DRAFT_B2_12.0_Section_M_Evaluation_Criteria.pdf

SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory

1. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD

This award will be made on the basis of lowest-price technically- acceptable price of proposal meeting the acceptability standards for non-cost/price factors established in the Request of Proposal (RFP). The University will select the lowest-price technically acceptable offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation’s requirements including all the stated terms and conditions and technical requirements. All technically acceptable offers shall be treated equally except for their prices. Failure to meet a requirement or inclusion of unacceptable exceptions, assumptions, conditions, or clarifications may result in an offer being determined technically unacceptable. Award may be made with or without clarifications and/or discussions.

A. Price Evaluation: Initially, offers will be ranked according to price, including any option prices if applicable. An offeror’s proposed prices will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in Section B by the proposed unit price for each Contract Line-Item Number or Subcontract Line Item Number to confirm the extended amount for each. The price evaluation will document for the offers evaluated under the following subparagraph B, the reasonableness and affordability of the proposed total evaluated prices.

B. Technical Acceptability: Technical proposals will be evaluated on a pass/fail basis; however, SLAC reserves the right to request clarification of any element of a proposal at the sole discretion of SLAC.

2. BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD TECHNICAL EVALUATION

Proposals shall be evaluated against the following Factors and Sub-factors:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach

• Sub-factor 1.1, Project Approach: The Offeror’s technical approach shall be evaluated on how the activities will be planned from start to finish. The Offeror’s technical approach should clearly demonstrate a technical understanding of the scope and the planning required to successfully complete the project.

• Sub-factor 1.2, Project Work Elements: The offeror shall be evaluated on the general approach to execute project work elements, including the

Section M – Evaluation Factors for Award

RFP 329772

B057 Modular Cleanroom following: coordination and communication with SLAC project personnel;

pre-mobilization activities; material staging and transport; installation of major components such as wall panels, ceiling grid system, fan filter units, lighting, and sprinkler system; work practices in and about adjacent operations; maintenance of as-built drawings; inspection and test plan;

waste disposal; and demobilization in order to successfully complete the project.

• Sub-factor 1.3 - Quality Assurance/Quality Control Plan: The offeror shall be evaluated on how well the general approach to Quality Assurance/Quality Control meets or exceeds the Technical Specifications, including:

a) The Quality Assurance plan for the activities/tasks on which you are proposing.

b) Cleanliness Plan: ensuring that cleanliness is maintained and controlled during the execution of the project.

• Sub-factor 1.4 - Assumptions: How well does the Offeror’s describe the assumptions and clarifications made in preparation of the Proposal? Do assumptions and clarifications affect the Offeror’s proposal in terms of meeting all the technical requirements in accordance with the Statement of Work (SOW), specifications, and drawings?

Factor 2 – Safety

• Sub-factor 2.1 Offeror’s ES&H program shall be evaluated for how well it meets the requirements outlined in SLAC General Terms and Conditions, Article 17, “Environmental, Safety, and Health Protection – Codes and Standards.”

• Sub-factor 2.2 Information provided by Offeror will be validated and checked for non-compliance and/or criminal or civil enforcement activity.

• Sub-factor 2.3 Offeror will be required to submit and obtain SLAC’s approval for Offeror’s completed Subcontractor Construction Safety Qualification Form (SQF):

• Using Offeror’s Experience Modification Rate (EMR) offer will be evaluated on whether it’s EMR is equal to or below 1.0; and

• If Offeror’s EMR is greater than 1.0, Offeror’s OSHA 300 logs for self-performed work performed over the past 3 years will be reviewed for any fatalities or serious injuries.

• Offerors with current approved as of and through October 2022 safety status are not required to submit new SQF. However, please state that it is on file.

Factor 3 - Schedule:

The Offeror shall be evaluated to confirm how their schedule meets the project schedule as indicated in Statement of Work and includes long lead items and a project end date no later than March 17, 2023.

Factor 4 – Past Performance The Offeror shall be evaluated on Offeror’s demonstrated experience of their ability to perform the scope of work outlined in the RFP and Offerors approval to contact listed references. Subcontractor will be evaluated for similar projects (size, scope, and complexity) within the past 5 years.

Factor 5 –Statement of Qualifications

• Sub-factor 5.1 Qualification information received (per instructions in Section L of this

RFP) shall be evaluated to confirm Offeror has a current and valid California Contractor’s license appropriate to Offeror’s trade.

• Sub-factor 5.2 Offeror’s written statement will be reviewed to ensure:

• Neither the Offeror’s firm, nor any of its owners or officers have been convicted of a crime involving the awarding of the contract of a government (U.S. Federal, State, and City) construction project, or the bidding or performance of a government contract.

• Offeror shall have a local presence in the San Francisco Bay Area established a minimum of three years.

• Offeror shall have prior experience working at Department of Energy (DOE) and/or Department of Defense (DOD) facilities.

BUSINESS EVALUATION

Financial (General Contractor Only) clearly stamp all company financial documents as “Business Sensitive” or equivalent language, if applicable, on any included documents.

• Bonding ability will be evaluated for the project and Offeror’s overall bonding capacity letter from the primary’s Surety.

• Dun and Bradstreet report will be reviewed to verify a SER score of 6 or lower.

• For Bidders with a Dun and Bradstreet SER score greater than 6, Financial Statements will be reviewed for risk.

Price

• RFP Section A (Subcontract Form) will be reviewed for completeness; acknowledgement of issued addendums per Solicitation Section A (9).

• RFP Section B (Supplier or Service Prices) will be reviewed for completeness and reasonableness.

• Price Breakdown Form Attachment A – B057 Modular Cleanroom

Bid Sheet Form will be reviewed for completeness and reasonableness. Proposed price and schedule will be evaluated against SLAC’s independent estimate.

Contract Documentation

• RFP Section A (Subcontract Form) completed and signed

• RFP Section B (Supplies or Services and Prices) completed as indicated

• RFP Section C Statement of Work, Drawings and Technical

Specifications

• RFP Section F (Deliveries or Performance)

• RFP Section G (Terms and Conditions)

• RFP Section H (Special Terms and Conditions) completed with Key

Personnel

• RFP Section I (Specific Contract Clauses)

• Submitted Section K and SAM.GOV, “Representations &

Certifications” shall be evaluated for completeness.

• Offeror shall complete and submit a signed IIPP Form (Section J, Attachment 03).

• Acknowledgment of all amendments per Section 9 of the

Amendment clause.

• Provide your company’s labor rate sheet, through the end of the performance period.