CN-370000-CN200-T19.pdf

Florida Department of Environmental Protection

TASK ASSIGNMENT NOTIFICATION FORM

Required Signatures: Adobe Signature

FDEP Contract No.: Task Assignment No.: Owner’s Name: Project No.:

Project Location: Project Name:

Consultant Name:

Consultant Representative: Phone: Email:

FDEP Contract Manager: Phone: Email:

Description of Task:

Project Manager:

Schedule Start Date: Fixed Price Cost:

Completion Date: Cost Reimbursement not to exceed:

Total Task Amount:

Approval Signatures:

Budget Representative, FDEP Signature Date

Project Manager, FDEP Signature Date

Contract Manager, FDEP Signature Date

Consultant Signature Date

Contract Authority, FDEP Signature Date

Project # Grant # Org Code Cat/Year Fund Module Object Code EO Amount

29 digit FLAIR Code: Total:

CN200 19 FDEP 61446C

New Ranger Station; Boardwalk; ADA Kayak Launch

George F. Young, Inc.

Jonathan Langston, P.E. (727) 822-4317 jlangston@georgefyoung.com

Ralph Perkins or successor (850) 245-2460 Ralph.Perkins@FloridaDEP.gov

Consultant to provide professional surveying and engineering services for the construction of a ranger station, boardwalk network extensions, and kayak launch at Werner-Boyce Salt Springs State Park, per proposal dated May 22, 2023.

Terry McCullum, Jr. or successor

Upon Execution $ 221,914.32 Contract End Date $ 4,600.00

$ 226,514.32

Tamika Bass Tamika Bass Digitally signed by Tamika Bass Date: 2023.05.24 12:05:31 -04'00'

Terry McCullum, Jr. Terry McCullum, Jr.

Digitally signed by Terry McCullum, Jr.

Date: 2023.05.30 11:11:44 -04'00'

David Matson for Ralph Perkins or successor David Matson Digitally signed by David Matson Date: 2023.05.30 15:05:38 -04'00'

Jonathan C Langston Jonathan C Langston Digitally signed by Jonathan C Langston Date: 2023.06.02 10:51:09 -04'00'

Bryan Bradner Bryan Bradner Digitally signed by Bryan Bradner Date: 2023.06.06 14:25:58 -04'00'

61446C 37504000259 080039/23 000286 U3100 134000 AD $ 226,514.32

$ 226,514.32

Werner-Boyce Salt Springs State Park integrity | quality | service

May 22, 2023

Terry L McCullum Jr.

Project Manager Bureau of Design and Construction Florida Department of Environmental Protection 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS 520 Tallahassee, FL 32399

RE: CN200 – George F. Young

Werner-Boyce Salt Springs State Park

Dear Mr. McCullum, For your review, George F. Young Inc. has provided a proposal summary and man-hour documentation for professional surveying and engineering services for the ranger station, boardwalk network extensions, and kayak launch project through the Werner-Boyce Salt Springs State Park, purposed to improve the accessibility and ADA connectivity of the park.

This scope reflects our previous meeting held on February 28, 2023, our understanding of the project, our research efforts, and the information provided. We trust the information contained in the attached proposal is consistent with your understanding.

Please review the attached Proposal Summary. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project and look forward to working with you. Please feel free to contact me if you should have any questions or require any changes.

Sincerely, Jonathan Langston, PE Project Manager

New Ranger Station, Boardwalks, and ADA Kayak Launch Werner-Boyce Salt Springs State Park

DEP Agreement Number CN200, Task Assignment Number 18 Subtask 1: Survey

Subtask 1A: Topographic and Boundary Survey

Description: GFY proposes to perform a detailed topographic survey and traditional topo survey of the existing ground to include the proposed boardwalk alignment areas, kayak launch area, proposed ranger station location and associated linear pond areas. Trees within the limits of the proposed boardwalks (approximately 5’ these alignments) will also be identified.

Survey – Boardwalk Extension Locations

• Includes topographic survey of the alignments discussed in the field with FDEP and documented in the KMZ file. The topographic shots are to be along the anticipated alignment discussed in the field, 15’ on either side, in 5’ grids.

• There are 3 boardwalk alignments/extensions.

Survey – Ranger Station Location

• Includes topographic survey of the proposed ranger station and surrounding pavement loop.

• There are a series of linear ponds that handle the treatment of existing runoff. These linear ponds within the vicinity of the ranger station and drainage structures are also to be gathered in the survey.

Additional areas such as the kayak launch area and the area between the kayak launch and existing boardwalk terminus are also included.

Deliverable: Survey deliverables will include an electronically signed and sealed topographic survey on 24x36 sheets in pdf format and .dwg CAD files. Paper copies can be provided upon request.

Performance Measure: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, accurate, and timely.

Fixed Price Cost: Man-hour Summary

Subtask 1B: Wetland Boundary Survey Description: Upon completion of Task 3: Wetland Delineation, the survey team will pick up the flagged boundary and add these points to the survey documentation completed in Subtask 1A. This work is to be coordinated with the Ecological Team.

Deliverable: Survey deliverables for Subtask 1B will include an amended topographic and boundary survey (from Subtask 1A) electronically signed and sealed on 24x36 sheets in pdf format and .dwg CAD files.

Paper copies can be provided upon request.

Performance Measure: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, accurate, and timely.

Firm Name Position Classification Hourly Rate Hours Total Fixed Price Cost

George F. Young Professional Surveyor & Mapper (Surveyor Manager) $105.00 16.00 $1,680.00 George F. Young Field Crew (2-Person) $70.59 76.00 $5,364.84 George F. Young CADD Technician $63.00 67.00 $4,221.00 Fee $11,265.84

Subtask 1A: Topographic and Boundary Survey

Robinson_MS Text Box

Total for Subtask 1: $12,714.33

Firm Name Position Classification Hourly Rate Hours Total Fixed Price Cost

George F. Young Professional Surveyor & Mapper (Surveyor Manager) $105.00 4.00 $420.00 George F. Young Field Crew (2-Person) $70.59 11.00 $776.49 George F. Young CADD Technician $63.00 4.00 $252.00 Fee

Subtask 1B: Wetland Boundary Survey

$1,448.49

Subtask 2: Geotechnical Engineering Description: Geotechnical Coordination and Evaluation is provided in the scope to aid in design.

Geotechnical cores are being proposed to assist in design of the boardwalks and ranger station.

Foundations may include shallow spread footings and timber piles. One pond boring will be taken in the existing linear pond near the proposed ranger station. The geotechnical data will be obtained at the time of the survey phase.

Based on recent aerial images, portions of the site are accessible to AREHNA’s track mounted drilling rig.

This proposal assumes that no permits or clearing will be required to complete the field work. SPT borings will be completed in nearest accessible locations to proposed boring locations. Hand auger borings will be completed within the proposed structure footprints for structures that do not have access for the drill rig. Hand auger borings are more limited in depth than SPT but can provide information on near-surface soil and groundwater conditions.

The purpose of our geotechnical study is to obtain information on the general subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the project site and to provide data and geotechnical recommendations, foundation capacities, estimated settlement and design soil parameters to the design team for the proposed improvements.

The following services will be performed:

• Review available project and site information, including historical aerial photographs of the site and USDA/NRCS Soil Survey maps and soil data.

• Site reconnaissance and stake boring locations.

• Request utility location services from Sunshine811.

• Perform a total of seven (7) Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings to a depth of 20 feet below existing ground surface at the project site. Samples will be collected, and Standard Penetration Test resistances measured continuously for the top ten feet and at approximate intervals of five feet, thereafter.

• Perform a total of five hand auger borings extending to a maximum depth of 6 feet below existing ground surface or auger refusal.

• Proposed boring locations may be adjusted based on accessibility, but are currently planned as follows:

• Ranger Station: One SPT boring within proposed footprint.

• Pond (or drainage feature) near Ranger Station: One SPT boring within proposed pond footprint.

• Kayak Launch Reconstruction and Site Stabilization: One SPT boring will be completed near the west end of the paved parking lot (will be moved closer if access allows). One hand auger boring, with a dynamic cone penetration (DCP) test within the hand auger location, will be completed within the structure area. Actual location will be determined by the Client. DCP testing allows for recording relative soil density.

• Boardwalk West: One SPT boring will be completed on the edge of the nearest trail, most likely east of the boardwalk (will be moved closer if access allows). Four hand auger borings, with a DCP test in each hand auger location, will be completed along the proposed boardwalk alignment.

• Boardwalk East: It appears that this boardwalk is accessible on the walking trail with a track mounted drill rig. Three SPT borings are proposed along the boardwalk alignment.

• Identification of the existing groundwater levels and estimated normal seasonal high groundwater fluctuations at each boring location.

• General location and description of potentially deleterious materials encountered in the borings which may have an impact on the proposed construction.

• Provide allowable capacities and estimated foundation settlement for shallow foundations supporting the structures including axial and lateral timber pile analysis for boardwalks.

• Provide general geotechnical recommendations for the proposed construction, including excavation, backfill, compaction, and soil re-use requirements.

• Provide recommended design soil parameters for the timber piles/boardwalks.

• Perform one Double Ring Infiltration (DRI) test within the proposed pond/drainage area, adjacent to the pond boring, at an approximate depth of two feet or at least 1-foot above the water table.

• Provide infiltration rates based on the results of the Double Ring Infiltration (DRI) tests. A horizontal infiltration value will be estimated based on correlations from the vertical infiltration rate and soil types encountered.

• Samples will be transferred to our laboratory for classification and testing.

• Visually classify and stratify soil samples in the laboratory using the Unified Soil Classification

System and conduct a laboratory testing program. Anticipated tests may include: percent passing the No. 200 sieve, natural moisture content, organic content and Atterberg Limits tests.

• Provide CAD figures including: General Topographic Map, USDA/NRCS Soil Survey Map, Boring Location Plan, and Soil Boring Profiles.

Please note that samples will be retained for 90 days after the date of the report and then disposed, unless other arrangements have been made.

The fieldwork can be completed within approximately four weeks from project commencement. During this time, the boring locations will be staked/marked and a utility locates request will be submitted to Sunshine811. The fieldwork should require approximately two days to complete, weather and access permitting. Our signed and sealed report should be available approximately three weeks after completion of the fieldwork.

Deliverable: The results of the field exploration and engineering analysis will be presented in electronically provided geotechnical engineering report in PDF format. The results of the subsurface exploration will be presented in a draft written report provided to the Client for review and comments. After receiving comments, a final report, signed and sealed by a professional engineer specializing in geotechnical engineering, will be provided.

Performance Measure: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, Firm Name Position Classification Unit Rate Units Unit Type

Total Fixed Price Cost

Arehna Engineering Inc. MAT Principal Engineer $234.99 1 Hours $234.99 Arehna Engineering Inc. MAT Senior Engineer $200.01 5 Hours $1,000.05 Arehna Engineering Inc. MAT Engineer $150.00 8 Hours $1,200.00 Arehna Engineering Inc. MAT Engineer Intern $114.99 20 Hours $2,299.80 Arehna Engineering Inc. MAT CADD/Computer Designer $99.99 12 Hours $1,199.88 Arehna Engineering Inc. MAT Senior Engineering Technician $93.99 2 Hours $187.98 Arehna Engineering Inc. MAT Engineering Technician $62.01 12 Hours $744.12 Arehna Engineering Inc. MAT Technical Secretary $63.99 1 Hours $63.99 Fee

Subtask 2: Geotechnical Engineering - Engineering Services

$6,930.81

Total for Subtask 2: $12,896.69

Firm Name Position Classification Unit Rate Units Unit Type

Total Fixed Price Cost

Arehna Engineering Inc. 418 Geo Drill Crew Support Vehicle $217.69 2 Day $435.38 Arehna Engineering Inc. 440 Geo Grout Boreholes- Truck/Mud Bug 0-50 Ft $6.50 140 LF $910.00 Arehna Engineering Inc. 446 Geo Hand Auger with DCP (0-50 ft) ASTM D1452 $25.44 30 LF $763.20 Arehna Engineering Inc. 478 Geo SPT Truck/Mud Bug 0-50 Ft $15.79 140 LF $2,210.60 Arehna Engineering Inc. 514 Geo Truck/Mud Bug Mobil (30 miles straightline dis $565.00 1 Each $565.00 Fee $4,884.18

Subtask 2: Geotechnical Engineering - Field Services

Firm Name Position Classification Unit Rate Units Unit Type

Total Fixed Price Cost

Arehna Engineering Inc. 811 Soils Liquid Limit AASHTO T89 $65.51 1 Test $65.51 Arehna Engineering Inc. 812 Soils Materials Finer than 200 Sieve FM 1-T011 $50.00 9 Test $450.00 Arehna Engineering Inc. 817 Soils Moisture Content Laboratory AASHTO T265 $17.96 14 Test $251.44 Arehna Engineering Inc. 819 Soils Organic Content Ignition FM 1 T-267 $48.45 5 Test $242.25 Arehna Engineering Inc. 826 Soils Plastic Limit & Plasticity Index AASHTO T90 $72.50 1 Test $72.50 Fee

Subtask 2: Geotechnical Engineering - Engineering Services

$1,081.70

Subtask 3: Environmental Analysis

Subtask 3A: Wetland Delineation Description 3A: Delineate project wetlands and coordinate the review of the flagged wetland lines with the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) and potentially with the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), since the applicant is the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP).

The FDEP was recently delegated wetland permitting of the USACE’s federal Section 404 permitting, but in this case the USACE will handle the permitting.

• Conduct an inspection of the project wetlands; identify the extent of any hydric soils on site;

determine the types and locations of any hydrophytic vegetation on site; use the historic wetland hydrology to determine the extent of any wetlands; and flag the extent of jurisdictional wetlands surrounding the area.

• Coordinate and attend site meeting(s) with agency personnel to review and approve the flagged wetland line, if necessary.

• Prepare and submit field notes and a map of the approximate flagged line to the project surveyor.

• Coordinate with SWFWMD and USACE on site to review and approve the flagged wetland line.

• The approved wetland line will be used to determine potential wetland impacts by the proposed project alternatives.

It is understood that there will be three separate locations that require a wetland delineation for this project. It’s assumed that SWFWMD will field review and approve the set wetland line, while PCNRD will accept SWFWMD wetland jurisdictional line as their own. Lastly, the USACE may require a review of the SWFWMD approved wetland line, and/or require their own modifications to the wetland line.

Coordination with USACE is included in this scope and fee.

Note, this subtask is for wetland delineation only; permitting for the wetland impacts is detailed further in Subtask 5.

Deliverable 3A: The results of the agreed upon wetland boundary will be provided to FDEP via all relevant documentation provided by the AHJ (Authority Having Jurisdiction) printed to pdf format and ultimately the surveyed and approved wetland lines delivered on the certified survey.

Performance Measure 3A: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, accurate, and timely.

Fixed Price Cost 3A: Man-hour Summary

George F. Young Contract Mgr. Civil EOR $130.41 $0.00 George F. Young Principal Ecologist $126.39 34.00 $4,297.26 George F. Young Senior Ecologist $108.00 $0.00 George F. Young CADD Technician $63.00 $0.00 Fee

Subtask 3: Wetland Delineation

$4,297.26

Subtask 3B: Asbestos / Lead Based Paint Survey Description 3B: The purpose of this asbestos and lead based paint evaluation is to document if Asbestos Containing Materials (ACMs) and lead based paint are present and may be disturbed during demolition activities related to the approximately 55’ long boardwalk. Demolition, including renovation activities are regulated under both State and Federal regulations as they pertain to asbestos. In general, prior to performing any renovation/demolition operation, an asbestos survey is required to be performed by a licensed/certified inspector.

Asbestos Evaluation

Our asbestos evaluation will include:

• All work will be performed under the direction of a Florida-licensed Asbestos Consultant (FLAC);

• A review of available building documents to identify potential locations of suspect ACMs;

• A visual building inspection of accessible areas by an US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) accredited asbestos inspector to identify suspect ACMs;

• Once suspect ACMs are identified, homogeneous materials (materials which are uniform in color, texture, construction/application date, and general appearance) will be determined;

• Record material quantities, locations, and physical condition (good, fair, or poor). The indicated material quantities are estimates based on the field observations and should be considered preliminary in nature. These estimates should not be used for bidding purposes without verification.

• Indicate whether the suspect ACM is friable (a material that when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized or reduced to powder by hand pressure) or non-friable.

• Collection of up to ten (10) bulk samples of each homogeneous suspect ACM. Record sample information on Asbestos Bulk Sample Forms (chain-of-custody sheets), which will be signed, dated, and sent with the samples to the laboratory.

• Analysis of the collected bulk samples at a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) for the presence of asbestos fibers. UES will provide PLM results to you immediately upon receipt for discussion to determine if further analysis is required. If PLM results indicate levels between “trace” and 10% asbestos, the material will be assumed to be asbestos containing. Materials having point count results <1% asbestos are considered non-ACM. If you choose the additional Point Count analysis, UES will pass-through these costs via a contract change order; and, Lead Based Paint Evaluation

Our lead-based paint assessment will include:

• Review available information concerning the structure including the initial date of construction, significant renovations, types of construction, and information regarding the use of the structure.

• Walk through and observe accessible areas within the structure to identify, locate, and assess suspect LBP.

• Collect up to six (6) paint chip samples from various walls for lead analysis.

• Provide a report documenting the sample collection procedures, locations, and results. Unless specifically noted in the proposal, no draft report will be issued. The fee estimate presented under this proposal includes an electronic copy of the Asbestos-Containing Material Survey report being submitted upon project completion.

The following conditions are anticipated prior to inspection of the structure and during the completion of the inspection:

• All areas requiring inspection will be accessible on the day(s) scheduled for the inspection.

Collection of bulk samples of suspect ACMs will be limited to those materials readily accessible.

• UES will make every effort to sample in the least destructive manner possible.

• Minor sampling damage will not be repaired.

• Destructive sampling techniques (such as wall and ceiling testing, carpet cuts to expose underlying flooring) will be employed in limited measures in the spaces inspected, and completed in a way to minimize disruption to operations and damage to building components. Extensive destructive sampling methods will not be used, and exploratory demolition of walls and/or removal of fixed items will not be conducted.

• Inspection and collection of bulk samples of suspect ACMs will be limited to those materials readily accessible. Spaces concealed by walls, floors, ceilings, etc. requiring access by demolition or other destructive means will not be investigated in order to minimize disruption to business operations and damage to building components. The presence of such spaces and the need for destructive investigation will be documented in the final reports. No attempt will be made to observe conditions in spaces not generally accessible, including but not limited to crawlspaces, pipe chases, plenums or confined spaces.

Deliverable: UES will prepare one Asbestos and Lead Based Paint Survey Report for the subject property.

A signed PDF copy of the report will be forwarded electronically upon completion (within 8 weeks of project commencement)

Performance Measure 3B: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, Fixed Price Cost 3B: Man-hour Summary

Total for Subtask 3: $5,901.51

Universal Engineering Sciences Principle Engineer / Geologist $127.41 2.00 $254.82 Universal Engineering Sciences Project Engineer / Scientist $84.06 1.00 $84.06 Universal Engineering Sciences Sr. Engineering Tech $54.63 2.00 $109.26 Universal Engineering Sciences Clerical $44.55 2.00 $89.10 Universal Engineering Sciences Staff Engineer / Scientist $69.96 10.00 $699.60 Fee $1,236.84

Subtask 3B: Asbestos / Lead Based Paint Services

Firm Name Position Classification Unit Rate Units Unit Type Total Fixed Price Cost

Universal Engineering Sciences Asbestos PLM Lab Analysis $15.00 10.00 EA $150.00 Universal Engineering Sciences Lead Based Paint Lab Analysis $15.00 6.00 EA $90.00 Fee $240.00

Subtask 3B: Asbestos / Lead Based Paint Testing robinson_ms Text Box $5,774.10

Subtask 4: 30% - Schematic Design Subtask 4A: Schematic Design – Civil

Description 4A: An overall site plan will be provided illustrating boardwalk alignments, ranger station, and kayak launch. It is understood that the additional impervious areas generated by the ranger station will be compensated for by removing impervious drive area from the existing loop while ensuring accessibility and mobility is maintained. Floor elevations, general notes, site plan, boardwalk typical sections, and system details for the proposed kayak launch will be included at this phase.

It is understood that no pavement rehabilitation or milling and resurfacing is needed nor required for this project. There are no stormwater concerns at this time as impervious areas are not anticipated to increase with the reduction of pavement areas at the ranger station.

No hydraulic/hydrologic modelling is anticipated for this work but can be added as an additional service if deemed necessary by the AHJ.

Deliverable 4A: A civil/site SD set will be submitted electronically via a signed and sealed pdf plan set.

Performance Measure 4A: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, Fixed Price Cost 4A: Man-hour Summary

Subtask 4B: Schematic Design – Architectural

Description 4B: An architectural site plan will be provided locating ranger station. These SD level plans are to include a site plan, floor plan(s), preliminary building elevations, a preliminary building section, and life safety considerations. Approach, building orientation and security are critical considerations for the ranger station design and location along with appropriate accessibility. Furthermore, proper space planning will be conducted with FDEP to ensure the interior spaces are properly programmed for required operations and the overall project is right sized as required.

Lastly, proper coordination with client and GFY on the Boardwalk alignments and kayak launch will be conducted to ensure all accessibility, operations and end-user considerations are accounted.

Deliverable 4B: An architectural SD level plan set will be submitted electronically via a signed and sealed pdf plan set.

Performance Measure 4B: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, accurate, and timely.

Fixed Price Cost 4B: Man-hour Summary

Firm Name Position Classification Hourly Rate Hours Total Fixed Price Cost

George F. Young Contract Mgr. Civil EOR $130.41 48.00 $6,259.68 George F. Young Project Engineer $93.16 24.00 $2,235.84 George F. Young Senior CADD Technician $78.00 60.00 $4,680.00 George F. Young CADD Technician $63.00 0.00 $0.00 Fee

Subtask 4A: Schematic Design - Civil

$13,175.52

Subtask 4C: Schematic Design – Structural:

Description 4C: A written narrative for the project will be provided that will list the structural loading and considerations used in design (such as wind loads, seismic requirements, flood requirements, etc.), as well as description of the structural system and foundations for the boardwalks, ranger station, and kayak launch. Elevating the ranger station to comply with finished floor elevations dictated by flood elevation requirements is included in this scope and fee. Coordination between the structural engineers, civil, and architectural teams will take place to make sure any typical sections represent the structural systems for each component of the project. Preliminary calculations will be performed to approximate some member sizes and maximum spans.

Note, the structural design of trusses, bridges, and miscellaneous structural components of the dock and pedestrian walkway to the dock structure (with the exception of piles) is typically provided by the dock manufacturer and is not included in this scope and fee. Should this be required it can be provided as an additional service and fee. (This is applicable to all structural phases of the project).

Deliverable 4C: A structural SD level narrative will be submitted electronically via a signed and sealed pdf plan set.

Performance Measure 4C: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, Fixed Price Cost 4C: Man-hour Summary

Subtask 4D: Schematic Design – Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP):

Description 4D: For all disciplines (mechanical, electrical, and plumbing), develop a basis of design narrative that will include:

• Preliminary sizing of mechanical equipment

• Preliminary electrical service size and voltage

• Preliminary evaluation of plumbing and fire protection services

• Design criteria for sizing of systems (lighting, ductwork, piping, etc)

Deliverable 4D: A MEP SD level plan set will be submitted electronically via a signed and sealed pdf plan set.

Firm Name Position Classification Hourly Rate Hours Total Fixed Price Cost

Zyscovich Architects Principal $504.00 1.00 $504.00 Zyscovich Architects Project Manager $156.00 10.00 $1,560.00 Zyscovich Architects CADD Drafter $90.00 90.00 $8,100.00 Zyscovich Architects Construction Administrator $96.00 0.00 $0.00 Zyscovich Architects Admin $87.00 3.00 $261.00 Fee $10,425.00

Subtask 4B: Schematic Design - Architectural

Firm Name Position Classification Hourly Rate Hours Total Fixed Price Cost

George F. Young Contract Mgr. Civil EOR $130.41 32.00 $4,173.12 George F. Young Project Engineer $93.16 0.00 $0.00 George F. Young Senior CADD Technician $78.00 0.00 $0.00 George F. Young CADD Technician $63.00 0.00 $0.00 Fee $4,173.12

Subtask 4C: Schematic Design - Structural

Performance Measure 4D: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, Fixed Price Cost 4D: Man-hour Summary

Total for Subtask 4: $29,375.64

Voltair Senior Professional Mech Engineer $144.00 4.00 $576.00 Voltair Senior Professional Elec Engineer $144.00 4.00 $576.00 Voltair Designers - Plumbing $174.00 2.00 $348.00 Voltair Clerical / Office Admin $102.00 1.00 $102.00 Fee $1,602.00

Subtask 4D: Schematic Design - Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing

Subtask 5: Permitting Description: Anticipated permitting tasks are outlined below for the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD), US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Pasco County Natural Resources Division (PCNRD), Port Richie, and Pasco County. Pre-application meetings will be scheduled by George F.

Young upon project commencement.

Note, no permitting is included for FDOT Access or FDOT Drainage as it is understood milling and resurfacing of the entrance is not proposed and stormwater runoff in the project limits maintains its historical flow away from FDOT facilities. Should any permitting services be required beyond SWFWMD, Pasco County, or USACE, additional design/permitting scope and fees will be handled in an addendum.

Provide Environmental Resources Permit (ERP) support, environmental input, and alternatives analysis.

Depending on the final project alternatives and impacts the permit may be a general permit or an individual permit. The permit type will be determined by the overall wetland impacts. Wetland impact avoidance and minimization will be used to avoid or minimize negative effects to wetlands, to the greatest extent possible. If necessary, wetland mitigation may be needed depending on the final wetland impacts.

The permit process includes the following:

• Pre-application meeting and agency coordination

• Wetland delineation (as per Part A above).

• Preliminary project assessment

• Alternatives analysis

• Avoidance and minimization of impacts

• Unified Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM) analysis and mitigation options

• Permit application and submittal to agencies

• Agency coordination and RAIs

A protected species survey and review and archaeological and historical file review through the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) will be requited.

• Assessment of protected species and their habitats, on the subject property and coordination with US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Freshwater Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC), if so necessary. The location of observed species habitats, nests or borrows will be documented, and a report with map(s) of the observed species and their habitats will be prepared. Recommendations for dealing with the protected species present during construction will be included in a Protected Species memorandum. Eagle nest # PS017, as identified by FWC, sits within the park’s boundaries. Any potential construction should take place outside of the 660 feet radius from the nest, and if not possible, construction activities should occur outside of the eagle breeding season.

• Coordination with the Florida Division of Historic Resources, State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) to determine if known archaeological and/or historic sites are present. This coordination and file review should provide information about known cultural resources sites. However, it does not include a survey for undiscovered or unknown cultural resources, which may require a Cultural Resource Assessment Survey (CRAS). GFY can coordinate and manage this task, which would be conducted by a SHPO-qualified archaeological and historical firm.

Assumptions

• Permitting for this project will involve SWFWMD, PCNRD and the USACE. The FDEP will have negligible involvement as the applicant is the FDEP.

• The plan is to avoid impacts to all natural resources at the park, and therefore avoid the necessity to do any major permitting, i.e., an individual ERP.

• General permits from SWFWMD is what is proposed.

• UMAM scores may be necessary and require approval through the SWFWMD and the USACE permitting process, if there are impacts.

• It is expected that some reconciliation regarding the project and potential impacts maybe necessary between the three agencies.

• Alternative analysis and avoidance and minimization of wetland impacts will be pivotal to preclude the need for mitigation.

• No on-site wetland mitigation is anticipated. If wetland impacts require mitigation, the wetland compensation will be conducted in a mitigation bank.

• No protected species or critical habitat should be affected by the proposed project.

• The eagle’s nest within the park, #PS017, is approximately 1000 feet from the closest of the three project construction areas. Therefore, there will be no impact to the eagle, hatchlings or the nest, regardless of the time of construction.

• No impacts to any cultural resources, archaeological or historic, are anticipated.

Subtask 5A: Southwest Florida Water Management District (ERP Minor Modification)

• Expected Minor Modification for reconfigured impervious area at the Park Ranger Station.

• Additional permitting/watershed modelling, or drainage related tasks beyond a minor modification is not anticipated and is excluded.

• Environmental aspects of the permitting process with SWFWMD are outlined in Subtask 5B.

Deliverable 5A: The permitting deliverables will be provided by the SWFWMD in their format and forwarded to FDEP in pdf format.

Performance Measure 5A: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, accurate, and timely.

Fixed Price Cost 5A: Man-hour Summary

Reimbursable Cost 5A:

SWFWMD: Minor Modification $400.00* Postage $25.00 Printing 30-40 pages ($25.00 estimate) Overnight Travel N/A Mileage (@ $0.445 per mile) N/A Reimbursable Total Cost $450

George F. Young Contract Mgr. Civil EOR $130.41 16.00 $2,086.56 George F. Young Project Engineer $93.16 40.00 $3,726.40 Fee

Subtask 5A: Southwest Florida Water Management District (Exemption or Minor Modification)

$5,812.96

Subtask 5B: Southwest Florida Water Management District (Wetland Impact/Mitigation) Participate in permitting meetings (1) (virtual or in-person) with SWFWMD and coordinate with agency staff to assist in the preparation and submittal of the ERP, as needed.

Mitigation options to be considered will include on-site or an approved agency(s) mitigation bank.

Mitigation bank options and mitigation credit requirements for wetlands impacts will be researched as necessary.

The on-site mitigation options maybe possible depending on site impacts, permitting requirements and agency criteria. If on-site wetland compensation is not viable or feasible, mitigation credits will be considered through an approved mitigation bank. If wetland mitigation is needed, an approved mitigation bank would be the first option recommended.

Conduct wetland impact assessment and perform the UMAM analysis which involves the completion of the UMAM sheets for the affected project wetlands. The UMAM forms will be reviewed and required by

SWFWMD.

Deliverable 5B: The permitting deliverables will be provided by the SWFWMD in their format and forwarded to FDEP in pdf format.

Performance Measure 5B: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are

Fixed Price Cost 5B:

Reimbursable Cost 5B: Man-hour Summary

SWFWMD $1100.00*

Postage $25.00 Printing 30-40 pages ($25.00 estimate) Overnight Travel N/A Mileage (@ $0.445 per mile) N/A Reimbursable Total Cost $1150.00

Subtask 5C: US Army Corps of Engineers Participate in permitting meetings (1) (virtual or in-person) with USACE and coordinate with agency staff to assist in the preparation and submittal of the ERP, as needed.

Mitigation options to be considered will include on-site or an approved agency(s) mitigation bank.

Mitigation bank options and mitigation credit requirements for wetlands impacts will be researched as necessary.

The on-site mitigation options maybe possible depending on site impacts, permitting requirements and agency criteria. If on-site wetland compensation is not viable or feasible, mitigation credits will be considered through an approved mitigation bank. If wetland mitigation is needed, an approved mitigation bank would be the first option recommended.

Firm Name Position Classification Hourly Rate Hours Total Fixed Price Cost

George F. Young Contract Mgr. Civil EOR $130.41 0.00 $0.00 George F. Young Principal Ecologist $126.39 80.00 $10,111.20 George F. Young Project Engineer $93.16 20.00 $1,863.20 Fee $11,974.40

Subtask 5B: Southwest Florida Water Management District (Environmental/Wetland Permitting)

Conduct wetland impact assessment and perform the UMAM analysis which involves the completion of the UMAM sheets for the affected project wetlands. The UMAM forms will be reviewed and require by

USACE.

Deliverable 5C: The permitting deliverables will be provided by the USACE in their format and forwarded to FDEP in pdf format.

Performance Measure 5C: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are

Fixed Price Cost 5C: Man-hour Summary

Reimbursable Cost 5C:

USACE $850.00*

Postage $25.00 Printing 30-40 pages ($25.00 estimate) Overnight Travel N/A Mileage (@ $0.445 per mile) N/A Reimbursable Total Cost $900

*permit fees are an estimate Subtask 5D: Pasco County Natural Resources Division Participate in permitting meetings (1) (virtual or in-person) with PCNRD and coordinate with agency staff to assist in the preparation and submittal of the ERP, as needed.

Mitigation options to be considered will include on-site or an approved agency(s) mitigation bank.

Mitigation bank options and mitigation credit requirements for wetlands impacts will be researched as necessary.

The on-site mitigation options maybe possible depending on site impacts, permitting requirements and agency criteria. If on-site wetland compensation is not viable or feasible, mitigation credits will be considered through an approved mitigation bank. If wetland mitigation is needed, an approved mitigation bank would be the first option recommended.

Conduct wetland impact assessment and perform the UMAM analysis which involves the completion of the UMAM sheets for the affected project wetlands. The UMAM forms will be reviewed and require by

PCNRD.

Deliverable 5D: The permitting deliverables will be provided by the PCNRD in their format and forwarded to FDEP in pdf format.

Performance Measure 5D: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are

George F. Young Contract Mgr. Civil EOR $130.41 0.00 $0.00 George F. Young Principal Ecologist $126.39 32.00 $4,044.48 George F. Young Project Engineer $93.16 4.00 $372.64 Fee $4,417.12

Subtask 5C: US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permitting

Fixed Price Cost 5D: Man-hour Summary

Reimbursable Cost 5D:

Pasco County $1050.00* Postage $25.00 Printing 30-40 pages ($25.00 estimate) Overnight Travel N/A Mileage (@ $0.445 per mile) N/A Reimbursable Total Cost $1,100.00

*permit fees are an estimate

Subtask 5E: Potable Water Utility Connection Permitting

• Expected minor permitting tasks relative to potable water utility connection permit.

• It is understood that the building being proposed is within the jurisdiction of the City of Port Richie but management of adjacent utilities is unclear between the City of Port Richie and Pasco County.

This subtask is only for potable water utility connection and additional permitting/watershed modelling, or drainage related tasks beyond a utility permit is not anticipated and is excluded. Any permitting related to ecological, stormwater design, hydraulic modelling, or any other tasks beyond utility connection permit is excluded from this subtask.

Deliverable 5E: The permitting deliverables will be provided by the City or County in their format and forwarded to FDEP in pdf format.

Performance Measure 5E: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are

Fixed Price Cost 5E: Man-hour Summary

Reimbursable Cost 5E:

County/City: General Use / Utility $450.00* Postage $25.00 Printing 30-40 pages ($25.00 estimate) Overnight Travel N/A Mileage (@ $0.445 per mile) N/A Reimbursable Total Cost $500

Note: It is understood that the contractor will pull the building permit. Building permit fees are not included in this proposal.

Firm Name Position Classification Hourly Rate Hours Total Fixed Price Cost

George F. Young Contract Mgr. Civil EOR $130.41 0.00 $0.00 George F. Young Principal Ecologist $126.39 16.00 $2,022.24 George F. Young Project Engineer $93.16 4.00 $372.64 Fee $2,394.88

Subtask 5D: Pasco County Natural Resource Division Wetland Permitting

Firm Name Position Classification Hourly Rate Hours Total Fixed Price Cost

George F. Young Contract Mgr. Civil EOR $130.41 12.00 $1,564.92 George F. Young Project Engineer $93.16 8.00 $745.28 Fee $2,310.20

Subtask 5E: Potable Water Utility Permitting

Subtask 5F: Sanitary Utility Connection Permitting

• Expected minor permitting tasks relative to sanitary sewer / force main utility connection permit.

• It is understood that the building being proposed is within the jurisdiction of the City of Port Richie but management of adjacent utilities is unclear between the City of Port Richie and Pasco County.

This subtask is only for sanitary sewer / force main utility connection while additional permitting/watershed modelling, or drainage related tasks beyond a utility permit is not anticipated and is excluded. Any permitting related to ecological, stormwater design, hydraulic modelling, or any other tasks beyond utility connection permit is excluded from this subtask.

Deliverable 5F: The permitting deliverables will be provided by the City or County in their format and forwarded to FDEP in pdf format.

Performance Measure 5F: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are

Fixed Price Cost 5F: Man-hour Summary

Reimbursable Cost 5F:

County/City: General Use / Utility $450.00* Postage $25.00 Printing 30-40 pages ($25.00 estimate) Overnight Travel N/A Mileage (@ $0.445 per mile) N/A Reimbursable Total Cost $500

Note: It is understood that the contractor will pull the building permit. Building permit fees are not included in this proposal.

Total for Subtask 5: $34,863.04

George F. Young Contract Mgr. Civil EOR $130.41 20.00 $2,608.20 George F. Young Project Engineer $93.16 8.00 $745.28 Fee $3,353.48

Subtask 5F: Sanitary Sewer / Force Main Utility Permitting

Subtask 6: 90% - Design Development Subtask 6A: Design Development - Civil

Description: Please refer to the description outlined in Subtask 4 for the overall engineering description.

DD Phase plans will refine elevations in line with any architectural driven revisions, detailed grading plan, drainage documentation necessary for permitting, details, and a striping plan for the ranger station approach will be provided. Lift station design will also be provided at this phase for connecting the new sanitary line to the existing force main. DD Phase plans will include an Opinion of Probable Cost.

Deliverable 6A: A DD plan set will be submitted electronically via a signed and sealed pdf plan set within 2 months of receipt of SD Phase FDEP comments with the appropriate revisions. An Opinion of Probable Cost will also be included in the DD phase deliverable in pdf format.

Performance Measure 6A: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, Fixed Price Cost 6A: Man-hour Summary

Subtask 6B: Design Development - Architectural

Description: The DD drawing set will consist of developed floor plans, building elevations (identifying fenestrations and openings), building sections illustrating building systems, interiors (including FF&E and NIC), roof plan, and ceiling plan.

Deliverable 6B: A DD Phase architectural plan set will be submitted electronically via a signed and sealed pdf plan set within 2 months of receipt of SD Phase FDEP comments with the appropriate revisions.

Performance Measure 6B: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, Fixed Price Cost 6B: Man-hour Summary

Subtask 6C: Design Development - Structural

Description 6C: The analysis and design of the structures will be completed to a level that the primary structural support will be finalized. Structural drawings will be provided that will include plan views of the layouts for each level of the ranger station, the board walks, and the kayak launch. The drawings will

Firm Name Position Classification Hourly Rate Hours Total Fixed Price Cost

George F. Young Contract Mgr. Civil EOR $130.41 52.00 $6,781.32 George F. Young Project Engineer $93.16 60.00 $5,589.60 George F. Young Senior CADD Technician $78.00 60.00 $4,680.00 George F. Young CADD Technician $63.00 0.00 $0.00 Fee $17,050.92

Subtask 6A: Design Development - Civil

Firm Name Position Classification Hourly Rate Hours Total Fixed Price Cost

Zyscovich Architects Principal $504.00 1.00 $504.00 Zyscovich Architects Project Manager $156.00 20.00 $3,120.00 Zyscovich Architects CADD Drafter $90.00 140.00 $12,600.00 Zyscovich Architects Construction Administrator $96.00 0.00 $0.00 Zyscovich Architects Admin $87.00 3.00 $261.00 Fee $16,485.00

Subtask 6B: Design Documentation - Architectural include the size and layout of primary structural members and foundations, general notes, loading requirements, and preliminary typical details and general notes.

Deliverable 6C: A DD Phase structural plan set will be submitted electronically via a signed and sealed pdf plan set within 2 months of receipt of SD Phase FDEP comments with the appropriate revisions.

Performance Measure 6C: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, Fixed Price Cost 6C: Man-hour Summary

Subtask 6D: Design Development – Mechanical, Electrical, and Plumbing (MEP):

Description 6D: For all disciplines (mechanical, electrical, and plumbing), develop overall floor plans showing:

• Major mechanical equipment located and scheduled

• Major primary duct sized and routed

• Preliminary lighting plans showing intent

• Preliminary electrical riser showing service size and electrical distribution

• Coordinated water, sewer, storm, fire protection (of required) entrances.

• Preliminary plumbing riser

Deliverable 6D: A MEP SD level plan set will be submitted electronically via a signed and sealed pdf plan set.

Performance Measure 6D: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, Fixed Price Cost 6D: Man-hour Summary

Total for Subtask 6: $46,817.88

George F. Young Contract Mgr. Civil EOR $130.41 32.00 $4,173.12 George F. Young Project Engineer $93.16 24.00 $2,235.84 George F. Young Senior CADD Technician $78.00 28.00 $2,184.00 George F. Young CADD Technician $63.00 10.00 $630.00 Fee $9,222.96

Subtask 6C: Design Development - Structural

Firm Name Position Classification Hourly Rate Hours Total Fixed Price Cost

Voltair Senior Professional Mech Engineer $144.00 1.00 $144.00 Voltair Senior Professional Elec Engineer $144.00 1.00 $144.00 Voltair Designers - Plumbing $174.00 2.00 $348.00 Voltair Clerical / Office Admin $102.00 1.00 $102.00 Voltair Engineer I - Mech/Elec/Plumb $135.00 18.00 $2,430.00 Voltair Engineeering Director $252.00 2.00 $504.00 Voltair BIM/CADD $129.00 3.00 $387.00 Fee $4,059.00

Subtask 6D: Design Documentation - Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing

Subtask 7: 100% - Construction Documents Subtask 7A: Construction Documents - Civil

Description: Please refer to the description outlined in Subtask 4 for the overall engineering description.

CD Phase plans will incorporate last comments, refined details, any detailed plans sheets necessary to address constructability concerns. CD Phase plans will include an Opinion of Probable Cost.

Deliverable 7A: A CD Phase plan set will be submitted electronically via a signed and sealed pdf plan set within 90 days of receipt of DD phase plan FDEP comments with appropriate revisions made. All relevant .dwg CAD files will be sent with the CD submittal. An Opinion of Probable Cost will also be included in the CD phase deliverable in pdf format.

Performance Measure 7A: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, Fixed Price Cost 7A: Man-hour Summary

Subtask 7B: Construction Documents - Architectural

Description 7B: CD phase plans to include fully developed architectural building plans for the ranger station in addition to pertinent detailing of the boardwalk and kayak launch areas.

Deliverable 7B: A CD Phase plan set will be submitted electronically via a signed and sealed pdf plan set within 90 days of receipt of DD phase plan FDEP comments with appropriate revisions made. All relevant .dwg CAD files will be sent with the CD submittal.

Performance Measure 7B: Deliverables will be reviewed by the Department to confirm they are complete, Fixed Price Cost 7B: Man-hour Summary

Subtask 7C: Construction Documents - Structural

Description 7C: The analysis and design of the structure will be further developed to include all members of the structural system and their attachments to each other and the foundation. The drawings will be further developed so that all plans, sections, and details are fully developed for construction. Any delegated design items and their design criteria will be specified as part of the construction documents.

Firm Name Position Classification Hourly Rate Hours Total Fixed Price Cost

George F. Young Contract Mgr. Civil EOR $130.41 48.00 $6,259.68 George F. Young Project Engineer $93.16 24.00 $2,235.84 George F. Young Senior CADD Technician $78.00 8.00 $624.00 George F. Young CADD Technician $63.00 $0.00 Fee $9,119.52

Subtask 7A: Construction Documents - Civil

Firm Name Position Classification Hourly Rate Hours Total Fixed Price Cost

Zyscovich Architects Principal $504.00 0.00 $0.00 Zyscovich Architects Project Manager $156.00 20.00 $3,120.00 Zyscovich Architects CADD Drafter $90.00 140.00 $12,600.00 Zyscovich Architects Construction Administrator $96.00 0.00 Zyscovich Architects Admin $87.00 3.00 $261.00 Fee

Subtask 7B: Construction Documents - Architectural

$15,981.00

Deliverable 7C: A CD Phase plan set…