ESBD_491035_1773407578150_576SM001 Addenda 3.pdf

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DIVISION

ADDENDUM No. 3

DATE: 3/13/2026

SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR STATEWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS -

STORMWATER SERVICES

SOLICITATION: 601CT0000005606

CHANGE TO PROPOSAL DUE DATE

The proposal submission deadline has been revised as follows:

• Original Proposal Due Date: March 20, 2026

• Revised Proposal Due Date: 12:00 noon, April 1, 2026

Proposals must be received via Bonfire no later than the revised deadline.

This Addendum is issued to modify the above-referenced solicitation. Except as specifically stated herein, all other terms and conditions of the solicitation remain unchanged.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

IN THE SUBMISSION OF THIS RESPONSE, RESPONDENT MUST ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT OF THIS

ADDENDUM; OTHERWISE, THIS RESPONSE MAY NOT BE GIVEN CONSIDERATION. RESPONDENT

MUST ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT BY ATTACHING THIS DOCUMENT VIA PDF TO YOUR PROPOSAL

COVER PAGE WHEN COMPLETING THE SUBMISSION FOR ATTACHMENT 1 IN BONFIRE.

SIGNED:

COMPANY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

COMPANY NAME

Reopened Questions/Response Question 1: How do the potential "Bonus Points" work?

Response 1: Bonus points are awarded based on projects associated with transportation right-of-way or completed within the applicable timeframe.

Question 2: How many total bonus points are available?

Response 2: TxDOT does not publish or disclose internal scoring formulas, weighting calculations, or role specific bonus point allocations beyond what is expressly stated in the solicitation.

Question 3: Are these points in addition to the total points for each Key Personnel role?

Response 3: While these bonus points will be included in the score, it will not cause any proposal to exceed the possible allowed points as stated in the RFP.

Question 4: Are bonus points awarded ONLY if a project was BOTH "associated with transportation right-of-way AND completed within the applicable timeframe, which appears to be either 5 or 10 years, depending on the reference?

Response 4: See Response 1.

Question 5: Alternatively, can partial bonus points be awarded if only one of these criteria is met?

Response 5: Bonus points are awarded based on response 1.

Question 6: Regarding the potential "Bonus Points," all three categories, MS4, CGP and Senior GIS, reflect bonus point eligibility in both the original RFP and Addendum 1. However, there appears to be an inconsistency between the responses to Question 4 and Question 11. The response to Question 4 states that MS4 bonus points require projects completed within the past 10 years, while CGP and Senior GIS bonus points reference projects completed within the past 5 years.

In contrast, the response to Question 11 states, "....For certain categories firms can receive bonus points for projects completed within the last 10 year, but there is no time limit on how old the project is." Please clarify this discrepancy between Response 4 and Response 11, specifically, whether all categories, MS4, CGP and Senior GIS roles, may receive bonus points for projects completed within the past 10 years?

Response 6: Addendum No. 2, Response 4 clarifies the number of years for each category.

Question 7: Are the potential bonus points awarded in addition to the 25 points allocated across the MS4 role, with a maximum of 11.5 points, the CGP role, with a maximum of 7.5 points, and the Senior GIS Analyst role, with a maximum of 6 points?

Response 7: Any bonus points, if awarded, are applied within the applicable qualification category and do not increase the overall maximum evaluation score of 100 points.

Question 8: If so, how are the bonus points weighted, specifically, how many bonus points are available for each role?

Response 8: See Response 2.

Question 9: Can you please confirm that the min/max for firm and team project descriptions is 7 / 14 (which corresponds to the limits for key individuals)?

Response 9: See RFP Adobe Page 14 of 22 (document page 19 of 60). The minimum and maximum number of verifiable projects for Firm and Team Experience identified in each subsection (Sections 1.1–1.4) are correct as written and remain unchanged.