DTFAWA-16-R-00024_Final SIR Questions and Comments 11-30-2016.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 30 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DTFAWA-16-R-00024
About this file
DTFAWA-16-R-00024_Final SIR Questions and Comments 11-30-2016 (xlsx)
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 288 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| # | Question | SIR No. | SIR Volume No. | RFP Section No. | Page No. | Response | |
| 1 | Section C.3.9.1.4 states that "The contractor must submit a draft Project Management Plan (PMP) with SIR submission." Which volume shall this be included? | Section C and Section F | TBD | C.3.9.1.4 and | |||
| Table F-1 | C-21, F-4 | Please submit draft Project Management Plan (PMP) in Volume II Management Approach. Please see revised language in Section L.6.2.2. | |||||
| 2 | If the draft PMP is required with the SIR submittal, please confirm it is excluded from page limitations. | Section C and Section F | TBD | C.3.9.1.4 and | |||
| Table F-1 | C-21, F-4 | The PMP is not excluded from the page limitations. | |||||
| 3 | Draft SIR Q&A Part 2, Q&A#6 affirms that small business subcontracting goals are 25% of the total contract value. In the final SIR, Section H.11 states that the contractor must set-aside 25% of its contracting dollars for small businesses, and it also states that the FAA's current small business goal is 45%. However, Section L.6.2.5 states that the small business contracting requirement is 45% for the NAVTAC contract. Can the Government clarify the small business contracting requirement is 25% and if that specific goal is based on the total contract ceiling value? If yes, please revise Section L accordingly. | Section H and Section L | 5 | H.11 and L.6.2.5 | H-8 - H.9 and L-18 | Revised Section L.6.2.5 to reflect the subcontracting goals for the NAVTAC contract. | |
| 4 | Please provide Attachment J-1. | Section J | 3 | Attachment J-1 | Attachment J-1 will not be determined until after award. The Labor Rate Tables will be updated with the final Awardee's rates. | ||
| 5 | If the offeror's team does not have any conflict of interest and has not participated on the acquisition team, do we need to complete and return Attachment J-10, Non-Disclosure Agreement with our proposal or would it be non-applicable? | Section J | TBD | Attachment J-10 | Removed Attachment J-11 Non-Disclosure Agreement. | ||
| 6 | If required, which volume should include the completed Attachment J-10, Non-Disclosure Agreement ? | Section J | TBD | Attachment J-10 | Not Required. Please see response to Question 5. | ||
| 7 | Attachment J-8 - J-11 are numbered incorrectly. Please revise. | Section J | 3 | Attachment J-8-J-11 | Revised Attachment J-8 - J-11 to reflect correct numbering. | ||
| 8 | The final SIR states that PPQ reference must be for contracts ongoing or completed within seven years of proposal submission. The PPQ form states five (5) years. Please issue a revised PPQ form. | Section J | 4 | Attachment J-9 | Revised Attachment J-9 PPQ to reflect seven (7) years instead of five (5) years. | ||
| 9 | The PPQ form instructions state a proposal due date of October 22, 2016. Please revise the due date to December 16, 2016. | Section J | 4 | Attachment J-9 | Revised Attachment J-9 to reflect new due date for PPQ form submittals to December 16, 2016. | ||
| 10 | Please clarify that the second listed Program Manager should be the Project Manager. | Section J | 3 | J-7 Price Proposal Bid Model_Final 10-26-16 | Revised Attachment J-7 to mirror Attachment J-2 Labor Category Descriptions. | ||
| 11 | If second Program Manager is meant to say Project Manager, should we assume historical hours? | Section J | 3 | J-7 Price Proposal Bid Model_Final 10-26-16 | Revised Attachment J-7 to mirror Attachment J-2 Labor Category Descriptions. Please note that all labor categories in the J-7 will not have historical hours. | ||
| 12 | Should worksheet J-7F PM include the labor costs of the Program Manager? | Section J | 3 | Section J-7 | All Offerors should include all costs related to Program Management in J-7F. | ||
| 13 | If the J-7F PM worksheet must include the Program Manager labor costs, please confirm that the rates should NOT be double-counted in J-7B-J-7D. | Section J | 3 | Section J-7 | Tab J-7F and Tabs J-7B - J-7D are independent of each other. No costs will be double counted. | ||
| 14 | Per Draft Part Q&A (#6), please confirm that table of contents, cover pages, acronym lists, compliance matrix, and executive summary are NOT included in the page count. | Section L | 1, 2, 4, 5 | L.6.1, Table L-2 | L-10 | Table of contents, cover pages, acronym lists, compliance matrix, and executive summary are NOT included in the page count. | |
| 15 | For Item 8) Worksheet J-7F, how should Offerors provide the detail breakdown of the costs? Please provide format and component instructions. | Section L | 3 | L.6.2.3.2 | L-16 | It is up to the Offeror's discretion as to how the Offeror intends to provide the detailed breakdown costs of Worksheet J-7F. | |
| 16 | Do Offerors have to submit at least two Past Performance Summaries from the prime and one from each major subcontractor? | Section L | 4 | L.6.2.4 | L-17 | Yes. Section L.6.2.4 language has been revised to reflect Past Performance Summaries in the second sentence. | |
| 17 | Please confirm that the "first step" should refer to the Past Performance Summaries. | Section L | 4 | L.6.2.4 | L-17, L-18 | Yes. Section L.6.2.4 language has been revised to reflect Past Performance Summaries in the second sentence. | |
| 18 | Please clarify the reference to section C.8.4 since this appears to be missing from Section C. | Section L | 3 | L.6.2.3.2 | L-16 | The reference should be Section C.3.9.4 Contractor Service Support Facility. | |
| 19 | In which volume shall Offerors include the Compensation Plan with price-supporting information? | Section L | TBD | L.6.2.2.2 | L-13 | The Offeror must describe the basis of its total compensation plan required by AMS Clause 3.6.2-15. The Offeror must not submit any actual salary or pricing information in this description in Volume II, but must include the non-price supporting information identified in AMS Clause 3.6.2-15. | |
| 20 | For the subcontractors' sealed package submissions as required under Volume III, will the government consider limiting this requirement to only major subcontractors as defined in Section L.6.2.4? | Section L | 3 | L.6.2.3.2 and L.6.2.3.3 | L-15 and L-16 | No. All subcontractors should submit sealed packages. | |
| 21 | For the subcontractors' sealed package submissions, do they need to provide 5 CD-ROMs and 1 hard copy as required for Volume III? | Section L | 3 | L.6.2.3.2 and L.6.2.3.3 | L-15 and L-16 | Yes. | |
| 22 | Should the subcontractor submissions include a signed Business Declaration form? | Section L | 3 | L.6.2.3.2 and L.6.2.3.3 | L-15 and L-16 | Yes. Please see revised language in Section L.6.2.6.1 (a). | |
| 23 | Should the subcontractor submissions include a signed Section K reps and certs? | Section L | 3 | L.6.2.3.2 and L.6.2.3.3 | L-15 and L-16 | Yes. Please see revised language in Section L.6.2.6.5(b). | |
| 24 | Does "Part A" refer to Past Performance Questionnaires or Past Performance Summaries? | Section M | 4 | M.6.4 | M-8 | Removed reference to Part A. | |
| 25 | The PPS requires the CO and Program Manager reference. The PPQ requires the CO or COR/COTR. Is it acceptable for PPQs to be completed by the Program Manager? | Section J | 4 | J-9 | Yes. Please see revised Attachment J-9. | ||
| 26 | J-2 Labor Category Descriptions include three (3) levels for the Air Traffic Specialist (Air Traffic Specialist ATS-1, Air Traffic Specialist II ATS-2, and Air Traffic Specialist III ATS-3). J-7 Price Proposal Bid Model only requires one (1) level which is Air Traffic Specialist. We respectfully request that the J-7 Price Proposal Bid Model be revised to include all three (3) levels if it is FAA's intent to use all three levels. | Section J | 3 | J-2 and J-7 | Please see revised Attachment J-7. | ||
| 27 | Please confirm the Historical Data (J-7.1) in the Price Proposal Bid Model is used only for evaluation purposes. | Section J | 3 | J-7.1 | Yes | ||
| 28 | Do Offerors need to submit a completed SIR Section B with the proposal? | Section B | 6 | Section B | Section B will not be determined until after award. The Tables will be updated with the final Awardee's Costs. | ||
| 29 | If yes, in which volume should Section B be included? | Section B | TBD | Section B | Please see response above. | ||
| 30 | SIR Table L-2 lists binder and CD quantities for both Volume 1A and Volume 1B. Do Part A and B need to be submitted in separate binders/CDs? | Section L.6.1 | 1 | Section L | L-10 | Yes | |
| 31 | SIR Table L-2 lists binder and CD quantities for both Volume 3A and Volume 3B. Do Part A and B need to be submitted in separate binders/CDs? | Section L.6.1 | 3 | Section L | L-10 | Yes | |
| 32 | Can subcontractor pricing be submitted on CD only? | Section L.6.2.3 | 3 | Section L | L-15 | No. | |
| 33 | Will the FAA allow for Offerors to submit follow-up questions following the release of any revisions to the SIR resulting from this current round of questions? | DTFAWA-16-R-00024 | N/A | N/A | N/A | No |
34 Position Descriptions, page 12, Logistics Management Specialist (Log 1/2/3) words state “…coordinating day-to-day logistic operations for their organization…”. Can the FAA define to which organization this coordination is intended to be performed? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol I Attachment J-2 Page 12 Coordination will be conducted with operations support organizations such as the FAA's Logistics Center (AML), Technical Training/Academy (AJI/AMA), Second Level Engineering (AJW), and Property Management (ALO).
35 The Position Description for the NAS Operations Specialist (NAS1/2) states, “…Develop a pilot program with major air carriers, and regional airlines to demonstrate the effectiveness of GNSS equipage, develop and certify avionics.” 1. Given the required specialty in avionics will the FAA modify this Position Description to include Aircraft Certification aerospace engineer with a specialty in avionics with experience in avionics design, development, and certification? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol I / II Attachment J-2 Page 12 35-1: The FAA does not intend to modify the NAS Operations Specialist position description.
35-2: The FAA is not considering extending the pilot program to cover general aviation.
| 2. Will the FAA consider extending this requirement to include general aviation? | ||||||
| 36 | The position description for Navigation Engineer describes “…implementation of Navigation and landing systems”? Lighting systems are not specifically mentioned. Are Lighting systems included under the generic term Navigation and Landing Systems. | DTFAWA-16-R-00024 | Vol I / II | Attachment J-2 | Page 14/15 | Yes, lighting systems are included under Navigation and Landing Systems |
37 The MIS & OA Task Order SOW, Section 2.1.1(9) states that Offer shall in conjunction with SNAPIT “Manage personal property in accordance with FAA Personal Property Management order.” May the FAA release additional guidance on the full scope of “personal property (for example the formal Personal Property Management Order)? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol I / J-6a J-6a J-6a Page 2 It is referenced in Section H of the SIR. The FAA Order 4600.27C is a public document.
38 The Airspace Services TO, states that in 2. SCOPE OF WORK that TLIN 0001 (PBN OPS FUNDED) and TLIN 0002 VORMON Implementation Requirement PBN/F&E Funded. However, subtask A. TLIN 0002 is described as PBN/OPS Funded. May the FAA clarify as to which one is correct? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Airspace Services Task Order J6b Pages 2/3 Please see revised Attachment J-6B_AJV-1 SOW.
39 The Airspace Services Task Order in Section 2 subtask A. 2.1.4. states the contractor will provide an environmental review specialist. Is the Environmental Review Specialist a labor category to be added to Attachment J-2 or is this a functional role to which the corresponding labor category will be determined by the Offeror? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Airspace Services Task Order Attachment J-2 Page 1 The environmental review specialist is NOT a labor category, it is a functional role to which the corresponding labor category will be determined by the Offeror.
| 40 | The MIS & OA draft Task Order SOW sites multiple references to the Satellite Navigation Automated Project Information Tool (SNAPIT) in the Scope of Work and the Deliverables Table. In order to enable non-incumbent bidders to understand this tool will the FAA release complete technical and user documentation (including but not limited to information on any applicable source code, operational platform, databases utilized, licensing requirements, and all of its integrated modules as described in section 2.1.7 of MIS & OA Task Order) as well as a demonstration site for SNAPIT? | DTFAWA-16-R-00024 | Vol I / | N/A | Multiple pages in MIS TO | The vendors are not being evaluated on the knowledge of SNAPIT. The reference of SNAPIT is in the Task Order. The evaluation is based on the selection of the labor category. We have already provide the operational platform: SNAPIT is a desktop and web based application (developed under MS Windows client/server environment). The developing tools are, but not limited to, Visual Studio, FoxPro, MS .Net. The databases are MS Access and Oracle. Other tools: search engine. Once the vendor is selected, a demo and technical discussion , documentation, and source code can be provided during the transition period. |
| J-6a |
41 In SOW requirement of GBNA Task Order … “Finalize DVOR System Specification, DME/DVOR deployment, test, and integration activities…”. Is it the FAA’s intent to have a stand-alone DVOR acquisition in addition to DVOR kit procurement? If so, will this represent a formal acquisition with a requirement for a JRC decision? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol I 2.1.1.2a 2 It is not the intent to initiate a DVOR program for procurement of systems. It is our plan to baseline the system specification and assess if any requirements are generated from the VOR MON in the future.
42 In the SOW requirement of GBNA TO … “Assist in the development of a program to baseline a CAT II/III services to include…”, what does ‘CAT II/III services’ refer to in the context of DME/DVOR? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol I 2.1.1.5 2 DME is used in a CAT II/III environment in conjunction with the ILS.
43 In GBNA Task Order SOW section 2.1.1.5 (b), does the task of coordinating with the CRD Office in preparation for JRC FID include developing and generating all AMS documentation and program management support required to drive a JRC decision? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol I 2.1.1.5b, c 2 Yes
44 Attachment J-2 accounts for three levels of the Air Traffic Specialist category and two levels of the Administrative Assistance category. Attachment J-7.1 Historical Data only includes total hours for the Air Traffic Specialist and Administrative Assistant categories. Does the FAA plan to provide a break out of the hours for each of the labor category levels specified in in attachment J-2. DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol III Attachment J-2, Attachment J-7 N/A Please see revised Attachment J-7.
45 Program Manager LCAT appears twice in worksheets J-7B(GS) and J-7C(CS) DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol III Attachment J-7 N/A Please see revised Attachment J-7.
46 C.3.9.1.4(b) states that “…The contractor must submit a draft PMP with their SIR submission.” May the FAA clarify as to which Volume of our proposal the draft PMP should be included and whether or not the draft PMP is counted against the applicable page limit? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 C-22 22 Please submit draft Project Management Plan (PMP) in Volume II Management Approach. Please see revised language in Section L.6.2.2.
| May the FAA clarify as to how the draft PMP will be evaluated in accordance with Section M? | Please see Section M.6.2. | |
| 47 | Attachment J-2 has more labor categories than what is listed in J-7. Please confirm that Offerors are only to respond to the labor categories in J-7. If the list of labor categories in J-7 remains unchanged, is Offeror correct in only using the J-7 labor categories for the Task Order level pricing in J-8? The labor categories in J-2 not included in J-7 are as follows: | Revised Attachment J-7 to mirror Attachment J-2 Labor Category Descriptions. |
| Junior Financial Management Analyst | ||
| Computer Support CS-1 | ||
| Junior Configuration Management Analyst CMA-1 | ||
| Senior Electrical/Electronics Engineer (ILS) EE-3 (ILS) | ||
| Senior Electrical /Electronics Engineer (Lighting) ENG-03 | ||
| Junior Field Implementation Manager GFIM-1 | ||
| Journeyman Field Implementation Manager GFIM-2 | ||
| Senior Field Implementation Manager GFIM-3 |
| Human Factors Engineer (HFE) HF-2 |
| Junior Logistics Management Specialist Log-1 |
| Journeyman Logistics Management Specialist Log-2 |
| Junior Mechanical /Civil Engineer GMCE-1 |
| Journeyman Mechanical /Civil Engineer GMCE-2 |
| NAS Operations Specialist NAS-1 |
| Junior Navigation Engineer NAV-1 |
| Journeyman Navigation Engineer NAV-2 |
| Obstruction Evaluation Specialist |
| Junior Program Analyst (Project Materiel) PM/A-PA-01 |
| Journeyman Program Analyst (Project Materiel) PM/A-PA-01 |
| Senior Program Analyst (Project Materiel) PM/A-PA-01 |
| Quality Assurance Analyst QA-1 |
| Senior Safety Engineer SS-1 |
| Junior Software Engineer SW-1 |
| Junior Technical Writer Tech-W-1 |
| Technical Writer Tech-W-2 |
| 48 | If using a Blended Rate approach (reference L.6.2.3.3(a), may the Offeror add additional columns to the format of the J-7D Rate Build-Up Worksheets to account for subcontractor costs that are additional rate build factors contributing to the final fully burdened T&M Rates? Examples of such additional columns would be to account for each proposed subcontractor, blending percentage for each subcontractor, and additional columns for each subcontractor’s indirect cost. | DTFAWA-16-R-00024 | Vol III | J-7 / L.6.2.3.3(a) | L-16 | Attachment J-7 is not locked. Therefore, the Offeror may add columns at its discretion. However, Offerors are cautioned to not add labor categories not included in the SIR. |
| 49 | C.3.9.4 states that “Separate Regional Rates must be provided for other identified national areas.” May the Offeror have the option to adjust the IDIQ level rates in Attachment J-7 and Task Orders in J-8 to accommodate potential rate differences for the different locations noted in the SOWs across the Task Orders? If allowed, will regional rates be calculated by the FAA in forming the TEP? | DTFAWA-16-R-00024 | Vol III | J-7 / J-8 / C.3.9.4 | C-24 | Regional Rates will be negotiated after award as needed. Regional Rates will not be included in the TEP. |
50 SOW Section 7. Place of Performance under the Obstruction Evaluation Group Task Order includes “NY” and “Alaska” among the locations of performance. May the FAA clarify on the specific region of NY and Alaska as similarly done with the other locations in the Task Order SOWs? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol III J-6C 4 The locations are the FAA Regional Offices in the specified cities.
51 Excel attachments J-7B and J-7C account for 2 Program Manager labor categories, whereas the J-7D rate build-up tabs account for 1 program manager and 1 project manager. Please confirm J7-B and J7-C should match J-7D. DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol III J-7 N/A Please see revised Attachment J-7.
52 L.6.2.3.2(c)(6) regarding the J7-D Rate Build Up 1-7 instructions request “Each Offeror must input its rate build-up information for Years 1-7 for each labor category for non-Washington DC, GS and CS rates.” However the J-7D MS Excel Spreadsheet request for Washington DC Government Site and Contractor Site to be included. May the FAA confirm that J-7D reflect rate build ups for Washington DC? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol III L.6.2.3.2(c)(6) L-15 Section L.6.2.3.2(c)(6) has been revised to the following "“Each Offeror must input its rate build-up information for Years 1-7 for each labor category for Washington DC, GS and CS rates.” The FAA confirmed that J-7D should reflect rate build ups for Washington DC.
53 The instructions for RFP attachment J-7 state “Labor rates with two decimal places must be entered into the Year 1 column of the pricing table. Rates for Year 1-7 will automatically be calculated using the annual escalation rates for Contract Year 1-7 entered into the cells indicated”. May the FAA allow offerors to modify the template to account for differences in the offerors DCAA approved escalation practices? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol III L.6.2.3.2 L-15 Please see revised Attachment J-7.
| 54 | Task order pricing spreadsheets are included in attachment J-7 (Worksheets J-6A through D) while the same spreadsheets are also included in attachment J-8. Please clarify which attachment(s) offeror should use for task order pricing. | DTFAWA-16-R-00024 | Vol III | L.6.2.3.4 | L-16 | All task order pricing should be included on Attachment J-8. The other spreadsheets have been removed from J-7. |
| 55 | In the first paragraph of Section L.6.2.4 of the SIR, the FAA notes contracts provided must be within the last 7 years. May Offeror include the specific contract period of performance in additional to the list of data requested by the FAA for past performance? | DTFAWA-16-R-00024 | Vol IV | L.6.2.4 | L-17, | Yes. |
| L-18 |
56 J-2 Labor Category Descriptions does not provide a labor category which supports the functional area of the SOW C.3.6.8 Test and Evaluation. Shall the Offeror use existing labor categories to comply with the C.3.6.8? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol I J-2 N/A Yes, the labor categories in the SIR will be used.
57 C.3.6.10 tasks to “Write, coordinate, and update system specific integrated logistics support plans (ILSPs).” May the FAA clarify as to the types of systems that require ILSPs? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol I Section C 14 ILSP's will be written and/or updated for systems within each of the Navigation Program Teams to include: Satellite Navigation's WAAS, Ground Based Navaids' DME and VORMON, and Lighting System's PAPI and RRCS. In addition, all future system procurements require an ILSP in accordance with the FAA Acquisition Management System Policy.
58 C.3.6.10 tasks to “Review and coordinate logistics related contract deliverables.” May the FAA clarify further on this deliverables? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol I Section C 14 Logistics related contract deliverables will include documents such as integrated support plans, training development documentation, technical instruction books, engineering drawings, logistics management information, provisioning data, contract depot logistics support transition plans, and part obsolesce studies.
59 Attachment J-8 does not appear to differentiate between contractor and government site rates; will the FAA modify the format? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol III J-8 N/A All Task Orders state that the place of location is a government site. No differentiation is needed at this time.
60 The Government intends to use the historical hours provided in attachment J-7 to calculate labor for TEP. Bidders are to propose both Contractor site and Government site labor rates. Will the Government provide Offeror’s the Contractor site and Government site hours that will be used to calculate the TEP? For example, there are 3,840 hours per year for a Librarian. Will the Government provide bidders guidance on what % of those hours will be multiplied by the contractor site rate and what % will be multiplied by the Government site rate for that category? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol III and M 6.3 M-7 All hours will be considered Government Site and the TEP calculated accordingly. All labor categories without hours (including all Contractor Site rates) will be evaluated for reasonableness, but not included in the TEP.
61 SIR section M.6.3.1 states that part of the total evaluated price will be a product of, “the proposed fully- burdened labor rates for each category multiplied by the historical hours for each labor category provided by the FAA in Attachment J-7.” In cases where bidders are to provide labor rates for multiple levels of a labor category, how will the Government distribute hours for price evaluation among the levels? (see Air Traffic Specialist as an example) DTFAWA-16-R-00024 M 6.3.1 8 Please note that for labor categories in Attachment J-7.1 without hours, those rates will be reviewed for reasonableness and realism but not be included as part of the TEP.
62 Will the FAA revise the draft Task Order SOWs to clarify if a Task Order Lead and/or Project Manager will be required prior to the 12/16/2016 submission deadline or will the FAA allow the Offeror to assess, determine and propose whether a Project Manager or a Task Order Lead should be applied? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 C C.3.9.1.3 C-21 The Offeror is advised to use their best business acumen and expertise to determine the required labor categories and level of effort to fulfill the requirements of the statement of work.
63 Is the Attachment J-11 (FAA Non-Disclosure Agreement) applicable only to “Non-Government Personnel” whom are supporting the FAA’s NAVTAC II procurement efforts for the FAA and as a result may have exposure to nonpublic acquisition sensitive data, including but not limited to Source Selection data in accordance with L.4.11? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol VI L.4.11 and Attachment J-11 L-8 and Attachment J-11 Removed Attachment J-11 Non-Disclosure Agreement.
64 Paragraph a) references the SF-33 to be completed and included in the Offeror’s proposal. Will the FAA provide the SF-33 to be completed? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol VI L.6.2.6.5(a) L-21 Needs to be uploaded.
65 L.6.2.6.5(b) requests the Offeror to complete the Representations and Certifications in SIR Section K. As an alternative, may the Offeror reference a current and updated status to the Offeror’s Representations and Certifications detailed in SAM.gov under the Offeror’s applicable DUNS number? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol VI L.6.2.6.5(b) L-21 Please complete the Reps and Certs in Section K.
| 66 | Section I includes AMS Clause 3.6.2-28 noting the Service Contract Act of 1965, as Amended (October 2014). The previous “draft” SIR established a Wage Determination Schedule in support of the AMS clause. May the FAA confirm that Wage Determination is no longer seen as applicable to this SIR? | DTFAWA-16-R-00024 | I | AMS Clause 3.6.2-28 | I-2 | The Wage Determination is no longer applicable to this SIR. |
| 67 | May the FAA allow years of experience to be a substitution for education requirements across all labor categories to be consistent with labor categories that allow for equivalency substitution (eg. Senior Database Administrator)? | DTFAWA-16-R-00024 | Vol I | J-2 | 19 | Please see requirements for all labor categrories in Attachment J-2 Labor Category Descriptions. |
| 68 | May the FAA provide the Navigation CCB Charter and the Navigation CCB operating procedures Offeror is to maintain? | DTFAWA-16-R-00024 | Vol I | C.3.6.2 | C-11 | Yes the Navigation Programs CCB charter can be provided at any time. The Navigation Programs CCB operating procedure is currently being updated and will be available in its draft form around the March 2017 timeframe. |
| C-12 | ||||||
| 69 | May the FAA provide the current Navigation Evolution Roadmap and Navigation Services Business Plan. | DTFAWA-16-R-00024 | Vol I | C.3.6.9 | C-14 | The Navigation Evolution Roadmap is now the NAS Enterprise Architecture |
Infrastructure Roadmap - Navigation. The approved version is provided. The FY17 Navigation Programs Business Plan is still under development.
70 May the FAA provide more information on the Project Material Management System and the Materiel Delivery Forecast Module? DTFAWA-16-R-00024 Vol I C.3.8.5 C-20 he FAA's Project Material Management System's User Guide is attached.
The Materiel Delivery Forecast Module (MDFM), also known as the CIP Material Deliveries Subsystem, provides an interactive, relational database application that enables users to perform automated forecasting and scheduling activities associated with CIP project materiel deliveries. In addition, the MDFM supports the expansion and modernization of the FAA F&E requirements for selected CIP and regionally generated, ongoing and nonrecurring F&E projects that are not covered under a specific CIP project. A web-based application, the MDFM is available to authorized users via the FAA Intranet. Project materiel delivery information from both Headquarters and Regional sources is tracked and made available for side-by-side comparison. The MDFM features flexible query and reporting capabilities for user-driven customization of output for specific organizational needs.
| 71 | In Section C.3.7.4, multiple bullets state “develop…” . Will the FAA asking Offeror’s to develop new products or to enhance existing products? In either case, please provide Offeror’s what should be developed and/or enhanced. | DTFAWA-16-R-00024 | Vol I | C.3.7.4 | C-17 | For C 3.7.4 – It can be both: enhancing existing products and developing new products. The SOW briefly states what to develop / enhance: databases, master schedule, documentation, training, Information System Infrastructure etc. |
| 72 | Will the FAA confirm the due date for Questionnaire Forms beings submitted by Offeror is no longer October 22, 2016 and is now December 16, 2016? | Vol IV | Page 1 | Revised Attachment J-9 to reflect new due date for PPQ form submittals to December 16, 2016. |
NAVTAC II Questions and Responses
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .