Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-045P.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Blue Ridge Parkway Preservation Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-17-R-00003
About this file
Bridge Inspection Rpt_STR#5140-045P
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
VA ROUTE 690 BRIDGE
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY OVER VA ROUTE 690
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5140-045P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/14
Report prepared by: WS
MILE POINT: 130.95
Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 210.79 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-045P
VA ROUTE 690 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/14
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 26.0 FT (7.9 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 24.0 FT (7.3 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK W IDTH: ...................... 48.0 FT (14.6 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB W IDTH: ..... 26.5 FT (8.1 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ UNKNOWN YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1N12 / 2064 SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 20 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1981-JOINT REPAIR. 2008-NEW PAVEMENT AND RAILING.
LOCATION
BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 130.95 (KM PT 210.79)
STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 0.6 MILES TO VA ROUTE 220
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. VA ROUTE 690
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete frame is in good structural condition overall and has only minor problems at this time. These include a lack of reflective object markers along the underpass roadway to define the structure limits, and a missing vertical clearance sign from the east underpass roadway approach.
Repairs should be made as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: D.K. JOHNSON, J.T. ALLEN (CLARK NEXSEN)
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
D. KEITH JOHNSON, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW :
GARY J. GOODLIN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6253
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/31/15
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-045P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
222.9 REMOVE DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY. 1 LS
222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS ALONG
UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
4 EA
60 PERIODICALLY REMOVE VEGETATION GROWTH FROM STRUCTURE. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-045P
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
N
58. DECK ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
OTHER
ALIGNMENT
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
FASCIA(E)
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
TRUSSES
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
GIRDERS OR BEAMS
BEARING DEVICES
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE
OTHER
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
UTILITIES
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
RIDEABILITY
WEARING SURFACE
EXPANSION JOINTS
DECK SLAB
ABUTMENTS
60. SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
10.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
PAINT
11.
N
N N G N N N N N G
N G
G G N G G N
N
N
N
N
58.3, 222.4 MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT ALONG
EAST EDGE.
58.6, 222.3 MINOR CHECKING OF TIMBER RAILINGS. MINOR RUSTING OF STEEL
BACKING PLATES AND CONNECTION HARDWARE.
59.3 MINOR SPALLING ON TOP OF NORTHEAST CORNER OF FRAME.
MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB
UNDERSIDE AT CONSTRUCTION JOINT. EXPOSED REBAR CHAIRS
ON SLAB UNDERSIDE THROUGHOUT. MINOR VEGETATION GROWTH
OVERHANGING WEST SIDE OF SLAB.
60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS.
60.6 MINOR DIAGONAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON
WINGWALLS; MINOR VEHICLE SCRAPES. MINOR MOSS GROWTH
ON WINGWALLS. VEGETATION GROWTH OVERHANGING
SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.
60.7 WEEP HOLE BLOCKED WITH DEBRIS AT NORTHWEST WINGWALL.
MINOR LOSS OF SOIL FILL ALONG UNDERPASS SHOULDERS DUE TO
WEEP HOLES.
60.9 MINOR EROSION AT WEST EDGE OF FLOOR SLAB ALONG
SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. MINOR EROSION BEHIND NORTHEAST,
NORTHWEST; AND SOUTHEAST WINGWALLS.
60.12 MINOR SPALLING OF WEST EDGE OF FLOOR SLAB. MINOR
TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF FLOOR SLAB.
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G
PILE BENTS 2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. N
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. N
FOUNDATIONS 5. N
WINGWALLS 6. F
WEEP HOLES 7. G
EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. F
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION 11. N
OTHER (FLOOR SLAB) 12. G
PIER(S)
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N
PILE BENTS 14. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. N
FOUNDATIONS 16. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. N
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. N
OTHER 19. N
INSPECTION DATE: 10/29/14
STRUCTURE NO. 5140-045P FIELD INSPECTION REPORT
VA ROUTE 690 BRIDGE
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.
1. ALIGNMENT
61. CHANNEL N
9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS 7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION 5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
1. APPROACH SLABS
((UNDERPASS ROADWAY
N N G G G G G G F
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.
FOUNDATION 3.
WEEP HOLES 2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.
APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.
TRANSITIONS B.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
222.7 NO OBJECT MARKERS PRESENT ALONG UNDERPASS ROADWAY.
14'-1" CLEARANCE POSTED AT BOTH UNDERPASS APPROACHES.
222.9 MINOR DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES AT UNDERPASS
ROADWAY BENEATH BRIDGE; MINOR EROSION AND SETTLEMENT
OF UNDERPASS SHOULDERS.
36.D RAIL ENDS NOT TERMINATED SAFELY.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-045P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 20 18 33 30
HS 32 29 54 49
TYPE 3 28 25 46 42
TYPE 3S2 41 37 68 62
TYPE 3-3 54 49 90 82
DESIGN LOADING: H20 (M18)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: RATING IS BASED ON DESIGN LOAD OF STRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-045P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... VA ROUTE 690 BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 161 - ROANOKE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-045P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... VA ROUTE 690
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 045P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140045P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.6 MILES TO VA ROUTE 220
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. ROANOKE (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1N12 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 130.95 (KM PT 210.79)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 2064 (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
07 - FRAME
24.0 FT (7.3 M)
26.0 FT (7.9 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
0 - UNKNOWN
0 - UNKNOWN
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. N - NOT APPLICABLE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. N - NOT APPLICABLE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 4 - H20 (M18) (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 32.0 TONS (29.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 54.0 TONS (49.0 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-045P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 26.5 FT (8.1 M)
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°10'16.30"
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 80°05'11.10"
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 75 MI (121 KM)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 02
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:
(30) YEAR OF ADT:
(114) FUTURE ADT:
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 3.5 FT (1.1 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1110
(75A) TYPE OF WORK: .............. 35 - GENERAL REHAB
(75B) WORK DONE BY: ............. 1 - CONTRACT
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: .. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(52) DECK WIDTH:
(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:
(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:
LEFT SHOULDER:
RIGHT SHOULDER:
(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:
(34) SKEW ANGLE:
(35) DECK FLARE?:
(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:
(50) SIDEWALKS:
LEFT :
RIGHT :
(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
RAIL CONFIGURATION:
MATERIAL:
DESIGN TYPE:
(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:
(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:
48.0 FT (14.6 M)
30.0 FT (9.1 M)
22.0 FT (6.7 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
4.0 FT (1.2 M)
0 - NO MEDIAN
20 °
NO
26.5 FT (8.1 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
0.0 FT (0.0 M)
1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
8 - TIMBER/OTHER
3 - SIMPLE RAIL (joints at each
2.25 FT (0.69 M)
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
14.33 FT (4.37 M)
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
N - Not over waterway.
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
$0
$0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1981-JOINT REPAIR. 2008-NEW PAVEMENT AND RAILING.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:80�05'11.10 http:37�10'16.30
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-045P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-045P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD CUMBERLAND KNOB
PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW
LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #4 - LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF
ASPHALT PAVEMENT ALONG EAST EDGE
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CHECKING OF RAILINGS;
WEST RAIL SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL RUSTING AND
CORROSION OF STEEL BACKING PLATES AND
CONNECTION HARDWARE; WEST RAIL
SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - EROSION BEHIND SOUTHEAST WINGWALL
PHOTO #8 - EROSION BEHIND NORTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO #9 - SPALLING ON TOP OF NORTHEAST CORNER OF FRAME
PHOTO #10 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH; NOTE
EXPOSED REBAR CHAIRS
PHOTO #11 - VEGETATION GROWTH
OVERHANGING WEST SIDE OF SLAB AND
SOUTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO #12 - LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB UNDERSIDE AT
CONSTRUCTION JOINT; ALSO NOTE TYPICAL
EXPOSED REBAR CHAIRS
PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH
ABUTMENT; NOTE TYPICAL DEBRIS
ACCUMULATION ALONG CURBLINES OF
UNDERPASS APPROACH BENEATH BRIDGE
PHOTO #14 - WEEP HOLE BLOCKED WITH
DEBRIS AT NORTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO #15 - TYPICAL TRANSVERSE
CRACKING OF FLOOR SLAB; WEST END
SHOWN
PHOTO #16 - SPALLING OF WEST EDGE OF
FLOOR SLAB
PHOTO #17 - EROSION AT WEST END OF FLOOR SLAB ALONG
SOUTHWEST WINGWALL
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .