BRDCOM-S3669 Evaluation Criteria.pdf
PDF 240 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Lobbying Services
- Solicitation number
- BRDCOM-S3669
- Issued by
- Nevada
About this file
This is an evaluation criteria document for a lobbying services contract opportunity issued by the Nevada State Board of Dental Examiners. The RFP seeks qualified bidders to provide comprehensive lobbying services as detailed in the Scope of Work, with evaluation based on five primary criteria weighted to reflect the agency's priorities and requirements for legislative advocacy support.
The evaluation criteria are weighted as follows: Cost/Fee Proposal (20%), which assesses total cost, fee structure options such as retainer versus hourly arrangements, clarity of included services, and rates for out-of-scope work; Nevada Professional Licensing Board Experience (25%), which evaluates demonstrated experience representing Nevada boards, commissions, or similarly situated public entities, along with understanding of Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) and Nevada Administrative Code (NAC) frameworks and public-sector constraints; Healthcare-Related Policy and Stakeholder Experience (20%), which considers track records with health policy issues including scope of practice, licensing and discipline matters, patient safety, workforce development, and Medicaid/public health initiatives; Company Experience, Key Personnel, and Capacity (20%), which examines relevant firm history, qualifications of assigned lobbyists, organizational stability and coverage, availability during legislative sessions, and capability to staff hearings, work sessions, and rapid-response needs; and Approach and Performance Plan (15%), which evaluates the quality of proposed methodology for legislative monitoring, advocacy strategy, relationship management, coalition building, regulatory engagement, and monthly or on-demand reporting with specified responsiveness standards and deliverables.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| BRDCOM-S3669-reference-questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| BRDCOM-S3669 Scope of Work.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3669 RFP~3.docx | DOCX document | |
| BRDCOM-S3669 Terms-and-conditions-for-services.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3669 Standard-form-contract.docx | DOCX document | |
| BRDCOM-S3669 Certification-regarding-lobbying.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3669 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3669-Vendor-Information-Response.pdf | ||
| Quote Instructions ~1.pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3669 Bid_Q_A_for_Export_Report.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| BRDCOM-S3669 Cost Schedule .pdf | ||
| BRDCOM-S3669 RFP~4.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria – Lobbying Services
1. Cost / Fee Proposal (20%)
• Total cost, fee structure (retainer vs. hourly), clarity of included services, and rates for out-of-scope work.
2. Nevada Professional Licensing Board Experience (25%)
• Demonstrated experience representing Nevada boards/commissions or similarly situated public entities; understanding of NRS/NAC frameworks and public-sector constraints.
3. Healthcare-Related Policy and Stakeholder Experience (20%)
• Track record with health policy issues, scope of practice, licensing/discipline, patient safety, workforce, Medicaid/public health, etc.
4. Company Experience, Key Personnel, and Capacity (20%)
• Relevant firm history, qualifications of assigned lobbyist(s), stability/coverage, availability during session, and ability to staff hearings/work sessions and rapid-response needs.
5. Approach and Performance Plan (15%)
• Quality of proposed methodology for: legislative monitoring, advocacy strategy, relationship management, coalition building, regulatory engagement, and monthly/on-demand reporting (including responsiveness standards and deliverables).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .