Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-019P.pdf

PDF 1 MB Posted

Attached to
Blue Ridge Parkway Preservation Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
DTFH71-17-R-00003
Issued by
Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration

About this file

Bridge Inspection Rpt_STR#5140-019P

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Blue Ridge Parkway Preservation, newest first.
File Type Posted
DTFH71-17-R-00003-Amend_0001.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-053P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-018P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-042P.pdf PDF
VETS-4212.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-047P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-165P.pdf PDF
RFP_Solicitation_-_NP-BLRI_PV_PRES_FY16.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-043P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-040P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-037P.pdf PDF
Subcontracting_plan.doc DOC document
ADV_Offeror's_Qualifications_Form_-_NP-BLRI_PV_PRES_FY16.doc DOC document
Plans_-_NP-BLRI_PV_PRES_FY16.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-054P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-041P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-048P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-049P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-038P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-044P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-017P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-046P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-052P.pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-051P.pdf PDF
Report_NEPA.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-039P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-050P.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Rpt_STR_5140-045P.pdf PDF
Synopsis_NP-BLRI_PV_PRES_FY16-Rev.pdf PDF
Synopsis_NP-BLRI_PV_PRES_FY16.pdf PDF
Show all 31

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

VA ROUTE 617 BRIDGE

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY OVER VA ROUTE 617

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5140-019P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 10/16/12

Report prepared by: WS

MILE POINT: 93.17

Federal Highway Administration KILOMETER POINT: 149.92 Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5140-019P

VA ROUTE 617 BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/16/12

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... FRAME NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 35.0 FT (10.7 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 35.0 FT (10.7 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 35.0 FT (10.7 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ UNKNOWN CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 30.5 FT (9.3 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 1K5 / 2033A SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 42 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1981-JOINT REPAIR.

LOCATION

BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY MILE POINT: ..................... 93.17 (KM PT 149.92)

STATE: ................................. VIRGINIA LOCATION: 2.3 MILES TO VA ROUTE 695

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. VA ROUTE 617

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete frame bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include minor to moderate deterioration of the parapet and wingwall masonry mortar joints in a few locations and severe deterioration of the expansion joint material in the parapets. It should be noted that vegetation has been cleared from around the structure since the last inspection.

Corrective action should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: J. THOMAS, R. TAYLOR (VOLKERT, INC.)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

JOE THOMAS, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 2/28/13

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-019P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.6, 60.6 CLEAN AND REPOINT PARAPET AND WINGWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AS

NECESSARY.

1 LS

58.2 CLEAN AND RESEAL EXPANSION JOINTS IN PARAPETS. 1 LS

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ...

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-019P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK N ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

N1. DECK SLAB

P2. EXPANSION JOINTS

G3. WEARING SURFACE

G4. RIDEABILITY

N5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

F6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

G7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

N8. UTILITIES

N9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

N10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

N

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

1. BEARING DEVICES

N

G3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

N5. TRUSSES

N6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

N7. PAINT

G8. FASCIA(E)

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

G10. ALIGNMENT

N11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

58.2 SEVERE DETERIORATION OF EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL IN

PARAPETS.

58.6 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS IN A FEW LOCATIONS.

59.3 MINOR CRACKING OF SLAB UNDERSIDE WITH EFFLORESCENCE IN

SOME LOCATIONS. GRAFFITI ON SLAB UNDERSIDE AT ABUTMENTS.

59.8 MINOR TO MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE ON RING STONES.

60.1 SMALL TREE GROWTH IN FRONT OF NORTH ABUTMENT AT WEST

END. WIDESPREAD GRAFFITI ON ABUTMENT BREASTWALL

MASONRY.

MINOR SEASONAL VINE GROWTH ON SOUTH ABUTMENT

BREASTWALL HAS BEEN REMOVED SINCE PREVIOUS INSPECTION.

60.6 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF WINGWALL MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS. MODERATE VERTICAL CRACK IN NORTHWEST

WINGWALL FROM GROUNDLINE TO RING STONES. MINOR TO

MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH ALONG WINGWALLS.

ABUTMENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS 1. G

PILE BENTS 2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 3. N

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS 4. N

FOUNDATIONS 5. N

WINGWALLS 6. F

WEEP HOLES 7. G

EXPANSION JOINTS 8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 9. G

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION 11. N

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N

PILE BENTS 14. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS 15. N

FOUNDATIONS 16. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 17. N

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 18. N

OTHER 19. N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5140-019P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION 3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 2.

ALIGNMENT 1.

61. CHANNEL N

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS 7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION 5.

SURFACING 4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

RELIEF JOINTS 2.

1. APPROACH SLABS

(UNDERPASS ROADWAY)

N N N G G G N G G

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION 5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.

FOUNDATION 3.

WEEP HOLES 2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS D.

APPROACH GUARDRAILS C.

TRANSITIONS B.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 0

N N N

222.5 STEEP ROADWAY EMBANKMENT DROP-OFF AT END OF

SOUTHWEST WINGWALL.

222.9 LARGE FALLEN TREE IN SHOULDER OF WEST UNDERPASS

APPROACH; MAJORITY OF TREE HAS BEEN CUT AND REMOVED.

36.A PARAPET HEIGHT OF 2'-0" DOES NOT MEET CURRENT MINIMUM

HEIGHT SPECIFICATION OF 2'-3" FOR TRAFFIC BARRIERS.

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5140-019P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 23 21 38 34

TYPE 3 20 18 33 30

TYPE 3S2 30 27 50 45

TYPE 3-3 39 35 66 60

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND CONDITION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-019P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY (1) STATE: ....................................... 513 - VIRGINIA (VA)

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... VA ROUTE 617 BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 023 - BOTETOURT

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5140-019P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 1 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... VA ROUTE 617

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 019P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. BLUE RIDGE PARKWAY

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5140019P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 2.3 MILES TO VA ROUTE 695

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. ROANOKE (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 1K5 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 93.17 (KM PT 149.92)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... 2033A (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .... N/A

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

07 - FRAME

35.0 FT (10.7 M)

35.0 FT (10.7 M)

0 - UNKNOWN

0 - UNKNOWN

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 23.0 TONS (20.9 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 38.0 TONS (34.5 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/12 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5140-019P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 30.5 FT (9.3 M)

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 37°27'58.60"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 79°41'58.70"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 30 MI (48 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 01

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 1 - HIGHWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... N

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 4.8 FT (1.5 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL: .......................... N

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 0NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(52) DECK WIDTH:

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:

LEFT SHOULDER:

RIGHT SHOULDER:

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:

(34) SKEW ANGLE:

(35) DECK FLARE?:

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT :

RIGHT :

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION:

MATERIAL:

DESIGN TYPE:

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK:

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE:

35.0 FT (10.7 M)

30.0 FT (9.1 M)

22.0 FT (6.7 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

4.0 FT (1.2 M)

0 - NO MEDIAN

42 °

NO

30.5 FT (9.3 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

0.0 FT (0.0 M)

3 - PARAPET ONLY

9 - OTHER

1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

2.00 FT (0.61 M)

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

15.50 FT (4.72 M)

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

N - Not over waterway.

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

$0

$0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1981-JOINT REPAIR.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:79�41'58.70 http:37�27'58.60

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5140-019P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5140-019P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTHBOUND TOWARD ROANOKE

PHOTO #2 - EAST SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOP SIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING NORTH

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF PARAPET EXPANSION JOINT

MATERIAL, NORTHEAST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #6 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY MORTAR

JOINTS, EAST PARAPET SHOWN

PHOTO #7 - STEEP EMBANKMENT DROPOFF

AT SOUTHWEST WINGWALL END

PHOTO #8 - VERTICAL CRACKING OF

NORTHWEST WINGWALL

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL VIEW OF NORTH ABUTMENT

PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SLAB

UNDERSIDE, NORTHWEST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE

ALONG RING STONES, EAST RING STONES

SHOWN

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL VEGETATION GROWTH

ALONG WINGWALLS, NORTHEAST WINGWALL

SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF UNDERPASS ROADWAY

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .