ESBD_549439_1786758244534_TSC RFI 358-26-002 Appendix H Shared User Operating Model.pdf
PDF 119 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Vibroacoustic, Vibration, and Electromagnetic Interference/Compatibility (EMI/EMC) Mobile Test Capabilities
- Solicitation number
- RFI-TSC-358-26-02
- Issued by
- Texas
About this file
This is an appendix to a Request for Information (RFI #358-26-002) issued by the Texas Space Commission under the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, addressing Electromagnetic Interference/Compatibility (EMI/EMC) Electronic State Business Daily requirements. The document provides a structured framework for describing a shared-user operating model for vibroacoustic, vibration, and EMI/EMC mobile test capabilities. Rather than detailing a specific procurement with dates and quantities, this appendix presents a comprehensive template with 19 operational elements that respondents must address when proposing how the capability could serve government, academic, nonprofit, startup, small-business, and established commercial users on fair, safe, secure, and sustainable terms. The elements span governance structures, customer eligibility criteria, technical feasibility screening, safety classifications, scheduling protocols, rate structures, security approaches, and performance metrics.
The appendix requires proposers to delineate current operating models against proposed shared-user models and provide supporting evidence or assumptions for each operational element. Key focus areas include affordable access mechanisms for startups, small businesses, and academic users; cost allocation and rate-card structures differentiated by user class; intellectual property and data handling procedures; security protocols addressing foreign persons, export control, and classified information; liability and insurance frameworks; dispute resolution processes; utilization and economic-impact reporting; financial sustainability through operator revenue, subsidies, and maintenance reserves; and statewide access commitments. The template includes a section on fee units and access classes, establishing a basis for subsidized or minimum-cost offerings across government, academic/nonprofit, startup/small business, and commercial user categories.
View the file
Other files
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TEXAS SPACE COMMISSION | RFI #358-26-002 | Electromagnetic Interference/Compatibility (EMI/EMC)
Electronic State Business Daily (ESBD) Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts Office Page 27 of 38
Appendix H - Shared-User Operating Model.
Describe how the capability could serve government, academic, nonprofit, startup, small-business, and established commercial users on fair, safe, secure, and sustainable terms.
Responses may compare more than one model.
Operating-Model Element Current Proposed Evidence / Assumption
Proposed owner, operator, and asset custodian Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Governance and advisory structure Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Customer eligibility and intake Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Technical feasibility screening Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Safety and hazard classification Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Scheduling, priority, and deconfliction Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Treatment of owners, affiliates, anchor tenants, and government priority Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Rate card, cost allocation, deposits, cancellation, and overtime Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Affordable access for startups, small businesses, and academic users Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Hours, surge operations, maintenance windows, and downtime policy Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Quality, calibration, configuration control, and document control Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Security, foreign-person, export-control, CUI, classified, and data-separation approach Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Customer IP, test data, publication, and records Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Insurance, liability, indemnity, and article-risk allocation Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Complaint, dispute, and conflict-resolution process Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Performance metrics and service-level targets Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Utilization and economic-impact reporting Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Operator revenue, subsidy, maintenance reserve, and lifecycle renewal Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Public-benefit commitments and statewide access Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
Transition, relocation, sale, encumbrance, or closure controls Current model: Proposed shared-user model: Assumptions / supporting document:
H.1. Example, Fee Units and Access Classes:
Service / Fee Unit Government Academic / Nonprofit Startup / Small Business Commercial Basis / Subsidy / Minimum
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .