offeror’s experience.

5.2. Projects provided for experience should demonstrate experience constructing and managing General Construction projects including work in an actively populated business environment and Phasing Projects on a large scale .

5.3. In this context, “Offeror or Offeror’s” refers to the proposed prime contractor, and all proposed major subcontractor(s).

5.4. Any teaming or proposed sub-contractor arrangement you are submitting as part of the proposal for evaluation must remain intact through contract completion. Completed letter of commitment for key Subcontractor is required (Exhibit H).

5.5. If more than four (4) projects are submitted, only the first four (4) will be evaluated. If the project is older than five (5) years, it may be considered less relevant.

5.6. The Government may place greater importance on projects that most closely resemble the project identified in this solicitation, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations.

5.7. The Government may place greater importance on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations.

5.8. The Government may place greater importance on projects that were performed at an active VA hospital, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations.

5.9. Provide the following information Performance Relevancy Form (Exhibit A) for each example.

5.9.1. Project Number, Title and location or facility performed (At least one (1) of the projects submitted must be the same or similar to the project described in the solicitation).

5.9.2. All projects submitted must be at least 50% complete.

5.9.3. At least one (1) of the projects submitted must be valued at greater than $4M and performed within the last 5 years.

5.9.4. Total Project Value and duration (at least 3 shall be greater than $2M).

5.9.5. Contracting Officer and COR Name and contact information, telephone, and email

5.9.6. List of subcontractors.

5.9.7. Initial/Final award amount.

5.9.8. State any change orders if occurred during the project performance.

5.9.9. Pictures of completed work.

5.9.10. Detailed description of work, including trades involved (identify percentage of self-performed work).

5.9.11. Explanation of why the projects were selected as the same or similar and how the experience obtained on the submitted project is pertinent to the execution of this project.

5.10. Past Performance will be evaluated based on information provided and any other past performance information obtained by the Government such as but are not limited to past performance information retrieved through the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting system (CPARS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) and may contact customers other than those identified by the Offeror when evaluating past performance.

5.11. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror and the government is under no obligation to check other sources and/or may not contact all the identified POCs.

5.12. In the absence of CPARS, the Offeror shall submit a completed PPQ form (Exhibit F) from the client for a project(s). If Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ (Exhibit F), which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s).

5.13. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact amber.milton@va.gov. Offerors shall specify which PPQ if any will be submitted by client with a valid and accurate email and telephone number information.

5.14. Subcontractor’s Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide, with proposal, Subcontractor Past Performance of Consent form referenced subcontractors authorizing release of their past performance information for this requirement (Exhibit G).

5.15. In the case of an Offeror without a record of past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

5.16. The Government will assess the past performance on projects submitted under the Specialized Experience Factor and reserves the right to conduct telephone interviews with point of contacts identified in the proposal and/or to review other recent projects rated in CPARS or other agency performance databases, review and/or contact Offeror-furnished references, or to review personal knowledge. The Government will perform a performance confidence assessment of the Offeror’s probability of successfully meeting the contract requirements considering the currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor performance.

Table 3. Performance Confidence Assessments Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

6. PRICE EVALUATION

6.1. PRICE EVALUATION: The Government will initially review pricing independently from the factor evaluation. Price is not rated but will be analyzed for fairness and reasonableness.

The Government may use various price analysis techniques and procedures to make a price reasonableness determination.

6.2. The proposed prices will be analyzed for fairness and reasonableness. There are THREE 3 areas where pricing is included. Include on the SF1442 back page (block 22 on Page 2)

Include copy of the Pricing Schedule of the solicitation (Price/Cost Schedule). Include price breakdown (Exhibit H) Ensure to submit the Price Breakdown sheet in Excel Format NOT

PDF.

6.3. Provide a detailed price breakdown for the purpose of evaluating price. The Price breakdown shall separately at a minimum but not limited to (this is not an all-inclusive breakdown list) include the following cost elements: Labor (Direct & Indirect), Materials, Material Markups, Material Overhead, Equipment, Subcontractor Cost, Other Direct Costs, Overhead Expenses, Indirect Cost, General & Administrative (G&A) expenses, and Profit.

While developing your price proposal please make sure to include all applicable taxes, and government stamps cost.

- - - END OF EVALUATION FACTORS AND PRICE EVALUATION - - -

See attached document: RFI 1 Exhibit A QA RFIs Response.

See attached document: 2025-07-15 Addendum No. 1.

See attached document: 010000 - General Requirements.

See attached document: Bid Summary - REV 1.

See attached document: SAM DBA WD FL20250194 03_14_2025.

See attached document: Exhibit E Performance Relevancy Survey v2 02.

See attached document: 323140_High Security Fences and Gates.

See attached document: AS-BUILT LSPLAN P3 LIBERTY.

See attached document: AS-BUILT LSPLAN P1 FREEDOM.

See attached document: DWG_AS-BUILT_2012-05-01.

See attached document: DWGs_Final_2015-02-03.