Exhibit 8 - PPQ_9.20.23_FINAL.pdf

PDF 638 KB Posted

Attached to
Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Spacecraft (SC) Phase B Implementation- Final RFP Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80GSFC23R0010F
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Center

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for evaluation of contractor performance on a previous federal contract. It requests assessment of a contractor's experience, performance quality, schedule adherence, cost controls, and management for work elements related to Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Spacecraft Phase B Implementation. Respondents provide ratings on a scale of Very High to Very Low for the contractor's technical, schedule and cost performance, as well as its communication, subcontractor management, and personnel retention. The questionnaire also collects contract details including value, period of performance, and cost/award fee data. Completed questionnaires are due to Lisa Mullen at NASA by November 1, 2023 to inform source selection for the Geostationary Extended Observations Spacecraft Phase B Implementation final solicitation issued by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Geostationary Extended Observations (GeoXO) Spacecraft (SC) Phase B Implementation- Final RFP, newest first.
File Type Posted
Amendment 1 Amend Section L.12.pdf PDF
GeoXO Spacecraft Final RFP Questions and Answers 3.pdf PDF
GeoXO Spacecraft SF33.pdf PDF
GeoXO Spacecraft Final RFP Questions and Answers Two (002).pdf PDF
GeoXO Spacecraft Final RFP Questions and Answers.pdf PDF
9.29.23 Final GeoXO Spacecraft Implementation Phase B RFP.pdf PDF
Attachment B-418-XO-SCCDRL-0053_V_1_0_final.pdf PDF
Attachment C-418-XO-PSPEC-0051_V_1_5_final.pdf PDF
Attachment F-2-418-XO-LMXUIID-0067 V1_4.pdf PDF
Attachment G-1-418-XO-IRD-0044_V_1_4.pdf PDF
Attachment O-GeoXO SC Engineering Units and Risk.pdf PDF
Attachment V -DEIA Plan DRD.pdf PDF
Attachment X - Small Business Subcontracting Plan.pdf PDF
Enclosure 3 Financial Capability Assessment (SEPT) 2020.pdf PDF
GeoXO Spacecraft Final RFP Cover Letter.pdf PDF
Attachment F-1-418-XO-GXIUIID-0023_V_2_4.pdf PDF
Attachment F-5-418-XO-ACXUIID-0072_V_1_6.pdf PDF
Attachment I-418-XO-RPT-0042 Radiation Environment for Electronic Devices final V1_2 RO (1).pdf PDF
Attachment M RESERVED.pdf PDF
Attachment P_GeoXO_TAM_Table Phase B - Final Rev1.pdf PDF
Attachment Q GeoXO MEL_09_28_2023_rev1.pdf PDF
Attachment R_GeoXO Link Budget Templates 09_28_2023.pdf PDF
Attachment AB - Requirements Statements List.pdf PDF
Attachment D-418-XO-GIRD-0041_V_2_4.pdf PDF
Attachment E-418-XO-PRAD-0037_V_1_6.pdf PDF
Attachment F-3-418-XO-GXSUIID-0030_V_1_6a.pdf PDF
Attachment F-6-418-XO-PTRUIID-0141_V_1_0.pdf PDF
Attachment G-2-418-XO-IRD-0043_V_1_4.pdf PDF
Attachment H-418-XO-SCMAR-0083_V_2_0-final (003).pdf PDF
Attachment L-GeoXO_ConOps_v1-0-final.pdf PDF
Attachment S - OCI Plan DRD.pdf PDF
Attachment T - Organizational Conflict of Interest Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment W -Diversity-Equity- Inclusion and Accessibility Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment AA- Safety and Health Plan.pdf PDF
Enclosure 2 -418-XO-PLN-0109 GeoXO QASP FINAL V2.0 RO.pdf PDF
Attachment F-4-418-XO-OCXUIID-0062_V_1_7.pdf PDF
Attachment K-418-XO-RPT-0045-FPGA 1.0.pdf PDF
Attachment A-418-XO-SCSOW-0122_V_1_0_final.pdf PDF
Attachment J-418-XO-RPT-0039_V_1_0.pdf PDF
Attachment N-Spacecraft Final RFP WBS dictionary 9-1-23cc.pdf PDF
Attachment U RESERVED.pdf PDF
Attachment Y - IT Security Management Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment Z- Information Technology (IT) Security Applicable Doc List docx.pdf PDF
Attachment AC -Government Furnished Property.pdf PDF
Enclosure 1 GeoXO SC Draft PEP Sept 2023.pdf PDF
GeoXO Spacecraft Cost Exhibits 1-7 September 2023.pdf PDF
Show all 46

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS

Sections 1-3 provide for contract-related descriptive information and identification of the evaluator.

Section 4 lists the major work elements within our Statement of Work (SOW). Please provide your assessment of the “relevant experience” and “performance” associated with our SOW evidenced within the contract for which you are a reference. “Experience” means a contractor who has performed work in the specific SOW Element. “Did not Perform” means that the specific SOW element was not performed under the contract.

Section 5 evaluates the contractor’s technical, schedule, and cost performance and management. (Additional pages may be used for comments if desired). If you cannot answer any questions, please circle “N/R” for Not Rated.

The following definitions are offered for your use in assigning a performance rating for each of the factors in Sections 5 and 6:

Very High

(VH)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance is of exceptional merit;

indicating exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) problems with no adverse effect on overall performance.

High

(H)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates very effective performance that would be fully responsive to contract requirements with contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part with only minor problems with little identifiable effect on overall performance.

Moderate

(M)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance demonstrates effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable problems, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance.

Low

(L)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable problems with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance.

Very Low

(VL)

The Offeror’s relevant past performance does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; problems in one or more areas which, adversely affect overall performance.

N/R Not Rated

Section 6 provides for evaluation of the contractor’s management of cost and award/incentive fee history.

RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE, VIA E-MAIL TO Lisa.A.Mullen@nasa.gov BY NOVEMBER 1, 2023.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Contract Information

A. Name of Company/Division Being Evaluated:_____________________

B. Address:_____________________________________________

C. Contractor Cage Code and/or DUNS number

D. Contract Number:_______________________________________

E. Contract Type:_________________________________________

F. Period of Performance (including options): From:______ To:_______

G. Total Contract Value:_____________________________________

H. Award Information: Competitive: Yes___ No___ Basis of Selection: Technical___ Cost/Price___ Other (specify)_________________________

2. Description of Contract

Briefly describe the services provided under this contract:

During the contract performance being evaluated, this firm was the:

Prime Contractor____ Significant Subcontractor ____ Team Member ____ Other (describe)____________________________________________

Does a corporate or business relationship exist between the firm being evaluated and your organization?

Yes ___ No ___. If yes, please describe: ___________________________

3. Evaluator Information

Name: _____________________________________________________ Title: _______________________________________________________ Agency/Company: ____________________________________________ E-mail Address: _______________________________________________ Phone: ______________ Date Questionnaire Completed: _____________ Role in Program/Contract: ______________________________________ Length of Involvement in this Program/ Contract: _____________________

This form contains Source Selection Information when completed. See FAR 3.104. 5

5. General Performance Survey

NO PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS

PERFORMANCE RATING

(Please Circle)

QUALITY

1. Quality of services and support provided VH H M L VL N/R

2. Timely identification and mitigation of risks VH H M L VL N/R

3.

Ability to identify and correct performance deficiencies in a timely manner

VH H M L VL N/R

4.

Demonstrated understanding and compliance with mission safety requirements and safety record

VH H M L VL N/R

Comment:

SCHEDULE

5.

Timeliness, quality, and accuracy of schedule estimates and reporting

6. Ability to meet/exceed schedule milestones VH H M L VL N/R

COST

7.

Ability to establish realistic cost estimates and adhere to estimated costs

VH H M L VL N/R

8.

Ability to anticipate, identify and control cost growth.

BUSINESS/MANAGEMENT

9.

Communicating/interfacing with Government and overall responsiveness to Government requests

VH H M L VL N/R

10.

Ability to effectively manage the contract including subcontractor performance, if applicable

VH H M L VL N/R

11.

Ability to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, including ability to fill key vacancies in a timely manner.

VH H M L VL N/R

12.

Adequacy of Contractor’s system(s) for processing task orders and/or changes.

VH H M L VL N/R

13.

Ability to meet Small Business Subcontracting Plan Goals

This form contains Source Selection Information when completed. See FAR 3.104. 6

Section 6:

What is the Contract Value:

Initial Value Current Value Estimated Cost: $___________ $____________

Fee: $___________ $____________

Total Value: $___________ $_____________

What are the total contract expenditures to date (cost/fees to date based on invoices, reports, etc)?

What is the Annual Contract Value to Date (The current contract expenditures to date divided by the number of years of performance to date)?

For example (note, these example numbers may not relate to this specific procurement):

Assume your contract is a current five-year contract, is still ongoing, and the latest cost report reflects a cost/fee of $43,500,000 through the first 2 years and 4 months (to date). In this example, current/total Contract Expenditures incurred to Date are $43,500,000 and associated period of performance for those expenditures, expressed in years, is 2.33 years.

Therefore, the Average Annual Cost/Fee Incurred to Date: $18,669,528 ($43,500,000/2.33 years)

Was there a cost overrun? ( ) Yes ( ) No If yes, please explain:

If this was an award fee contract, what are the individual and/or average ratings of performance by your organization? Please attach any available award fee letters or database entries.

Please comment on particularly strong/weak points of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, and/or cost). If the Overall Contract Performance Rating below is less than Very High, please provide some explanation in this section on why a higher rating was not provided.

Overall Contract Performance Rating (circle one)

Very High High Moderate Low Very Low

If less than Very High-Performance Rating, please explain:

This form contains Source Selection Information when completed. See FAR 3.104. 7

Please add any other comments you may feel are pertinent.

Rater’s Signature Date

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .