Exhibit 11. PastPerf Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 679 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24W26R0017
- Issued by
-
Department of Veterans Affairs
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed to collect and evaluate contractor performance information for federal contract solicitation 36C24W26R0017 related to a VA/CBOC facility lease in Twin Falls, Idaho.
Section A of the questionnaire is completed by the prospective contractor and collects basic contract information including the contractor's name and address, point of contact, phone number, assessor contract award number, description of services provided, contract award date, contract amount (initial and final), and period of performance. The contractor must authorize release of information to RPO West Leasing and the Lease Contracting Officer, Christina Wolf, via email at Christina.Wolf@va.gov.
Section B is completed by assessors and uses a five-level rating scale (Exceptional/Very Low Risk, Satisfactory/Low Risk, Marginal/Moderate Risk, Unsatisfactory/High Risk, and Neutral/Unknown Risk) to evaluate contractor performance across three primary categories: Quality of Service (compliance with contractual requirements and overall service quality), Schedule (timely delivery and cost control with accurate invoicing), and Business Relations (business practices, working relationships, report/invoice submission timeliness, and responsiveness to complaints). Assessors must provide rationales for any marginal or unsatisfactory ratings, indicate willingness to award future contracts, and provide an overall performance rating. The assessor must identify their role (Contract Specialist/Lease Contracting Officer, Technical Project Lead/Project Officer, or other) and period of involvement with the contract.
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for whom past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
Solicitation Number 36C24W26R0017 Project/Requirement VA/CBOC - Twin Falls, ID Customer/Agency CFM - RPO West Leasing / VA
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s ______________________________________ Name and Address: ______________________________________
2. Contractor Point of Contact: ___________________________________________
3. Phone number (with area code): ___________________________________________
4. Assessor Contract Award number: _________________________________________
5. Description of Services provided under contract:
6. Contract award date: ___________ Contract Amount: Initial ___________Final ____
7. Period of Performance or Delivery Date: _________________________
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name Title Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to RPO West Leasing, Christina Wolf, Lease Contracting Officer, via email at Christina.Wolf@va.gov.
(Signature)
(Name and Title of Authorizing Official) (Date)
RLP 36C24W26R0017
Exhibit No. 11
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors).
RATING SCALE Definitions
Past Performance Ratings and Definitions
E Exceptional/Very Low Risk Offer’s past performance record provides essentially no doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
S Satisfactory/Low Risk Offer’s past performance record provides little doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
M Marginal/Moderate Risk Offer’s past performance record, although satisfactory, provides some doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
U Unsatisfactory/High Risk Offer’s past performance record provides substantial doubt that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
N Neutral/Unknown Risk The offeror has no relevant past performance record. A thorough search was unable to identify any past performance. Will not rate favorably or unfavorably.
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor’s compliance with contractual requirements. _________ (E /S /M /U /N)
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service. _________ (E /S /M /U /N)
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
1. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements. _________ (E /S /M /U /N)
2. Rate the contractor’s ability to control cost and submit invoices.
Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely? _________ (E /S /M /U /N)
BUSINESS RELATIONS
1. Overall rating of contractor’s business practices (e.g., maintaining A positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively Resolution of any problems, etc.) _________ (E /S /M /U /N)
2. Rate the working relationship between contractor’s management, and your company (i.e., contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer). _________ (E /S /M /U /N)
3. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner. _________ (E /S /M /U /N)
4. Rate the contractor’s responsiveness to customer complaint resolution. _________ (E /S /M /U /N)
5. Overall rating of contractor’s business relations. _________ (E /S /M /U /N)
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor? (Mark with an “X”) ______ Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.
______ Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.
______ Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor but would do so if no better alternative existed.
______ Do not wish to award another contract to this contractor.
______ Would not award another contract to this contractor.
Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
Exceptional Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
Role Period of Involvement Contract Specialist/LEASE
CONTRACTING OFFICER
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
(Signature) (Date) (Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)
(Phone Number) (Email)
Assessor Name
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .